Erratum: The curvilinear relationship between state neuroticism and momentary task performance (PLoS ONE (2014) 9:9 (e106989) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106989);The curvilinear relationship between state neuroticism and momentary task performance

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Debusscher, Jonas ^a   Hofmans, Joeri ^a   De Fruyt, Filip ^b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB DEMAND; MALE; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; STATE NEUROTICISM; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORK; ANXIETY DISORDER; MENTAL STRESS; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907190402     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114538     Document Type: Erratum

References (52)

1. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Int J Select Assess 9: 9-30. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00160.
2. Le H, Oh I, Robbins SB, Ilies R, Holland E, et al. (2011) Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. J Appl Psychol 96: 113-133. doi: 10.1037/a0021016.
3. Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 44: 1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.
4. Witt LA, Burke LA, Barrick MR, Mount MK (2002) The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. J Appl Psychol 87: 164-169. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.164.
5. Judge TA, Klinger R, Simon LS, Yang IWF (2008) The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2: 1982-2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00136.x.
6. Morgeson FP, Campion NA, Dipboye RL, Hollenbeck JR, Murphy K, et al. (2007) Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Pers Psychol 60: 683-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x.
7. Robie C, Ryan AM (1991) Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. Int J Select Assess 7: 157-169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115.
8. LaHuis DM, Martin NR, Avis JM (2005) Investigating Nonlinear Conscientiousness-Job Performance Relations for Clerical Employees. Hum Perform 18: 199-212. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803-1.
9. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Dilchert S (2005) Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Hum Perform 18: 389-404. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804-5.
10. Whetzel DL, McDaniel MA, Yost AP, Kim N (2010) Linearity of personality - performance relationships: A large-scale examination. Int J Select Assess 18: 310-320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00514.x.
11. Judge TA, Simon LS, Hurst C, Kelley K (2013) What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to withinindividual variation in the Five-Factor model of personality. J Appl Psychol. doi: 10.1037/a0034485.
12. Hamaker EL (2011) Why researchers should think "within-person." In Mehl MR, Conner TA, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press. pp.43-61.
13. La Guardia JG, Ryan RM (2007) Why identities fluctuate: Variability in traits as a function of situational variations in autonomy support. J Pers 75: 1205-1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00473.x.
14. Mischel W (2004) Toward an integrative model for CBT: Encompassing behavior, cognition, affect, and process. Behav Ther 35: 185-203. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80011-X.
15. Fleeson W (2007) Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. J Pers 75: 825-861. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.
16. Heller D, Komar J, Lee WB (2007) The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Pers Soc Psychol B 33: 898-910. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301010.
17. Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manage Psychol 22: 309-328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115.
18. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Verbeke W (2004) Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum Resour Manage 43: 83-104. doi: 10.1002/hrm.
19. Mangos PM, Steele-Johnson D (2001) The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, self-efficacy, and performance relationships. Hum Perform 14: 169-185. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1402-03.
20. van Veldhoven M, Sluiter JK (2009) Work-related recovery opportunities: testing scale properties and validity in relation to health. Int Arch Occ Env Hea 82: 1065-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00420-009-0411-z.
21. Heller D, Perunovic WQE, Reichman D (2009) The future of person-situation integration in the interface between traits and goals: A bottom-up framework. J Res Pers 43: 171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.011.
22. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J Comp Neurol Psycho 18: 459-482.
23. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Four ways five factors are basic. Pers Indiv Differ 13: 653-665. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I.
24. Easterbrook JA (1959) Emotion, cue utilization, and organization of behavior. Psychol Rev 66: 183-201. doi: 10.1037/h0047707.
