Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-37

  Ohnishi, Yusuke ^a   Huber, Wolfgang ^a   Tsumura, Akiko ^b   Kang, Minjung ^c   Xenopoulos, Panagiotis ^c   Kurimoto, Kazuki ^d,e   Oleå, Andrzej K ^a   Araúzo Bravo, Marcos J ^f   Saitou, Mitinori ^b,d,e,g   Hadjantonakis, Anna Katerina ^c   Hiiragi, Takashi ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^f MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOMEDICINE   (Germany)

^g KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 6;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; ENDODERM; GENE EXPRESSION; INNER CELL MASS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84891346362     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2881     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Rossant, J., Tam, P. P. Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse. Development 136, 701-713 (2009).
2. Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., Rossant, J. Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev. Cell 10, 615-624 (2006).
3. Plusa, B., Piliszek, A., Frankenberg, S., Artus, J., Hadjantonakis, A. K. Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135, 3081-3091 (2008).
4. Schrode, N. et al. Anatomy of a blastocyst: cell behaviors driving cell fate choice and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo. Genesis 51, 219-233 (2013).
5. Grabarek, J. B. et al. Differential plasticity of epiblast and primitive endoderm precursors within the ICM of the early mouse embryo. Development 139, 129-139 (2012).
6. Lanner, F., Rossant, J. The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development 137, 3351-3360 (2010).
7. Yamanaka, Y., Lanner, F., Rossant, J. FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst. Development 137, 715-724 (2010).
8. Arman, E., Haffner-Krausz, R., Chen, Y., Heath, J. K. Lonai, P. Targeted disruption of-broblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrulation mammalian development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5082-5087 (1998).
9. Nichols, J., Silva, J., Roode, M., Smith, A. Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development 136, 3215-3222 (2009).
10. Cheng, A. M. et al. Mammalian Grb2 regulates multiple steps in embryonic development and malignant transformation. Cell 95, 793-803 (1998).
11. Feldman, B., Poueymirou, W., Papaioannou, V. E., DeChiara, T. M. Goldfarb, M. Requirement of FGF-4 for postimplantation mouse development. Science 267, 246-249 (1995).
12. Wilder, P. J. et al. Inactivation of the FGF-4 gene in embryonic stem cells alters the growth and/or the survival of their early differentiated progeny. Dev. Biol. 192, 614-629 (1997).
13. Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., Hadjantonakis, A. K. FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse. Development 140, 267-279 (2013).
14. Chisholm, J. C. Houliston, E. Cytokeratin-lament assembly in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Development 101, 565-582 (1987).
15. Morris, S. A. et al. Origin and formation of the-rst two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6364-6369 (2010).
16. Guo, G. et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell 18, 675-685 (2010).
17. Kurimoto, K. et al. An improved single-cell cDNA ampli-cation method for ef-cient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e42 (2006).
18. Kurimoto, K., Yabuta, Y., Ohinata, Y., Saitou, M. Global single-cell cDNA ampli-cation to provide a template for representative high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nat. Protocols 2, 739-752 (2007).
19. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377-382 (2009).
20. Tang, F. et al. RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell. Nat. Protocols 5, 516-535 (2010).
21. Pelkmans, L. Cell Biology. Using cell-to-cell variability-a new era in molecular biology. Science 336, 425-426 (2012).
22. Eldar, A., Elowitz, M. B. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467, 167-173 (2010).
23. Hu, M. et al. Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. Genes Dev. 11, 774-785 (1997).
24. Pina, C. et al. Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 287-294 (2012).
25. Moignard, V. et al. Characterization of transcriptional networks in blood stem and progenitor cells using high-throughput single-cell gene expression analysis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 544 (2013).
26. Buganim, Y. et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 150, 1209-1222 (2012).
27. Frankenberg, S. et al. Primitive endoderm differentiates via a three-step mechanism involving Nanog and RTK signaling. Dev. Cell 21, 1005-1013 (2011).
28. Solter, D., Knowles, B.B. Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 5099-5102 (1975).
29. Gerbe, F., Cox, B., Rossant, J., Chazaud, C. Dynamic expression of Lrp2 pathway members reveals progressive epithelial differentiation of primitive endoderm in mouse blastocyst. Dev. Biol. 313, 594-602 (2008).
30. Artus, J., Piliszek, A., Hadjantonakis, A. K. The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. Dev. Biol. 350, 393-404 (2011).
31. Widmer, C. et al. Molecular basis for the action of the collagen-speci-c chaperone Hsp47/SERPINH1 and its structure-speci-c client recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13243-13247 (2012).
32. Tarkowski, A. K. Wroblewska, J. Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4-and 8-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 18, 155-180 (1967).
33. Silva, J., Smith, A. Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132, 532-536 (2008).
34. Wennekamp, S., Mesecke, S., Nedelec, F., Hiiragi, T. A self-organization framework for symmetry breaking in the mammalian embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 454-461 (2013).
35. Dietrich, J. E. Hiiragi, T. Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. Development 134, 4219-4231 (2007).
36. Xiong, F. et al. Speci-ed neural progenitors sort to form sharp domains after noisy shh signaling. Cell 153, 550-561 (2013).
37. Kay, R. R. Thompson, C. R. Forming patterns in development without morphogen gradients: scattered differentiation and sorting out. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a001503 (2009).
38. Ohnishi, Y. et al. Small RNA class transition from siRNA/piRNA to miRNA during pre-implantation mouse development. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5141-5151 (2010).
39. Irizarry, R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249-264 (2003).
40. Kauffmann, A., Gentleman, R., Huber, W. arrayQualityMetrics-a bioconductor package for quality assessment of microarray data. Bioinformatics 25, 415-416 (2009).
41. Hornik, K. A CLUE for CLUster Ensembles. J. Statist. Software 14 (2005).