Who is creative? identifying children's creative abilities

Roeper Review

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 40-46

  Fishkin, Anne S ^a   Johnson, Aileen S ^b  

^a Marshall University Graduate College   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT BROWNSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007883789     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199809553925     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abeel, L. B., Callahan, C. M., & Hunsaker, S. L. (1994). The use of published instruments in the identification of gifted students. (Monograph). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
2. Amabile, T. M. (in press). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Aschbacher, P. R. (1991). Performance assessment: State activity, interest, and concerns. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 275-288.
4. Baer, J. (1994). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 17, 7-11.
5. Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1987). Creative product analysis: Testing a model by developing a judging instrument. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics, (pp. 341-357). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
6. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. NY: Teachers College Press.
7. Callahan, C. M. (1991). The assessment of creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 219-236). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Chase, C. I. (1985). [Review of the test Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking]. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook: Vol. 2 (pp. 1630-1634). Lincoln: NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
9. Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1993). Issues and practices related to identification of gifted and talented students in the visual arts, Spotlight, Newsletter of the Visual and Performing Arts Division of the National Association for Gifted Children, 3 (2), 1-7.
10. Cohen, L., & Gelbrich, J. (1998). Early childhood interests: Seeds of adult creativity. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11. Cramond, B. (1994). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: From design through establishment of predictive validity. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp 229-254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Cramond, B. (1998). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Going beyond the scores. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
13. Davis, G. A. (1989). Testing for creative potential. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 257-274.
14. Davis, G. A. (1992). Creativity is forever (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
15. Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Dawson, V. L. (1997). In search of the wild bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19, 148-152.
17. Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231-247.
18. Fishkin, A. S. (1998). Issues in studying creativity in youth. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19. Frasier, M. M. (1994). The Frasier Talent Assessment Profile (FTAP): A multiple criteria model for the identification and education of gifted students. (University of Georgia, Torrance Center for Creative Studies).
20. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.
21. Haensley, P. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Creativity and intelligence. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 33-52). New York: Plenum.
22. Haroutounian, J. (1993). Identifying talent in the performing arts, Spotlight, Newsletter of the Visual and Performing Arts Division of the National Association for Gifted Children, 3 (2), 1-7.
23. Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds, (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum.
24. Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (1991). Original thinking in preschool children: A validation of ideational fluency measures. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 253-260.
25. Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (1996). The structure of giftedness: The domain of literature as an exemplar. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 31-40.
26. Hunsaker, S. L. (1994). Adjustments to traditional procedures for identifying underserved students: Successes and failures. Exceptional Child, 61, 72-76.
27. Hunsaker, S. L., & Callahan, C. M. (1995). Creativity and giftedness: Published instrument uses and abuses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 110-114.
28. Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Introduction: An orientation to the frontiers of creativity research. In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 1-26). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
29. Isaksen, S. G., Fierstien, R. L., Murdock, M. C., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). The assessment of creativity: An occasional paper from the Creativity Based Information Resources Project. Buffalo, NY: Center for Studies in Creativity.
30. Jatko, B. P. (1995). Using a whole class tryout procedure for identifying economically disadvantaged students in three socioeconomically diverse schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 83-105.
31. Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 138-155.
32. Johnsen, S. K., & Ryser, G. K. (1997). The validity of portfolios in predicting performance in a gifted program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 253-267.
33. Johnson, A. S., & Fishkin, A. S. (1998). Assessment of cognitive and affective behaviors related to creativity. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34. Keyser, D. J. & Sweetland, R. C. (Eds.) (1992). Test critiques (Vol. 9). Austin, TX: Pro- Ed.
35. Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1990). Manual for Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
36. Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Armstrong, D. (1998). Diagnostic assessment of creativity in students. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37. Kramer, J. J., & Conoley, J. C. (Eds.) (1992). The eleventh mental measurement yearbook. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
38. Lazear, D. (1994). Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment: Solving the assessment conundrum. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
39. MacKinnon, D. W. (1961). The study of creativity. In D. W. MacKinnon (Ed.), The creative person (pp. I-1 - I-15) [Proceedings of Conference at theTahoe Alumni Center, October, 1961], Berkeley: Institute of Personality Assessment Research, University of California.
40. Magyari-Beck, I. (1993). Creatology: A potential paradigm for an emerging discipline. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 48-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Meeker, M., Meeker, R., & Roid, G. H. (1985). Structure of Intellect Learning Abilities Test Manual, Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
42. Michael, W. B., & Wright, C. R. (1989) Psychometric issues in the assessment of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 33-52). New York: Plenum.
43. Milgram, R. M., Dunn, R., & Price, G. E. (Eds.). (1993). Teaching gifted and talented learners for learning style: An international perspective. New York: Praeger.
44. Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1993). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. Roeper Review, 15, 135-139.
45. Murdock, M. C., & Puccio, G. J. (1993). A contextual organizer for conducting creativity research. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 249-280). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. Ohio Department of Education (1992). Model for the identification of creative-thinking ability. Columbus, OH: Author.
47. Parnes, S. J. (1972). Creative potential and the educational experience. In Creativity: Unlocking human potential (pp. 6-30). Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. (Reprinted from paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., April, 1967).
48. Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York: Merrill.
49. Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1996). Where art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 81-92.
50. Pyryt, M. (1998). Effectiveness of training children's divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
51. Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (1997). Giftedness from a multiple intelligences perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128-134.
53. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition, Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-84, 261.
54. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., & Hartman, R. K. (1976). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
55. Rhodes, M. (1961/1987) An analysis of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 216-222). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
56. Rimm, S.B. (1980). Group Inventory for Finding Creative Talent. Watertown, WI: Educational Assessment Service.
57. Rogers, K. (1998). Is creativity quantitatively measurable? A paradigm for creativity research. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
58. Rose, L. H., & Lin, H. T. (1984). A meta-analysis of a long-term creativity training program. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22.
59. Rosenthal, A., DeMers, S. T., Stillwell, W., Graybeal, S., & Zins, J. (1983). Comparison of inter-rater reliability on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking for gifted and nongifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 35-40.
60. Runco, M.A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
61. Runco, M. A. (1993a). Cognitive and psychometric issues in creativity research. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, M. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline, (pp. 331-368). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Runco, M. A. (1993b). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 16-22.
63. Shaw, M. P. (1994). Affective components of scientific creativity. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.) Creativity and affect, (pp. 3-43). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64. Tardif, T.Z., & Steinberg, R.J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspective (pp. 429-440). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
66. Torrance, E. P. (1987). Teaching for creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 189-215). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
67. Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
68. Torrance, E. P., & Ball, O. (1984). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Directions manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
69. Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1989). The long range predictive validity of the Just Suppose Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 219-223.
70. Treffinger, D. J. (1987). Research on creativity assessment. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics, (pp. 103-119). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
71. Treffinger, D. J. (1995, July-September). Assessing creativity in educational settings. Creative Learning Today 5 (3), 2-5. (Available from Center for Creative Learning, 4152 Independence Court, Suite C-7, Sarasota, FL 34234).
72. Vaughn, V.L., Feldhusen, J.F., & Asher, J.W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92-98.
73. Wakefield, J. F. (1987, November). The outlook for creativity tests. Paper presented at Council for Exceptional Children's Topical Conference on the Future of Special Education, Orlando, FL.
74. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt.