The Sensitivity of Genetic Connectivity Measures to Unsampled and Under-Sampled Sites

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Koen, Erin L ^a   Bowman, Jeff ^b   Garroway, Colin J ^c   Wilson, Paul J ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; THEORETICAL SAMPLE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GENE FLOW; MODELS, GENETIC; MUSTELIDAE; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84873671192     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056204     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R, (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15261-15264.
2. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P, (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol and Evol 18: 189-197.
3. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, et al. (2007) Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 98: 128-142.
4. Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, et al. (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13: 2841-2850.
5. Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, Squires JR, Inman RM, et al. (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90: 3222-3232.
6. Wasserman TN, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, Wallin DO, (2010) Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho. Landsc Ecol 25: 1601-1612.
7. Galpern P, Manseau M, Wilson P, (2012) Grains of connectivity: analysis at multiple spatial scales in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 21: 3996-4009.
8. Carr D, Bowman J, Kyle CJ, Tully SM, Koen EL, et al. (2007) Rapid homogenization of multiple sources: genetic structure of a recolonizing population of fishers. J Wildl Manage 71: 1853-1861.
9. Giordano AR, Ridenhour BJ, Storfer A, (2007) The influence of altitude and topography on genetic structure in the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactulym). Mol Ecol 16: 1625-1637.
10. Crawford LA, Desjardins S, Keyghobadi N, (2011) Fine-scale genetic structure of an endangered population of the Mormon metalmark butterfly (Apodemia mormo) revealed using AFLPs. Conserv Genet 12: 991-1001.
11. Hagerty BE, Nussear KE, Esque TC, Tracy CR, (2011) Making molehills out of mountains: landscape genetics of the Mojave desert tortoise. Landsc Ecol 26: 267-280.
12. Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conserv Genet 10: 441-452.
13. Beerli P, (2004) Effect of unsampled populations on the estimation of population sizes and migration rates between sampled populations. Mol Ecol 13: 827-836.
14. Landguth EL, Fedy BC, Oyler-McCance SJ, Gearey AL, Emel SL, et al. (2012) Effects of sample size, number of markers, and allelic richness on the detection of spatial genetic pattern. Mol Ecol Resour 12: 276-284.
15. Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE, (2012) Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS ONE 7: e45170.
16. Hokit DG, Ascunce M, Ernst J, Branch LC, Clark AM, (2010) Ecological metrics predict connectivity better than geographic distance. Conserv Genet 11: 149-159.
17. Lange R, Diekotter T, Schiffmann LA, Wolters V, Durka W, (2012) Martix quality and habitat configuration interactively determine functional connectivity in a widespread bush cricket at a small spatial scale. Landsc Ecol 27: 381-392.
18. Dyer RJ, Nason JD, Garrick RC, (2010) Landscape modelling of gene flow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks. Mol Ecol 19: 3746-3759.
19. Jost L, (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17: 4015-4026.
20. Dyer RJ, Nason JD, (2004) Population Graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Mol Ecol 13: 1713-1727.
21. Weir BS, Cockerham CC, (1984) Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
22. Dyer RJ (2012) Package 'gstudio' version 0.6. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gstudio/index.html Accessed 15 September 2012.
23. Rogers JS, (1972) Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics VI Univ. Texas Publ. No.7203: 145-153.
24. Robins G, Pattison P, Woolcock J, (2004) Missing data in networks: exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents. Soc Networks 26: 257-283.
25. Kossinets G, (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc Networks 28: 247-268.
26. Kim P-J, Jeong H, (2007) Reliability of rank order in sampled networks. Eur Phys J B 55: 109-114.
27. Frantz TL, Cataldo M, Carley KM, (2009) Robustness of centraility measures under uncertainty: examining the role of network topology. Comput Math Organ Th 15: 303-328.
28. Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Rico Y, Lovell J, Fortin M-J, Murphy MA, (2012) Implications of incomplete networks on estimation of landscape genetic connectivity. Conserv Genet DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0385-3.
29. Garroway CJ, Bowman J, Carr D, Wilson PJ, (2008) Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics. Evol Appl 1: 620-630.
30. Koen EL, Bowman J, Garroway CJ, Mills SC, Wilson PJ, (2012) Landscape resistance and American marten gene flow. Landsc Ecol 27: 29-43.
31. Carr D, Bowman J, Wilson PJ, (2007) Density-dependent dispersal suggests a genetic measure of habitat suitability. Oikos 116: 629-635.
32. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 15 September 2012.
33. Rousset F, (2008) GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106.
34. Crawford NG, (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 556-557.
35. Dyer RJ, (2009) GeneticStudio: a suite of programs for spatial analysis of genetic-marker data. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 110-113.
36. Jombart T, (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 1403-1405.
37. Chessel D, Dufour AB, Thioulouse J, (2004) The ade4 package I One-table methods. R News 4: 5-10.
38. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. 567p.
39. Maindonald JH, Braun WJ (2012) Data analysis and graphics using R, 2nd ed. Available: http://www.stats.uwo.ca/DAAG.Accessed 15 September 2012.
40. Moran MD, (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100: 403-405.
41. Mantel N, (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209-220.
42. Goslee SC, Urban DL, (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22: 1-19.
43. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, (2010) CDPOP: A spatially-explicit cost distance population genetics program. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 156-161.
44. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, Murphy M, McKelvey KS, Luikart G, (2010) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19: 4179-4191.
45. Oyler-McCance SJ, Fedy BC, Landguth EL, (2012) Sample design effects in landscape genetics. Conserv Genet DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0415-1.
46. Spear SF, Crisafulli CM, Storfer A, (2012) Genetic structure among coastal tailed frog populations at Mount St. Helens is moderated by post-disturbance management. Ecol Appl 22: 856-869.
47. Legendre P, Fortin M-J, (2010) Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 831-844.
48. Leng L, Zhang D, (2011) Measuring population differentiation using GST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions. Mol Ecol 20: 2494-2509.
49. Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW, (2011) Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 5-18.
50. Whitlock MC, (2011) GST and D do not replace FST. Mol Ecol 20: 1083-1091.
51. Slatkin M, (2005) Seeing ghosts: the effect of unsampled populations on migration rates estimated for sampled populations. Mol Ecol 14: 67-73.
52. Clauset A, Moore C, Newman MEJ, (2008) Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453: 98-101.
53. Guimera R, Sales-Pardo M, (2009) Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 22073-22078.
54. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.