Mindboggling morphometry of human brains

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Klein, Arno ^a   Ghosh, Satrajit S ^b,c   Bao, Forrest S ^d   Giard, Joachim ^e,j   Häme, Yrjö ^f,k   Stavsky, Eliezer ^f,l   Lee, Noah ^f,m   Rossa, Brian ^g,n   Reuter, Martin ^c   Chaibub Neto, Elias ^h   Keshavan, Anisha ⁱ  

^a CHILD MIND INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d University of Akron   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^f Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^g TankThink Labs   (United States)

^h SAGE BIONETWORKS   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j Axinesis   (Belgium)

^k PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

^l Toyota Technical Center USA Inc   (United States)

^m 1010data   (United States)

ⁿ F CAL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

BRAIN IMAGES; HUMAN BRAIN; LABEL INFORMATION; MORPHOMETRY; OPEN-SOURCE; SHAPE MEASURE; SURFACE DATA; T1-WEIGHTED; TABULAR DATA; VOLUME DATA;

BRAIN MAPPING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN MORPHOMETRY; BRAIN SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL THICKNESS (BRAIN); HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LEFT HEMISPHERE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SOFTWARE; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 85014292275     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005350     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Paulus MP, Tapert SF, Schuckit MA, Neural activation patterns of methamphetamine-dependent subjects during decision making predict relapse. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2005Jul;62(7):761–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.761
2. Koutsouleris N, Meisenzahl EM, Davatzikos C, Bottlender R, Frodl T, Scheuerecker J, et al. Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2009Jul [cited 2016 Aug 6];66(7):700–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.62
3. Whalley HC, Simonotto E, Moorhead W, McIntosh A, Marshall I, Ebmeier KP, et al. Functional imaging as a predictor of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2006Sep1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];60(5):454–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.013
4. Canli T, Cooney RE, Goldin P, Shah M, Sivers H, Thomason ME, et al. Amygdala reactivity to emotional faces predicts improvement in major depression. Neuroreport [Internet]. 2005Aug22;16(12):1267–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16056122
5. Chen C-H, Ridler K, Suckling J, Williams S, Fu CHY, Merlo-Pich E, et al. Brain imaging correlates of depressive symptom severity and predictors of symptom improvement after antidepressant treatment. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2007Sep1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];62(5):407–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.018
6. Fu CHY, Williams SCR, Brammer MJ, Suckling J, Kim J, Cleare AJ, et al. Neural responses to happy facial expressions in major depression following antidepressant treatment. Am J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2007Apr [cited 2016 Aug 6];164(4):599–607. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.599
7. Nitschke JB, Sarinopoulos I, Oathes DJ, Johnstone T, Whalen PJ, Davidson RJ, et al. Anticipatory activation in the amygdala and anterior cingulate in generalized anxiety disorder and prediction of treatment response. Am J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2009Mar [cited 2016 Aug 6];166(3):302–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07101682
8. Kumari V, Peters ER, Fannon D, Antonova E, Premkumar P, Anilkumar AP, et al. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity predicts responsiveness to cognitive-behavioral therapy in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2009Sep15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];66(6):594–602. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.036
9. Doehrmann O, Ghosh SS, Polli FE, Reynolds GO, Horn F, Keshavan A, et al. Predicting treatment response in social anxiety disorder from functional magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Psychiatry [Internet]. 2013Jan;70(1):87–97. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.5
10. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Ghosh SS, Nieto-Castanon A, Saygin Z, Doehrmann O, Chai XJ, et al. Brain connectomics predict response to treatment in social anxiety disorder. Mol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2015Aug11; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.109
11. Gabrieli JDE, Ghosh SS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron [Internet]. 2015Jan7;85(1):11–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.047
12. Insel TR, Cuthbert BN, Endophenotypes: bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2009Dec1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];66(11):988–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.008
13. Crum WR, Camara O, Rueckert D, Bhatia KK, Jenkinson M, Hill DLG, Generalised overlap measures for assessment of pairwise and groupwise image registration and segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2005 [Internet]. Springer; 2005 [cited 2015 Oct 10]. p. 99–106. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11566465_13
14. Devlin JT, Poldrack RA, In praise of tedious anatomy. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2007Oct1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];37(4):1033–41; discussion 1050–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.055
15. Bohland JW, Bokil H, Allen CB, Mitra PP, Sporns O, The brain atlas concordance problem: quantitative comparison of anatomical parcellations. PLoS One [Internet]. 2009Sep29 [cited 2016 Aug 6];4(9):e7200. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007200
16. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang M-C, et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2009Jul1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];46(3):786–802. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
17. Avants B, Klein A, Tustison N, Wu J, Gee JC. Evaluation of open-access, automated brain extraction methods on multi-site multi-disorder data. In: 16th annual meeting for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping. 2010.
