Corrigendum to: The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize Into Beautiful Articles (Journal of Management, (2017), 43, 2, (376-399), 10.1177/0149206314527133);The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize Into Beautiful Articles

Journal of Management

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 376-399

  O’Boyle, Ernest Hugh ^a   Banks, George Christopher ^b   Gonzalez Mulé, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ethics; morality and moral behavior; philosophy of science; statistical methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009433827     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206316667701     Document Type: Erratum

References (94)

1. Agnew R., 1992. Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30: 47-88.
2. Agnew R., Brezina T., Wright J. P., Cullen F. T., 2002. Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40: 43-72.
3. Aguinis H., Gottfredson R. K., Joo H., in press. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods.
4. Academy of Management. 2006. Academy of Management code of ethics. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://aom.org/uploadedFiles/About_AOM/Governance/AOM_Code_of_Ethics.pdf
5. American Psychological Association. 2010. American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
6. Ariely D., 2012. The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone-especially ourselves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
7. Bakker M., van Dijk A., Wicherts J. M., 2012. The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7: 543-554.
8. Banks G. C., McDaniel M. A., 2011. The kryptonite of evidence-based I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4: 40-44.
9. Banks G. C., O’Boyle E. H., 2013. Why we need I-O psychology to fix I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6: 284-287.
10. Bedeian A. G., 2003. The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12: 331-338.
11. Bedeian A. G., 2004. Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3: 198-216.
12. Bedeian A. G., Taylor S. G., Miller A. N., 2010. Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 715-725.
13. Bracken M. B., Sinclair J. C., (1998). When can odds ratios mislead? Avoidable systematic error in estimating treatment effects must not be tolerated. British Medical Journal, 317:1156-1157.
14. Briner R. B., Rousseau D. M., 2011. Evidence-based I-O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4: 3-22.
15. Buchheit S., Collins D., Reitenga A., 2002. A cross-discipline comparison of top-tier academic journal publication rates: 1997-1999. Journal of Accounting Education, 20: 123-130.
16. Cashen L. H., Geiger S. W., 2004. Statistical power and the testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management research and recommendations for future studies. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 151-167.
17. Chalmers I., 1990. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263: 1405-1408.
18. Chan A. W., Hrobjartsson A., Jorgensen K. J., Gotzsche P. C., Altman D. G., 2008. Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: Comparison of publications with protocols. British Medical Journal, 337, 1-8.
19. Chen X. P., 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7: 423-432.
20. Cloward R. A., Ohlin L. E., 1960. Delinquency and opportunity. New York, NY: Free Press.
21. Cohen A. K., 1955. Delinquent boys. New York, NY: Free Press.
22. Cohen J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37-46.
23. Cohen J., 1990. Things I have learned (thus far). American Psychologist, 45: 1304-1312.
24. Cohen J., 1994. The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49: 997-1003.
25. Corley K. G., Gioia D. A., 2000. The rankings game: Managing business school reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3: 319-333.
26. Crook T. R., Shook C. L., Morris M. L., Madden T. M., 2010. Are we there yet? An assessment of research design and construct measurement practices in entrepreneurship research. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 192-206.
27. Dalton D. R., Aguinis H., Dalton C. M., Bosco F. A., Pierce C. A., 2012. Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta-analysis: An assessment of published and nonpublished correlation matrices. Personnel Psychology, 65: 221-249.
28. Davies H. T. O., Crombie I. K., Tavakoli M., (1998). When can odds ratios mislead? British Medical Journal, 316: 989-991.
29. Dwan K., Altman D. G., Arnaiz J. A., Bloom J., Chan A. W., Cronin E., Williamson P. R., 2008. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One, 3: e3081.
30. Dwan K., Altman D. G., Cresswell L., Blundell M., Gamble C., Williams P. R., 2011. Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. The Cochrane Collaboration.
31. Eden D., 2002. From the editors: Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 841-846.
32. Emerson G. B., Warme W. J., Wolf F. M., Heckman J., Brand R. A., Leopold S. S., 2008. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170: 1934-1939.
33. Fanelli D., 2010a. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from United States data. PLoS One, 5: e10271.
34. Fanelli D., 2010b. “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 5: e10068.
35. Fanelli D., 2012. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90: 891-904.
36. Fischer C. T., 1970. Levels of cheating under conditions of informative appeal to honesty, public affirmation of value, and threats of punishment. Journal of Educational Research, 64: 12-16.
37. Frank M. C., Saxe R., 2012. Teaching replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7: 600-604.
38. Gerber A. S., Malhotra N., 2008. Publication bias in empirical sociological research: Do arbitrary significance levels distort published results? Sociological Methods and Research, 37: 3-30.
39. Gigerenzer G., 2004. Mindless statistics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 587-606.
40. Gioia D., Corley K. G., 2002. Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1: 107-120.
41. Gomez-Mejia L. R., Balkin D. B., 1992. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 921-955.
42. Guttmacher A. E., Nabel E. G., Collins F. S., 2009. Why data-sharing policies matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 16894.
43. Hahn S., Williamson P. R., Hutton J. L., Garner P., Flynn E. V., 2000. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. Statistics in Medicine, 19: 3325-3336.
