Modulating the default mode network using hypnosis

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 206-228

  Deeley, Quinton ^a   Oakley, David A ^b   Toone, Brian ^a   Giampietro, Vincent ^a   Brammer, Michael J ^a   Williams, Steven C R ^a   Halligan, Peter W ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; DEFAULT MODE NETWORK; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; SELF CONCEPT; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; BRAIN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859183248     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2012.648070     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1), 80-95.
2. Bullmore, E., Long, C., Suckling, J., Fadili, J., Calvert, G., Zelaya, F., Brammer, M. (2001). Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains. Human Brain Mapping, 12(2), 61-78.
3. Bullmore, E., Suckling, J., Overmeyer, S., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Taylor, E., & Brammer, M. J. (1999). Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Bunge, S. A., Ochsner, K. N., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain, 124, 2074-2086.
5. Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215-222.
6. Cardeña, E. (2005). The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 37-59.
7. Egner, T., & Raz, A. (2007). Cognitive control processes and hypnosis. In Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 29-50). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Fletcher, P. C., & Henson, R. N. (2001). Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain, 124, 849-881.
9. Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 9673-9678.
10. Friman, O., Borga, M., Lundberg, P., & Knutsson, H. (2003). Adaptive analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage, 19, 837-845.
11. Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Lateral prefrontal damage affects processing selection but not attention switching. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 267-279.
12. Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003). Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(1), 253-258.
13. Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V. (2004). Default-mode activity during a passive sensory task: Uncoupled from deactivation but impacting activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1484-1492.
14. Gruzelier, J. H. (1998). A working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: A review of the evidence. Contemporary Hypnosis, 15, 3-21.
15. Gusnard, D. A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 4259-4264.
16. Gusnard, D. A., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 685-694.
17. Heap, M., & Aravind, K. K. (2002). Hartland's Medical and Dental Hypnosis (4th ed.). Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
18. Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). The altered state of hypnosis-Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846-858.
19. Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., Roberts, K., Dienes, Z., Hallquist, M. N., Williams, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Slipping into trance. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(3-4), 202-209.
20. Lawrence, N. S., Ross, T. J., Hoffmann, R., Garavan, H., & Stein, E. A. (2003). Multiple neuronal networks mediate sustained attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1028-1038.
21. LeCron, L. M. (1953). A method of measuring the depth of hypnosis. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 1, 4-7.
22. Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315 (5810), 393-395.
23. Mazoyer, B., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Etard, O., Houde, O., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Research Bulletin, 54(3), 287-298.
24. McConkey, K. M. (2008). Generations and landscapes of hypnosis: Questions we've asked, questions we should ask. In A. J. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 53-77). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25. McConkey, K. M., Wende, V., & Barnier, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 23-39.
26. McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness & Cognition, 18, 848-855.
27. McGuire, P. K., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1996). Brain activity during stimulus independent thought. Neuroreport, 7, 2095-2099.
28. McKiernan, K. A., D'Angelo, B. R., Kaufman, J. N., & Binder, J. R. (2006). Interrupting the "stream of consciousness": An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 29, 1185-1191.
29. McKiernan, K. A., Kaufman, J. N., Kucera-Thompson, J., & Binder, J. R. (2003). A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 394-408.
30. Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004). Cortical midline structures and the self. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 8, 102-107.
31. Oakley, D. A. (2008). Hypnosis, trance, and suggestion: Evidence from neuroimaging. In M. R. Nash & A. Barnier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 365-392). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
32. Oakley, D. A., Deeley, Q., & Halligan, P. W. (2007). Hypnotic depth and response to suggestion under standardized conditions and during fMRI scanning. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 32-58.
33. Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009a). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 264-270.
34. Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. (2009b). Psychophysiological foundations of hypnosis and suggestion. In S. J. Lynn, J. W. Rhue, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 79-118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Price, D., & Barrell, J. (1990). The structure of the hypnotic state: A self-directed experiential study. In J. J. Barrell (Ed.), The structure of the hypnotic state: A self-directed experiential study, in the experiential method: Exploring the human experience (pp. 85-97). Acton, MA: Copely.
36. Raichle, M. E., & Snyder, A. Z. (2007). A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage, 37, 1083-1090; discussion 1097-1089.
37. Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Bushnell, M. C., Duncan, G. H., & Price, D. D. (2002). Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 887-901.
38. Rainville, P., & Price, D. (2004). The neurophenomenology of hypnosis and hypnotic analgesia. In D. Price & M. Bushnell (Eds.), The neurophenomenology of hypnosis and hypnotic analgesia, in psychological methods of pain control: Basic Science and clinical perspectives (Vol. 29, pp. 235-267). Seattle WA: IASP.
39. Raz, A. (2005). Attention and hypnosis: Neural substrates and genetic associations of two converging processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 237-258.
40. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
41. Tart, C. T. (1970). Self-report scales of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 105-125.
42. Thirion, B., Pinel, P., Meriaux, S., Roche, A., Dehaene, S., & Poline, J. B. (2007). Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. Neuroimage, 35(1), 105-120.
43. Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 971-978.
44. Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them? In A. J. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255-280). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45. Zhang, D., & Raichle, M. E. (2010). Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(1), 15-28.