18. Klein A, Ghosh SS, Avants B, Yeo BTT, Fischl B, Ardekani B, et al. Evaluation of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration methods. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2010May15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];51(1):214–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.091
19. Klein A, Hirsch J, Mindboggle: a scatterbrained approach to automate brain labeling. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2005Jan15;24(2):261–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.016
20. Rogelj P, Kovacic S, Gee JC. Validation of a nonrigid registration algorithm for multimodal data. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM, editors. Medical Imaging 2002 [Internet]. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2002 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. p. 299–307. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.467170
21. Rademacher J, Caviness VS, JrSteinmetz H, Galaburda AM, Topographical variation of the human primary cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 1993Jul [cited 2016 Aug 6];3(4):313–29. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8400809
22. Klein A, Tourville J, 101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front Neurosci [Internet]. 2012Dec5 [cited 2016 Aug 6];6:171. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00171
23. Klein A, Dal Canton T, Ghosh SS, Landman B, Worth A. Open labels: online feedback for a public resource of manually labeled brain images. In: 16th annual meeting for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping [Internet]. 2010. https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/tmjbn/?action=download%26mode=render
24. Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, Hacker CD, Harwell J, Yacoub E, et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature [Internet]. 2016Jul20; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18933
25. Régis J, Mangin J-F, Ochiai T, Frouin V, Riviére D, Cachia A, et al. “Sulcal root” generic model: a hypothesis to overcome the variability of the human cortex folding patterns. Neurol Med Chir [Internet]. 2005Jan;45(1):1–17. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15699615
26. Lohmann G, von Cramon DY, Colchester ACF, Deep sulcal landmarks provide an organizing framework for human cortical folding. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 2008Jun [cited 2016 Aug 6];18(6):1415–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm174
27. Meng Y, Li G, Lin W, Gilmore JH, Shen D, Spatial distribution and longitudinal development of deep cortical sulcal landmarks in infants. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2014Oct15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];100:206–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.004
28. Perrot M, Rivière D, Mangin J-F, Cortical sulci recognition and spatial normalization. Med Image Anal. 2011Aug;15(4):529–50. 21441062
29. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis. 1998; https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6ba2/73a7cfa282f73423110d00a5d20ad36766e1.pdf
30. Bansal R, Staib LH, Laine AF, Hao X, Xu D, Liu J, et al. Anatomical brain images alone can accurately diagnose chronic neuropsychiatric illnesses. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012Dec7;7(12):e50698. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050698
31. Lerch JP, Pruessner J, Zijdenbos AP, Collins DL, Teipel SJ, Hampel H, et al. Automated cortical thickness measurements from MRI can accurately separate Alzheimer’s patients from normal elderly controls. Neurobiol Aging [Internet]. 2008Jan [cited 2016 Aug 6];29(1):23–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.013
32. Im K, Lee J-M, Seo SW, Hyung Kim S, Kim SI, Na DL, Sulcal morphology changes and their relationship with cortical thickness and gyral white matter volume in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2008Oct15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];43(1):103–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.016
33. Julkunen V, Niskanen E, Koikkalainen J, Herukka S-K, Pihlajamäki M, Hallikainen M, et al. Differences in cortical thickness in healthy controls, subjects with mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease patients: a longitudinal study. J Alzheimers Dis [Internet]. 2010;21(4):1141–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504134
34. Steenwijk MD, Geurts JJG, Daams M, Tijms BM, Wink AM, Balk LJ, et al. Cortical atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis are non-random and clinically relevant. Brain [Internet]. 2016Jan [cited 2016 Aug 6];139(Pt 1):115–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv337
35. Kuperberg GR, Broome MR, McGuire PK, David AS, Eddy M, Ozawa F, et al. Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2003Sep;60(9):878–88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.878
