Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Volumn 81, Issue , 2017, Pages 59-74

  Terhune, Devin B ^a   Cleeremans, Axel ^b   Raz, Amir ^c,d   Lynn, Steven Jay ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; Cognitive control; Metacognition; Placebo; Suggestibility; Suggestion; Therapy

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; CONSCIOUSNESS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL DISSOCIATION; METACOGNITIVE CONTROL; MOTOR CONTROL; PERCEPTION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL COGNITION; SUGGESTION; TOP DOWN REGULATION; METACOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SELF CONTROL;

CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; METACOGNITION; SELF-CONTROL;

EID: 85013113053     PISSN: 01497634     EISSN: 18737528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (262)

1. Adachi, T., Fujino, H., Nakae, A., Mashimo, T., Sasaki, J., A meta-analysis of hypnosis for chronic pain problems: a comparison between hypnosis, standard care, and other psychological interventions. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 62 (2014), 1–28.
2. Agard, E., Pernod, C., El Chehab, H., Russo, A., Haxaire, M., Dot, C., A role for hypnosis in cataract surgery: report of 171 procedures. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 39:3 (2016), 287–291, 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.04.024.
3. Allen, J.J., Iacono, W.G., Laravuso, J.J., Dunn, L.A., An event-related potential investigation of posthypnotic recognition amnesia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 104 (1995), 421–430.
4. Augustinova, M., Ferrand, L., Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19:3 (2012), 521–527, 10.3758/s13423-012-0217-y.
5. Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevisan, M., Warner, D., Cortical event-related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 47 (1999), 5–22, 10.1080/00207149908410019.
6. Barber, T.X., Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach. 1969, Reinhold, New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
7. Barber, T.X., Changing unchangeable bodily processes by (hypnotic) suggestions. Sheikh, A.A., (eds.) Imagination and Healing, 1984, Baywood, Farmingdale, NY, 69–127.
8. Barber, T.X., Hypnosuggestive procedures as catalysts for psychotherapies. Lynn, S.J., Garske, J.P., (eds.) Contemporary Psychotherapies: Models and Methods, 1985, Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH, 333–376.
9. Barber, T.X., A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Cardeña-Buelna, E., Amigo, S., (eds.) Clinical Hypnosis and Self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral Perspectives, 1999, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 21–48.
10. Barnier, A.J., Cox, R.E., McConkey, K.M., The province of highs: the high hypnotizable person in the science of hypnosis and in psychological science. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 1:2 (2014), 168–183.
11. Barnier, A.J., Dienes, Z., Mitchell, C.J., How hypnosis happens: new cognitive theories of hypnotic responding. Nash, M., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 141–178.
12. Barnier, A.J., McConkey, K.M., Reports of real and false memories: the relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and context of memory test. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 101:3 (1992), 521–527.
13. Barnier, A.J., McConkey, K.M., Hypnotic and posthypnotic suggestion: finding meaning in the message of the hypnotist. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 47:3 (1999), 192–208, 10.1080/00207149908410032.
14. Bell, V., Oakley, D.A., Halligan, P.W., Deeley, Q., Dissociation in hysteria and hypnosis: evidence from cognitive neuroscience. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82:3 (2011), 332–339, 10.1136/jnnp.2009.199158.
15. Benedetti, F., Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor-patient relationship. Physiol. Rev. 93:3 (2013), 1207–1246, 10.1152/physrev.00043.2012.
16. Benham, G., Woody, E.Z., Wilson, K.S., Nash, M.R., Expect the unexpected: ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:2 (2006), 342–350, 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342.
17. Bentler, P.M., Hilgard, E.R., A comparison of group and individual induction of hypnosis with self-scoring and observer-scoring. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 11 (1963), 49–54.
18. Bhavsar, V., Ventriglio, A., Bhugra, D., Dissociative trance and spirit possession: challenges for cultures in transition. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 70:12 (2016), 551–559, 10.1111/pcn.12425.
19. Birnie, K.A., Noel, M., Parker, J.A., Chambers, C.T., Uman, L.S., Kisely, S.R., McGrath, P.J., Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 39 (2014), 783–808.
20. Blakemore, S.J., Frith, C.D., Wolpert, D.M., Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11:5 (1999), 551–559.
21. Blakemore, S.J., Oakley, D.A., Frith, C.D., Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia 41:8 (2003), 1058–1067.
22. Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M., Frith, C.D., Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1:7 (1998), 635–640, 10.1038/2870.
23. Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., Seeck, M., Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature 419:6904 (2002), 269–270, 10.1038/419269a.
24. Bowers, K.S., Do the Stanford Scales tap the classic suggestion effect?. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 29:1 (1981), 42–53, 10.1080/00207148108409142.
25. Bowers, K.S., The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 41:1 (1993), 35–46.
26. Bowers, P., Laurence, J.R., Hart, D., The experience of hypnotic suggestions. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 36:4 (1988), 336–349, 10.1080/00207148808410523.
27. Braffman, W., Kirsch, I., Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: an empirical analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77:3 (1999), 578–587.
28. Braffman, W., Kirsch, I., Reaction time as a predictor of imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Contemp. Hypn. 18:3 (2001), 107–119.
29. Brown, D.P., Fromm, E., Hypnotherapy and Hypnoanalysis. 1986, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
30. Brown, R.J., Antonova, E., Langley, A., Oakley, D.A., The effects of absorption and reduced critical though on suggestibility in an hypnotic context. Contemp. Hypn. 18 (2001), 62–72.
31. Brown, R.J., Oakley, D.A., An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotizability. Heap, M., Brown, R.J., Oakley, D.A., (eds.) The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Issues, 2004, Brunner-Routledge, New York, NY, 152–186.
32. Brown, R.J., Reuber, M., Psychological and psychiatric aspects of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES): A systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 45 (2016), 157–182, 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.01.003.
33. Bryant, R.A., Barnier, A.J., Mallard, D., Tibbits, R., Posthypnotic amnesia for material learned before hypnosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 47:1 (1999), 46–64.
34. Bryant, R.A., Hung, L., Guastella, A.J., Mitchell, P.B., Oxytocin as a moderator of hypnotizability. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37:1 (2012), 162–166, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.010.
35. Buckner, R.L., Andrews‐Hanna, J.R., Schacter, D.L., The brain's default network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124:1 (2008), 1–38.
36. Burgess, C.A., Kirsch, I., Shane, H., Niederauer, K.L., Graham, S.M., Bacon, A., Facilitated communication as an ideomotor response. Psychol. Sci. 9:1 (1998), 71–74, 10.1111/1467-9280.00013.
37. Cardeña, E., The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: quiescent and physically active. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 53:1 (2005), 37–59, 10.1080/00207140490914234.
38. Cardeña, E., Jonsson, P., Terhune, D.B., Marcusson-Clavertz, D., The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex 49:2 (2013), 375–385, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.001.
39. Cardeña, E., Terhune, D.B., Hypnotizability, personality traits and the propensity to experience alterations of consciousness. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 1 (2014), 292–307.
40. Cardeña, E., Terhune, D.B., Loof, A., Buratti, S., Hypnotic experience is related to emotional contagion. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 57:1 (2009), 33–46.
41. Cardeña, E., Van Duijl, M., Weiner, L., Terhune, D.B., Possession/trance phenomena. Dell, P.F., O'Neil, J.A., (eds.) Dissociation and the Dissociative Disorders: DSM-V and Beyond, 2009, Routledge, New York, NY, 171–181.
42. Carlson, E.B., Putnam, F.W., Integrating research on dissociation and hypnotizability: are there two pathways to hypnotizability?. Dissociation 2 (1989), 32–38.
43. Christoff, K., Gordon, A.M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., Schooler, J.W., Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:21 (2009), 8719–8724.
44. Cohen Kadosh, R., Henik, A., Catena, A., Walsh, V., Fuentes, L.J., Induced cross-modal synaesthetic experience without abnormal neuronal connections. Psychol. Sci. 20:2 (2009), 258–265, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02286.x.
45. Cojan, Y., Piguet, C., Vuilleumier, P., What makes your brain suggestible? Hypnotizability is associated with differential brain activity during attention outside hypnosis. Neuroimage 117 (2015), 367–374, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.076.
46. Cojan, Y., Waber, L., Schwartz, S., Rossier, L., Forster, A., Vuilleumier, P., The brain under self-control: modulation of inhibitory and monitoring cortical networks during hypnotic paralysis. Neuron 62:6 (2009), 862–875, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.021.
47. Colloca, L., Benedetti, F., Placebo analgesia induced by social observational learning. Pain 144:1–2 (2009), 28–34, 10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.033.
48. Comey, G., Kirsch, I., Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: the phenomenology of hypnotic responding. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 47:1 (1999), 65–85, 10.1080/00207149908410023.
49. Connors, M.H., Hypnosis and belief: a review of hypnotic delusions. Conscious. Cogn. 36 (2015), 27–43, 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.015.
50. Connors, M.H., Barnier, A.J., Coltheart, M., Cox, R.E., Langdon, R., Mirrored-self misidentification in the hypnosis laboratory: recreating the delusion from its component factors. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 17:2 (2012), 151–176, 10.1080/13546805.2011.582287.
51. Cook, S.W., Harris, R.E., The verbal conditioning of the galvanic skin reflex. J. Exp. Psychol. 21:2 (1937), 202–210.
52. Cox, R.E., Bryant, R.A., Advances in hypnosis research: methods, designs and contributions of intrinsic and instrumental hypnosis. Nash, M., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 311–336.
53. Crawford, H.J., Brown, A.M., Moon, C.E., Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 102:4 (1993), 534–543.
54. de Guzman, M., Bird, G., Banissy, M.J., Catmur, C., Self-other control processes in social cognition: from imitation to empathy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci., 371(1686), 2016, 20150079, 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079.
55. De Pascalis, V., Chiaradia, C., Carotenuto, E., The contribution of suggestibility and expectation to placebo analgesia phenomenon in an experimental setting. Pain 96 (2002), 393–402, 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00485-7.
56. Deeley, Q., Oakley, D.A., Toone, B., Bell, V., Walsh, E., Marquand, A.F., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M.J., Williams, S.C., Mehta, M.A., Halligan, P.W., The functional anatomy of suggested limb paralysis. Cortex 49 (2013), 411–422.
57. Deeley, Q., Oakley, D.A., Toone, B., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M.J., Williams, S.C., Halligan, P.W., Modulating the default mode network using hypnosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 60:2 (2012), 206–228, 10.1080/00207144.2012.648070.
58. Deeley, Q., Oakley, D.A., Walsh, E., Bell, V., Mehta, M.A., Halligan, P.W., Modelling psychiatric and cultural possession phenomena with suggestion and fMRI. Cortex 53 (2014), 107–119, 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.004.
59. Demacheva, I., Aubert-Bonn, N., Lucero, S., Ladouceur, M., Raz, A., Le role des facteurs developpementaux dans la determination de la responsabilite morale chez les jeunes: une etude pilote evaluant les opinions d'experts legaux et cliniques. Criminologie 45 (2012), 187–218.
60. Derbyshire, S.W., Whalley, M.G., Oakley, D.A., Fibromyalgia pain and its modulation by hypnotic and non-hypnotic suggestion: an fMRI analysis. Eur. J. Pain 13:5 (2009), 542–550.
