Dpath software reveals hierarchical haemato-endothelial lineages of Etv2 progenitors based on single-cell transcriptome analysis

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Gong, Wuming ^a   Rasmussen, Tara L ^a   Singh, Bhairab N ^a   Koyano Nakagawa, Naoko ^a   Pan, Wei ^b   Garry, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME; ER71 PROTEIN, MOUSE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALGORITHM; CANCER; GENETIC VARIATION; HEMATOLOGY; RNA; RODENT; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; ENDOTHELIAL LINEAGE; ENTROPY; FEMALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; STEM CELL; ANIMAL; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL SEPARATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYOID BODY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; MALE; METABOLISM; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

MUS MUSCULUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL SEPARATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EMBRYOID BODIES; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS; MALE; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85012069825     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14362     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Schmeisser, A. & Strasser, R. H. Phenotypic overlap between hematopoietic cells with suggested angioblastic potential and vascular endothelial cells. J. Hematother. Stem Cell Res. 11, 69-79 (2002).
2. Shalaby, F. et al. A requirement for Flk1 in primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Cell 89, 981-990 (1997).
3. Shalaby, F. et al. Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature 376, 62-66 (1995).
4. Robb, L. et al. Absence of yolk sac hematopoiesis from mice with a targeted disruption of the scl gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7075-7079 (1995).
5. Shivdasani, R. A., Mayer, E. L. & Orkin, S. H. Absence of blood formation in mice lacking the T-cell leukaemia oncoprotein tal-1/SCL. Nature 373, 432-434 (1995).
6. Visvader, J. E., Fujiwara, Y. & Orkin, S. H. Unsuspected role for the T-cell leukemia protein SCL/tal-1 in vascular development. Genes Dev. 12, 473-479 (1998).
7. Stainier, D. Y., Weinstein, B. M., Detrich, H. W., Zon, L. I. & Fishman, M. C. Cloche, an early acting zebrafish gene, is required by both the endothelial and hematopoietic lineages. Development 121, 3141-3150 (1995).
8. Dumont, D. J. et al. Dominant-negative and targeted null mutations in the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase, tek, reveal a critical role in vasculogenesis of the embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 1897-1909 (1994).
9. Sato, T. N. et al. Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 376, 70-74 (1995).
10. Takakura, N. et al. Critical role of the TIE2 endothelial cell receptor in the development of definitive hematopoiesis. Immunity 9, 677-686 (1998).
11. De Val, S. et al. Combinatorial regulation of endothelial gene expression by ets and forkhead transcription factors. Cell 135, 1053-1064 (2008).
12. Ferdous, A. et al. Nkx2-5 transactivates the Ets-related protein 71 gene and specifies an endothelial/endocardial fate in the developing embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 814-819 (2009).
13. Lee, D. et al. ER71 acts downstream of BMP, Notch, and Wnt signaling in blood and vessel progenitor specification. Cell Stem Cell 2, 497-507 (2008).
14. Rasmussen, T. L. et al. ER71 directs mesodermal fate decisions during embryogenesis. Development 138, 4801-4812 (2011).
15. Palencia-Desai, S. et al. Vascular endothelial and endocardial progenitors differentiate as cardiomyocytes in the absence of Etsrp/Etv2 function. Development 138, 4721-4732 (2011).
16. Koyano-Nakagawa, N. et al. Etv2 is expressed in the yolk sac hematopoietic and endothelial progenitors and regulates lmo2 gene expression. Stem Cells 30, 1611-1623 (2012).
17. Scialdone, A. et al. Resolving early mesoderm diversification through single-cell expression profiling. Nature 35, 289-293 (2016).
18. Li, G. et al. Transcriptomic profiling maps anatomically patterned subpopulations among single embryonic cardiac cells. Dev. Cell 39, 491-507 (2016).
19. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371-375 (2014).
20. Usoskin, D. et al. Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 145-153 (2014).
21. Ohnishi, Y. et al. Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 27-37 (2014).
22. Tang, F. et al. Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis. Cell Stem Cell 6, 468-478 (2010).
23. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381-386 (2014).
24. Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L. & Scadden, D. T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 11, 740-742 (2014).
25. Grün, D., Kester, L. & van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637-640 (2014).
26. Grün, D. et al. De novo prediction of stem cell identity using single-cell transcriptome data. Cell Stem Cell 19, 266-277 (2016).
27. Setty, M. et al. Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 637-645 (2016).
28. Chen, J., Schlitzer, A., Chakarov, S., Ginhoux, F. & Poidinger, M. Mpath maps multi-branching single-cell trajectories revealing progenitor cell progression during development. Nat. Commun. 7, 11988 (2016).
29. Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788-791 (1999).
30. Van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 85 (2008).
31. Brunet, J.-P., Tamayo, P., Golub, T. R. & Mesirov, J. P. Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4164-4169 (2004).
32. Heikinheimo, M., Scandrett, J. M. & Wilson, D. B. Localization of transcription factor GATA-4 to regions of the mouse embryo involved in cardiac development. Dev. Biol. 164, 361-373 (1994).
33. Lou, X., Deshwar, A. R., Crump, J. G. & Scott, I. C. Smarcd3b and Gata5 promote a cardiac progenitor fate in the zebrafish embryo. Development 138, 3113-3123 (2011).
