Smart hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

International Journal of Bioprinting

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-14

  Wang, Shuai ^a   Lee, Jia Min ^a   Yeong, Wai Yee ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

3D printing; Addictive manufacturing; Bioprinting; Hydrogel; Rapid prototyping; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009181092     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24248002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18063/IJB.2015.01.005     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Guillemot F, Mironov Vand Nakamura M, 2010, Bio-printing is coming of age: report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bor-deaux (3B'09). Biofabrication, vol.2(1): 010201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201.
2. Seol Y-J, Kang H-W, Lee SJ, et al. 2014, Bioprinting technology and its applications. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.46(3): 342-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu148.
3. Seliktar D, Dikovsky Dand Napadensky E, 2013, Bio-printing and tissue engineering: recent advances and fu-ture perspectives. Israel Journal of Chemistry, vol.53(9-10): 795-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300084.
4. Bajaj P, Schweller RM, Khademhosseini A, et al. 2014, 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol.16: 247-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155.
5. Murphy SV and Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, vol.32: 773-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
6. Arafat MT, Gibson Iand Li X, 2014, State of the art and future direction of additive manufactured scaf-folds-based bone tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol.20(1): 13-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2012-0023.
7. Castilho M, Moseke C, Ewald A, et al. 2014, Direct 3D powder printing of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds for substitution of complex bone defects. Biofabrication, vol.6(1): 015006. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015006.
8. Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, et al. 2015, 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Ap-plications, vol.47: 237-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024.
9. Tasoglu Sand Demirci U, 2013, Bioprinting for stem cell research. Trends in Biotechnology, vol.31: 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.005.
10. Wang CY, Tang ZY, Zhao Y, et al. 2014, Three-dimensional in vitro cancer models: a short review. Bio-fabrication, vol.6(2): 022001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/022001.
11. Chang R, Nam Jand Sun W, 2008, Direct cell writing of 3D microorgan for in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Tis-sue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.14: 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2007.0392.
12. Horváth L, Umehara Y, Jud C, et al. 2015, Engineering an in vitro air-blood barrier by 3D bioprinting. Scientific Reports, vol.5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep07974.
13. Wang S, Wang ZX, Foo SE M, et al. 2015, Culturing Fibroblasts in 3D human hair keratin hydrogels. Acs Ap-plied Materials & Interfaces, vol.7(9): 5187-5198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00854.
14. Wang S, Taraballi F, Tan LP, et al. 2012, Human keratin hydrogels support fibroblast attachment and proliferation in vitro. Cell and Tissue Research, vol.347(3): 795-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-011-1295-2.
15. Galler KM, Hartgerink JD, Cavender AC, et al. 2012, A customized self-assembling peptide hydrogel for den-tal pulp tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A, vol.18(1-2): 176-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0222.
16. Kundu Band Kundu SC, 2012, Silk seri-cin/polyacrylamide in situ forming hydrogels for dermal reconstruction. Biomaterials, vol.33(30): 7456-7467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.091.
17. Rustad KC, Wong VW, Sorkin M, et al. 2012, En-hancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capac-ity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials, vol.33(1): 80-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.041.
18. Chang CY, Duan B, Cai J, et al. 2010, Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and con-trollable delivery. European Polymer Journal, vol.46(1): 92-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.04.033.
19. Syrett JA, Becer CR and Haddleton DM, 2010, Self-healing and self-mendable polymers. Polymer Chemistry, vol.1(7): 978-987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0py00104j.
20. Hoffman AS, 2013, Stimuli-responsive polymers: Bio-medical applications and challenges for clinical transla-tion. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol.65(1): 10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.004.
21. Jochum FD and Theato P, 2013, Temperature-and light-responsive smart polymer materials. Chemical So-ciety Reviews, vol.42(17): 7468-7483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35191a.
22. Lee J, Cuddihy MJ and Kotov NA, 2008, Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol.14(1): 61-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/teb.2007.0150.
23. Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, et al. 2006, Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Bioma-terials, vol.27(21): 3964-3972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.039.
24. Wu SL, Liu XM, Yeung KW K, et al. 2014, Biomi-metic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ma-terials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, vol.80: 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001.
25. Hannachi IE, Itoga K, Kumashiro Y, et al. 2009, Fabri-cation of transferable micropatterned-co-cultured cell sheets with microcontact printing. Biomaterials, vol.30 (29): 5427-5432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.033.
26. Cohen DL, Malone E, Lipson H, et al. 2006, Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Engineering, vol.12(5): 1325-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1325.
27. Smith CM, Stone AL, Parkhill RL, et al. 2004, Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating via-ble tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Engineering, vol.10(9-10): 1566-1576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1566.
28. Smith CM, Christian JJ, Warren WL, et al. 2007, Cha-racterizing environmental factors that impact the viabili-ty of tissue-engineered constructs fabricated by a di-rect-write bioassembly tool. Tissue Engineering, vol.13(2): 373-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0101.
29. Wang XH, Yan YN, Pan YQ, et al. 2006, Generation of three-dimensional hepatocyte/gelatin structures with rapid prototyping system. Tissue Engineering, vol.12(1): 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.83.
30. Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, et al. 2008, Three-dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue En-gineering Part A, vol.14(1): 127-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.a.2007.0158.
31. Kelm JM and Fussenegger M, 2004, Microscale tissue engineering using gravity-enforced cell assembly. Trends in Biotechnology, vol.22(4): 195-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.02.002.
32. Visser J, Peters B, Burger TJ, et al. 2013, Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication, vol.5(3): 035007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035007.
33. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al. 2014, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tis-sue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Bio-materials, vol.35(1): 49-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078.
34. Xu T, Zhao WX, Zhu JM, et al. 2013, Complex hetero-geneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, vol.34(1): 130-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.035.
35. Abeyewickreme A, Kwok A, McEwan JR, et al. 2009, Bio-electrospraying embryonic stem cells: interrogating cellular viability and pluripotency. Integrative Biology, vol.1(3): 260-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B819889f.
36. Fang Y, Frampton JP, Raghavan S, et al. 2012, Rapid generation of multiplexed cell cocultures using acoustic droplet ejection followed by aqueous two-phase exclu-sion patterning. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.18(9): 647-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0709.
37. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck CT, et al. 2013, Tissue engi-neered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bio-printing form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS ONE, vol.8(3): e57741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057741.
38. Soman P, Chung PH, Zhang AP, et al. 2013, Digital mi-crofabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.110(11): 3038-3047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Bit.24957.
39. Okuda S, Inoue Y, Eiraku M, et al. 2015, Vertex dynam-ics simulations of viscosity-dependent deformation dur-ing tissue morphogenesis. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol.14(2): 413-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-014-0613-5.
40. Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, et al. 2013, 3D bio-printing of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with al-ginate/gelatin hydrogels. Jounal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.101A(5): 1255-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420.
41. Shim J-H, Lee J-S, Kim JY, et al. 2012, Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering us-ing a multi-head tissue/organ building system. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol.22(8): 085014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014.
42. Nishiyama Y, Nakamura M, Henmi C, et al. 2008, De-velopment of a three-dimensional bioprinter: construc-tion of cell supporting structures using hydrogel and state-of-the-art inkjet technology. Journal of Biome-chanical Engineering, vol.131(3): 035001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3002759.
43. Hill PS, Apel PJ, Barnwell J, et al. 2011, Repair of pe-ripheral nerve defects in rabbits using keratin hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Engineering Part A, vol.17(11-12): 1499-1505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0184.
44. Cui XF and Boland T, 2009, Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, vol.30(31): 6221-6227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056.
45. Guillemot F, Guillotin B, Fontaine A, et al. 2011, La-ser-assisted bioprinting to deal with tissue complexity in regenerative medicine. MRS Bulletin, vol.36(12): 1015-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/Mrs.2011.272.
