Theory Pruning: Strategies to Reduce Our Dense Theoretical Landscape

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 644-667

  Leavitt, Keith ^a   Mitchell, Terence R ^b   Peterson, Jeff ^c  

^a UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

philosophy of science; quantitative research; research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956464681     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428109345156     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aguinis, H., & Adams, S.K.R. (1998). Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations - A strong inference approach. Group & Organization Management, 23, 414-446.
2. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C.A., Bosco, F.A., & Muslin, I.S. (2009). First decade of organizational research methods trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 9-34.
3. Aguinis, H., Sturman, M.C., & Pierce, C.A. (2008). Comparison of three meta-analytic procedures for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 69-112.
4. Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research - A must for the scientific advancement of psychology. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 51-69.
5. Arthur, W., & Villado, A.J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-442.
6. Avoilio, B.J., Avery, J.B., & Quisenberry, D. (in press). Estimating the return on leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly.
7. Bacharach, S.B. (1989). Organizational theories - Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515.
8. Bakan, D. (1966). Test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
9. Barger, P.B., & Grandey, A.A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1229-1238.
10. Barrick, M.R., Bradley, B.H., Kristof-Brown, A.L., & Colbert, A.E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544-557.
11. Barrick, M.R., & Zimmerman, R.D. (2005). Reducing voluntary, avoidable turnover through selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 159-166.
12. Behling, O. (1980). The case for the natural science model for research in organizational behavior and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 5, 483-490.
13. Bozarth, J.D., & Roberts, R.R. (1972). Signifying significant significance. American Psychologist, 27, 774-775.
14. Brief, A.P., & Weiss, H.M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279-307.
15. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
16. Cashen, L.H., & Geiger, S.W. (2004). Statistical power and the testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management research and recommendations for future studies. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 151-167.
17. Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541-560.
18. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <. 05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
19. Cohn, L.D., & Becker, B.J. (2003). How meta-analysis increases statistical power. Psychological Methods, 8, 243-253.
20. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
21. Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
22. Cumming, G., & Maillardet, R. (2006). Confidence intervals and replication: Where will the next mean fall? Psychological Methods, 11, 217-227.
23. Dalton, D.R., & Dalton, C.M. (2008). Meta-analyses - Some very good steps toward a bit longer journey. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 127-147.
24. Davis, R.H. (2006). Strong inference - Rationale or inspiration? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 238-249.
25. Eden, D. (2002). Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
26. Edwards, J.R., & Bagozzi, R.P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155-174.
27. Eysenck, H.J. (1997). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1224-1237.
28. Fishbein, M. (1967). A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389-400). New York: Wiley.
29. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Furchtgott, E. (1984). Replicate, again and again. American Psychologist, 39, 1315-1316.
31. Greenwald, A.G., & Ronis, D.L. (1981). On the conceptual disconfirmation of theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 131-137.
32. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346-1352.
33. Henley, A.B., Shook, C.L., & Peterson, M. (2006). The presence of equivalent models in strategic management research using structural equation modeling - Assessing and addressing the problem. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 516-535.
34. Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
35. Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J.S. (1994). Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 233-248.
36. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Judge, T.A., & Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 775-778.
38. Kaplan, A. (1964). Explanation. In A. Kaplin (Ed.), The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science (pp. 327-369). San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
39. Kelly, C.W., Chase, L.J., & Tucker, R.K. (1979). Replication in experimental communication research: An analysis. Human Communication Research, 5, 338-342.
40. Kluger, A.N., & Tikochinsky, J. (2001). The error of accepting the "theoretical" null hypothesis: The rise, fall, and resurrection of commonsense hypotheses in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 408-423.
41. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
42. Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes, Philosophical papers vol. I by Imre Lakatos. UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Latane, B., & Darley, J.M. (1969). Bystander apathy. American Scientist, 57, 244-268.
44. Latham, G.P., Erez, M., & Locke, E.A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists - Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753-772.
45. Law, K.S., & Wong, C.S. (1999). Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. Journal of Management, 25, 143-160.
46. Lee, F., Hallahan, M., & Herzog, T. (1996). Explaining real-life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 732-741.
47. Lindsay, R.M., & Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. American Statistician, 47, 217-228.
48. Lykken, D.T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.
49. Mackenzie, K.D., & House, R. (1978). Paradigm development in the social sciences: A proposed research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 7-23.
50. Maxwell, S.E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147-163.
51. Meehl, P.E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics - Methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
52. Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks - Karl, Ronald, and Slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
53. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral-study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67, 371-378.
54. Mitchell, T.R., & Biglan, A. (1971). Instrumentality theories - Current uses in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 432-454.
55. Mitchell, T.R., & James, L.R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530-547.
56. Platt, J.R. (1964). Strong inference - Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146, 347-353.
57. Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson & Co. Ltd.
58. Porter, L.W. (1996). Forty years of organization studies: Reflections from a micro-perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 262-269.
59. Price, J.L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
60. Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral-research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 1-30.
61. Rowley, T.J., Greve, H.R., Rao, H., Baum, J.A.C., & Shipilov, A.V. (2005). Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm, exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 499-520.
62. Rozenboom, W.W. (1960). The fallacy of the nullhypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
63. Runkel, P.J., & McGrath, J.E. (1972). Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
64. Scandura, T.A., & Williams, E.A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248-1264.
65. Schmidt, F.L. (1992). What do data really mean - Research findings, metaanalysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
66. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (2003). Meta-analysis. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 533-554). New Jersey: John Wiley.
67. Seligman, M.E., Maier, S.F., & Geer, J.H. (1968). Alleviation of learned helplessness in dog. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 256-262.
68. Shah, J., & Higgins, E.T. (1997). Expectancy x value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
69. Shalley, C.E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179-185.
70. Shareef, R. (2007). Want better business theories? Maybe Karl Popper has the answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 272-280.
71. Shaw, J.D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J.E. (2005). Alternative conceptualizations of the relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 50-68.
72. Singleton, R.A., & Straits, B.C. (1999). Approaches to social research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Spence, J.T., & Spence, K.W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimuli. In Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
74. Stinchcombe, A. (1968). Constructing social theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
75. Sutton, R.I., & Staw, B.M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.
76. Vancouver, J.B., More, K.M., & Yoder, R.J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35-47.
77. Vandenberg, R.J., & Grelle, D.M. (2008). Alternative model specifications in structural equation modeling: Fact, fictions and truth. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 165-192). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
78. Van de Ven, A.H., & Johnson, P.E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802-821.
79. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
80. Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 960-976.
81. Weick, K.E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385-390.
82. Wood, M. (2005). Bootstrapped confidence intervals as an approach to statistical inference. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 454-470.