Using computer simulations to assess sampling effects on spatial genetic structure in forest tree species

New Forests

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 225-243

  Rico, Yessica ^a  

^a Jalisco   (Mexico)

Author keywords

CDPOP; Cluster sampling; Isolation by distance; Microsatellites; Random sampling; Sample size; Systematic sampling

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DNA SEQUENCES; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SAMPLING;

CDPOP; CLUSTER SAMPLING; ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; MICROSATELLITES; RANDOM SAMPLING; SAMPLE SIZES; SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING;

FORESTRY;

ANIMAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; ISOLATED POPULATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; SAMPLING BIAS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TREE;

COMPUTATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENETIC ENGINEERING; RESTORATION; SAMPLING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 85011586022     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: 15735095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-017-9571-y     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abeysinghe PD, Triest L, Greef BD et al (2000) Genetic and geographic variation of the mangrove tree Bruguiera in Sri Lanka. Aquat Bot 67:131–141. doi:10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00096-0
2. Ahmed S, Compton SG, Butlin RK, Gilmartin PM (2009) Wind-borne insects mediate directional pollen transfer between desert fig trees 160 kilometers apart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20342–20347. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902213106
3. Alberto FJ, Aitken SN, Alía R et al (2013) Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change—evidence from tree populations. Glob Change Biol 19:1645–1661. doi:10.1111/gcb.12181
4. Anderson CD, Epperson BK, Fortin MJ et al (2010) Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow. Mol Ecol 19:3565–3575. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04757.x
5. Arroyo JM, Rigueiro C, Rodríguez R et al (2010) Isolation and characterization of 20 microsatellite loci for laurel species (Laurus, Lauraceae). Am J Bot 97:e26–e30. doi:10.3732/ajb.1000069
6. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS et al (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003376
7. Bankenhol N, Fortin MJ (2016) Basics of study design: sampling landscape heterogeneity and genetic variation for landscape genetic studies. In: Bankenhol N, Cushman S, Storfer A, Waits L (eds) Landscape genetics: concepts, methods, applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 58–76. doi:10.1002/9781118525258.ch05
8. Bonfil-Sanders C, Cajero-Lázaro I, Evans RY (2008) Germinación de semillas de seis especies de Bursera del centro de México. Agrociencia 42:827–834
9. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457
10. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ et al (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol Appl 1:587–597. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x
11. Caetano S, Silveira P, Spichiger R, Naciri-Graven Y (2005) Identification of microsatellite markers in a neotropical seasonally dry forest tree, Astronium urundeuva (Anacardiaceae). Mol Ecol Notes 5:21–23. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00814.x
12. Calderón de Rzedowski G, Germán MT (1993) Meliaceae. Flora del Bajío y de Regiones Adyacentes 11:1–5
13. Cantarello E, Newton AC, Hill RA et al (2011) Simulating the potential for ecological restoration of dryland forests in Mexico under different disturbance regimes. Ecol Model 222:1112–1128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.12.019
14. Carrillo-Ángeles IG, Mandujano MC (2011) Patrones de distribución espacial en plantas clonales. Bol Soc Bot Mex 89:1–18
15. de Campos Telles MP, Dobrovolski R, da Silva e Souza K et al (2014) Disentangling landscape effects on population genetic structure of a neotropical savanna tree. Nat Conserv 12:65–70. doi:10.4322/natcon.2014.012
16. Dubreuil M, Riba M, González-Martínez SC et al (2010) Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability. Am J Bot 97:303–310. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900148
17. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q et al (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6:e19379. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
18. Encino-Ruiz L, Lindig-Cisneros R, Gómez-Romero M (2014) Desempeño de tres especies arbóreas del bosque tropical caducifolio en un ensayo de restauración ecológica. Bot Sci 91:107–114. doi:10.17129/botsci.406
19. Ennos RA (2001) Inferences about spatial processes in plant populations from the analysis of molecular markers. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J (eds) Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 45–57
