Beyond the intellect: Complexity and learning trajectories in Raven's Progressive Matrices depend on self-regulatory processes and conative dispositions

Intelligence

Volumn 61, Issue , 2017, Pages 63-77

  Birney, Damian P ^a   Beckmann, Jens F ^b   Beckmann, Nadin ^b   Double, Kit S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complexity; Confidence ratings; Fluid intelligence; Learning; Self regulatory processes

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011578170     PISSN: 01602896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ackerman, P., Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 (1988), 288–318.
2. Ackerman, P., A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence 22 (1996), 227–257.
3. Ackerman, P., Beier, M.E., Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., (eds.) The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise, 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1–30.
4. Ackerman, P., Heggestad, E.D., Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997), 219–245.
5. Ackerman, R.A., The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2014), 1349–1368.
6. Alderton, D.L., Larson, G.E., Dimensionality of Raven's advanced progressive matrices items. Educational and Psychological Measurement 50 (1990), 887–900.
7. Azevedo, R., Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 40 (2005), 199–209.
8. Bandura, A., Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991), 248–287.
9. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997, Freeman, New York, NY.
10. Beckmann, J.F., Birney, D.P., What happens before and after it happens: Insights regarding antecedences and consequences of adult learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 2012, 561–562.
11. Beckmann, N., Wood, R.E., Minbashian, A., It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 44 (2010), 593–601.
12. Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J.F., Minbashian, A., Birney, D.P., In the heat of the moment: On the effect of state neuroticism on task performance. Personality and Individual Differences 54 (2013), 447–452.
13. Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J.F., Birney, D.P., Wood, R.E., A problem shared is learning doubled: Deliberative processing in dyads improves learning in complex dynamic decision-making tasks. Computers in Human Behavior 48 (2015), 654–662.
14. Beier, M.E., Ackerman, P.L., Current-events knowledge in adults: An investigation of age, intelligence, and nonability determinants. Psychology and Aging 16 (2001), 615–628.
15. Birney, D.P., Bowman, D.B., An experimental-differential investigation of cognitive complexity. Psychology Science Quarterly 51 (2009), 449–469.
16. Birney, D.P., Sternberg, R.J., Intelligence and cognitive abilities as competencies in development. Bialystok, E., Craik, G., (eds.) Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change, 2006, Oxford University Press, New York, 315–330.
17. Birney, D.P., Halford, G.S., Andrews, G., Measuring the influence of relational complexity on reasoning: The development of the Latin square task. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66 (2006), 146–171.
18. Birney, D.P., Beckmann, J.F., Wood, R.E., Precursors to the development of flexible expertise: Metacognitive self-evaluations as antecedences and consequences in adult learning. Learning and Individual Differences 22 (2012), 563–574.
19. Birney, D.P., Bowman, D.B., Beckmann, J., Seah, Y., Assessment of processing capacity: Latin-square task performance in a population of managers. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28 (2012), 216–226.
20. Bors, D.A., Vigneau, F., The effect of practice on Raven's advanced progressive matrices. Learning and Individual Differences 13 (2001), 291–312.
21. Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., Larouche, C., The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 65 (1995), 317–329.
22. Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., Joshi, R., Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. The Reading Teacher 61 (2007), 70–77.
23. Brunner, J., Austin, P.C., Inflation of type I error rates in multiple regression when independent variables are measured with error. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 37 (2009), 33–46.
24. Bui, M., Birney, D.P., Learning and individual differences in Gf processes and Raven's. Learning and Individual Differences 32 (2014), 104–113.
25. Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., Shell, P., What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review 97 (1990), 404–431.
26. Cattell, R.B., Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. 1987, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
27. Crawford, J.D., Intelligence, task complexity and the distinction between automatic and effortful mental processing. Rowe, H., (eds.) Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement, 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 119–144.
28. Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., De Fruyt, F., The curvilinear relationship between state neuroticism and momentary task performance. PloS One, 9, 2014, e106989.
29. DeYoung, C.G., Higher-order factors of the big five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006), 1138–1151.
30. DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B., Higgins, D.M., Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality 73 (2005), 825–858.
31. Digman, J.M., Higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1997), 1246–1256.
32. Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J.E., Conway, A.R., Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (1999), 309–331.
33. Eysenck, H.J., The biological basis of personality. 1967, Thomas, Springfield, NJ.
34. Gelman, A., Hill, J., Yajima, M., Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparisons. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 5 (2012), 189–211.
35. Goff, M., Ackerman, P., Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (1992), 537–552.
36. Halford, G.S., Wilson, W.H., Phillips, S., Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1998), 803–831.
37. Heslin, P.A., Latham, G.P., VandeWalle, D., The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005), 842–856.
38. Hox, J.J., Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. 2nd ed., 2010, Routledge, New York.
39. Kahneman, D., Attention and effort. 1973, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
40. Kan, K., Kievit, R.A., Dolan, C.V., van der Maas, H., On the interpretation of the CHC factor Gc. Intelligence 39:5 (2011), 292–302.
41. Kane, M.J., Hambrick, D.Z., Conway, A.R.A., Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005), 66–71.
42. Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P., Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1989), 657–690.
