Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 692-702

  Choi, Jong Kyu ^a   Ji, Yong Gu ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERSONALITY TRAITS; SENSATION-SEEKING; SITUATION MANAGEMENT; TECHNICAL COMPETENCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES;

EID: 84943368855     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. E.Adell, (2010). Acceptance of driver support systems. Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 475–486.
2. L.D.Bacon, (1999, February). Using LISREL and PLS to measure customer satisfaction. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Sawtooth Software Conference, La Jolla, CA.
3. R.P.Bagozzi,, & Y.Yi, (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
4. D.Barclay,, C.Higgins,, & R.Thompson, (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309.
5. S.A.Beiker, (2012). Legal aspects of autonomous driving. Santa Clara Law Review, 52 (4),Article 1.
6. L.L.Berry, (1995). Relationship marketing of services—Growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 236–245.
7. P.C.Burns,, & G.J.Wilde, (1995). Risk taking in male taxi drivers: Relationships among personality, observational data and driver records. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 267–278.
8. L.Carter,, & F.Bélanger, (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5–25.
9. P.Y.K.Chau,, & P.J.H.Hu, (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39, 297–311.
10. W.W.Chin, (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 295–336.
11. W.W.Chin,, B.L.Marcolin,, & P.R.Newsted, (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189–217.
12. F.D.Davis, (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319–340.
13. F.D.Davis,, R.P.Bagozzi,, & P.R.Warshaw, (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
14. F.D.Davis,, & V.Venkatesh, (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 45, 19–45.
15. P.M.Doney,, & J.P.Cannon, (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 35–51.
16. R.F.Falk,, & N.B.Miller, (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
17. M.S.Featherman,, & P.A.Pavlou, (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 59, 451–474.
18. Feypell, V., & Scheunemann, J. (2012). Road deaths: Latest traffic safety data released. Retrieved from http://internationaltransportforum.org/Press/PDFs/2012-05-02IRTAD.pdf
19. C.Fornell,, & F.L.Bookstein, (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.
20. C.Fornell,, & D.F.Larcker, (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
21. D.Gefen,, E.Karahanna,, & D.W.Straub, (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51–90.
22. D.Gefen,, & D.W.Straub, (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 8.
23. D.Gefen,, D.Straub,, & M.C.Boudreau, (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 7.
24. M.Ghazizadeh,, Y.Peng,, J.D.Lee,, & L.N.Boyle, (2012, September). Augmenting the technology acceptance model with trust: Commercial drivers’ attitudes towards monitoring and feedback. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2286–2290.
25. J.F.Hair,, W.C.Black,, B.J.Babin,, R.E.Anderson,, & R.L.Tatham, (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
26. Z.Hasan,, A.Krischkowsky,, & M.Tscheligi, (2012). Modelling user-centered-trust (UCT) in software systems: Interplay of trust, affect and acceptance model (pp. 92–109). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27. S.L.Jarvenpaa,, N.Tractinsky,, & L.Saarinen, (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2).
28. Johnson, T. (2013, January 31). Enhancing safety through automation (SAE gov’t-industry meeting, automation and connected vehicle safety). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Available from http://www.sae.org/events/gim/presentations/2013/johnson_tim.pdf
29. B.A.Jonah, (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: A review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29, 651–665.
30. D.E.Kieras,, & S.Bovair, (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.
31. W.R.King,, & J.He, (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755.
32. N.Krause,, & S.Stryker, (1984). Stress and well-being: The buffering role of locus of control beliefs. Social Science & Medicine, 18, 783–790.
33. J.Lee,, & N.Moray, (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human–machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243–1270.
34. J.D.Lee,, & N.Moray, (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 40, 153–184.
35. J.D.Lee,, & K.A.See, (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
36. J.M.Leimeister,, W.Ebner,, & H.Krcmar, (2005). Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 101–131.
37. S.K.Lippert, (2001). An exploratory study into the relevance of trust in the context of information systems technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
38. Q.Ma,, & L.Liu, (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16, 59–72.
39. M.Madsen,, & S.Gregor, (2000, December). Measuring human–computer trust. Proceedings of Eleventh Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 6–8.