25. Pierce JR, Aguinis H (2011) The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing effect in management. J Manage 39: 313-338. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410060.
26. Beal DJ, Weiss HM, Barros E, MacDermid SM (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. J Appl Psychol 90: 1054-1068. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054.
27. Curfman GD (1993) Is exercise beneficial-or hazardous-to your heart? New Engl J Med 329: 1730-1731. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312023292310.
28. Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Tofler GH, Sherwood JB, Goldberg RJ, et al. (1993) Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion-protection against triggering by regular exertion. New Engl J Med 329: 1677-1683. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312023292301.
29. Vancouver JB, Thompson CM, Tischner EC, Putka DJ (2002) Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. J Appl Psychol 87: 506-516. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.506.
30. Fisher CD, To ML (2012) Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. J Organ Behav. doi: 10.1002/job.1803.
31. Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol 54: 579-616. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.
32. Beal DJ (2012) Industrial/Organizational Psychology. In Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. New York: Guilford. pp.144-159.
33. Sitzmann T, Yeo G (2013) A meta-analytic investigation of the within-person self-efficacy domain: Is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Pers Psychol 66: 531-568. doi: 10.1111/peps.12035.
34. Van den Broeck A, De Cuyper N, De Witte H, Vansteenkiste M (2014) Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands-Resources model. Eur J Work Organ Psy. doi: 10.1080/13594320903223839.
35. Hoekstra HA, Ormel J, de Fruyt F (1996) NEO persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI. Handleiding. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
36. Grube A, Schroer J, Hentzschel C, Hertel G (2008) The event reconstruction method: An efficient measure of experience-based job satisfaction. J Occup Organ Psych 81: 669-689. doi: 10.1348/096317907X251578.
37. Saucier G (1994) Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. J Pers Assess 63: 506-516. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303-8.
38. Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage 17: 601-617. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305.
39. Wille B, Hofmans J, Feys M, De Fruyt F (2014) Maturation of work attitudes: Correlated change with Big Five personality traits and reciprocal effects over 15 years. J Organ Behav 35: 507-529. doi: 10.1002/job.1905.
40. Maynard DC, Hakel MD (1997) Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Hum Perform 10: 303-330. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1004-1.
41. van Veldhoven M, de Jonge J, Broersen S, Kompier M, Meijman T (2002) Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach. Work Stress 16: 207-228. doi: 10.1080/02678370210166399.
42. Bates DM (2010) lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. Available: http://rforge. r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php/∗checkout∗/www/lMMwR/lrgprt.pdf?revision=600&root=lme4. Accessed 25 January 2014.
43. Sieracki JH, Leon SC, Miller SA, Lyons JS (2008) Individual and provider effects on mental health outcomes in child welfare: A three level growth curve approach. Child Youth Serv Rev 30: 800-808. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth. 2007.12.008.
44. Snijders TA, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage. 368 p.
45. Cucina JM, Vasilopoulos NL (2005) Nonlinear personality-performance relationships and the spurious moderating effects of traitedness. J Pers 73: 227-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00309.x.
46. Zillig LMP, Hemenover SH, Dienstbier RA (2002) What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 personality inventories. Pers Soc Psychol B 28: 847-858. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289013.
47. Beal DJ, Weiss HM (2003) Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organ Res Methods 6: 440-464. doi: 10.1177/1094428103257361.
48. Nezlek JB (2012) Multilevel Modeling Analyses of Diary-Style Data. In Mehl MR, Conner TA, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press. pp.357-383.
49. Judge TA, Hulin CL, Dalal RS (2009) Job satisfaction and job affect. In Kozlowski SWJ, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 496-525.
50. Browne WJ, Golalizadeh M, Parker RMA (2009) A guide to sample size calculations for random effect models via simulation and the MLPowSim software package. Available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlpowsim. Accessed 3 June 2014.
51. Yang Y, Read SJ, Denson TF, Xu Y, Zhang J, et al. (2013) The key ingredients of personality traits: Situations, behaviors, and explanations. Pers Soc Psychol B. doi: 10.1177/0146167213505871.
52. Saucier G (1998) Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. J Pers Assess 70: 263-276. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7002-6.