Modelling acceptance of driver assistance systems: Application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 23-34

  Adell, Emeli ^a   Várhelyi, András ^b   Nilsson, Lena ^c  

^a Trivector Traffic ^*  (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901141911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Adell, E. 2007. The concept of acceptance. Proceedings of the 20th ICTCT workshop, Valencia, Spain.
2. Adell, E. 2009. Driver experience and acceptance of driver assistance systems a case of speed support. Bulletin 251. PhD thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
3. Adell, E., Várhelyi, A. and Dalla Fontana, M. 2009. The effects of a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance - a real-life field study. Transportation Research Part C, 19: 145-55.
4. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
5. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bhattacheijee, A. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25(3): 351-70.
7. Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvönen, K., Puhakainen, J. and Walden, P. 2006. Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services - Searching for Answers with the UTAUT. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
8. Chang, I-C., Hwang, H-G., Hung, W-F. and Li, Y-C. 2007. Physicians' acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision assistance systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 33: 296-303.
9. Clegg, C.W. 2000. Sociotechnical principles for system design. Appl. Ergon. 31: 463-77.
10. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 189-211.
11. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-40.
12. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14): 1111-32.
13. Emersson, R.M. 1987. Toward a theory of value in social exchange, In Social exchange theory. Edited by K.S. Cook. Newbury Park: Sage: 11-46.
14. Fulk, J. 1993. Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 921-50.
15. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J.A. and Steinfield, C.W. 1990. A social influence model of technology use. In Organizations and communication technology. Edited by J. Fulk and C. Steinfield. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 117-40.
16. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213-36.
17. Hennington, A.H. and Janz, B.D. 2007. Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19: 60-80.
18. Kelley, H.H. 1979. Personal relationships: their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawence Erlbaum.
19. Liaw, S.S., Chang, W.C., Hung, W.H. and Huang, H.M. 2006. Attitudes toward search engines as a learning assisted tool: approach of Liaw and Huang's research model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2): 177-90.
20. Lubrin, E., Lawrence, E., Zmijewska, A., Navarro, K.F. and Culjak, G. 2006. Exploring the benefits of using motes to monitor health: an acceptance survey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, Washington DC, USA.
21. Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Molin, E. and Brookhuis, K. 2007. Modelling acceptability of the intelligent speed adapter. Transportation Research Part F, 10(2): 99-108.
23. Najm, W.G., Stearns, M.D., Howarth, H., Koopmann, J. and Hitz, J. 2006. Evaluation of an automotive rear-end collision avoidance system (chapter 5). US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 810 569; Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe National Transportation Systems Centre, Cambridge, MA, USA.
24. Oliver R.L. 1980. A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 17: 460-69.
25. Parasuraman, A. 2000.Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2: 307-20.
26. Regan, M.A., Mitsopoulos, E., Haworth, N. and Young, K. 2002. Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers. Report no. 02/02 Monash University Accident Research Centre, Australia.
27. Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
28. Saadé, G.R. 2007. Dimensions of perceived usefulness: toward enhanced assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(2): 289-310.
29. Schaper, L.K. and Pervan, G.P. 2007. ICT and OTs: a model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76: 212-21.
30. Stearns, M., Najm, W. and Boyle, L. 2002. A methodology to evaluate driver acceptance. Presentation at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
31. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. 1995. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4): 561-70.
32. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. 1991. Personal computing: towards a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1): 124-43.
33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425-78.
34. Yang, S., Park, J. and Park, J. 2007. Consumers' channel choice for university- licensed products: exploring factors of consumer acceptance with social identification. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(3): 165-74.