61. Derbyshire, S.W., Whalley, M.G., Stenger, V.A., Oakley, D.A., Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. Neuroimage 23:1 (2004), 392–401.
62. Dery, C., Campbell, N.K., Lifshitz, M., Raz, A., Suggestion overrides automatic audiovisual integration. Conscious. Cogn. 24 (2014), 33–37, 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.010.
63. Dienes, Z., Brown, E., Hutton, S., Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., Wright, D.B., Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation. Conscious. Cogn., 2009.
64. Dienes, Z., Hutton, S., Understanding hypnosis metacognitively: rTMS applied to left DLPFC increases hypnotic suggestibility. Cortex 49:2 (2013), 386–392, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.07.009.
65. Dienes, Z., Lush, P., Semmens-Wheeler, R., Naish, P., Hypnosis as self-deception: meditation as self-insight. Raz, A., Lifshitz, M., (eds.) Hypnosis and Meditation: Toward an Integrative Science of Conscious Planes, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
66. Dienes, Z., Perner, J., Executive control without conscious awareness: the cold control theory of hypnosis. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 293–314.
67. Dixon, M., Brunet, A., Laurence, J.R., Hypnotizability and automaticity: toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 99:4 (1990), 336–343.
68. Dixon, M., Laurence, J.R., Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: Automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop colour-naming task. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 101:2 (1992), 344–347.
69. Dolby, R.M., Sheehan, P.W., Cognitive processing and expectancy behavior in hypnosis. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 86:4 (1977), 334–345.
70. Edwards, M.J., Neurobiologic theories of functional neurologic disorders. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 139 (2017), 131–137, 10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00012-6.
71. Egner, T., Jamieson, G., Gruzelier, J., Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Neuroimage 27:4 (2005), 969–978.
72. Egner, T., Raz, A., Cognitive control processes and hypnosis. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 29–50.
73. Elkins, G., Handbook of Medical and Psychological Hypnosis: Foundations, Applications, and Professional Issues. 2017, Springer, New York, NY.
74. Erickson, M.H., Rossi, E.L., Rossi, S.I., Hypnotic Realities: The Induction of Hypnosis and Forms of Indirect Suggestions. 1976, Irvington, New York, NY.
75. Facco, E., Hypnosis and anesthesia: back to the future. Minerva Anestesiol., 2016.
76. Farvolden, P., Woody, E.Z., Hypnosis, memory: and frontal executive functioning. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 52 (2004), 3–26.
77. Faymonville, M.E., Fissette, J., Mambourg, P.H., Roediger, L., Joris, J., Lamy, M., Hypnosis as an adjunct therapy in conscious sedation for plastic surgery. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 20:2 (1995), 145–151.
78. Flammer, E., Alladin, A., The efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders: meta-analytical evidence. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 55 (2007), 251–274.
79. Flammer, E., Bongartz, W., On the efficacy of hypnosis: a meta-analytic study. Contemp. Hypn. 51 (2003), 179–197.
80. Fleming, S.M., Ryu, J., Golfinos, J.G., Blackmon, K.E., Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions. Brain 137:Pt 10 (2014), 2811–2822, 10.1093/brain/awu221.
81. Frankel, F.H., Apfel-Savitz, R., Nemiah, J.C., Sifneos, P.E., The relationship between hypnotizability and alexithymia. Psychother. Psychosom. 28 (1977), 172–178.
82. Freeman, L.P., Cox, R.E., Barnier, A.J., Transmitting delusional beliefs in a hypnotic model of folie a deux. Conscious. Cogn. 22:4 (2013), 1285–1297, 10.1016/j.concog.2013.07.011.
83. Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Suggestibility and memory conformity. Ridley, A.M., Gabbert, F., La Rooy, D.J., (eds.) Suggestibility in Legal Contexts: Psychological Research and Forensic Implications, 2013, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 63–83.
84. Galea, V., Woody, E.Z., Szechtman, H., Pierrynowski, M.R., Motion in response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity: a window on underlying mechanisms. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 58:3 (2010), 251–268, 10.1080/00207141003760561.
85. Gandhi, B., Oakley, D.A., Does ‘hypnosis' by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of ‘hypnotic' inductions depends on the label ‘hypnosis'. Conscious. Cogn. 14:2 (2005), 304–315.
86. Gauld, A., A History of Hypnotism. 1992, Camridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
87. Gazzaley, A., D'Esposito, M., Unifying prefrontal cortex function: executive control, neural networks and top-down modulation. Cummings, J., Miller, B., (eds.) The Human Frontal Lobes, 2nd ed., 2007, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 187–206.
88. Gfeller, J.D., Lynn, S.J., Pribble, W.E., Enhancing hypnotic susceptibility: interpersonal and rapport factors. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52 (1987), 586–595.
89. Gheorghiu, V.A., Netter, P., Eysenck, M., Rosenthal, R., Suggestion and Suggestibility: Theory and Research. 1989, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
90. Gorassini, D.R., Enhancing hypnotizability. The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Issues, 2004, Routledge, New York, NY, 213–239.
91. Green, J.P., Lynn, S.J., Hypnosis and suggestion-based approaches to smoking cessation: an examination of the evidence. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 48 (2000), 195–224.
92. Gruzelier, J.H., Frontal functions: connectivity and neural efficiency underpinning hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. Contemp. Hypn. 23 (2006), 15–32.
93. Gudjonsson, G.H., Interrogative suggestibility and compliance. Ridley, A.M., Gabbert, F., La Rooy, D.J., (eds.) Suggestibility in Legal Contexts: Psychological Research and Forensic Implications, 2013, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 45–61.