46. Bertassoni LE, Cardoso JC, Manoharan V, et al. 2014, Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated ge-latin hydrogels. Biofabrication, vol.6(2): 024105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105.
47. Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, et al. 2011, Di-rect-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid sys-tems for future regenerative therapies. Journal of Bio-medical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomate-rials, vol.98B(1): 160-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31831.
48. Kim JD, Choi JS, Kim BS, et al. 2010, Piezoelectric inkjet printing of polymers: stem cell patterning on po-lymer substrates. Polymer, vol.51(10): 2147-2154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.038.
49. Song S-J, Choi J, Park Y-D, et al. 2010, A three-dimensional bioprinting system for use with a hy-drogel-based biomaterial and printing parameter cha-racterization. Artificial Organs, vol.34(11): 1044-1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01143.x.
50. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, et al. 2000, Hy-drogels in pharmaceutical formulations. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol.50 (1): 27-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0939-6411(00)00090-4.
51. Nguyen MK and Lee DS, 2010, Injectable Biodegrad-able Hydrogels. Macromolecular Bioscience, vol.10(6): 563-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200900402.
52. Bushetti SS, Singh V, Raju SA, et al. 2009, Stimuli sensitive hydrogels: a review. Indian Journal of Phar-maceutical Education and Research, vol.43(3): 241-250.
53. Singh NK and Lee DS, 2014, In situ gelling pH-and temperature-sensitive biodegradable block copolymer hydrogels for drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Re-lease, vol.193: 214-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.056.
54. Roth EA, Xu T, Das M, et al. 2004, Inkjet printing for high-throughput cell patterning. Biomaterials, vol.25(17): 3707-3715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.052.
55. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti JP, et al. 2014, Design and fa-brication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprint-ing. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.20(6): 473-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335.
56. Park JY, Choi J-C, Shim J-H, et al. 2014, A compara-tive study on collagen type Iand hyaluronic acid de-pendent cell behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprint-ing. Biofabrication, vol.6(3): 035004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004.
57. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, et al. 2012, Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnolgy and Bio-engineering, vol.109(7): 1855-1863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.24455.
58. Rouse JG and Van Dyke ME, 2010, A review of kera-tin-based biomaterials for biomedical applications. Ma-terials, vol.3(2): 999-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma3020999.
59. Balaji S, Kumar R, Sripriya R, et al. 2012, Characteri-zation of keratin-collagen 3D scaffold for biomedical applications. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol.23(3): 500-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pat.1905.
60. Szeverenyi I, Cassidy AJ, Chung CW, et al. 2008, The human intermediate filament database: comprehensive information on a gene family involved in many human diseases. Human Mutation, vol.29(3): 351-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.20652.
61. Makarem Rand Humphries MJ, 1991, LDV: a novel cell adhesion motif recognized by the integrin a4ß1. Biochemical Society Transactions, vol.19(4): 380S.
62. Verma V, Verma P, Ray P, et al. 2008, Preparation of scaffolds from human hair proteins for tissue-engineering applications. Biomedical Materials, vol.3(2): 025007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025007.
63. Joo MK, Park MH, Choi BG, et al. 2009, Reverse thermogelling biodegradable polymer aqueous solutions. Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol.19(33): 5891-5905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b902208b.
64. Yu Land Ding JD, 2008, Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chemical Society Reviews, vol.37(8): 1473-1481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b713009k.
65. Loh XJ and Li J, 2007, Biodegradable thermosensitive copolymer hydrogels for drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol.17(8): 965-977.
66. Kretlow JD, Klouda Land Mikos AG, 2007, Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engi-neering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol.59(4-5): 263-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.013.
67. Geever L, Cooney C, Devine D, et al. 2008, Negative temperature sensitive hydrogels in controlled drug deli-very. Macromolecular Symposia, vol.266(1): 53-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/masy.200850610.