36. Jiao Y, Chen R, Ke X, Chu K, Lu Z, Herskovits EH, Predictive models of autism spectrum disorder based on brain regional cortical thickness. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2010Apr1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];50(2):589–99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.047
37. Durazzo TC, Tosun D, Buckley S, Gazdzinski S, Mon A, Fryer SL, et al. Cortical thickness, surface area, and volume of the brain reward system in alcohol dependence: relationships to relapse and extended abstinence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res [Internet]. 2011Jun [cited 2016 Aug 6];35(6):1187–200. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01452.x
38. Bakkour A, Morris JC, Dickerson BC, The cortical signature of prodromal AD: regional thinning predicts mild AD dementia. Neurology [Internet]. 2009Mar24 [cited 2016 Aug 6];72(12):1048–55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000340981.97664.2f
39. Querbes O, Aubry F, Pariente J, Lotterie J-A, Démonet J-F, Duret V, et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using cortical thickness: impact of cognitive reserve. Brain [Internet]. 2009Aug [cited 2016 Aug 6];132(Pt 8):2036–47. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp105
40. Eskildsen SF, Coupé P, García-Lorenzo D, Fonov V, Pruessner JC, Collins DL, et al. Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the ADNI cohort using patterns of cortical thinning. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Jan15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];65:511–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.058
41. Wee C-Y, Yap P-T, Shen D, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativePrediction of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using cortical morphological patterns. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 2013Dec [cited 2016 Aug 6];34(12):3411–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22156
42. Wei R, Li C, Fogelson N, Li L, Prediction of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease Using MRI and Structural Network Features. Front Aging Neurosci [Internet]. 2016Apr19 [cited 2016 Aug 6];8:76. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00076
43. Dickerson BC, Wolk DA, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMRI cortical thickness biomarker predicts AD-like CSF and cognitive decline in normal adults. Neurology [Internet]. 2012Jan10;78(2):84–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823efc6c
44. Latha V, Petroula P, Eric W, J-Sebastian M, Patrizia M, Bruno V, et al. Entorhinal Cortex Thickness Predicts Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Aug 6];(3):755–66. Available from: http://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&genre=article&issn=1387-2877&volume=33&issue=3&spage=755&doi=10.3233/JAD-2012-121408
45. Foland-Ross LC, Sacchet MD, Prasad G, Gilbert B, Thompson PM, Gotlib IH, Cortical thickness predicts the first onset of major depression in adolescence. Int J Dev Neurosci [Internet]. 2015Nov [cited 2016 Aug 6];46:125–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.07.007
46. Shaw P, Lerch J, Greenstein D, Sharp W, Clasen L, Evans A, et al. Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and clinical outcome in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2006May;63(5):540–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.540
47. Ecker C, Marquand A, Mourão-Miranda J, Johnston P, Daly EM, Brammer MJ, et al. Describing the brain in autism in five dimensions—magnetic resonance imaging-assisted diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using a multiparameter classification approach. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2010Aug11 [cited 2016 Aug 6];30(32):10612–23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5413-09.2010
48. Cointepas Y, Mangin J-F, Garnero L, Poline J-B, Benali H, BrainVISA: Software platform for visualization and analysis of multi-modality brain data. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2001/6 [cited 2016 Aug 6];13(6, Supplement):98. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811901914417
49. Kochunov P, Rogers W, Mangin J-F, Lancaster J, A library of cortical morphology analysis tools to study development, aging and genetics of cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics [Internet]. 2012Jan [cited 2016 Aug 6];10(1):81–96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-011-9127-9
50. Liu T, Sachdev PS, Lipnicki DM, Jiang J, Cui Y, Kochan NA, et al. Longitudinal changes in sulcal morphology associated with late-life aging and MCI. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Jul1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];74:337–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.047
51. Cachia A, Paillère-Martinot M-L, Galinowski A, Januel D, de Beaurepaire R, Bellivier F, et al. Cortical folding abnormalities in schizophrenia patients with resistant auditory hallucinations. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2008Feb1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];39(3):927–35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.049