94. Haggard, P., Cartledge, P., Dafydd, M., Oakley, D.A., Anomalous control: when ‘free-will' is not conscious. Conscious. Cogn. 13:3 (2004), 646–654.
95. Halligan, P.W., Oakley, D.A., Hypnosis and beyond: exploring the broader domain of suggestion. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 1 (2014), 105–122, 10.1037/cns0000019.
96. Hammond, D.C., Haskins-Bartsch, C., Grant, C.W., McGhee, M., Comparison of self-directed and tape-assisted self-hypnosis. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 31 (1988), 129–137.
97. Heap, M., Brown, R.J., Oakley, D.A., The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Issues. 2004, Brunner-Routledge, New York, NY.
98. Hilgard, E.R., Toward a neo-dissociation theory: multiple cognitive controls in human functioning. Perspect. Biol. Med. 17:3 (1974), 301–316.
99. Hilgard, E.R., The problem of divided consciousness: a neodissociation interpretation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 296 (1977), 48–59.
100. Hilgard, J.R., Personality and Hypnosis: A Study of Imaginative Involvement. 1979, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
101. Holt, D.J., Cassidy, B.S., Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Lee, S.M., Coombs, G., Goff, D.C., Gabrieli, J.D., Moran, J.M., An anterior-to-posterior shift in midline cortical activity in schizophrenia during self-reflection. Biol. Psychiatry 69 (2011), 415–423.
102. Huber, A., Lui, F., Duzzi, D., Pagnoni, G., Porro, C.A., Structural and functional cerebral correlates of hypnotic suggestibility. PLoS One, 9(3), 2014, e93187, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093187.
103. Hull, C.L., Hypnosis and Suggestibility: An Experimental Approach. 1933, D. Appleton-Century Co., New York, NY.
104. Iani, C., Ricci, F., Gherri, E., Rubichi, S., Hypnotic suggestion modulates cognitive conflict: the case of the flanker compatibility effect. Psychol. Sci. 17:8 (2006), 721–727.
105. Isotani, T., Lehmann, D., Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Kochi, K., Wackermann, J., Saito, N., Yagyu, T., Kinoshita, T., Sasada, K., EEG source localization and global dimensional complexity in high- and low- hypnotizable subjects: a pilot study. Neuropsychobiology 44 (2001), 192–198.
106. Jamieson, G.A., Burgess, A.P., Hypnotic induction is followed by state-like changes in the organization of EEG functional connectivity in the theta and beta frequency bands in high-hypnotically susceptible individuals. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 8, 2014, 528, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00528.
107. Jamieson, G.A., Sheehan, P.W., An empirical test of Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory of hypnosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 52:3 (2004), 232–249.
108. Jamieson, G.A., Woody, E., Dissociated control as a paradigm for cognitive neuroscience research and theorising in hypnosis. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 111–129.
109. Jensen, M.P., Adachi, T., Hakimian, S., Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 57:3 (2015), 230–253, 10.1080/00029157.2015.985573.
110. Jensen, M.P., Hakimian, S., Sherlin, L.H., Fregni, F., New insights into neuromodulatory approaches for the treatment of pain. J. Pain 9:3 (2008), 193–199, 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.11.003.
111. Jiang, H., White, M.P., Greicius, M.D., Waelde, L.C., Spiegel, D., in press Brain activity and functional connectivity associated with hypnosis, Cereb. Cortex, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw220.
112. Jo, H.G., Hinterberger, T., Wittmann, M., Schmidt, S., Do meditators have higher awareness of their intentions to act?. Cortex 65 (2015), 149–158, 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.015.
113. Jones, T.F., Craig, A.S., Hoy, D., Gunter, E.W., Ashley, D.L., Barr, D.B., Brock, J.W., Schaffner, W., Mass psychogenic illness attributed to toxic exposure at a high school. N. Engl. J. Med. 342 (2000), 96–100.
114. Kallio, S., Revonsuo, A., Hypnotic phenomena and altered states of consciousness: a multilevel framework of description and explanation. Contemp. Hypn. 20 (2003), 111–164.
115. Khodaverdi-Khani, M., Laurence, J.-R., Working memory and hypnotizability. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 3 (2016), 80–92.
116. Kihlstrom, J.F., Hypnosis, memory and amnesia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 352:1362 (1997), 1727–1732, 10.1098/rstb.1997.0155.
117. Kihlstrom, J.F., The domain of hypnosis, revisited. Nash, M.R., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 21–52.
118. King, B.J., Council, J.R., Intentionality during hypnosis: an ironic process analysis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 46:3 (1998), 295–313.
119. Kirsch, I., Clinical hypnosis as a nondeceptive placebo. Kirsch, I., Capafons, A.C.-B., Amigo, E.S., (eds.) Clinical Hypnosis and Self-regulation, 1999, American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 211–225.
120. Kirsch, I., Hypnosis and placebos: response expectancy as a mediator of suggestion effects. Anales de Psicologia 15 (1999), 99–110.
121. Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Cardeña-Buelna, E., Amigo, S., Clinical Hypnosis and Self-Regulation: Cognitive-behavioral Perspectives. 1999, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
122. Kirsch, I., Council, J.R., Wickless, C., Subjective scoring for the harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form a. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 38:2 (1990), 112–124.
123. Kirsch, I., Lynn, S.J., Social-cognitive alternatives to dissociation theories of hypnotic involuntariness. Review of General Psychology 2:1 (1998), 66–80.
124. Kirsch, I., Milling, L.S., Burgess, C., Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford group C scale. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 46:3 (1998), 269–279.
125. Kirsch, I., Montgomery, G., Sapirstein, G., Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 63, 1995, 214.
126. Kosslyn, S.M., Thompson, W.L., Costantini-Ferrando, M.F., Alpert, N.M., Spiegel, D., Hypnotic visual illusion alters colour processing in the brain. Am. J. Psychiatry 157:8 (2000), 1279–1284, 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279.
