It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 593-601

  Beckmann, Nadin ^a   Wood, Robert E ^b   Minbashian, Amirali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conscientiousness; Experience sampling; Neuroticism; Organizational behavior; Personality structure; Within person variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957299532     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baddeley A.D. Working memory. Science 1992, 255:556-559.
2. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:1-26.
3. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. Handbook of principles of organizational behavior 2000, 15-28. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. E.A. Locke (Ed.).
4. Biesanz J.C., West S.G. Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality 2004, 72:845-876.
5. Bless H., Fiedler K. Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. Affect, cognition and social behavior 2006, 65-85. Psychology Press, New York, NY. J.P. Forgas (Ed.).
6. Block J. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 1177:187-215.
7. Borkenau P., Ostendorf F. The Big Five states: How useful is the five-factor model to describe intraindividual variation over time?. Journal of Research in Personality 1998, 32:202-221.
8. Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G.J., Heerden J. The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review 2003, 110:203-219.
9. Cervone D. Social-cognitive mechanisms and personality coherence: Self-knowledge, situational beliefs, and cross-situational coherence in perceived self-efficacy. Psychological Science 1997, 8:43-50.
10. Cervone D. Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology 2005, 56:423-452.
11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
12. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117:216-220.
13. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) manual 1992, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
14. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Four ways five factors are not basic. Reply to Eysenck. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 13:861-865.
15. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual 1994, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
16. DeYoung C.G., Quilty L.C., Peterson J.B. Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:880-896.
17. Digman J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:1246-1256.
18. Eysenck H.J. Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 13:667-673.
19. Feldman L.A. Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:153-166.
20. Feldman Barrett L.A., Barrett D.J. An introduction to computerised experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review 2001, 19:175-185.
21. Fisher C., Noble C.S. A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance 2004, 17:145-168.
22. Fleeson W. Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distribution of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:1011-1027.
23. Fleeson W. Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality 2007, 75:825-861.
24. Fleeson W., Malanos A.D., Achille N.M. An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as " good" as being extraverted?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:1409-1422.
25. Forgas J.P. Affect and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008, 3(2):94-100.
26. Forgas J.P., George J.M. Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspectives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 86:3-34.
27. Goldberg L.R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 1992, 4:26-42.
28. Goldberg L.R. The structure of personality traits: Vertical and horizontal aspects. Studying lives through time: Personality and development 1993, 169-188. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. D.C. Funder, R.D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, K. Widaman (Eds.).
29. Goldberg L.R. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 1993, 48:26-34.
30. Goldberg L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe 1999, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands. I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F.D. Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (Eds.).
31. Goldberg L.R., Johnson J.A., Eber H.W., Hogan R., Ashton M.C., Clonginer C.R., et al. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality 2006, 40:84-96.
32. Hofstee W.K.B., de Raad B., Goldberg L.R. Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 63:146-163.
33. Hogan R., Hogan J. Hogan personality inventory manual 1992, Hogan Assessment Systems, Tulsa, OK.
34. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 1997, 52:509-516.
35. McCrae R.R., Zonderman A.B., Costa P.T., Bond M.H., Paunonen S.V. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:552-566.
36. McNiel J.M., Fleeson W. The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality 2006, 40:529-550.
37. Mount M.K., Barrick M.R., Laffitte L., Callans M. The personal characteristics inventory manual 1999, The Wonderlic Corporation, Libertyville, IL.
38. Mount M.K., Barrick M.R., Scullen S.M., Rounds J. Higher-order dimension of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology 2005, 58:447-478.
39. Nezlek J.B. Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:771-785.
40. Ostendorf F. Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality structure: On the validity of the five-factor model of personality] 1990, Roderer, Regensburg, Germany.
41. Peabody D., Goldberg L.R. Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1989, 57:552-567.
42. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Newbury Park, CA. 2nd ed.
43. Roberts B.W., Chernyshenko O.S., Stark S., Goldberg L.R. The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology 2005, 58:105-139.
44. Saucier G. Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment 1994, 63:506-516.
45. Saucier G. Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality 2002, 36:1-31.
46. Schmitz B. Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction 2006, 16:433-449.
47. Schutte N.S., Malouf J.M., Segrera E., Wolf A., Rodgers L. States reflecting the Big Five dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 34:591-603.
48. Tennen H., Affleck G. Daily processes in coping with chronic pain: Methods and analytic strategies. Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications 1996, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, England. M. Zeidner, N.S. Endler (Eds.).
49. Zelenski J.M., Larsen R.J. The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality 2000, 178:197.