Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 727-736

  Terhune, Devin Blair ^a   Cardeña, Etzel ^a   Lindgren, Magnus ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict monitoring; Dissociation; Heterogeneity; Hypnosis; Hypnotic suggestibility; Typology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATED CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; LEISURE; MALE; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; UPREGULATION;

COGNITION; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; SUGGESTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051670960     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aikins D., Ray W.J. Frontal lobe contributions to hypnotic susceptibility: A neuropsychological screening of executive functioning. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2001, 49:320-329.
2. Barber T.X. A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives 1999, 21-48. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, S. Amigo (Eds.).
3. Baribeau, J., LeBeau, M., Roth, R. M., & Laurence, J.-R. (1994). Hypnotizability and perceptual automaticity: An 'out-of-context' event related potential investigation. In Paper presented at the Seventh International Congress of Psychophysiology, Thessaloniki, Greece.
4. Barnier A.J., McConkey K.M. Hypnosis, human nature, and complexity: Integrating neuroscience approaches into hypnosis research. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2003, 51:282-308.
5. Bernstein E.M., Putnam F.W. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1986, 174:727-735.
6. Botvinick M.M. Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:356-366.
7. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
8. Bowers K.S. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1993, 41:35-46.
9. Braffman W., Kirsch I. Reaction time as a predictor of imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An exploratory investigation. Contemporary Hypnosis 2001, 18:107-119.
10. Brown R.J. Different types of " dissociation" have different psychological mechanisms. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 2006, 7:7-28.
11. Brown R.J., Oakley D.A. An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotizability. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 152-186. Bruner-Routledge, New York. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
12. Butler P.V., Bryant R.A. Assessing hypnotizability and dissociation in different contexts. Contemporary Hypnosis 1997, 14:167-172.
13. Cardeña E. The domain of dissociation. Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives 1994, 15-31. Guilford Press, New York. S.J. Lynn, J.W. Rhue (Eds.).
14. Carlson E.B., Putnam F.W. Integrating research on dissociation and hypnotizability: Are there two pathways to hypnotizability?. Dissociation 1989, 2:32-38.
15. Carlson E.B., Putnam F.W. An update on the dissociative experiences scale. Dissociation 1993, 6:16-27.
16. Cohen Kadosh R., Henik A., Catena A., Walsh V., Fuentes L.J. Induced cross-modal synaesthetic experience without abnormal neuronal connections. Psychological Science 2009, 20:258-265.
17. Cojan Y., Waber L., Schwartz S., Rossier L., Forster A., Vuilleumier P. The brain under self-control: Modulation of inhibitory and monitoring cortical networks during hypnotic paralysis. Neuron 2009, 62:862-875.
18. Crawford H.J., Brown A.M., Moon C.E. Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities? Differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1993, 102:534-543.
19. David D., King B.J., Borkardt J.J. Is a capacity for negative priming correlated with hypnotizability? A preliminary study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2001, 49:30-37.
20. DePrince A.P., Freyd J.J. Dissociative tendencies, attention, and memory. Psychological Science 1999, 10:449-452.
21. Dienes Z., Brown E., Hutton S., Kirsch I., Mazzoni G., Wright D.B. Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:837-847.
22. Dixon M., Laurence J.-R. Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: Automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop color-naming task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1992, 101:344-347.
23. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:380-390.
24. Egner T., Delano M., Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage 2007, 35:940-948.
25. Egner T., Jamieson G., Gruzelier J. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. NeuroImage 2005, 27:969-978.
26. Egner T., Raz A. Cognitive control processes and hypnosis. Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective 2007, 29-50. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G.A. Jamieson (Ed.).
27. Galea V., Woody E.Z., Szechtman H., Pierrynowski M.R. Motion in response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity: A window on underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2010, 58:251-268.
28. Giesbrecht T., Merckelbach H. Betrayal trauma theory of dissociative experiences: Stroop and directed forgetting findings. American Journal of Psychology 2009, 122:337-348.
29. Giesbrecht T., Merckelbach H., Geraerts E., Smeets E. Dissociation in undergraduate students: Disruptions in executive functioning. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2004, 192:567-569.
30. Graham C., Evans F.J. Hypnotizability and deployment of waking attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1977, 86:631-638.
31. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:480-506.
32. Gruzelier J., Warren K. Neuropsychological evidence of reductions on left frontal tests with hypnosis. Psychological Medicine 1993, 23:93-101.
33. Haggard P. Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:934-946.
34. Holmes E.A., Brown R.J., Mansell W., Fearon R.P., Hunter E.C.M., Frasquilho F., et al. Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications. Clinical Psychology Review 2005, 25:1-23.
35. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.P. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
36. Horton J.E., Crawford H.J. Neurophysiological and genetic determinants of high hypnotizability. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 133-151. Bruner-Routledge, New York. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
37. Iani C., Ricci F., Gherri E., Rubichi S. Hypnotic suggestion modulates cognitive conflict - The case of the flanker compatibility effect. Psychological Science 2006, 17:721-727.