127. Kotov, R.I., Bellman, S.B., Watson, D.B., Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS). 2004, Stony Brook University (Retrieved 05/09/16, from) https://medicine.stonybrookmedicine.edu/system/files/MISSBriefManual.pdf.
128. Kühn, S., Brass, M., Haggard, P., Feeling in control: neural correlates of experience of agency. Cortex 49:7 (2013), 1935–1942, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.002.
129. Laidlaw, T.M., Willett, M.J., Self-hypnosis tapes for anxious cancer patients: an evaluation using Personalised Emotional Index (PEI) diary data. Contemp. Hypn. 19 (2002), 25–33.
130. Landry, M., Raz, A., Hypnosis and imaging of the living human brain. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 57:3 (2015), 285–313, 10.1080/00029157.2014.978496.
131. Landry, M., Raz, A., Neurophysiology of hypnosis. Elkins, G., (eds.) Handbook of Medical and Psychological Hypnosis: Foundations, Applications, and Professional Issues, 2017, Springer, New York, NY, 19–25.
132. Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., The cognitive neuropsychology of delusions. Mind and Language 15 (2000), 184–218.
133. Laurence, J., Perry, C., Hypnosis, Will, and Memory: A Psycho-Legal History. 1988, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
134. Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., du Chéné, T., Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. Nash, M., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 225–253.
135. Laurence, J.R., Perry, C., Hypnotically created memory among highly hypnotizable subjects. Science 222:4623 (1983), 523–524.
136. Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., Pearl, D.K., Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 106:3 (1983), 623–642.
137. Loftus, E., Creating False Memories. 1997, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
138. London, P., Developmental experiments in hypnosis. J. Proj. Tech. Pers. Assess. 29 (1965), 189–199, 10.1080/0091651X.1965.10120197.
139. Ludwig, V.U., Stelzel, C., Krutiak, H., Magrabi, A., Steimke, R., Paschke, L.M., Walter, H., The suggestible brain: posthypnotic effects on value-based decision-making. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 2013, 10.1093/scan/nst110.
140. Lund, K., Petersen, G.L., Erlandsen, M., De Pascalis, V., Vase, L., Jensen, T.S., Finnerup, N.B., The magnitude of placebo analgesia effects depends on how they are conceptualized. J. Psychosom. Res. 79:6 (2015), 663–668, 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.05.002.
141. Lush, P., Naish, P., Dienes, Z., Metacognition of intentions in mindfulness and hypnosis. Neurosci. Conscious., 2016, 1–10.
142. Lynn, S.J., Cardeña, E., Hypnosis and the treatment of posttraumatic conditions: an evidence-based approach. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 55 (2007), 167–188.
143. Lynn, S.J., Kirsch, I., Hallquist, M., Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. Nash, M.R., Barnier, A., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 111–140.
144. Lynn, S.J., Kirsch, I., Knox, J., Fassler, O., Lilienfeld, S.O., Hypnosis and neuroscience: implications for the altered state debate. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 145–165.
145. Lynn, S.J., Laurence, J.-R., Kirsch, I., Hypnosis, suggestion: and suggestibility: an integrative model. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 57 (2015), 314–329.
146. Lynn, S.J., Malaktaris, A., Maxwell, R., Mellinger, D., van der Kloet, D., Do hypnosis and mindfulness practices inhabit the same domain Research, clinical, and forensic implications. Mind-Behav. Self Regul. 12 (2012), 12–26.
147. Lynn, S.J., Matthews, A., Barnes, S., Hypnosis and memory: from Bernheim to the present. Markman, K., Klein, W., Suhr, J., (eds.) Handbook of imagination and mental stimulation, 2009, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
148. Lynn, S.J., Meyer, E., Shindler, K., Clinical correlates of high hypnotizability. Brown, A.M., (eds.) The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental, and Clinical Issues, 2004, Brunner-Routledge, London, UK, 187–212.
149. Lynn, S.J., Nash, M.R., Rhue, J.W., Frauman, D.C., Sweeney, C.A., Nonvolition, expectancies: and hypnotic rapport. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 93 (1984), 295–303.
150. Lynn, S.J., Neufeld, V.R., Mare, C., Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 41 (1993), 124–152.
151. Lynn, S.J., Rhue, J., Kirsch, I., Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis. 2nd ed., 2010, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
152. Lynn, S.J., Snodgrass, M., Rhue, J.W., Nash, M.R., Frauman, D.C., Attributions, involuntariness: and hypnotic rapport. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 30 (1987), 36–43.
153. Lynn, S.J., Weekes, J.R., Neufeld, V., Zivney, O., Brentar, J., Weiss, F., Interpersonal climate and hypnotizability level: effects on hypnotic performance, rapport, and archaic involvement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 60, 1991, 759.
154. Mason, M.F., Norton, M.I., Van Horn, J.D., Wegner, D.M., Grafton, S.T., Macrae, C.N., Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315:5810 (2007), 393–395.
155. Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., McGeown, W.J., Kirsch, I., Neuroimaging resolution of the altered state hypothesis. Cortex 49:2 (2013), 400–410, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.005.
156. McConkey, K.M., Barnier, A.J., High hypnotizability: unity and diversity in behavior and experience. Heap, M., Brown, R.J., Oakley, D.A., (eds.) The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Issues, 2004, Routledge, New York, NY, 61–84.
157. McGeown, W.J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., Kirsch, I., Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Conscious. Cogn. 18:4 (2009), 848–855, 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001.