52. Penttilä J, Cachia A, Martinot J-L, Ringuenet D, Wessa M, Houenou J, et al. Cortical folding difference between patients with early-onset and patients with intermediate-onset bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord [Internet]. 2009Jun [cited 2016 Aug 6];11(4):361–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00683.x
53. Mangin J-F, Jouvent E, Cachia A, In-vivo measurement of cortical morphology: means and meanings. Curr Opin Neurol [Internet]. 2010Aug [cited 2016 Aug 6];23(4):359–67. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833a0afc
54. Kempton MJ, Salvador Z, Munafò MR, Geddes JR, Simmons A, Frangou S, et al. Structural neuroimaging studies in major depressive disorder. Meta-analysis and comparison with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2011Jul [cited 2016 Aug 6];68(7):675–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.60
55. Mikhno A, Nuevo PM, Devanand DP, Parsey RV, Laine AF. Multimodal classification of Dementia using functional data, anatomical features and 3D invariant shape descriptors. In: 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) [Internet]. IEEE; 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. p. 606–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235621
56. Gorgolewski KJ, Alfaro-Almagro F, Auer T, Bellec P, Capota M, Mallar Chakravarty M, et al. BIDS Apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 3]. p. 079145. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/10/20/079145
57. Gorgolewski K, Burns CD, Madison C, Clark D, Halchenko YO, Waskom ML, et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinform [Internet]. 2011Aug22 [cited 2016 Aug 6];5:13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2011.00013
58. Klein A, Automated brain labeling with Mindboggle. [New York, NY]: Cornell University; 2004.
59. Klein A, Mensh B, Ghosh S, Tourville J, Hirsch J, Mindboggle: automated brain labeling with multiple atlases. BMC Med Imaging [Internet]. 2005Oct5;5:7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-5-7
60. Caviness VS, JrMeyer J, Makris N, Kennedy DN, MRI-Based Topographic Parcellation of Human Neocortex: An Anatomically Specified Method with Estimate of Reliability. J Cogn Neurosci [Internet]. 1996Nov [cited 2016 Aug 6];8(6):566–87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.566
61. Klein Arno, Mindboggle-101 manually labeled individual brains [Internet]. Harvard Dataverse; 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HMQKCK
62. Klein Arno, Mindboggle-101 templates (unlabeled images from a population of brains) [Internet]. Harvard Dataverse; 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WDIYB5
63. Klein Arno, Mindboggle-101 atlases (anatomical labels from a population of brains) [Internet]. Harvard Dataverse; 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XCCE9Q
64. Wang H, Yushkevich PA, Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion and corrective learning-an open source implementation. Front Neuroinform [Internet]. 2013Nov22 [cited 2016 Aug 6];7:27. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00027
65. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI, Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage [Internet]. 1999Feb [cited 2016 Aug 6];9(2):179–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0395
66. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM, Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage [Internet]. 1999Feb [cited 2016 Aug 6];9(2):195–207. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0396
67. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM, High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 1999;8(4):272–84. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619420
68. Klein A, Bao FS, Hame Y, Stavsky E, Giard J, Haehn D, et al. Mindboggle: Automated human brain MRI feature extraction, labeling, morphometry, and online visualization. In: Neuroinformatics [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://f1000research.com/f1000posters/1092565
69. Arno K, Nolan N, Daniel H, Mindboggle 2 interface: online visualization of extracted brain features with XTK. Front Neuroinform [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 6];8. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/AbstractDetails.aspx?ABS_DOI=10.3389/conf.fninf.2014.08.00086
70. Keshavan A, Klein A, Cipollini B, Interactive online brain shape visualization [Internet]. 2016Aug. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/067678
71. Jack CR, JrBernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P, Alexander G, Harvey D, et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2008Apr [cited 2016 Aug 6];27(4):685–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21049
72. Simmons A, Westman E, Muehlboeck S, Mecocci P, Vellas B, Tsolaki M, et al. MRI measures of Alzheimer’s disease and the AddNeuroMed study. Ann N Y Acad Sci [Internet]. 2009Oct;1180:47–55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05063.x
