Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion for arm rigidity

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 186-205

  Winkel, Justin D ^a   Younger, Jarred W ^b   Tomcik, Nathan ^a   Borckardt, Jeffrey J ^c   Nash, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE RIGIDITY; SELF REPORT; TRICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE;

ADULT; ARM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE RIGIDITY; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SUGGESTION;

EID: 33645553325     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140500528430     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. As, A., & Lauer, L. (1962). A factor-analytic study of hypnotizability and related personal experiences. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10, 169-181.
2. Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1985). The "stuff" of hypnotic performance: A review of psychometric approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 283-296.
3. Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevisan, M., & Warner, M. (1999). Cortical event-related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 5-22.
4. Barber, T. X. (1999). A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, & S. Ámigo (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 21-48). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
5. Barrett, D. (1996). Fantasizers and dissociaters: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 123-135). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). A comparison of group and individual induction of hypnosis with self-scoring and observer-scoring. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11, 49-54.
7. Blakemore, S. J., Oakley, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychological, 41, 1058-1067.
8. Bowers, K. S. (1993). Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WGSC) hypnotic susceptibility scale: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 35-46.
9. Curran, J. D., & Gibson, H. B. (1974). Critique of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: British usage and factorial structure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 695-704.
10. DePascalis, V. (1999). Psychophysiological correlates of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 117-143.
11. Field, P. B. (1965). An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13(4), 238-249.
12. Hammer, A. G., Evans, F. J., & Bartlett, M. (1963). Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 15-23.
13. Hartman, B. J. (1965). Self-scoring and observer-scoring estimates of hypnotic susceptibility in a group situation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 452.
14. Heap, M. (1999). High hypnotizability: Types and dimensions. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16, 153-156.
15. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
16. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Costantini-Ferrando, M. F., Alpert, N. M., & Spiegel, D. (2000). Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1279-1284.
17. McConkey, K. M., Wende, V., & Barnier, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 23-39.
18. Nadon, R., Laurence, J. R., & Perry, C. (1987). Multiple predicators of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 948-960.
19. O'Connell, D. N. (1964). An experimental comparison of hypnotic depth measured by self-ratings and by an objective scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 34-46.
20. Peters, J., Dhanens, R., Lundy, R., & Landy, F. (1974). A factor analytic investigation of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 377-378.
21. Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Bushnell, K. C., Duncan, G. H,., & Price, D. D. (2002). Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 887-901.
22. Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Paus, T., Duncan, G. H., Bushnell, K. C., & Price, D. D. (1999). Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 110-125.
23. Shor, R. E. (1970). The three-factor theory of hypnosis as applied to the book-reading fantasy and to the concept of suggestion. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 89-98.
24. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25. Tart, C. T. (1979). Quick and convenient assessment of hypnotic depth. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21(2 & 3), 186-207.
26. Tellegin, A., & Atkinson, G. (1976). Complexity and measurement of hypnotic susceptibility: A comment on Coe and Sarbin's alternative interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 142-148.
27. Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1974). When is an "instruction" an "instruction"? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 258-269.
28. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
29. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
30. Younger, J. W., Kemmerer, D., Winkel, J. D., & Nash, M. R. (2005). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of self-report and the memory for items. International Journal for Clinical and Experimental, Hypnosis, 53, 306-320.