158. McGeown, W.J., Venneri, A., Kirsch, I., Nocetti, L., Roberts, K., Foan, L., Mazzoni, G., Suggested visual hallucination without hypnosis enhances activity in visual areas of the brain. Conscious. Cogn. 21:1 (2012), 100–116, 10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.015.
159. Mendelsohn, A., Chalamish, Y., Solomonovich, A., Dudai, Y., Mesmerizing memories: brain substrates of episodic memory suppression in posthypnotic amnesia. Neuron 57:1 (2008), 159–170, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.022.
160. Mertens, G., Raes, A.K., De Houwer, J., Can prepared fear conditioning result from verbal instructions?. Learn. Motiv. 53:7 (2016), 7–23.
161. Miele, D.B., Wager, T.D., Mitchell, J.P., Metcalfe, J., Dissociating neural correlates of action monitoring and metacognition of agency. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:11 (2011), 3620–3636, 10.1162/jocn_a_00052.
162. Miller, E.K., Cohen, J.D., An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 (2001), 167–202, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
163. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., Pribram, K.H., Plans and the Structure of Behavior. 1960, Henry Holt & Co., New York, NY.
164. Mink, J.W., Conversion disorder and mass psychogenic illness in child neurology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1304 (2013), 40–44, 10.1111/nyas.12298.
165. Montgomery, G.H., David, D., Winkel, G., Silverstein, J.H., Bovbjerg, D.H., The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 94 (2002), 1639–1645.
166. Montgomery, G.H., DuHamel, K.N., Redd, W.H., A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis?. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 48:2 (2000), 138–153.
167. Moore, J.W., What Is the sense of agency and why does it matter?. Front. Psychol., 7, 2016, 1272, 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272.
168. Moore, J.W., Haggard, P., Intentional binding and higher order agency experience. Conscious. Cogn. 19:1 (2010), 490–491, 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.007.
169. Moore, J.W., Obhi, S.S., Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Conscious. Cogn. 21:1 (2012), 546–561, 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002.
170. Moore, J.W., Ruge, D., Wenke, D., Rothwell, J., Haggard, P., Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277:1693 (2010), 2503–2509, 10.1098/rspb.2010.0404.
171. Morgan, A.H., The heritability of hypnotic susceptibility in twins. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 82:1 (1973), 55–61.
172. Morgan, A.H., Hilgard, E.R., Davert, E.C., The heritability of hypnotic susceptibility of twins: a preliminary report. Behav. Genet. 1:3 (1970), 213–224.
173. Morgan, A.H., Hilgard, J.R. (1978–79). The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for children. Am. J. Clin. Hypn., 21(2–3), 148–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403969.
174. Morgan, A.H., Johnson, D.L., Hilgard, E.R., The stability of hypnotic susceptibility: a longitudinal study. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 22:3 (1974), 249–257.
175. Nash, M.R., Why scientific hypnosis needs psychoanalysis (or something like it). Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 45 (1997), 291–300.
176. Nash, M.R., The importance of being earnest when crafting definitions: science and scientism are not the same thing. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 53:3 (2005), 265–280, 10.1080/00207140590961934.
177. Nash, M.R., Lynn, S.J., Stanley, S.M., The direct hypnotic suggestion of altered mind/body perception. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 27 (1984), 95–102.
178. Newberg, A.B., Wintering, N.A., Morgan, D., Waldman, M.R., The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during glossolalia: a preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Res. 148:1 (2006), 67–71, 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.07.001.
179. Nitzan, U., Chalamish, Y., Krieger, I., Erez, H.B., Braw, Y., Lichtenberg, P., Suggestibility as a predictor of response to antidepressants: a preliminary prospective trial. J. Affect. Disord. 185 (2015), 8–11, 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.028.
180. Oakley, D.A., Halligan, P.W., Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13:6 (2009), 264–270.
181. Oakley, D.A., Halligan, P.W., Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14:8 (2013), 565–576, 10.1038/nrn3538.
182. Oakman, J.M., Woody, E.Z., A taxometric analysis of hypnotic susceptibility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71:5 (1996), 980–991, 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.980.
183. Patterson, D.R., Clinical Hypnosis for Pain Control. 2010, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
184. Patterson, D.R., Hoffman, H.G., Palacios, A.G., Jensen, M.J., Analgesic effects of posthypnotic suggestions and virtual reality distraction on thermal pain. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115:4 (2006), 834–841.
185. Patterson, D.R., Jensen, M.P., Hypnosis and clinical pain. Psychol. Bull. 129:4 (2003), 495–521.
186. Pekala, R.J., Kumar, V.K., An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: with particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 167–194.
187. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E.R., Zimbardo, P.G., On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56:2 (1989), 289–295.
188. Polito, V., Barnier, A.J., Woody, E.Z., Developing the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS): An empirical measure of agency disruption in hypnosis. Conscious. Cogn. 22:3 (2013), 684–696, 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.003.
189. Polito, V., Barnier, A.J., Woody, E.Z., Connors, M.H., Measuring agency change across the domain of hypnosis. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 1:1 (2014), 3–19.
190. Polito, V., Langdon, R., Barnier, A.J., Sense of agency across contexts: insights from schizophrenia and hypnosis. Psychol. Conscious.: Theory Res. Pract. 2:3 (2015), 301–314.
191. Priftis, K., Schiff, S., Tikhonoff, V., Giordano, N., Amodio, P., Umilta, C., Casiglia, E., Hypnosis meets neuropsychology: simulating visuospatial neglect in healthy participants. Neuropsychologia 49:12 (2011), 3346–3350, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.008.
192. Raes, A.K., De Houwer, J., De Schryver, M., Brass, M., Kalisch, R., Do CS-US pairings actually matter? A within-subject comparison of instructed fear conditioning with and without actual CS-US pairings. PLoS One, 9(1), 2014, e84888, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084888.
