Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: The effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages

PeerJ

Volumn 2016, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Peterman, William ^a,b   Brocato, Emily R ^b   Semlitsch, Raymond D ^b   Eggert, Lori S ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambystoma; Amphibian; Complex life cycle; Genetic sampling; Landscape genetics; Microsatellite; Mixing tissue samples; Population genetics; Salamander; Sibship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBYSTOMA; CALCULATION; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EMBRYO; GENETIC ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LANDSCAPE; LARVA; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; POND; SAMPLING; SIBLING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84963935734     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1813     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allendorf FW, Phelps SR. 1981. Use of allelic frequencies to describe population structure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1507-1514 DOI 10.1139/f81-203.
2. Anderson EC, Dunham KK. 2008. The influence of family groups on inferences made with the program Structure. Molecular Ecology Resources 8:1219-1229 DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02355.x.
3. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T. 2004. Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations. Molecular Ecology 13:3021-3031 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318.x.
4. Beebee TJC, Rowe G. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad Bufo calamita Lau-renti populations: consequences of dispersal from a Pleistocene refugium. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69:367-381 DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01211.x.
5. Berven KA. 1990. Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599-1608 DOI 10.2307/1938295.
6. Clarke RT, Rothery P, Raybould AF. 2002. Confidence limits for regression relationships between distance matrices: estimating gene flow with distance. Journal of Agricul-tural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 7:361-372 DOI 10.1198/108571102320.
7. Dahlberg MD. 1979. A review of survival rates of fish eggs and larvae in relation to impact assessments. Marine Fisheries Review 41:1-12.
8. Ficetola GF, Garner TWJ, Wang J, De Bernardi F. 2011. Rapid selection against inbreeding in a wild population of a rare frog. Evolutionary Applications 4:30-38 DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00130.x.
9. Frankham R. 1996. Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology 10:1500-1508 DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061500.x.
10. Goldberg CS, Waits LP. 2010. Quantification and reduction of bias from sampling larvae to infer population and landscape genetic structure. Molecular Ecology Resources 10:304-313 DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02755.x.
11. Goslee SC, Urban DL. 2007. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. Journal of Statistical Software 22:1-19.
12. Goudet J. 2013. hierfstat: estimation and tests of hierarchical F-statistics. R package version 0.04-10. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hierfstat.
13. Guillot G, Rousset F. 2013. Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:336-344 DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12018.
14. Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE. 2012. Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS ONE 7:e45170 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045170.
15. Hansen MM, Nielsen EE, Mensberg KLD. 1997. The problem of sampling families rather than populations: relatedness among individuals in samples of juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta L. Molecular Ecology 6:469-474 DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.t01-1-00202.x.
16. Harrison XA, Bearhop S, Inger R, Colhoun K, Gudmundsson GA, Hodgson D, McElwaine G, Tregenza TOM. 2011. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in a migratory bird: an analysis of inbreeding and single-locus effects. Molecular Ecology 20:4786-4795 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05283.x.
17. Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek L-AC. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. In: Foster MS, ed. Biological diversity handbook series. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 364.
18. Hocking DJ, Rittenhouse TAG, Rothermel BB, Johnson BR, Conner CA, Harper EB, Semlitsch RD. 2008. Breeding and recruitment phenology of amphib-ians in Missouri oak-hickory forests. American Midland Naturalist 160:41-60 DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160[41:BARPOA]2.0.CO;2.
19. Holzhauer SIJ, Ekschmitt K, Sander AC, Dauber J, Wolters V. 2006. Effect of historic landscape change on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli. Landscape Ecology 21:891-899 DOI 10.1007/s10980-005-0438-9.
20. Jombart T, Ahmed I. 2011. adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070-3071 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521.
21. Kiritani K, Nakasuji F. 1967. Estimation of the stage-specific survival rate in the insect population with overlapping stages. Researches on Population Ecology 9:143-152 DOI 10.1007/BF02514921.