68. Cirillo G, Spataro T, Curcio M, et al. 2015, Tunable thermo-responsive hydrogels: synthesis, structural anal-ysis and drug release studies. Materials Science and En-gineering: C, vol.48: 499-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.045.
69. Censi R, Schuurman W, Malda J, et al. 2011, A printable photopolymerizable thermosensitive p(HPMAm-lactate)-PEG hydrogel for tissue engineering. Advanced Functional Materials, vol.21(10): 1833-1842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201002428.
70. Yoon JJ, Chung HJ and Park TG, 2007, Photo-crosslinkable and biodegradable Pluronic/heparin hy-drogels for local and sustained delivery of angiogenic growth factor. Journal of Biomedical Materials Re-search Part A, vol.83A(3): 597-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31271.
71. Escobar-Chávez JJ, López-Cervantes M, Naïk A, et al. 2006, Applications of thermo-reversible pluronic F-127 gels in pharmaceutical formulations. Journal of Phar-macy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol.9(3): 339-358.
72. Müller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, et al. 2013, Printing thermoresponsive reverse molds for the crea-tion of patterned two-component hydrogels for 3D cell culture. Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol.2013(77): e50632. http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/50632.
73. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al. 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced Materials, vol.26(19): 3124-3130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506.
74. Schmedlen RH, Masters KS and West JL, 2002, Pho-tocrosslinkable polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels that can be modified with cell adhesion peptides for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials, vol.23(22): 4325-4332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00177-1.
75. Ifkovits JL and Burdick JA, 2007, Review: photopo-lymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue en-gineering applications. Tissue Engineering, vol.13(10): 2369-2385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2007.0093.
76. Nguyen KT and West JL, 2002, Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomate-rials, vol.23(22): 4307-4314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00175-8.
77. Liu VA and Bhatia SN, 2002, Three-dimensional pho-topatterning of hydrogels containing living cells. Bio-medical Microdevices, vol.4(4): 257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1020932105236.
78. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al. 2010, Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Bio-materials, vol.31(21): 5536-5544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064.
79. Torgersen J, Qin XH, Li ZQ, et al. 2013, Hydrogels for two-photon polymerization: a toolbox for mimicking the extracellular matrix. Advanced Functional Materials, vol.23(36): 4542-4554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201203880.
80. Skardal A, Zhang JX, McCoard L, et al. 2010, Photo-crosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting. Tissue Engineering Part A, vol.16(8): 2675-2685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0798.
81. Xiao WQ, He JK, Nichol JW, et al. 2011, Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomaterialia, vol.7(6): 2384-2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.016.
82. Shin H, Olsen BD and Khademhosseini A, 2012, The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomate-rials, vol.33(11): 3143-3152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.050.
83. Jackson Nand Stam F, 2015, Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for electro-responsive hydrogels for biomedical applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol.132(12): app.41687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.41687.
84. Adesanya K, Vanderleyden E, Embrechts A, et al. 2014, Properties of electrically responsive hydrogels as a po-tential dynamic tool for biomedical applications. Jour-nal of Applied Polymer Science, vol.131(23): app.41195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.41195.
85. Attaran A, Brummund Jand Wallmersperger T, 2015, Modeling and simulation of the bending behavior of electrically-stimulated cantilevered hydrogels. Smart Materials and Structures, vol.24: 035021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/035021.
86. Boruah M, Mili M, Sharma S, et al. 2015, Synthesis and evaluation of swelling kinetics of electric field respon-sive poly(vinyl alcohol)-g-polyacrylic acid/OMNT na-nocomposite hydrogels. Polymer Composites, vol.36(1): 34-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.22909.
87. Taghizadeh B, Taranejoo S, Monemian SA, et al. 2015, Classification of stimuli-responsive polymers as anti-cancer drug delivery systems. Drug Delivery, vol.22(2): 145-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.887157.