193. Raichle, M.E., The brain's default mode network. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 2015.
194. Rainville, P., Carrier, B., Hofbauer, R.K., Bushnell, M.C., Duncan, G.H., Dissociation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain using hypnotic modulation. Pain 82:2 (1999), 159–171.
195. Rainville, P., Duncan, G.H., Price, D.D., Carrier, B., Bushnell, M.C., Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277:5328 (1997), 968–971.
196. Raz, A., Hypnosis: a twilight zone of the top-down variety: few have never heard of hypnosis but most know little about the potential of this mind-body regulation technique for advancing science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15:12 (2011), 555–557, 10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.002.
197. Raz, A., Hypnosis as a lens to the development of attention. Conscious. Cogn. 21:3 (2012), 1595–1598, 10.1016/j.concog.2012.05.011.
198. Raz, A., Buhle, J., Typologies of attentional networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:5 (2006), 367–379, 10.1038/nrn1903.
199. Raz, A., Fan, J., Posner, M.I., Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:28 (2005), 9978–9983, 10.1073/pnas.0503064102.
200. Raz, A., Kirsch, I., Pollard, J., Nitkin-Kaner, Y., Suggestion reduces the stroop effect. Psychol. Sci. 17:2 (2006), 91–95.
201. Raz, A., Lifshitz, M., Hypnosis and Meditation: Toward an Integrative Science of Conscious Planes. 2016, University Press, Oxford, UK: Oxford.
202. Reyher, J., A paradigm for determining the clinical relevance of hypnotically induced psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 59 (1962), 344–352.
203. Rhue, J., Developmental determinants of high hypnotizability. Heap, M., Brown, R.J., Oakley, D.A., (eds.) The Highly Hypnotizable Person: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Issues, 2004, Brunner-Routledge, New York, NY, 115–132.
204. Richardson, J., Smith, J.E., McCall, G., Richardson, A., Pilkington, K., Kirsch, I., Hypnosis for nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur. J. Cancer Care 16 (2007), 402–412.
205. Röder, C.H., Michal, M., Overbeck, G., van de Ven, V.G., Linden, D.E., Pain response in depersonalization: a functional imaging study using hypnosis in healthy subjects. Psychother. Psychosom. 76:2 (2007), 115–121.
206. Roelofs, K., Hoogduin, K.A., Keijsers, G.P., Naring, G.W., Moene, F.C., Sandijck, P., Hypnotic susceptibility in patients with conversion disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 111:2 (2002), 390–395.
207. Rominger, C., Weiss, E.M., Nagl, S., Niederstatter, H., Parson, W., Papousek, I., Carriers of the COMT Met/Met allele have higher degrees of hypnotizability, provided that they have good attentional control: a case of gene-trait interaction. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 62:4 (2014), 455–482, 10.1080/00207144.2014.931177.
208. Rosenthal, D., Consciousness and Mind. 2005, University Press, Oxford, UK: Oxford.
209. Sadler, P., Woody, E.Z., Four decades of group hypnosis scales: what does item-response theory tell us about what we've been measuring?. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 52:2 (2004), 132–158.
210. Sapp, M., Obesity and weight loss. Elkins, G., (eds.) Handbook of Medical and Psychological Hypnosis: Foundations, Applications, and Professional Issues, 2017, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, 589–598.
211. Schaefert, R., Klose, P., Moser, G., Häuser, W., Efficacy, tolerability: and safety of hypnosis in adult irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom. Med. 76 (2014), 389–398.
212. Schoenberger, N.E., Kirsch, I., Gearan, P., Montgomery, G., Pastyrnak, S.L., Hypnotic enhancement of a cognitive behavioral treatment for public speaking anxiety. Behav. Ther. 28 (1997), 127–140.
213. Sheehan, P.W., Hypnosis, context, and commitment. Lynn, S.J., Rhue, J.W., (eds.) Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives, 1991, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 520–541.
214. Sheiner, E.O., Lifshitz, M., Raz, A., Placebo response correlates with hypnotic suggestibility. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research and Practice 3:2 (2016), 146–153.
215. Shih, M., Yang, Y.H., Koo, M., A meta-analysis of hypnosis in the treatment of depressive symptoms: a brief communication. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 57 (2009), 431–432.
216. Shor, R.E., Orne, E.C., Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. 1962, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
217. Spanos, N.P., Gorassini, D.R., Structure of hypnotic test suggestions and attributions of responding involuntarily. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46:3 (1984), 688–696, 10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.688.
218. Summerfield, C., de Lange, F.P., Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 (2014), 745–756, 10.1038/nrn3838.
219. Swider, K., Babel, P., The effect of the sex of a model on nocebo hyperalgesia induced by social observational learning. Pain 154:8 (2013), 1312–1317, 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.001.
220. Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Obsessive-compulsive disorder as a disturbance of security motivation. Psychol. Rev. 111:1 (2004), 111–127, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.111.
221. Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K.S., Nahmias, C., Where the imaginal appears real: a positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:4 (1998), 1956–1960.
222. Tart, C.T., Hilgard, E.R., Responsiveness to suggestions under hypnosis and waking-imagination conditions: a methodological observation. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 14:3 (1966), 247–256, 10.1080/00207146608412967.
223. Tasso, A.F., Perez, N., Parsing everyday suggestibility: what does it tell us about hypnosis?. Nash, M.R., Barnier, A., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 283–309.
224. Tefikow, S., Barth, J., Maichrowitz, S., Beelmann, A., Strauss, B., Rosendahl, J., Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 33 (2013), 623–636.
225. Tellegen, A., Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: comment on Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: the relevance of attention by Qualls and Sheehan. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 110 (1981), 217–226.