73. Allen GI, Amoroso N, Anghel C, Balagurusamy V, Bare CJ, Beaton D, et al. Crowdsourced estimation of cognitive decline and resilience in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement [Internet]. 2016Jun [cited 2016 Aug 6];12(6):645–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.006
74. Van Essen DC, Drury HA, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson CH, An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc [Internet]. 2001Sep;8(5):443–59. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11522765
75. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron [Internet]. 2002Jan31;33(3):341–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11832223
76. Tustison NJ, Cook PA, Klein A, Song G, Das SR, Duda JT, et al. Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2014Oct1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];99:166–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.044
77. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Wu J, Cook PA, Gee JC, An open source multivariate framework for n-tissue segmentation with evaluation on public data. Neuroinformatics [Internet]. 2011Dec [cited 2016 Aug 6];9(4):381–400. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-011-9109-y
78. Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold A, Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 2009Apr;30(4):1310–27. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20599
79. Winkler AM, Kochunov P, Blangero J, Almasy L, Zilles K, Fox PT, et al. Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2010Nov15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];53(3):1135–46. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.028
80. Lorio S, Kherif F, Ruef A, Melie-Garcia L, Frackowiak R, Ashburner J, et al. Neurobiological origin of spurious brain morphological changes: A quantitative MRI study: Computational Anatomy Studies of the Brain. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 2016May [cited 2016 Aug 6];37(5):1801–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23137
81. Fischl B, Dale AM, Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [Internet]. 2000Sep26 [cited 2016 Aug 6];97(20):11050–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200033797
82. Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Czanner S, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2006Aug1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];32(1):180–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051
83. Dahnke R, Yotter RA, Gaser C, Cortical thickness and central surface estimation. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Jan15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];65:336–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.050
84. Lüsebrink F, Wollrab A, Speck O, Cortical thickness determination of the human brain using high resolution 3T and 7T MRI data. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Apr15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];70:122–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.016
85. Salat DH, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Greve DN, Desikan RSR, Busa E, et al. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 2004Jul [cited 2016 Aug 6];14(7):721–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh032
86. Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Amlien I, Espeseth T, Reinvang I, Raz N, et al. High consistency of regional cortical thinning in aging across multiple samples. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 2009Sep [cited 2016 Aug 6];19(9):2001–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn232
87. Winkler AM, Sabuncu MR, Yeo BTT, Fischl B, Greve DN, Kochunov P, et al. Measuring and comparing brain cortical surface area and other areal quantities. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2012Jul16 [cited 2016 Aug 6];61(4):1428–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.026
88. Deppe M, Marinell J, Krämer J, Duning T, Ruck T, Simon OJ, et al. Increased cortical curvature reflects white matter atrophy in individual patients with early multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin [Internet]. 2014Mar3 [cited 2016 Aug 6];6:475–87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.02.012
89. King JB, Lopez-Larson MP, Yurgelun-Todd DA, Mean cortical curvature reflects cytoarchitecture restructuring in mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin [Internet]. 2016Jan6 [cited 2016 Aug 6];11:81–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.01.003
90. Ronan L, Pienaar R, Williams G, Bullmore E, Crow TJ, Roberts N, et al. Intrinsic curvature: a marker of millimeter-scale tangential cortico-cortical connectivity?Int J Neural Syst [Internet]. 2011Oct [cited 2016 Aug 6];21(5):351–66. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0129065711002948
91. Ronan L, Voets N, Rua C, Alexander-Bloch A, Hough M, Mackay C, et al. Differential tangential expansion as a mechanism for cortical gyrification. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 2014Aug [cited 2016 Aug 6];24(8):2219–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht082