38. Ingram R.E., Saccuzzo D.P., Mcneill B.W., Mcdonald R. Speed of information-processing in high and low susceptible subjects - Preliminary-study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1979, 27:42-47.
39. Jamieson G.A., Sheehan P.W. An empirical test of Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2004, 52:232-249.
40. Jamieson G.A., Woody E. Dissociated control as a paradigm for cognitive-neuroscience research and theorising in hypnosis. Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective 2007, 111-129. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G.A. Jamieson (Ed.).
41. Kaiser J., Barker R., Haenschel C., Baldeweg T., Gruzelier J.H. Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: A test of the frontal hypothesis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1997, 27:215-222.
42. Kallio S., Revonsuo A., Hamalainen H., Markela J., Gruzelier J. Anterior brain functions and hypnosis: A test of the frontal hypothesis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2001, 49:95-108.
43. Kihlstrom J.F. The domain of hypnosis, revisited. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 21-52. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).
44. King B.J., Council J.R. Intentionality during hypnosis: An ironic process analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1998, 46:295-313.
45. Kirsch I., Lynn S.J. Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:100-115.
46. Körlin D., Edman G., Nybäck H. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the dissociative experiences scale (DES-II). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 61:126-142.
47. Kunzendorf R.G., Boisvert P. Presence vs. absence of a 'hidden observer' during total deafness: The hypnotic illusion of subconsciousness vs. the imaginal attenuation of brainstem evoked potentials. Hypnosis and imagination 1996, 223-234. Baywood, Amityville, NY. R.G. Kunzendorf, N.P. Spanos, B. Wallace (Eds.).
48. Laurence J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost D., du Chéné T. Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 225-253. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).
49. Lynn S.J., Kirsch I., Hallquist M. Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 111-140. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A. Barnier (Eds.).
50. McConkey K.M., Barnier A.J. High hypnotizability: Unity and diversity in behavior and experience. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 61-84. Bruner-Routledge, New York. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
51. Moghrabi, H. (2004). Cognitive correlates of hypnotizability and imaginativity: A movement towards a perceptual control model of hypnosis. Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, 2004. Dissertation Abstracts International (vol. 65, p. 6066).
52. Nordby H., Hugdahl K., Jasiukaitis P., Spiegel D. Effects of hypnotizability on performance of a stroop task and event-related potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1999, 88:819-830.
53. Notebaert W., Gevers W., Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B. Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:112-117.
54. Oakley D.A. Hypnosis as a tool in research: Experimental psychopathology. Contemporary Hypnosis 2006, 23:3-14.
55. Oakley D.A., Halligan P.W. Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:264-270.
56. Oldfield R.C. Assessment and analysis of handedness: Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
57. Palmer R.D., Field P.B. Cognitive factors in hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1971, 37:165.
58. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K. An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective 2007, 167-194. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G.A. Jamieson (Ed.).
59. Rubichi S., Ricci F., Padovani R., Scaglietti L. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task. Consciousness and Cognition 2005, 14:296-303.
60. Sadler P., Woody E.Z. Does the more vivid imagery of high hypnotizables depend on greater cognitive effort? A test of dissociation and social-cognitive theories of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2006, 54:372-391.
61. Segalowitz N., Frenkiel-Fishman S. Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33:644-653.
62. Sheehan P.W., Donovan P., Macleod C.M. Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1988, 97:455-460.
63. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
64. Tellegen A. Practicing the 2 disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment? Comment on role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback? The relevance of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 1981, 110:217-226.
65. Terhune D.B., Cardeña E. Differential patterns of spontaneous phenomenological response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:1140-1150.
66. Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2010). Dissociative tendencies, working memory, and conflict adaptation. Unpublished manuscript, Lund University.
67. Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (in press). Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry.
68. Wagenmakers E.-J., Brown S. On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review 2007, 114:830-841.
69. Weitzenhoffer A.M. When is an instruction an instruction?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1974, 22:258-269.
70. Weitzenhoffer A.M., Hilgard E.R. Revised Stanford profile scales of hypnotic susceptibility: Forms I and II 1967, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
71. Winkel J.D., Younger J.W., Tomcik N., Borckardt J.J., Nash M.R. Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion for arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2006, 54:186-205.
72. Woody E.Z., Barnier A.J., McConkey K.M. Multiple hypnotizabilities: differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment 2005, 17:200-211.
73. Woody E.Z., Bowers K.S. A frontal assault on dissociated control. Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives 1994, 52-79. Guilford, New York. S.J. Lynn, J.W. Rhue (Eds.).
74. Woody E., Farvolden P. Dissociation in hypnosis and frontal executive function. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1998, 40:206-216.
75. Woody E.Z., McConkey K.M. What we don't know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: A view from the Buckhorn Inn. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2003, 51:309-338.
76. Woody E., Sadler P. On reintegrating dissociated theories: Comment on Kirsch and Lynn (1998). Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:192-197.
77. Woody E.Z., Sadler P. Dissociation theories of hypnosis. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 81-110. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).