22. Lee-Yaw JA, Davidson A, McRae BH, Green DM. 2009. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Molecular Ecology 18:1863-1874 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04152.x.
23. Lee-Yaw JA, Irwin JT, Green DM. 2008. Postglacial range expansion from north-ern refugia by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Molecular Ecology 17:867-884 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03611.x.
24. Legendre P, Anderson MJ. 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multi-species responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological Monographs 69:1-24 DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2.
25. Legendre P, Fortin M-J, Borcard D. 2015. Should the Mantel test be used in spatial anal-ysis? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:1239-1247 DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12425.
26. Legendre P, Legendre L. 2012. Numerical ecology. 3rd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 990 pages.
27. Mullins ML, Pierce BA, Gutzwiller KJ. 2004. Assessment of quantitative enclosure sam-pling of larval amphibians. Journal of Herpetology 38:166-172 DOI 10.1670/67-03A.
28. Munwes I, Geffen E, Roll U, Friedmann A, Daya A, Tikochinski Y, Gafny S. 2010. The change in genetic diversity down the core-edge gradient in the eastern spadefoot toad (Pelobates syriacus). Molecular Ecology 19:2675-2689 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04712.x.
29. Peterman WE, Brocato ER, Pauley LR, Stuart EC, Semlitsch RD, Eggert LS. 2013a. De-velopment and characterization of 18 microsatellite loci for the spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) using paired-end Illumina shotgun sequencing. Conserva-tion Genetics Resources 5:989-991 DOI 10.1007/s12686-013-9950-4.
30. Peterman WE, Connette GM, Spatola BN, Eggert LS, Semlitsch RD. 2012. Identifi-cation of polymorphic loci in Ambystoma annulatum and review of cross-species microsatellite use in the genus Ambystoma. Copeia 2012:570-577 DOI 10.1643/CH-11-001.
31. Peterman WE, Rittenhouse TAG, Earl JE, Semlitsch RD. 2013b. Demographic network and multi-season occupancy modeling of Rana sylvatica reveal spatial and temporal patterns of population connectivity and persistence. Landscape Ecology 28:1601-1613 DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9906-9.
32. Peterson CL, Wilkinson RF, Don M, Holder T. 1991. Premetamorphic survival of Ambystoma annulatum. Herpetologica 47:96-100.
33. Petranka JW. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
34. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www. R-project.org/.
35. Richardson JL. 2012. Divergent landscape effects on population connectivity in two co-occurring amphibian species. Molecular Ecology 21:4437-4451 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05708.x.
36. Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS. 2009. Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conservation Genetics 10:441-452 DOI 10.1007/s10592-008-9622-1.
37. Scillitani G, Belfiore C, Picariello O, Cataudo A. 1996. Estimating genetic variation from larvae and adults of mayflies: an electrophoretic analysis of three species of Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera). Italian Journal of Zoology 63:23-30 DOI 10.1080/11250009609356102.
38. Semlitsch RD, Anderson TL, Osbourn MS, Ousterhout BH. 2014. Structure and dynamics of ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) populations in Missouri. Herpetologica 70:14-22 DOI 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-13-00074.
39. Semlitsch RD, Todd BD, Blomquist SM, Calhoun AJK, Gibbons JW, Gibbs JP, Graeter GJ, Harper EB, Hocking DJ, Hunter ML, Patrick DA, Rittenhouse TAG, Rothermel BB. 2009. Effects of timber harvest on amphibian populations: understanding mechanisms from forest experiments. Bioscience 59:853-862 DOI 10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.7.
40. Shoop CR. 1974. Yearly variation in larval survival of Ambystoma maculatum. Ecology 55:440-444 DOI 10.2307/1935233.
41. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE, McEwan JC. 2004. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93:255-265 DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485.
42. Wang J. 2012. Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data. Genetics 191:183-194 DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.138149.