43. Kleitman, S., Stankov, L., Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences 17 (2007), 161–173.
44. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Bell, B.S., Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (2006), 900–916.
45. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z.R., Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal 40 (2003), 281–310.
46. Kuiper, R., Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use of self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 33 (2002), 78–87.
47. Linacre, J., WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program (v3.75.0). 2012, Winsteps.com, Chicago.
48. Lozano, J.H., Are impulsivity and intelligence truly related constructs? Evidence based on the fixed-links model. Personality and Individual Differences 85 (2015), 192–198.
49. Marshalek, B., Lohman, D.F., Snow, R.E., The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence 7 (1983), 107–127.
50. Minbashian, A., Wood, R.E., Beckmann, N., Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 9 (2010), 793–806.
51. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review 102 (1995), 246–268.
52. Mitchum, A.L., Kelley, C.M., Fox, M.C., When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (2016), 200–219.
53. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., Tsaousis, I., Is the relationship between intelligence and trait neuroticism mediated by test anxiety?. Personality and Individual Differences 40 (2006), 587–597.
54. Muthen, B.O., Laten variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. Sociological Methodology 27 (1997), 453–480.
55. Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthiir, V., Kleitman, S., Knezevic, G., Stankov, L., Roberts, R.D., The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgements. The Journal of General Psychology 129 (2002), 257–299.
56. Perline, R., Wright, B., Wainer, H., The Rasch model as additive conjoint measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 3 (1979), 237–255.
57. Pintrich, P.R., The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. 2000.
58. Primi, R., Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks: Contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence 30 (2001), 41–70.
59. Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Congdon, R., HLM7: Linear and nonlinear modelling. 2011, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
60. Raven, J.C., Standardisation of progressive matrices, 1938. 1941, British Journal of Medical Psychology, XIX, 137–150.
61. Ren, X., Goldhammer, F., Moosbrugger, H., Schweizer, K., How does attention relate to the ability-specific and position-specific components of reasoning measured by APM?. Learning and Individual Differences 22 (2012), 1–7.
62. Ren, X., Gong, Q., Chu, P., Wang, T., Impulsivity is not related to the ability and position components of intelligence: A comment on Lozano (2015). Personality and Individual Differences 104 (2017), 533–537.
63. Ren, X., Wang, T., Altmeyer, M., Schweizer, K., A learning-based account of fluid intelligence from the perspective of the position effect. Learning and Individual Differences 31 (2014), 30–35.
64. Schweizer, K., The fixed-links model for investigating the effects of general and specific processes on intelligence. Methodology 2 (2006), 149–160.
65. Schweizer, K., Altmeyer, M., Ren, X., Schreiner, M., Models for the detection of deviations from the expected processing strategy in completing the items of cognitive measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 50 (2015), 544–554.
66. Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin 137 (2011), 421–442.
67. Smeding, A., Darnon, C., Van Yperen, N.W., Why do high working memory individuals choke? An examination of choking under pressure effects in math from a self-improvement perspective. Learning and Individual Differences 37 (2015), 176–182.
68. Soubelet, A., Salthouse, T.A., Personality-cognition relations across audulthood. Developmental Psychology 47 (2011), 303–310.
69. Spearman, C., The abilities of man. 1927, Macmillan, New York.
70. Stankov, L., Mining on the “no Man's land” between intelligence and personality. Ackerman, P.L., Kyllonen, P.C., Roberts, R.D., (eds.) Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants, 1999, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 315–337.
71. Stankov, L., Complexity, metacognition and fluid intelligence. Intelligence 28 (2000), 121–143.
72. Stankov, L., Crawford, J.D., Ingredients of complexity in fluid intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences 5 (1993), 73–111.
73. Stankov, L., Lee, J., Quest for the best non-cognitive perdictor of academic achievement. Educational Psychology 34 (2014), 1–8.
74. Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R.S., Hoover, P.B., Schmidt, A.M., Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000), 724–738.
75. Sternberg, R.J., Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. 1985, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
76. Sternberg, R.J., Intelligence is not just inside the head: The theory of successful intelligence. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 2002, 227–244.
77. Sternberg, R.J., Gastel, J., Coping with novelty in human intelligence: An empirical investigation. Intelligence 13 (1989), 187–197.
78. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J., Paas, F., Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1998), 251–296.
79. Szymura, B., Individual differences in resource allocation model. Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., Szymura, B., (eds.) Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control, 2010, Springer, New York, NY, 231–246.
80. VandeWalle, D., Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57 (1997), 995–1015.
81. Verguts, T., De Boeck, P., The induction of solution rules in Raven's progressive matrices test. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 14 (2002), 521–547.
82. Wang, T., Ren, X., Altmeyer, M., Schweizer, K., An account of the relationship between fluid intelligence and complex learning in considering storage capacity and executive attention. Intelligence 41 (2013), 537–545.
83. Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D., The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18 (1908), 459–482.
84. Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Heene, M., Asendorpf, J., Buhner, J., Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality 46 (2012), 173–183.
85. Zimmerman, B.J., Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (2000), 82–91.
86. Zimprich, D., Allemand, M., Dellenbach, M., Openness to experience, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence in middle-aged and old adults. Journal of Research in Personality 43 (2009), 444–454.