88. Zhang HM, Li JJ, Cui HT, et al. 2015, Forward osmo-sis using electric-responsive polymer hydrogels as draw agents: Influence of freezing-thawing cycles, voltage, feed solutions on process performance. Chemical Engi-neering Journal, vol.259: 814-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.065.
89. Kulkarni RV and Biswanath SA, 2007, Electrically responsive smart hydrogels in drug delivery: a review. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics, vol.5(3): 125-139.
90. Sawahata K, Hara M, Yasunaga H, et al. 1990, Electri-cally controlled drug delivery system using polyelectro-lyte gels. Journal of Controlled Release, vol.14(3): 253-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(90)90165-P.
91. Giani G, Fedi Sand Barbucci R, 2012, Hybrid magnetic hydrogel: A potential system for controlled drug deli-very by means of alternating magnetic fields. Polymers, vol.4(2): 1157-1169. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/polym4021157.
92. Asa'di S, Frounchi Mand Dadbin S, 2013, Nano-magnetic poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Advanced Me-terials Research, vol.829: 539-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.829.539.
93. Li ZQ, Shen JF, Ma HW, et al. 2012, Preparation and characterization of sodium alginate/poly(N-sopropy-acrylamide)/clay semi-IPN magnetic hydrogels. Poly-mer Bulletin, vol.68: 1153-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00289-011-0671-0.
94. Tóth IY, Veress G, Szekeres M, et al. 2015, Magnetic hyaluronate hydrogels: preparation and characterization. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol.380:175-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.139.
95. Mahdavinia GR and Etemadi H, 2014, In situ synthesis of magnetic CaraPVA IPN nanocomposite hydrogels and controlled drug release. Materials Science & Engi-neering C-Materials for Biological Applications, vol.45: 250-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.023.
96. Szabó D, Czakó-Nagy I, Zrínyi M, et al. 2000, Magnetic and mössbauer studies of magnetite-loaded polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 221(2): 166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6572.
97. Li YH, Huang GY, Zhang XH, et al. 2013, Magnetic hydrogels and their potential biomedical applications. Advanced Functional Materials, Vol.23(6): 660-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201201708.
98. Ng SS, Li Cand Chan V, 2011; Experimental and nu-merical determination of cellular traction force on po-lymeric hydrogels. Inerface Focus, vol.1: 777-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0036.
99. Manzano S, Moreno-Loshuertos R, Doblaré M, et al. 2015, Structural biology response of a collagen hydrogel synthetic e10.1007xtracellular matrix with embedded human fibroblast: computational and experimental analysis. Medical & Biological Engineering & Compu-ting, vol.53: 721-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1277-8.
100. Zhang H, Dai S, Bi JX, et al. 2011, Biomimetic three-dimensional microenvironment for controlling stem cell fate. Interface Focus, vol.2011(1): 792-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0035.
101. Kazimierska-Drobny K, El Fray Mand Kaczmarek M, 2015, Determination of mechanical and hydraulic prop-erties of PVA hydrogels. Materials Science & Engi-neering C-Materials for Biological Applications, vol.48: 48-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.034.
102. Credi C, Biella S, De Marco C, et al. 2014, Fine tuning and measurement of mechanical properties of cros-slinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels as biomimetic scaf-fold coating in regenerative medicine. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol.29: 309-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.025.
103. Melzak KA, Mateescu A, Toca-Herrera JL, et al. 2012, Simultaneous measurement of mechanical and surface properties in thermoresponsive, anchored hydrogel films. Langmuir, vol.28(35): 12871-12878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la3019666.
104. Kesti M, Müeller M, Becher J, et al. 2015, A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaf-folds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomaterialia, vol.11: 162-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033.
105. Stoychev G, Puretskiy Nand Ionov L, 2011, Self-folding all-polymer thermoresponsive microcap-sules. Soft Matter, vol.2011(7): 3277-3279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1SM05109A.
106. Jamal M, Kadam SS, Xiao R, et al. 2013, Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol.2(8): 1142-1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200458.