40. M.Maltz,, H.Sun,, Q.Wu,, & R.Mourant, (2004). In-vehicle alerting system for older and younger drivers: Does experience count? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1899, 64–70.
41. R.C.Mayer,, J.H.Davis,, & F.D.Schoorman, (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
42. A.Meschtscherjakov,, D.Wilfinger,, T.Scherndl,, & M.Tscheligi, (2009, September). Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 81–88.
43. V.W.Mitchell, (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 163–195.
44. N.Moray,, T.Inagaki,, & M.Itoh, (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 44.
45. B.M.Muir, (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 27, 527–539.
46. D.A.Norman, (2002). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
47. J.H.Numan, (1998). Knowledge-based systems as companions: Trust, human computer interaction and complex systems. University of Groningen. Doctoral dissertation.
48. R.Parasuraman,, T.B.Sheridan,, & C.D.Wickens, (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 140–160.
49. K.R.Parkes, (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 655–668.
50. P.A.Pavlou, (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 101–134.
51. W.Payre,, J.Cestac,, & P.Delhomme, (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 252–263.
52. J.P.Peter,, & M.J.Ryan, (1976). An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 184–188.
53. P.Ratnasingham,, & K.Kumar, (2000, December). Trading partner trust in electronic commerce participation. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Information Systems, 544–552.
54. V.A.Riley, (1994). Human use of automation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
55. J.B.Rotter, (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), Whole No. 609.
56. C.M.Rudin-Brown,, & I.Noy, Y.Ian (2002). Investigation of behavioral adaptation to lane departure warnings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1803, 30–37.
57. C.M.Rudin-Brown,, & H.A.Parker, (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7, 59–76.
58. J.Schepers,, & M.Wetzels, (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, 90–103.
59. B.H.Sheppard,, J.Hartwick,, & P.R.Warshaw, (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.
60. T.B.Sheridan, (1975). Considerations in modeling the human supervisory controller. International Federation of Automatic Control, Triennial World Congress, 6th, 40.
61. T.B.Sheridan,, & R.T.Hennessy, (1984). Research and modeling of supervisory control behavior. Report of a workshop. Washington DC: National Research Council, Committee on Human Factors.
62. M.Söllner,, A.Hoffmann,, H.Hoffmann,, & J.M.Leimeister, (2011, December). Towards a theory of explanation and prediction for the formation of trust in IT artifacts. Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS (Vol. 4).
63. N.A.Stanton,, & P.Marsden, (1996). From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science, 24, 35–49.
64. N.A.Stanton,, & M.S.Young, (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48, 1294–1313.
65. J.C.Stutts, (1998). Do older drivers with visual and cognitive impairments drive less? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 854–861.
66. S.Taylor,, & P.A.Todd, (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144–176.
67. J.B.Thatcher,, D.McKnight,, E.W.Baker,, R.E.Arsal,, & N.H.Roberts, (2011). The role of trust in postadoption it exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 56–70.
68. V.Venkatesh,, & F.D.Davis, (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
69. V.Venkatesh,, M.G.Morris,, G.B.Davis,, & F.D.Davis, (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
70. N.J.Ward,, S.Fairclough,, & M.Humphreys, (1995). The effect of task automatisation in the automotive context: A field study of an Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Experimental analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness, November, 1–3, Daytona Beach, Florida.
71. C.G.West,, G.Gildengorin,, G.Haegerstrom-Portnoy,, L.A.Lott,, M.E.Schneck,, & J.A.Brabyn, (2003). Vision and driving self-restriction in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 1348–1355.
72. J.H.Wu,, W.S.Shen,, L.M.Lin,, R.A.Greenes,, & D.W.Bates, (2008). Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare profes-sionals’ intention to use an adverse event reporting system. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20, 123–129.
73. M.Zuckerman, (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.