34. Barnes, R. M., Firulli, B. A., Conway, S. J., Vincentz, J. W. & Firulli, A. B. Analysis of the Hand1 cell lineage reveals novel contributions to cardiovascular, neural crest, extra-embryonic, and lateral mesoderm derivatives. Dev. Dyn. 239, 3086-3097 (2010).
35. Kataoka, H. et al. Expressions of PDGF receptor alpha, c-Kit and Flk1 genes clustering in mouse chromosome 5 define distinct subsets of nascent mesodermal cells. Dev. Growth Differ. 39, 729-740 (1997).
36. Bondue, A. et al. Defining the earliest step of cardiovascular progenitor specification during embryonic stem cell differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 192, 751-765 (2011).
37. DeVeale, B. et al. Oct4 is required ∼E7.5 for proliferation in the primitive streak. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003957 (2013).
38. Hart, A. H., Hartley, L., Ibrahim, M. & Robb, L. Identification, cloning and expression analysis of the pluripotency promoting Nanog genes in mouse and human. Dev. Dyn. 230, 187-198 (2004).
39. Pierson, E. & Yau, C. ZIFA: dimensionality reduction for zero-inflated singlecell gene expression analysis. Genome Biol. 16, 241 (2015).
40. Haghverdi, L., Buettner, F. & Theis, F. J. Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics 31, 2989-2998 (2015).
41. Heinäniemi, M. et al. Gene-pair expression signatures reveal lineage control. Nat. Methods 10, 577-583 (2013).
42. MacArthur, B. D. & Lemischka, I. R. Statistical mechanics of pluripotency. Cell 154, 484-489 (2013).
43. Kim, D. H. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic changes in lncRNA expression during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 16, 88-101 (2015).
44. Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps (Springer, 2001).
45. Waddington, C. H. The Strategy of the Genes 20 (2015).
46. Kageyama, S.-I., Liu, H., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. The role of ETS transcription factors in transcription and development of mouse preimplantation embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 344, 675-679 (2006).
47. Narumiya, H. et al. Endocardiogenesis in embryoid bodies: novel markers identified by gene expression profiling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 357, 896-902 (2007).
48. Misfeldt, A. M. et al. Endocardial cells are a distinct endothelial lineage derived from Flk1+ multipotent cardiovascular progenitors. Dev. Biol. 333, 78-89 (2009).
49. von Gise, A. & Pu, W. T. Endocardial and epicardial epithelial to mesenchymal transitions in heart development and disease. Circ. Res. 110, 1628-1645 (2012).
50. Tanaka, Y. et al. Circulation-independent differentiation pathway from extraembryonic mesoderm toward hematopoietic stem cells via hemogenic angioblasts. Cell Rep. 8, 31-39 (2014).
51. Singh, B. N. et al. Hedgehog signaling during appendage development and regeneration. Genes (Basel) 6, 417-435 (2015).
52. Kim, P. G. et al. Signaling axis involving Hedgehog, Notch, and Scl promotes the embryonic endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E141-E150 (2013).
53. Dyer, M. A., Farrington, S. M., Mohn, D., Munday, J. R. & Baron, M. H. Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development 128, 1717-1730 (2001).
54. Hochman, E., Kinston, S., Harmelin, A., Göttgens, B. & Izraeli, S. The SCL 3′ enhancer responds to Hedgehog signaling during hemangioblast specification. Exp. Hematol. 34, 1643-1650 (2006).
55. Pierre, M., Yoshimoto, M., Huang, L., Richardson, M. & Yoder, M. C. VEGF and IHH rescue definitive hematopoiesis in Gata-4 and Gata-6-deficient murine embryoid bodies. Exp. Hematol. 37, 1038-1053 (2009).
56. Li, Y. & Patra, J. C. Genome-wide inferring gene-phenotype relationship by walking on the heterogeneous network. Bioinformatics 26, 1219-1224 (2010).
57. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545-15550 (2005).
58. Liu, F. et al. Induction of hematopoietic and endothelial cell program orchestrated by ETS transcription factor ER71/ETV2. EMBO Rep. 16, 654-669 (2015).
59. Banerji, C. R. S. et al. Cellular network entropy as the energy potential in Waddington's differentiation landscape. Sci. Rep. 3, 3039 (2013).
60. Downs, K. M. & Davies, T. Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118, 1255-1266 (1993).
61. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNAseq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562-578 (2012).
62. Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 1093-1095 (2013).
63. Zeisel, A. et al. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138-1142 (2015).
64. Wang, G., Kossenkov, A. V. & Ochs, M. F. LS-NMF: a modified non-negative matrix factorization algorithm utilizing uncertainty estimates. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 175 (2006).
65. Boutsidis, C. & Gallopoulos, E. SVD based initialization: a head start for nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recogn. 41, 1350-1362 (2008).
66. Wehrens, R. & Buydens, L. M. C. Self- and super-organizing maps in R: the Kohonen package. J. Stat. Softw. 21, 1-19 (2007).
67. Tong, H. H.., Faloutsos, C. & Pan, J. Y. Random walk with restart: fast solutions and applications. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14, 327-346 (2008).
68. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R. & Winograd, T. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ((Stanford InfoLab Publication Server, 1999).
69. Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Interjournal, Complex Systems 1695, 1-9 (2006).