226. Terhune, D.B., Discrete response patterns in the upper range of hypnotic suggestibility: a latent profile analysis. Conscious. Cogn. 33 (2015), 334–341, 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.018.
227. Terhune, D.B., Brugger, P., Doing better by getting worse: posthypnotic amnesia improves random number generation. PLoS One, 6(12), 2011, e29206, 10.1371/journal.pone.0029206.
228. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24 (2015), 452–457, 10.1177/0963721415604611.
229. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Nuances and uncertainties regarding hypnotic inductions: toward a theoretically informed praxis. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 59:2 (2016), 155–174, 10.1080/00029157.2016.1201454.
230. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Lindgren, M., Disruption of synaesthesia by posthypnotic suggestion: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 48:11 (2010), 3360–3364, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.004.
231. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Lindgren, M., Differential frontal-parietal phase synchrony during hypnosis as a function of hypnotic suggestibility. Psychophysiology 48:10 (2011), 1444–1447, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01211.x.
232. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Lindgren, M., Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility. Conscious. Cogn. 20:3 (2011), 727–736, 10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.005.
233. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., Lindgren, M., Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 16:2 (2011), 113–135, 10.1080/13546805.2010.503048.
234. Terhune, D.B., Cohen Kadosh, R., The emerging neuroscience of hypnosis. Cortex 48 (2012), 382–386.
235. Tomes, J.L., Katz, A.N., Habitual susceptibility to misinformation and individual differences in eyewitness memory. Appl. Cogn.Psychol. 11 (1997), 233–251.
236. Van Der Does, A.J.W., Van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P., Kloosman, A., The effectiveness of standardized versus individualized hypnotic suggestions: a brief communication. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 37 (1989), 1–5.
237. Varga, K., Kekecs, Z., Feature-based coding system: a new way of characterizing hypnosis styles. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 63 (2015), 215–235.
238. Varga, S., Varga, K., Visual imaginative synchrony. Contemp. Hypn. 26 (2009), 146–158.
239. Vuilleumier, P., Brain circuits implicated in psychogenic paralysis in conversion disorders and hypnosis. Neurophysiologie Clinique-Clin. Neurophysiol. 44:4 (2014), 323–337, 10.1016/j.neucli.2014.01.003.
240. Wager, T.D., Atlas, L.Y., The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16:7 (2015), 403–418, 10.1038/nrn3976.
241. Walsh, E., Oakley, D.A., Halligan, P.W., Mehta, M.A., Deeley, Q., The functional anatomy and connectivity of thought insertion and alien control of movement. Cortex 64 (2015), 380–393, 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.012.
242. Wegner, D., The Illusion of Conscious Will. 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
243. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., When is an instruction an instruction?. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 22:3 (1974), 258–269, 10.1080/00207147408413005.
244. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 22:3 (1980), 130–146.
245. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., Hilgard, E.R., Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C. 1962, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
246. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., Hilgard, E.R., Revised Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Forms I and II. 1967, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
247. Whalley, M.G., Brooks, G.B., Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide. Psychopharmacology 203:4 (2009), 745–752.
248. Wheatley, T., Haidt, J., Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychol. Sci. 16:10 (2005), 780–784, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x.
249. Wickramasekera, I.E., Mysteries of hypnosis and the self are revealed by the psychology and neuroscience of empathy. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 57 (2015), 330–348.
250. Wickramasekera, I.E., Szlyk, J.P. 2nd, Could empathy be a predictor of hypnotic ability?. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 51:4 (2003), 390–399.
251. Williams, J.D., Gruzelier, J.H., Differentiation of hypnosis and relaxation by analysis of narrow band theta and alpha frequencies. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 49:3 (2001), 185–206.
252. Winkel, J.D., Younger, J.W., Tomcik, N., Borckardt, J.J., Nash, M.R., Anatomy of a hypnotic response: self-report estimates, actual behavior: and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 54 (2006), 186–205.
253. Woody, E., Szechtman, H., To see feelingly: emotion, motivation and hypnosis. Jamieson, G.A., (eds.) Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 241–255.
254. Woody, E.Z., Barnier, A.J., Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: what do we know and how should we use them?. Nash, M., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 255–281.
255. Woody, E.Z., Barnier, A.J., McConkey, K.M., Multiple hypnotizabilities: differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychol. Assess. 17:2 (2005), 200–211.
256. Woody, E.Z., Bowers, K.S., A frontal assault on dissociated control. Lynn, S.J., Rhue, J.W., (eds.) Dissociation: Clinical and Theoretical Perspectives, 1994, Guilford, New York, NY, 52–79.
257. Woody, E.Z., Drugovic, M., Oakman, J.M., A reexamination of the role of nonhypnotic suggestibility in hypnotic responding. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72:2 (1997), 399–407.
258. Woody, E.Z., Lewis, V., Snider, L., Grant, H., Kamath, M., Szechtman, H., Induction of compulsive-like washing by blocking the feeling of knowing: an experimental test of the security-motivation hypothesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav. Brain Funct., 1, 2005, 11, 10.1186/1744-9081-1-11.
259. Woody, E.Z., McConkey, K.M., What we don't know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: a view from the Buckhorn Inn. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 51:3 (2003), 309–338.
260. Woody, E.Z., Sadler, P., Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Nash, M., Barnier, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Practice, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 81–110.
261. Woody, E.Z., Szechtman, H., Using hypnosis to develop and test models of psychopathology. J. Mind-Body Regul. 1 (2011), 4–16.
262. Woolgar, A., Jackson, J., Duncan, J., Coding of visual, auditory, rule, and response information in the brain: 10 years of multivoxel pattern analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 28:10 (2016), 1433–1454, 10.1162/jocn_a_00981.