92. Rettmann ME, Han X, Xu C, Prince JL, Automated sulcal segmentation using watersheds on the cortical surface. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2002Feb [cited 2016 Aug 6];15(2):329–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0975
93. Lohmann G, von Cramon DY, Automatic labelling of the human cortical surface using sulcal basins. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2000Sep;4(3):179–88. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11145307
94. Kao C-Y, Hofer M, Sapiro G, Stem J, Rehm K, Rottenberg DA, A geometric method for automatic extraction of sulcal fundi. IEEE Trans Med Imaging [Internet]. 2007Apr;26(4):530–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.886810
95. Li G, Liu T, Nie J, Guo L, Wong STC, A novel method for cortical sulcal fundi extraction. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv [Internet]. 2008;11(Pt 1):270–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18979757
96. Le Troter A, Auzias G, Coulon O, Automatic sulcal line extraction on cortical surfaces using geodesic path density maps. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2012Jul16;61(4):941–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.021
97. Im K, Jo HJ, Mangin J-F, Evans AC, Kim SI, Lee J-M, Spatial distribution of deep sulcal landmarks and hemispherical asymmetry on the cortical surface. Cereb Cortex [Internet]. 2010Mar [cited 2016 Aug 6];20(3):602–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp127
98. Im K, Pienaar R, Lee J-M, Seong J-K, Choi YY, Lee KH, et al. Quantitative comparison and analysis of sulcal patterns using sulcal graph matching: a twin study. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2011Aug1 [cited 2016 Aug 6];57(3):1077–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.062
99. Takerkart S, Auzias G, Brun L, Coulon O, Structural graph-based morphometry: A multiscale searchlight framework based on sulcal pits. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2017Jan;35:32–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.04.011
100. Coleman RG, Sharp KA, Travel depth, a new shape descriptor for macromolecules: application to ligand binding. J Mol Biol [Internet]. 2006Sep22 [cited 2016 Aug 6];362(3):441–58. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.022
101. Giard J, Alface PR, Gala J-L, Macq B, Fast surface-based travel depth estimation algorithm for macromolecule surface shape description. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform [Internet]. 2011Jan [cited 2016 Aug 6];8(1):59–68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2009.53
102. Yun HJ, Im K, Yang Jin-Ju, Yoon U, Lee J-M, Draganski B, Automated sulcal depth measurement on cortical surface reflecting geometrical properties of sulci. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013Feb13 [cited 2016 Aug 6];8(2):e55977. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055977
103. Boucher M, Whitesides S, Evans A, Depth potential function for folding pattern representation, registration and analysis. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2009Apr [cited 2016 Aug 6];13(2):203–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.09.001
104. Bao F, Lee N, Hame Y, Im K, Riviera D, Li G, et al. Automated extraction of nested sulcal features from human brain MRI data. In: 17th annual meeting for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping [Internet]. 2011. https://github.com/binarybottle/nestedsulcusfeatures_HBM2011
105. Lee N, Klein A, A graph-based database of hierarchical brain features. In: Frontiers in Neuroinformatics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org/10.3389/conf.fninf.2011.08.00139/event_abstract
106. Reuter M, Wolter F-E, Peinecke N, Laplace–Beltrami spectra as “Shape-DNA” of surfaces and solids. Comput Aided Des Appl [Internet]. 2006/4 [cited 2016 Aug 6];38(4):342–66. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448505001867
107. Reuter M, Wolter F-E, Shenton M, Niethammer M, Laplace–Beltrami eigenvalues and topological features of eigenfunctions for statistical shape analysis. Comput Aided Des Appl [Internet]. 2009Oct [cited 2016 Aug 6];41(10):739–55. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448509000463
108. Reuter M, Schmansky NJ, Rosas HD, Fischl B, Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2012Jul16 [cited 2016 Aug 6];61(4):1402–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084
109. Konukoglu E, Glocker B, Criminisi A, Pohl KM, WESD—Weighted Spectral Distance for measuring shape dissimilarity. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell [Internet]. 2013Sep [cited 2016 Aug 6];35(9):2284–97. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.275
110. Celebi ME, Aslandogan YA. A comparative study of three moment-based shape descriptors. In: International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC’05)—Volume II [Internet]. IEEE; 2005 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. p. 788–93 Vol. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ITCC.2005.3
