Students' engagement in Collaborative learning group supported by communication tools: An empirical study

Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages

  Zhang, Xi ^a   Meng, Yao ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Communication tools; Social influence; Student engagement

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMMUNICATION TOOLS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; STUDENTS' ENGAGEMENTS; WORK SATISFACTIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85011023997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690): Springer.
2. Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social influence, 1(1), 3-15.
3. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
4. Clarke, T., & Minocha, S. (2009). Role of social software tools in education: a literature review. Education+ Training, 51(5/6), 353-369.
5. Davis, J. L., Le, B., Coy, A. E., Rickert, J., Regan, B., & Ridgeway, K. (2015). Commitment to the environment: the role of subjective norms in college and community samples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
6. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
7. Eklöf, H. (2010). Skill and will: test-taking motivation and assessment quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 345-356.
8. Ennen, N. L., Stark, E., & Lassiter, A. (2015). The importance of trust for satisfaction, motivation, and academic performance in student learning groups. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 615-633.
9. Erez, A., & Isen, A. M. (2002). The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055.
10. Fallon, E., Walsh, S., & Prendergast, T. (2013). An activity-based approach to the learning and teaching of research methods: Measuring student engagement and learning. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 2(1), 2.
11. Falloon, G. (2015). What's the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62-77.
12. Feichtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1984). Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups. Journal of Management Education, 9(4), 58-73.
13. Ferreri, S. P., & O'Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77 (1).
14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
15. Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1), 1-9.
16. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.
17. Gregory, R., & Thorley, L. (2013). Using group-based learning in higher education: Routledge.
18. Hütter, M., & Diehl, M. (2011). Motivation losses in teamwork: The effects of team diversity and equity sensitivity on reactions to free-riding. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1368430211402405.
19. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
20. Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1469787412467123.
21. Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2009). Group work in schools with close friends and acquaintances: Linking self-processes with group processes. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 214-227.
22. Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12(4), 435-449.
23. Kominis, G., & Emmanuel, C. R. (2007). The expectancy-valence theory revisited: Developing an extended model of managerial motivation. Management Accounting Research, 18(1), 49-75.
24. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
25. Mangos, P. M., & Steele-Johnson, D. (2001). The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, self-efficacy, and performance relations. Human performance, 14(2), 169-185.
26. Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 34(7), 913-923.
27. Parappilly, M. B., De Ritter, S., & Schmidt, L. (2015). Improving student learning and engagement in stem disciplines using team-based learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).
28. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
29. Sanchez, R. J., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2000). Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 739.
30. Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227-239.
31. Sun, Y., Wang, N., Yin, C., & Zhang, J. X. (2015). Understanding the relationships between motivators and effort in crowdsourcing marketplaces: A nonlinear analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 267-276.
32. Swift, P. E., & Hwang, A. (2013). The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 20-37.
33. Taylor, M. S. (1981). The motivational effects of task challenge: A laboratory investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(2), 255-278.
34. Wächter, T., Lungu, O. V., Liu, T., Willingham, D. T., & Ashe, J. (2009). Differential effect of reward and punishment on procedural learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(2), 436-443.
35. Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312.
36. Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231.
37. Young, H. P. (2009). Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. The American economic review, 1899-1924.
38. Yuan, M., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Vogel, D. R., & Chu, X. (2009). Antecedents of coordination effectiveness of software developer dyads from interacting teams: an empirical investigation. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 56(3), 494-507.
39. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization science, 9(2), 141-159.
40. Zhang, X., Ordonez de Pablos, P., & Zhang, Y. (2012). The relationship between incentives, explicit and tacit knowledge contribution in online engineering education project. The Knowledge Society Selected Papers on Engineering Education from the 4th World Summit on the Knowledge Society.