44. Hambrick D. C., 2007. The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1346-1352.
45. Hardin G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
46. Harter J. K., Schmidt F. L., 2008. Conceptual versus empirical distinctions among constructs: Implications for discriminant validity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 36-39.
47. Harzing A. W., van der Wal R., 2008. A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60: 41-46.
48. Hirsch J. E., 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 16569-16572.
49. Huic M., Marusic M., Marusic A., 2011. Completeness and changes in registered data and reporting bias of randomized controlled trials in ICMJE journals after trial registration policy. PLoS One, 6: 9.
50. Ioannidis J. P. A., 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2: e124.
51. Ioannidis J. P. A., 2008. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19: 640-648.
52. Jick T. D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602-611.
53. John L. K., Loewenstein G., Prelec D., 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23: 524-532.
54. Kacmar K. M., 2009. From the editors: An ethical quiz. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 432-434.
55. Kemper T. D., 1978. A social interactional theory of emotions. New York, NY: Wiley.
56. Kepes S., McDaniel M. A., 2013. How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6: 252-268.
57. Kerr N. L., 1998. HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2: 196-217.
58. Kirkham J. J., Riley R. D., Williams P. R., 2011. A multivariate meta-analysis approach for reducing the impact of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews. Statistics in Medicine, 31: 2179-2195.
59. Kish-Gephart J. J., Harrison D. A., Treviño L. K., 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1-31.
60. Klein O., Doyen S., Leys C., Miller S., Questienne L., Cleeremans A., 2012. Low hopes, high expectations, expectancy effects, and the replicability of behavioral experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7: 572-584.
61. Knol M. J., Duijnhoven R. G., Grobbee D. E., Moons K. G., Groenwold R. H., (2011). Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 6: e21248.
62. Leavitt K., Mitchell T. R., Peterson J., 2010. Theory pruning: Strategies to reduce our dense theoretical landscape. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 644-667.
63. Le H., Oh I.-S., Shaffer J., Schmidt F. L., 2007. Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21: 6-15.
64. Leung K., 2011. Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: Ethical and theoretical issues. Management and Organization Review, 7: 85-94.
65. Locke E. A., Latham G. P., 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
66. MacDonald S., Kam J., 2007. Ring a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 640-55.
67. Marszalek J. M., Barber C., Kohlhart J., Holmes C. B., 2011. Sample size in psychological research over the past 30 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112: 331-348.
68. Martinson B. C., Anderson M. S., De Vries R., 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435: 737-738.
69. Masicampo E. J., Lalande D. R., 2012. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below. 05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65: 2271-2279.
70. Mathieu S., Boutron I., Moher D., Altman D. G., Ravaud P., 2009. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302: 977-984.
71. Mazar N., Amir O., Ariely D., 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45: 633-644.
72. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D., 1996. The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6: 461-476.
73. Meehl P. E., 1978. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46: 806-834.
74. Merton R. K., 1938. Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3: 672-682.
75. Mills J. L., 1993. Data torturing. New England Journal of Medicine, 329: 1196-1199.
76. Nicholas J. M., Katz M., 1985. Research methods and reporting practices in organization development: A review and some guidelines. Academy of Management Review, 10: 737-749.
77. Nickerson R. S., 2000. Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5: 241-301.
78. Orlitzky M., 2012. How can significance tests be deinstitutionalized? Organizational Research Methods, 15: 199-228.
79. Popper K. R., 1968. The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
80. Rosenthal R., 1990. Replication in behavioral research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5: 1-30.
81. Rynes S., Gerhart B., 2003. Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Sackett D. L., Deeks J. J., Altman D. G., (1996). Down with odds ratios! Evidence Based Medicine, 1: 164-166.
83. Sackett P. R., Larson J. R., 1990. Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M., (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 1: 419-489. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
84. Schmidt F., Hunter J., 2002. Are there benefits from NHST? American Psychologist, 57: 65-66.
85. Schmidt F. L., 1992. What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47: 1173-1181.
86. Schmidt F. L., 1996. Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1: 115-129.
87. Schminke M., 2009. Editor’s comments: The better angels of our nature-ethics and integrity in the publishing process. Academy of Management Review, 34: 586-591.
88. Siemens J. C., Burton S., Jensen T., Mendoza N. A. T., 2005. An examination of the relationship between research productivity in prestigious business journals and popular press. Journal of Business Research, 58: 467-76.
89. Simmons J. P., Nelson L. D., Simonsohn U., 2011. False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22: 1359-1366.
90. Stroebe W., Postmes T., Spears R., 2012. Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspective of Psychological Science, 7: 670-688.
91. Tsang E. W., Frey B. S., 2007. The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6: 128-136.
92. Turner E. H., Knoepflmacher D., Shapley L., 2012. Publication bias in antipsychotic trials: An analysis of efficacy comparing the published literature to the US Food and Drug Administration database. PLoS Medicine, 9: 1-17.
93. Wagenmakers E. J., 2007. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14: 779-804.
94. Wood J. A., 2008. Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 79-95.