Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: The Indiana University experience

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 448-454

  Kahi, Charles J ^a,b   Vemulapalli, Krishna C ^a   Johnson, Cynthia S ^a   Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RICHARD L ROUDEBUSH VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES;

ADENOMA; BENCHMARKING; COLONOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIANA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84893868517     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, and J. Stoker et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
2. S.C. Chen, and D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861 (Pubitemid 46496608)
3. J.F. Bretagne, S. Hamonic, and C. Piette et al. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 335 341
4. W. Atkin, P. Rogers, and C. Cardwell et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy Gastroenterology 126 2004 1247 1256 (Pubitemid 38552789)
5. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, and S. Winawer et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
6. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med;362:1795-1803.
7. S.S. Rogal, P.F. Pinsky, and R.E. Schoen Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 2013 73 78
8. H.S. Wang, J. Pisegna, and R. Modi et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 71 78
9. T.J. Lee, M.D. Rutter, and R.G. Blanks et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Gut 61 2012 1050 1057
10. B. Denis, E.A. Sauleau, and I. Gendre et al. Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 1325 1336
11. C.J. Kahi, D.G. Hewett, and D.L. Norton et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9 2011 42 46
12. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, and B.E. Juliar et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
13. D.G. Hewett, C.J. Kahi, and D.K. Rex Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: How do we bridge the gap? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20 2010 673 684
14. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guidelines for clinical application Statement on role of short courses in endoscopic training. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 50 1999 913 914
15. J.C. Anderson, L. Butterly, and M. Goodrich et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 2013 1308 1312
16. D.K. Rex Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication Am J Gastroenterol 90 1995 353 365