Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1188-1194

  Anderson, Joseph C ^a,b   Butterly, Lynn F ^b,c   Weiss, Julia E ^b   Robinson, Christina M ^c  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; HUMAN; INTERNIST; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGMOID; SURGEON; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; BENCHMARKING; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; NEW HAMPSHIRE; PATHOLOGY; REGISTER; STANDARDS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; BENCHMARKING; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW HAMPSHIRE; REGISTRIES;

EID: 85014212243     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Rex, D.K., Ahnen, D.J., Baron, J.A., et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 107 (2012), 1315–1329 quiz 1314-30.
2. Anderson, J.C., Rangasamy, P., Rustagi, T., et al. Risk factors for sessile serrated adenomas. J Clin Gastroenterol 45 (2011), 694–699.
3. Arain, M.A., Sawhney, M., Sheikh, S., et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 105 (2010), 1189–1195.
4. Anderson, J.C., Butterly, L.F., Goodrich, M., et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 (2013), 1308–1312.
5. Anderson, J.C., Butterly, L.F., Robinson, C.M., et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc 80 (2014), 463–470.
6. Hetzel, J.T., Huang, C.S., Coukos, J.A., et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 105 (2010), 2656–2664.
7. Kahi, C.J., Hewett, D.G., Norton, D.L., et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9 (2011), 42–46.
8. Kahi, C.J., Li, X., Eckert, G.J., et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 75 (2012), 515–520.
9. Liang, J., Kalady, M.F., Appau, K., et al. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 14 (2012), 1323–1327.
10. Kahi, C.J., Vemulapalli, K.C., Johnson, C.S., et al. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience. Gastrointest Endosc 79 (2014), 448–454.
11. Anderson, J.C., Butterly, L.F., Colonoscopy: quality indicators. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 6, 2015, e77.
12. Rex, D.K., Petrini, J.L., Baron, T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006), 873–885.
13. Rex, D.K., Schoenfeld, P.S., Cohen, J., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015), 31–53.
14. Butterly, L., Robinson, C.M., Anderson, J.C., et al. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 109 (2014), 417–426.
15. Butterly, L.F., Goodrich, M., Onega, T., et al. Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk. Dig Dis Sci 55 (2010), 754–760.
16. Carney, P.A., Butterly, L., Goodrich, M., et al. Design and development of a population-based colonoscopy registry. J Registry Manag 33 (2006), 91–99.
17. Greene, M.A., Butterly, L.F., Goodrich, M., et al. Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc 74 (2011), 334–340.
18. Weaver, D.L., Rosenberg, R.D., Barlow, W.E., et al. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer 106 (2006), 732–742.
19. Lieberman, D.A., Rex, D.K., Winawer, S.J., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 143 (2012), 844–857.
20. Corley, D.A., Jensen, C.D., Marks, A.R., et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370 (2014), 1298–1306.
21. Kaminski, M.F., Regula, J., Kraszewska, E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1795–1803.
22. JE IJ, Bevan R, Senore C, et al. Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview. Gut. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
23. Greenspan, M., Rajan, K.B., Baig, A., et al. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol 108 (2013), 1286–1292.
24. Do, A., Weinberg, J., Kakkar, A., et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc 77 (2013), 376–380.
25. JE, I.J., van Doorn, S.C., van der Brug, Y.M., et al. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 82 (2015), 870–877.
26. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
27. Payne SR, Church TR, Wandell M, et al. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Epub 2013 Dec 10.