111. Mangin J-F, Poupon F, Duchesnay E, Rivière D, Cachia A, Collins DL, et al. Brain morphometry using 3D moment invariants. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2004Sep [cited 2016 Aug 6];8(3):187–96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2004.06.016
112. Novotni M, Klein R, Shape retrieval using 3D Zernike descriptors. Comput Aided Des Appl [Internet]. 2004Sep15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];36(11):1047–62. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448504000077
113. Pozo JM, Villa-Uriol M-C, Frangi AF, Efficient 3D geometric and Zernike moments computation from unstructured surface meshes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell [Internet]. 2011Mar;33(3):471–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2010.139
114. Rosas HD, Liu AK, Hersch S, Glessner M, Ferrante RJ, Salat DH, et al. Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease. Neurology [Internet]. 2002Mar12 [cited 2016 Aug 6];58(5):695–701. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11889230
115. Kabani N, Le Goualher G, MacDonald D, Evans AC, Measurement of Cortical Thickness Using an Automated 3-D Algorithm: A Validation Study. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2/2001 [cited 2016 Jun 27];13(2):375–80. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811900906529
116. Li G, Guo L, Nie J, Liu T, An automated pipeline for cortical sulcal fundi extraction. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2010Jun [cited 2016 Aug 6];14(3):343–59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.01.005
117. Jovicich J, Marizzoni M, Sala-Llonch R, Bosch B, Bartrés-Faz D, Arnold J, et al. Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Dec;83:472–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.007
118. Klein A, Chaibub Neto E, Giard J, Bao F, Hame Y, Reuter M, et al. Shape analysis of 101 healthy human brains. In: 20th annual meeting for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping [Internet]. 2014. https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/w2vda/?action=download%26mode=render
119. Klein A, Chaibub Neto E, Ghosh S, ADNI. Detailed shape analysis of healthy brains and brains with Alzheimer’s disease. In: 21st annual meeting for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping [Internet]. 2015. https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/xfts3/?action=download%26mode=render
120. Zuo X-N, Anderson JS, Bellec P, Birn RM, Biswal BB, Blautzik J, et al. An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci Data [Internet]. 2014Dec9 [cited 2016 Aug 6];1:140049. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.49
121. Maclaren J, Han Z, Vos SB, Fischbein N, Bammer R, Reliability of brain volume measurements: a test-retest dataset. Scientific Data [Internet]. 2014Oct14 [cited 2016 Aug 6];1:140037. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.37
122. Huang L, Huang T, Zhen Z, Liu J, A test-retest dataset for assessing long-term reliability of brain morphology and resting-state brain activity. Sci Data [Internet]. 2016Mar15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];3:160016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.16
123. Holmes AJ, Hollinshead MO, O’Keefe TM, Petrov VI, Fariello GR, Wald LL, et al. Brain Genomics Superstruct Project initial data release with structural, functional, and behavioral measures. Sci Data [Internet]. 2015Jul7 [cited 2016 Aug 6];2:150031. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.31
124. Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TEJ, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013Oct15 [cited 2016 Aug 6];80:62–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041
125. Gorgolewski KJ, Mendes N, Wilfling D, Wladimirow E, Gauthier CJ, Bonnen T, et al. A high resolution 7-Tesla resting-state fMRI test-retest dataset with cognitive and physiological measures. Sci Data [Internet]. 2015Jan20 [cited 2016 Aug 6];2:140054. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.54
126. Auzias G, Brun L, Deruelle C, Coulon O, Benchmark data for sulcal pits extraction algorithms. Data Brief [Internet]. 2015Dec [cited 2016 Aug 6];5:595–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.10.004
127. Huo Y, Plassard AJ, Carass A, Resnick SM, Pham DL, Prince JL, et al. Consistent cortical reconstruction and multi-atlas brain segmentation. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2016Sep;138:197–210. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.030
128. Schmidhuber J, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw [Internet]. 2015Jan [cited 2016 Aug 6];61:85–117. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
129. Lee N, Laine AF, Klein A. Towards a deep learning approach to brain parcellation. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro [Internet]. IEEE; 2011 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. p. 321–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872414