Erratum to: Implications of incomplete networks on estimation of landscape genetic connectivity (Conserv Genet, 10.1007/s10592-012-0385-3);Implications of incomplete networks on estimation of landscape genetic connectivity

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 287-298

  Naujokaitis Lewis, Ilona R ^a   Rico, Yessica ^a   Lovell, John ^b   Fortin, Marie Josée ^a   Murphy, Melanie A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Landscape genetics; Network indices; Network theory; Sampling issue; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BREEDING SITE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FROG; GENE FLOW; GRAPHICAL METHOD; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; NETWORK ANALYSIS; POND; SAMPLING; TOPOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BIGHORN CRAGS; IDAHO; UNITED STATES;

ANURA; RANA LUTEIVENTRIS;

EID: 84875719365     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0430-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Anderson BS, Butts C, Carley K (1999) The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices. Soc Netw 21(3): 239-267.
2. Anderson CD, Epperson BK, Fortin MJ, Holderegger R, James PMA, Rosenberg MS, Scribner KT, Spear S (2010) Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow. Mol Ecol 19(17): 3565-3575.
3. Bowcock AM, Ruizlinares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavallisforza LL (1994) High-resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368(6470): 455-457.
4. Brassel KE, Reif D (1979) A procedure to generate Thiessen polygons. Geogr Anal 325: 31-36.
5. Clauset A, Moore C, Newman MEJ (2008) Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453(7191): 98-101.
6. Conover WJ, Johnson ME, Johnson MM (1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics 23: 351-361.
7. Costenbader E, Valente TW (2003) The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc Netw 25(4): 283-307.
8. Dale MRT, Fortin MJ (2010) From graphs to spatial graphs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41: 21-38.
9. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1: 269-271.
10. Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecol Lett 5(4): 558-567.
11. Dyer RJ, Nason JD (2004) Population graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Mol Ecol 13: 1713-1727.
12. Evans I (1972) In: Chorley RJ (ed) Spatial analysis in geomorphology. Harper & Row, New York, pp 17-90.
13. Fedor A, Vasas V (2009) The robustness of keystone indices in food webs. J Theor Biol 260(3): 372-378.
14. Fogelqvist J, Niittyvuopio A (2010) Cryptic population genetic structure: the number of inferred clusters depends on sample size. Mol Ecol Resour 10(2): 314-323.
15. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Fortuna MA, Albaladejo RG, Fernandez L, Aparicio A, Bascompte J (2009) Networks of spatial genetic variation across species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(45): 19044-19049.
17. Freeman LC (1977) Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1): 35-41.
18. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks 1: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3): 215-239.
19. Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, Maxell BA, Pilliod DS, Amish S, Allendorf FW (2005) Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol Ecol 14(2): 483-496.
20. Gabriel KR, Sokal RR (1969) A new statistical approach to geographic variation analysis. Syst Zool 18(3): 259-278.
21. Garroway CJ, Bowman J, Carr D, Wilson PJ (2008) Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics. Evol Appl 1: 620-630.
22. Griffith D, Amrhein C (1997) Multivariate statistical analysis for geographers. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
23. Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2006) A brief guide to landscape genetics. Landsc Ecol 21(6): 793-796.
24. Koen EL, Bowman J, Garroway CJ, Mills SC, Wilson PJ (2012) Landscape resistance and American marten gene flow. Landsc Ecol 27: 29-43.
25. Kossinets G (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc Netw 28(3): 247-268.
26. Laita A, Monkkonen M, Kotiaho JS (2010) Woodland key habitats evaluated as part of a functional reserve network. Biol Conserv 143(5): 1212-1227.
27. Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D (2002) The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25(5): 601-615.
28. Mantel N (1967) Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27(2P1): 209-220.
29. Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22(2): 297-307.
30. Murphy M, Evans J, Cushman S, Storfer A (2008) Evaluation of a novel approach for representing "populations" as continuous surfaces in landscape genetics. Ecography 31: 685-697.
31. Murphy MA, Dezzani R, Pilliod DS, Storfer A (2010a) Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol Ecol 19(17): 3634-3649.
32. Murphy MA, Evans JS, Storfer A (2010b) Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91(1): 252-261.
33. Pilliod DS, Peterson CR (2001) Local and landscape effects of introduced trout on amphibians in historically fishless watersheds. Ecosystems 4: 322-333.
34. Pilliod DS, Peterson CR, Ritson PI (2002) Seasonal migration of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) among complementary resources in a high mountain basin. Can J Zool 80: 1849-1862.
35. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
36. Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92: 847-858.
37. Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12(2): 618-628.
38. Rehfeldt GE (2006) A spline model of climate for the Western United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-165. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
39. Rozenfeld AF, Arnaud-Haond S, Hernandez-Garcia E, Eguiluz VM, Serrao EA, Duarte CM (2008) Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(48): 18824-18829.
40. Sole RV, Montoya JM (2001) Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268(1480): 2039-2045.
41. Spear S, Balkenhol N, Fortin MJ, McRae BH, Scribner KT (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19: 3576-3591.
42. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP (2007) Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 98(3): 128-142.
43. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.
44. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68(3): 571-573.
45. van Oppen MJ, Peplow LM, Kininmonth S, Berkelmans R (2011) Historical and contemporary factors shape the population genetic structure of the broadcast spawning coral, Acropora millepora, on the Great Barrier Reef. Mol Ecol 20: 4899-4914.