Modifiers of the Genotype–Phenotype Map: Hsp90 and Beyond

PLoS Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Schell, Rachel ^a   Mullis, Martin ^a   Ehrenreich, Ian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90;

DNA POLYMORPHISM; EPISTASIS; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; REVIEW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HUMAN;

EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; HSP90 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85007281943     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001015     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Rutherford SL, Lindquist S, Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998;396(6709):336–42. doi: 10.1038/245509845070
2. Queitsch C, Sangster TA, Lindquist S, Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;417(6889):618–24. doi: 10.1038/nature74912050657
3. Jarosz DF, Lindquist S, Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science. 2010;330(6012):1820–4. doi: 10.1126/science.119548721205668
4. Gibson G, Dworkin I, Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(9):681–90. doi: 10.1038/nrg142615372091
5. Hermisson J, Wagner GP, The population genetic theory of hidden variation and genetic robustness. Genetics. 2004;168(4):2271–84. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.02917315611191
6. Paaby AB, Rockman MV, Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(4):247–58. doi: 10.1038/nrg368824614309
7. Taylor MB, Phan J, Lee JT, McCadden M, Ehrenreich IM, Diverse genetic architectures lead to the same cryptic phenotype in a yeast cross. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11669. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1166927248513
8. Cowen LE, Lindquist S, Hsp90 potentiates the rapid evolution of new traits: drug resistance in diverse fungi. Science. 2005;309(5744):2185–9. doi: 10.1126/science.111837016195452
9. Rohner N, Jarosz DF, Kowalko JE, Yoshizawa M, Jeffery WR, Borowsky RL, et al. Cryptic variation in morphological evolution: Hsp90 as a capacitor for loss of eyes in cavefish. Science. 2013;342(6164):1372–5. doi: 10.1126/science.124027624337296
10. Le Rouzic A, Carlborg O, Evolutionary potential of hidden genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(1):33–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.01418079017
11. Masel J, Siegal ML, Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet. 2009;25(9):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.00519717203
12. Ehrenreich IM, Pfennig DW, Genetic assimilation: a review of its potential proximate causes and evolutionary consequences. Ann Bot. 2016;117(5):769–79. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv13026359425
13. Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S, Hsp90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(7):515–28. doi: 10.1038/nrm291820531426
14. Jarosz DF, Taipale M, Lindquist S, Protein homeostasis and the phenotypic manifestation of genetic diversity: principles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:189–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.09041221047258
15. Geiler-Samerotte KA, Zhu YO, Goulet BE, Hall DW, Siegal ML, Selection transforms the landscape of genetic variation interacting with Hsp90. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000465
16. Sangster TA, Salathia N, Lee HN, Watanabe E, Schellenberg K, Morneau K, et al. Hsp90-buffered genetic variation is common in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(8):2969–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071221010518287064
17. Sangster TA, Salathia N, Undurraga S, Milo R, Schellenberg K, Lindquist S, et al. Hsp90 affects the expression of genetic variation and developmental stability in quantitative traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(8):2963–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071220010518287065
18. Siegal ML, Leu JY, On the nature and evolutionary impact of phenotypic robustness mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2014;45:496–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-09170526034410
19. Mani R, St Onge RP, Hartman JLt, Giaever G, Roth FP, Defining genetic interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(9):3461–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071225510518305163
20. Phillips PC, Epistasis—the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(11):855–67. doi: 10.1038/nrg245218852697
21. Mackay TF, Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(1):22–33. doi: 10.1038/nrg362724296533
22. Taylor MB, Ehrenreich IM, Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits. Trends Genet. 2015;31(1):34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.00125284288
23. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, Lite TL, Kruglyak L, Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature. 2013;494(7436):234–7. doi: 10.1038/nature1186723376951
24. Bloom JS, Kotenko I, Sadhu MJ, Treusch S, Albert FW, Kruglyak L, Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8712. doi: 10.1038/ncomms971226537231
25. Tirosh I, Reikhav S, Sigal N, Assia Y, Barkai N, Chromatin regulators as capacitors of interspecies variations in gene expression. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:435. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.8421119629
26. Richardson JB, Uppendahl LD, Traficante MK, Levy SF, Siegal ML, Histone variant HTZ1 shows extensive epistasis with, but does not increase robustness to, new mutations. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(8):e1003733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100373323990806
27. Taylor MB, Ehrenreich IM, Transcriptional derepression uncovers cryptic higher-order genetic interactions. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(10):e1005606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100560626484664
28. True HL, Lindquist SL, A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity. Nature. 2000;407(6803):477–83. doi: 10.1038/3503500511028992
29. True HL, Berlin I, Lindquist SL, Epigenetic regulation of translation reveals hidden genetic variation to produce complex traits. Nature. 2004;431(7005):184–7. doi: 10.1038/nature0288515311209
30. Halfmann R, Jarosz DF, Jones SK, Chang A, Lancaster AK, Lindquist S, Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature. 2012;482(7385):363–8. doi: 10.1038/nature1087522337056
31. Chakrabortee S, Byers JS, Jones S, Garcia DM, Bhullar B, Chang A, et al. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Drive Emergence and Inheritance of Biological Traits. Cell. 2016;167(2):369–81e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.01727693355
32. Levy SF, Siegal ML, Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(11):e264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.006026418986213
33. Ehrenreich IM, Torabi N, Jia Y, Kent J, Martis S, Shapiro JA, et al. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1039–42. doi: 10.1038/nature0892320393561
34. Bergman A, Siegal ML, Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature. 2003;424(6948):549–52. doi: 10.1038/nature0176512891357
35. Omholt SW, Plahte E, Oyehaug L, Xiang K, Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis. Genetics. 2000;155(2):969–80. 10835414
36. Gjuvsland AB, Hayes BJ, Omholt SW, Carlborg O, Statistical epistasis is a generic feature of gene regulatory networks. Genetics. 2007;175(1):411–20. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.05885917028346
37. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 2010;327(5964):425–31. doi: 10.1126/science.118082320093466
38. Chen B, Wagner A, Hsp90 is important for fecundity, longevity, and buffering of cryptic deleterious variation in wild fly populations. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-2522369091
39. Ronnegard L, Valdar W, Detecting major genetic loci controlling phenotypic variability in experimental crosses. Genetics. 2011;188(2):435–47. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.12706821467569
40. Nelson RM, Pettersson ME, Li X, Carlborg O, Variance heterogeneity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression data: trans-regulation and epistasis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.007950724223957
41. Forsberg SKG, Bloom JS, Sadhu MJ, Kruglyak L, Carlborg O, Accounting for genetic interactions is necessary for accurate prediction of extreme phenotypic values of quantitative traits in yeast. bioRxiv. 2016. Preprint. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/059485
42. Hallin J, Märtens K, Young AI, Zackrisson M, Salinas F, Parts L, et al. Powerful decomposition of complex traits in a diploid model. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13311. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13311.27804950