Studying the mind of the gifted: Eunsook hong, guest editor

Roeper Review

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 244-252

  Hong, Eunsook ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007781599     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199909553971     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E, (1994). Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 303-311.
2. Alexander, J., Noyes, C. R., MacBrayer, E. K., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Fabricius, W. V. (1998). Concepts of mental activities and verbs in children of high and average verbal intelligence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 16-28.
3. Amabile, T. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
4. Audet, R. H., & Abegg, G. L. (1996). Geographic Information Systems: implications for Problem Solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 21-45.
5. Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 391-402.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., von Hippel, W., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought-listing technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 65,928-940.
7. Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1996). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 18,212- 217.
8. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
9. Cheng, P. (1993). Metacognition and gifledness: The state of the relationship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37,105-112.
10. Chi, M. T. H. (1981). Knowledge development and memory performance. In M. Friedman, J. P. Das, & N. O'Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning (pp. 221-231). New York: Plenum.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-125.
12. Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 15-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NI: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise.
14. Clancey, W. J. (1993). Situated action: A neurological interpretation response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 87-116.
15. Clark, D. A. (1997). Twenty years of cognitive assessment: Current status and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65,996-1000.
16. Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity ad cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21(4) 253.
17. Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1998). Fruitless polarities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21,411.
18. Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 269-281). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
19. de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. New York: Basic Books.
20. de Kleer, J., & Brown, J. S. (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic metal models. In Genter, D. & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Dorough, D. K., & Rye, J. A. (1997). Mapping for understanding: using concept maps as windows to students' minds. The Science Teacher, 64,36-41.
22. Ericsson, K. A. (Eds.) (1996a). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Ericsson, K. A. (1996b). TTie acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Ericsson, K. A. (1998). Basic capacities can be modified or circumvented by deliberate practice: A rejection of talent accounts of expert performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21,413-414.
25. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Feldman, D. H. (1995). Learning and development in nonuniversal theory. Human Development, 38,315-321.
27. Feldman, D. H., & Benjamin, A. C. (1986). Giftedness as a developmentalist sees it. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 285-305). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fishkin, A. S., & Johnson, A. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children's creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21,40-46.
29. Freeman, J. (1998). Inborn talent exists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21,415.
30. Gaultney, J., Bjorklund, D. F., & Goldstein, D. (1996). To be young, gifted, and strategic: Advantages for memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61,43- 66.
31. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-pro- cessing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
32. Glass, C. R., & Amkoff, D. B. (1997). Questionnaire methods of cognitive self-statement assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 911-927.
33. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Role of presentation time in recall of game and random positions (Tech. Rep. C.I.P. 524). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
34. Gruber, H. E. (1996). The life space of a scientist: the visionary function and other aspects of Jean Piaget's thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 251-265.
35. Hanesley, P. A. (1999). The role of cognitive style in transforming preschoolers' gifted potential. Roeper Review, 21(4), 272.
36. Hannafin, M., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 101-117.
37. Hilgard, E. R. (1997). A personal view of 20th-century psychology: With an eye to the 21st century. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Mind and brain sciences in the 21st century (pp. 11-15). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Holland, J. L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52,136-147.
39. Hong, E. (1995). Mental models in word problem solving: A comparison between American and Korean sixth-grade students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 123-142.
40. Hong, E. (in preparation). Mental models of science-gifted adolescents.
41. Hong, E., & O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1992). Instructional strategies to help learners build relevant mental models in inferential statistics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84,150-159.
42. Hong, E., Whiston, S. C., & Milgram, R. M. (1993). Leisure activities in career guidance for gifted and talented adolescents: A validation study of the Tel-Aviv activities inventory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37,65-68.
43. Horowitz, F. D., & O'Brien, M. (1985). Epilogue: Perspectives on research and development. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 437-454). Washington, DC: American psychological Association.
44. Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1986). A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151-181). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Janassen, D. IL, Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. A. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Kail, R. (1997). Processing time, imagery, and spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64,67-78.
47. Kanevsky, L. (1992). The learning game. In P. S. Klein & a. J. Tanncnbaum (Eds.), To be young and gifted (pp. 204-241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48. Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8,255-273.
49. Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (1997). Knowing that you don't know: metamcmory and discourse processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1378-1393.
50. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational Implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52,57-66.
51. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal-of-Experimental-Psychology: General, volume 126, 349-370.
52. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory metaphors and the real-life laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 167-188.
53. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4,317-345.
54. Livne, N. L., Livne, O. E., & Milgram, R. M. (in press). Assessing academic and creative abilities in mathematics at four levels of understanding. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.
55. Malpass, J. R., O'Neil, H. F., Hocevar, D. (1999). Self-regulation, goal orientation, self-efficacy, worry, and high-stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21(4) 281-288.
56. McLellan, H. (1994). Situated learning: Continuing the conversation. Educational Technology. 34, 7-8.
57. Miller, L. T., & Vernon, P. A. (1997). Developmental changes in speed of information processing in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33,549-554.
58. Mumford, M. D. (1998). Creative thought: Structure, components, and educational implications. Roeper Review, 21, 14-19.
59. Neisser, U. (1992). Two themes in the study of cognition. In J. L. Pick, Jr., P. van den Broek, & D. C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 333-340). Washington, DC: American psychological Association.
60. Overtoom-Cosmit, R., Dekker, R., & Span, P. (1990). Information processing in intellectually highly gifted children by solving mathematical tasks. Gifted Education International, 6, 143-148.
61. Park, O., & Gittelman, S. S. (1995). Dynamic characteristics of mental modes! and dynamic visual displays. Instructional Science, 23,303-320.
62. Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Developmental accounts of the transition from medical students to doctor: Some problems and suggestions. Medical Education, 25,527-535.
63. Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgoid, A. M. (1981). Interactive processes in reading: Where do we stand? In A. M. Lesgoid & Ca. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 387-407). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Priest, A. G., & Lindsay, R. O. (1992). New light on novice-expert differences in physics problem solving. British-Journal-of-Psychology, 83,389-405.
65. Rabinowitz, M., Glaser, R. (1985). Cognitive structure and process in highly competent performance. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 75-98). Washington, DC: American psychological Association.
66. Richman, H. B., Gobet, F., Staszewski, J. J., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Perceptual and memory processes in the acquisition of expert performance: The EPAM model. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 167-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Roediger, H. L. (1997). TTie future of cognitive psychology? In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Mind and brain sciences in the 21st century (pp. 175-198). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
68. Roeper, T. (1998). The indivisibility of self, mind, and intelligence. Roeper Review, 20,199- 203.
69. Rogers, K. B. (1986). Do the gifted think differently? A review of recent research and its implications for instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 719(1), 17-39.
70. Saccuzzo, D. P., Johnson, N. E., & Guertin, T. L. (1994). Information processing in gifted versus nongifted African American, Latino, Filipino, and white children: Speeded versus nonspeedcd paradigms. Intelligence, 19, 219-243.
71. Salomon, G. (1993). (Ed). Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
72. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Stevens, T. P., & Carr, M. (1997). Metacognitive Knowledge of Gifted Children and Nonidentified Children in Early Elementary School. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41,25-35.
73. Sheppard, S., & Kanevsky, L. S. (1999). Nurturing gifted students' metacognitive awareness: effects of training in homogeneous and heterogeneous classes. Roeper Review, 27(4) 266-272.
74. Shore, B. M., & Kanevsky, L. (1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 133-147). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
75. Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Smagorinsky, P. (1995). The social construction of data: Methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research, 65, 191-212.
78. Starkes, J. I., & Allard, F. (1993). Cognitive issues in motor expertise. Amsterdam: North- Holland.
79. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11-20.
80. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9-17.
81. Thagard, P. (1996). Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
82. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual (revised). Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
83. Walberg, H. J., and 17 associates. (1996). Childhood traits and experiences of eminent women. Creativity Research Journal, 9,97-102.
84. Ward, T. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive psychology, 27, 1-40.
85. Ward, T., Saunders, K. N., & Dodds, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 27(4), 260-266.
86. Winner, E. (1996). The rage to mater: The decisive role of talent in the visual arts. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 271-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.