Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 27, Issue PB, 2014, Pages 252-263

  Payre, William ^a,b   Cestac, Julien ^b   Delhomme, Patricia ^b  

^a VeDeCom Institute   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

A priori acceptability; Attitudes; Fully automated driving; Intention

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

A PRIORI ACCEPTABILITY; ATTITUDES; DRIVING ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS; FULLY AUTOMATED; INTENTION; ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PERSONALITY TRAITS; SENSATION-SEEKING;

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84915784605     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albarracín, D. E., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). The Handbook of Attitudes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
2. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607.
3. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779.
4. Boutelier, J. (2013, December). Next Two: Renault lancer sa voiture robot avant 2020 [Video file]. Retrieved from 〈http://fr.itweb.tv/Next-Two-Renault-lancera-sa-voiture-robot-avant-2020-v1328.html〉.
5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445-455.
6. Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (Eds.). (2012). European Road Users' Risk Perception and Mobility, The SARTRE 4 Survey. Lyon France: Public Imprim.
7. Cestac, J., Paran, F., & Delhomme, P. (2011). Young drivers' sensation seeking, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control and their roles in predicting speeding intention: How risk-taking motivations evolve with gender and driving experience. Safety Science, 49, 424-432.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
10. de Waard, D., van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1999). Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 67-82.
11. Delhomme, P. (2002). Croyances des jeunes automobilistes en matière de vitesse. Rapport final. Convention DSCR-INRETS No00/010/T-étude No7.
12. Delhomme, P., & Meyer, T. (2002, 2ème édition). Les projets de recherche en psychologie sociale: méthodes et techniques. La recherche en psychologie sociale. Projets, méthode et techniques. Paris: Armand Colin, Coll. Cursus.
13. Delhomme, P., Verlhiac, J.-F., & Martha, C. (2009). Are drivers' comparative risk judgments about speeding realistic? Journal of Safety Research, 40, 333-339.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15. European Commission (2011). White paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area-Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM, 2011, 144.
16. Fancher, P., Ervin, R., Sayer, J., Hagan, M., Bogard, S., Bareket, Z., Mefford, M., & Haugen, J. (1998). Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operation Test. Final Report. NHTSA Report No. DOT HS 808 849.
17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory of Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(3), 461-472.
19. Guizzo, E. (2011). How Google's Self-driving Car Works. IEEE Spectrum Online, October, 18.
20. Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1998). Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transportation Research Part F, 1, 95-106.
21. Hoedemaker, M., & Kopf, M. (2001). Visual sampling behavior when driving with adaptive cruise control. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Vision in vehicles Australia, August 19-22, 2001.
22. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
23. Jamson, A. H., Merat, N., Carsten, O. M., & Lai, F. C. (2013). Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 30, 116-125.
24. Jonah, B. A., Thiessen, R., & Au-Yeung, E. (2001). Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(5), 679-684.
25. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to The Program and Applications (Vol. 2). Chicago: Spss.
26. Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16(3), 126-131.
27. Laurencin, J.-P., Hoffman, J., Forest, F., & Ruffieux, B. (2004). Retrieved May 19, 2009, from 〈www.mshalpes.prd.fr〉. Website: 〈www.mshalpes.prd.fr/luce/documents/presentations/Axe4-Acceptabilite-Forest-19052004.ppt〉.
28. Lefeuvre, R., Bordel, S., & Guingouain, G. (2008). Sentiment de contrôle et acceptabilité sociale a priori des aides à la conduite. Le Travail Humain, 71(2), 97-135.
29. Leggett, C., Kleckner, N., Boyle, K., Duffield, J., & Mitchell, R. (2003). Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews. Land Economics, 79(4), 561-575.
30. Maccoby, E., & Maccoby, N. (1954). The interview: A tool of social science. Handhook of Social Psychology, I, 449-487.
31. Maltz, M., Sun, H., Wu, Q., & Mourant, R. (2004). In-vehicle alerting system for older and younger drivers: Does experience count? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1899(1), 64-70.
32. Montag, I., & Comrey, A. L. (1987). Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 339-343.
33. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., & Itoh, M. (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(1), 44-58.
34. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles System. Washington, DC.
35. Nilsson, L. (1995). Safety effects of adaptive cruise control in critical traffic situations. In: Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 1254-1259). Tokyo: Vehicle, Road and Traffic Intelligence Society.
36. Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., & Kaistinen, J. (2005). Traffic locus of control, driving skills, and attitudes towards in-vehicle technologies (ISA and ACC). In: Proceedings of the 18th international cooperation on theories and concepts in traffic safety (ICTCT), Helsinki, Finland.
37. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. A. (1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
38. Parasuraman, S., Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1992). Automation-related complacency: A source of vulnerability in contemporary organizations. IFIP Transactions A - Computer Science and Technology, 13, 426-432.
39. Riley, V. (1994). Human use of Automation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
40. Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford UK and Cambridge, USA: Backwell.
41. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1-28.
42. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Ian Noy, Y. (2002). Investigation of behavioral adaptation to lane departure warnings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1803(1), 30-37.
43. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to lane departure warning. Transportation Research Record, 1803, 30-37.
44. Saad, F., & Villame, T. (1996). Assessing new driving support systems: contribution of an analysis of drivers' activity in real situations. In: Proceedings of Third Annual World Congress on Intelligent Transport System (CD Rom).
45. Saad, F., Hjälmdahl, M., Cañas, J., Alonso, M., Garayo, P., Macchi, L., Nathan, F., Ojeda, L., Papakostopoulos, V., Panou, M., & Bekiaris, E. (2004). Literature Review of Behavioural Effects. Rapport AIDE.
46. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (1998). Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics, 41(7), 1014-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 001401398186568.
47. Stanton, N. A., & Marsden, P. (1996). From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science, 24, 35-49.
48. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48(10), 1294-1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130500252990.
49. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., & McCaulder, B. (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science, 27, 149-159.
50. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., Walker, G. H., Turner, H., & Randle, S. (2001). Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5(3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503-5.
51. Taubman, O., Mikulincer, M., & Iram, A. (1996). The Cognitive, Motivational and Emotional System of Driving. Israel: Research report, Department of Casualties and Road Safety of the Israeli Army.
52. Terrade, F., Pasquier, H., Reerinck-Boulanger, J., Guingouain, G., & Somat, A. (2009). L'acceptabilité sociale: la prise en compte des déterminants sociaux dans l'analyse de l'acceptabilité des systèmes technologiques. Le Travail Humain, 72, 383-395.
53. van der Laan, J. D., Heino, A., & de Waard, D. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C, 5, 1-10.
54. van Dijke, J. P., & van Schijndel, M. (2012). CityMobil, advanced transport for the urban environment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2324(1), 29-36.
55. van Driel, C. J. G., Hoedemaeker, M., & Van Arem, B. (2007). Impacts of a congestion assistant on driving behaviour and acceptance using a driving simulator. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(2), 139-152.
56. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 33-60.
57. Ward, N.J., Fairclough, S. & Humphreys, M. (1995). The effect of task automatisation in the automotive context: a field study of an autonomous intelligent cruise control system. In: Paper presented at International Conference on Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness, 1 November, Daytona Beach, FL.
58. Ward, N.J., Humphreys, M., & Fairclough, S. (1996). A field study of behavioural adaptation with an autonomous intelligent cruise control system. In: Handbook of the International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology (pp. 15-19). 22-25 May, Valencia, Spain.
59. Wiener, E.L. (1981). Complacency: Is the term useful for air safety? In: Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar, 117, Denver: Flight Safety Foundation Inc.
60. Yagil, D. (2001). Reasoned action and irrational motives: A prediction of drivers' intention to violate traffic laws. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 720-740.
61. Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2007). What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload. Ergonomics, 50(8), 1324-1339. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130701318855.
62. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.