Manipulation of conformational change in proteins by single-residue perturbations

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 933-943

  Atilgan, C ^a   Gerek, Z N ^b   Ozkan, S B ^b   Atilgan, A R ^a  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENYLATE KINASE; AMINO ACID; CHAPERONIN 60; PROTEIN;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ADENYLATE KINASE; AMINO ACIDS; CHAPERONIN 60; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 77955680967     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brooks, B., and M. Karplus. 1985. Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules: application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:4995-4999.
2. Case, D. A. 1994. Normal-mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4:285-290.
3. Hinsen, K. 1998. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins. 33:417-429.
4. Tama, F., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2001. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng. 14:1-6.
5. Atilgan, A. R., S. R. Durell, I. Bahar. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505-515.
6. Bahar, I., A. R. Atilgan, and B. Erman. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2:173-181.
7. Gerek, Z. N., O. Keskin, and S. B. Ozkan. 2009. Identification of specificity and promiscuity of PDZ domain interactions through their dynamic behavior. Proteins. 77:796-811.
8. Kondrashov, D. A., Q. Cui, and G. N. Phillips, Jr. 2006. Optimization and evaluation of a coarse-grained model of protein motion using x-ray crystal data. Biophys. J. 91:2760-2767.
9. Yang, L., G. Song, and R. L. Jernigan. 2009. Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:12347-12352.
10. Gerstein, M., and W. Krebs. 1998. A database of macromolecular motions. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:4280-4290.
11. Keskin, O. 2007. Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations: a case study of antibodies. BMC Struct. Biol. 7:31.
12. Franklin, J., P. Koehl, M. Delarue. 2007. MinActionPath: maximum likelihood trajectory for large-scale structural transitions in a coarsegrained locally harmonic energy landscape. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (Web Server issue):W477-W482.
13. Kim, M. K., R. L. Jernigan, and G. S. Chirikjian. 2002. Efficient generation of feasible pathways for protein conformational transitions. Biophys. J. 83:1620-1630.
14. Maragakis, P., and M. Karplus. 2005. Large amplitude conformational change in proteins explored with a plastic network model: adenylate kinase. J. Mol. Biol. 352:807-822.
15. Zheng, W., B. R. Brooks, and G. Hummer. 2007. Protein conformational transitions explored by mixed elastic network models. Proteins. 69:43-57.
16. Zheng, W., and M. Tekpinar. 2009. Large-scale evaluation of dynamically important residues in proteins predicted by the perturbation analysis of a coarse-grained elastic model. BMC Struct. Biol. 9:45.
17. Petrone, P., and V. S. Pande. 2006. Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes? Biophys. J. 90:1583-1593.
18. Cavasotto, C. N., J. A. Kovacs, and R. A. Abagyan. 2005. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:9632-9640.
19. Dobbins, S. E., V. I. Lesk, and M. J. Sternberg. 2008. Insights into protein flexibility: the relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:10390-10395.
20. Yang, L., G. Song, and R. L. Jernigan. 2007. How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models? Biophys. J. 93:920-929.
21. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2001. Coordination topology and stability for the native and binding conformers of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proteins. 45:62-70.
22. Yilmaz, L. S., and A. R. Atilgan. 2000. Identifying the adaptive mechanism in globular proteins: fluctuations in densely packed regions manipulate flexible parts. J. Chem. Phys. 113:4454-4464.
23. Sacquin-Mora, S., and R. Lavery. 2009. Modeling the mechanical response of proteins to anisotropic deformation. ChemPhysChem. 10:115-118.
24. Zheng, W., and B. Brooks. 2005. Identification of dynamical correlations within the myosin motor domain by the normal mode analysis of an elastic network model. J. Mol. Biol. 346:745-759.
25. Ming, D., and M. E. Wall. 2006. Interactions in native binding sites cause a large change in protein dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 358:213-223.
26. Ikeguchi, M., J. Ueno, A. Kidera. 2005. Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:078102.
27. Atilgan, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2009. Perturbation-response scanning reveals ligand entry-exit mechanisms of ferric binding protein. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000544.
28. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, P. E. Bourne. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
29. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2001. Elucidating the structural mechanisms for biological activity of the chemokine family. Proteins. 43:150-160.
30. Benavraham, D. 1993. Vibrational normal-mode spectrum of globular proteins. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 47:14559-14560.
31. Atilgan, A. R., P. Akan, and C. Baysal. 2004. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 86:85-91.
32. Tehver, R., J. Chen, and D. Thirumalai. 2009. Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 387:390-406.
33. Tehver, R., and D. Thirumalai. 2008. Kinetic model for the coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and substrate protein folding and aggregation. J. Mol. Biol. 377:1279-1295.
34. Betancourt, M. R., and D. Thirumalai. 1999. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci. 8:361-369.
35. Klein, G., and C. Georgopoulos. 2001. Identification of important amino acid residues that modulate binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to its various cochaperones. Genetics. 158:507-517.
36. Brocchieri, L., and S. Karlin. 2000. Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution. Protein Sci. 9:476-486.
37. Hogenhout, S. A., F. van der Wilk, J. F. van den Heuvel. 2000. Identifying the determinants in the equatorial domain of Buchnera GroEL implicated in binding Potato leafroll virus. J. Virol. 74:4541-4548.
38. Henzler-Wildman, K., and D. Kern. 2007. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature. 450:964-972.
39. Yan, H. G., T. Dahnke, M. D. Tsai. 1990. Mechanism of adenylate kinase. Critical evaluation of the x-ray model and assignment of the AMP site. Biochemistry. 29:10956-10964.
40. Henzler-Wildman, K. A., M. Lei, D. Kern. 2007. A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature. 450:913-916.
41. Henzler-Wildman, K. A., V. Thai, D. Kern. 2007. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature. 450:838-844.
42. Schrank, T. P., D.W. Bolen, and V. J. Hilser. 2009. Rational modulation of conformational fluctuations in adenylate kinase reveals a local unfolding mechanism for allostery and functional adaptation in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:16984-16989.