20. Epperson BK (2007) Plant dispersal, neighbourhood size and isolation by distance. Mol Ecol 16:3854–3865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03434.x
21. Frankham R (2010) Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biol Conserv 143:1919–1927. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.011
22. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilaritybased analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19
23. Guillot G, Rousset F (2013) Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods Ecol Evol 4:336–344. doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12018
24. Hall LA, Beissinger SR (2014) A practical toolbox for design and analysis of landscape genetics studies. Landsc Ecol 29:1487–1504. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0082-3
25. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x
26. He J, Chen L, Si Y et al (2009) Population structure and genetic diversity distribution in wild and cultivated populations of the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Magnolia officinalis subsp. biloba (Magnoliaceae). Genetica 135:233–243. doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9272-8
27. Hernández G, Buonamici A, Walker K et al (2008) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Cedrela odorata L. (Meliaceae), a high value neotropical tree. Conserv Genet 9:457–459. doi:10.1007/s10592-007-9334-y
28. Hoban S (2014) An overview of the utility of population simulation software in molecular ecology. Mol Ecol 23:2383–2401. doi:10.1111/mec.12741
29. Hoban S, Schlarbaum S (2014) Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure. Biol Conserv 177:90–99. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.014
30. Hoban S, Strand A (2015) Ex situ seed collections will benefit from considering spatial sampling design and species’ reproductive biology. Biol Conserv 187:182–191. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.023
31. Hoban S, Gaggiotti O, Bertorelle G (2013) Sample planning optimization tool for conservation and population genetics (SPOTG): a software for choosing the appropriate number of markers and samples. Methods Ecol Evol 4:299–303. doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12025
32. Jenkins DG, Carey M, Czerniewska J et al (2010) A meta-analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics? Ecography. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06285.x
33. Kalisz S, Nason JD, Hanzawa FM, Tonsor SJ (2001) Spatial population genetic structure in Trillium grandiflorum: the roles of dispersal, mating, history, and selection. Evolution 55:1560–1568. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00675.x
34. Keller D, Holderegger R, Van Strien MJ (2013) Spatial scale affects landscape genetic analysis of a wetland grasshopper. Mol Ecol 22:2467–2482. doi:10.1111/mec.12265
35. Kenfack D, Dick CW (2009) Isolation and characterization of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Tetragastris panamensis (Burseraceae), a widespread Neotropical forest tree. Conserv Genet Resour 1:385–387. doi:10.1007/s12686-009-9089-5
36. Koen EL, Bowman J, Garroway CJ, Wilson PJ (2013) The Sensitivity of genetic connectivity measures to unsampled and under-sampled sites. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056204
37. Kossinets G (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc Netw 28(3):247–268
38. Landguth EL, Balkenhol N (2012) Relative sensitivity of neutral versus adaptive genetic data for assessing population differentiation. Conserv Genet 13:1421–1426. doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0354-x
39. Landguth EL, Cushman SA (2010) Cdpop: a spatially explicit cost distance population genetics program. Mol Ecol Resour 10:156–161. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02719.x
40. Landguth EL, Schwartz MK (2014) Evaluating sample allocation and effort in detecting population differentiation for discrete and continuously distributed individuals. Conserv Genet 15:981–992. doi:10.1007/s10592-014-0593-0
41. Landguth EL, Fedy BC, Oyler-McCance SJ et al (2012) Effects of sample size, number of markers, and allelic richness on the detection of spatial genetic pattern. Mol Ecol Resour 12:276–284. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03077.x
42. Landguth EL, Bearlin A, Day CC, Dunham J (2016) CDMetaPOP: an individual-based, eco-evolutionary model for spatially-explicit simulation of landscape demogenetics. Methods Ecol Evol. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12608
43. Latch EK, Rhodes OE (2006) Evidence for bias in estimates of local genetic structure due to sampling scheme. Anim Conserv 9:308–315. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00037.x
44. Luximon N, Petit EJ, Broquet T (2014) Performance of individual vs. group sampling for inferring dispersal under isolation-by-distance. Mol Ecol Resour 14:745–752. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12224
45. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
46. McCauley DE (1997) The relative contributions of seed and pollen movement to the local genetic structure of Silene alba. J Hered 88:257–263. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023103
47. Meirmans PG (2012) The trouble with isolation by distance. Mol Ecol 21:2839–2846. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05578.x
48. Nathan R, Katul GG, Horn HS et al (2002) Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature 418:409–413. doi:10.1038/nature00844
49. Naujokaitis-Lewis IR, Rico Y, Lovell J et al (2013) Implications of incomplete networks on estimation of landscape genetic connectivity. Conserv Genet 14:287–298
50. Oyler-McCance SJ, Kahn NW, Burnham KP et al (1999) A population genetic comparison of large- and small-bodied sage grouse in Colorado using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8:1457–1465. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00716.x
51. Oyler-McCance SJ, Fedy BC, Landguth EL (2013) Sample design effects in landscape genetics. Conserv Genet 14:275–285. doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0415-1
52. Peterman W, Brocato ER, Semlitsch RD, Eggert LS (2016) Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages. PeerJ 4:e1813. doi:10.7717/peerj.1813
53. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S et al (2005) Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol 14:689–701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02410.x
54. Prunier JG, Kaufmann B, Fenet S et al (2013) Optimizing the trade-off between spatial and genetic sampling efforts in patchy populations: towards a better assessment of functional connectivity using an individual-based sampling scheme. Mol Ecol 22:5516–5530. doi:10.1111/mec.12499
55. Rebaudo F, Le Rouzic A, Dupas S et al (2013) SimAdapt: an individual-based genetic model for simulating landscape management impacts on populations. Methods Ecol Evol 4:595–600. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12041
56. Rico Y, Lorenzo C, González-Cózatl FX, Espinoza E (2008) Phylogeography and population structure of the endangered Tehuantepec jackrabbit Lepus flavigularis: implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 9:1467–1477
57. Rzedowski J, Guevara-Féfer F (1992) Burseraceae. Flora del Bajío y de regiones adyacentes 3:46
58. Rzedowski J, Zamudio S, Calderón G, Paizanni A (2014) El bosque tropical caducifolio en la cuenca lacustre de Pátzcuaro. Michoacán, México
59. Sánchez-Martínez E, Hérnandez-Oria JG, Hernández-Martínez MM, Maruri-Aguilar B, Torres-Galeana LE, Chávez-Martínez R (2011) Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Querétaro, Querétaro, México
60. Sato H, Adenyo C, Harata T et al (2014) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the large-seeded Tree Protorhus deflexa (Anacardiaceae). Appl Plant Sci 2:1300046. doi:10.3732/apps.1300046
61. Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merilä J (2013) Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 14:807–820. doi:10.1038/nrg3522
62. Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conserv Genet 10:441–452. doi:10.1007/s10592-008-9622-1
63. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon Inc, Boston
64. R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
65. Tucker JM, Schwartz MK, Truex RL et al (2014) Sampling affects the detection of genetic subdivision and conservation implications for fisher in the Sierra Nevada. Conserv Genet 15:123–136. doi:10.1007/s10592-013-0525-4
66. van Strien MJ, Holderegger R, Van Heck HJ (2014) Isolation-by-distance in landscapes: considerations for landscape genetics. Heredity 114:27–37. doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.62
67. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13:921–935. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02076.x
68. Wagner HH, Fortin MJ (2016) Basics of spatial data analysis: linking landscape and genetic data for landscape genetic studies. In: Bankenhol N, Cushman S, Storfer A, Waits L (eds) Landscape genetics: concepts, methods, applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 77–100. doi:10.1002/9781118525258.ch05
69. Wang Z-F, Lian J-Y, Ye W-H et al (2016) Pollen and seed flow under different predominant winds in wind-pollinated and wind-dispersed species Engelhardia roxburghiana. Tree Genet Genomes 12:19. doi:10.1007/s11295-016-0973-3
70. Zeller KA, Creech TG, Millette KL et al (2016) Using simulations to evaluate Mantel-based methods for assessing landscape resistance to gene flow. Ecol Evol. doi:10.1002/ece3.2154
71. Zhao R, Xia H, Lu BR (2009) Fine-scale genetic structure enhances biparental inbreeding by promoting mating events between more related individuals in wild soybean (Glycine soja; Fabaceae) populations. Am J Bot 96:1138–1147. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800173