Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics

Periodontology 2000

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 178-192

  Joda, Tim ^a   Ferrari, Marco ^a   Gallucci, German O ^a   Wittneben, Julia Gabriela ^a   Brägger, Urs ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMPLANT-SUPPORTED DENTURE; LABORATORY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHODONTICS; TRENDS; WORKFLOW;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; LABORATORIES, DENTAL; PROSTHODONTICS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 85006789355     PISSN: 09066713     EISSN: 16000757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/prd.12164     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Abduo J, Lyons K. Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. Int J Dent 2013: 2013: 768121.
2. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014: 2014: 783948.
3. Alani A, Corson M. Soft tissue manipulation for single implant restorations. Br Dent J 2011: 211: 411–416.
4. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014: 111: 186–194.
5. Avery DR. The maturation of CAD/CAM. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010: 31: 391–394, 396–398
6. Bassi F, Carr AB, Chang TL, Estafanous EW, Garrett NR, Happonen RP, Koka S, Laine J, Osswald M, Reintsema H, Rieger J, Roumanas E, Salinas TJ, Stanford CM, Wolfaardt J. Economic outcomes in prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont 2013: 26: 465–469.
7. Bauer JC, Brown WT. The digital transformation of oral health care. Teledentistry and electronic commerce. J Am Dent Assoc 2001: 132: 204–209.
8. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009: 80: 140–151.
9. Berman B. 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horizons 2012: 55: 155–162.
10. Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, Edelhoff D, Naumann M. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dent Mater 2012: 28: 449–456.
11. Bouchard P, Renouard F, Bourgeois D, Fromentin O, Jeanneret MH, Beresniak A. Cost-effectiveness modeling of dental implant vs. bridge. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009: 20: 583–587.
12. Braegger U. Cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of periodontitis prevention. J Clin Periodontol 2005: 32 (Suppl. 6): 301–313.
13. Buch RS, Weibrich G, Wegener J, Wagner W. [Patient satisfaction with dental implants]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2002: 6: 433–436.
14. Buskin R, Salinas TJ. Transferring emergence profile created from the provisional to the definitive restoration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998: 10: 1171–1179; quiz 1180.
15. Chee WW. Treatment planning and soft-tissue management for optimal implant esthetics: a prosthodontic perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003: 31: 559–563.
16. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016: pii: S0022–3913(16)00041-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009: 140: 1301–1304.
18. Cooper LF. Objective criteria: guiding and evaluating dental implant esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008: 20: 195–205.
19. Dawood A, Purkayastha S, Patel S, MacKillop F, Tanner S. Microtechnologies in implant and restorative dentistry: a stroll through a digital dental landscape. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010: 224: 789–796.
20. den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008: 35: 1073–1086.
21. Eaddy MT, Cook CL, O'Day K, Burch SP, Cantrell CR. How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review. P T 2012: 37: 45–55.
22. Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012: 14 (Suppl. 1): e30–e38.
23. Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013: 16: 11–21.
24. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015: 46: 9–17.
25. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010: 31 (Spec No 4): 2–11; quiz 12.
26. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005: 16: 639–644.
27. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008: 19: 1–4.
28. Griffin JD Jr. Combining monolithic zirconia crowns, digital impressioning, and regenerative cement for a predictable restorative alternative to PFM. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013: 34: 212–222.
29. Hammerle CH, Stone P, Jung RE, Kapos T, Brodala N. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009: 24 (Suppl): 126–131.
30. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010: 43: 159–172.
31. Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent 2015: 113: 623–627.
32. Joda T. Time-dependent supraimplant mucosa changes: short communication. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015: 30: 619–621.
33. Joda T, Bragger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014: 25: 1304–1306.
34. Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015: 26: 1430–1435.
35. Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015: doi: 10.1111/clr.12600. [Epub ahead of print].
36. Joda T, Bragger U. Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: a prospective clinical crossover trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015: 30: 1047–1053.
37. Joda T, Bragger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016: doi: 10.1111/clr.12753. [Epub ahead of print]
38. Joda T, Bragger U, Gallucci G. Systematic literature review of digital three-dimensional superimposition techniques to create virtual dental patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015: 30: 330–337.
39. Joda T, Burki A, Bethge S, Bragger U, Zysset P. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015: 30: 1272–1279.
40. Joda T, Buser D. Digital implant dentistry – a workflow in five steps. CAD/CAM 2013: 4: 16–20.
41. Joda T, Ferrari M, Braegger U. A digital approach for one-step formation of the supra-implant emergence profile with an individualized CAD/CAM healing abutment. J Prosthodont Res 2016: doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.005. [Epub ahead of print].
42. Joda T, Gallucci GO. The virtual patient in dental medicine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015: 26: 725–726.
43. Joda T, Huber S, Burki A, Zysset P, Bragger U. Influence of abutment design on stiffness, strength, and failure of implant-supported monolithic resin nano ceramic (RNC) crowns. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015: 17: 1200–1207.
44. Joda T, Katsoulis J, Bragger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015: doi: 10.1111/cid.12377 [Epub ahead of print].
45. Joda T, Wittneben JG, Bragger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014: 25: 395–397.
46. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 38: 323–330.
47. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009: 24 (Suppl): 110–117.
48. Kapos T, Evans CA. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014: 29(Suppl): 117–136.
49. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Rotkina L, Zbaren C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014: 25: 165–174.
50. Katsoulis J, Muller P, Mericske-Stern R, Blatz MB. CAD/CAM fabrication accuracy of long- vs. short-span implant-supported FDPs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015: 26: 245–249.
51. Kim JH, Lee SJ, Park JS, Ryu JJ. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration. Implant Dent 2013: 22: 66–70.
52. Layton D, Walton T. Patient-evaluated dentistry: development and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for fixed prosthodontic treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2011: 24: 332–341.
53. Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015: 26: 715–719.
54. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implant Res 2013: 24: 111–115.
55. Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol 2000 1998: 17: 47–54.
56. Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013: 28: 480–487.
57. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009: 28: 44–56.
58. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014: 112: 1461–1471.
59. Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Troger M, Vairaktaris E, Neukam FW, Fenner M. Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: a prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007: 18: 197–203.
60. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO, Doukoudakis A, Weber HP, Chronopoulos V. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014: 29: 836–845.
61. Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010: 141 (Suppl. 2): 20S–24S.
62. Pennington M, Vernazza C, Heasman P. Making the leap from cost analysis to cost-effectiveness. J Clin Periodontol 2009: 36: 667–668.
63. Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009: 25: 929–936.
64. Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Berge SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011: 40: 341–352.
65. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011: 22: 223–229.
66. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011: 22: 106–112.
67. Priest G. Developing optimal tissue profiles implant-level provisional restorations. Dent Today 2005: 24: 96, 98, 100.
68. Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005: 63: 22–32.
69. Redmond WR. Digital models: a new diagnostic tool. J Clin Orthod 2001: 35: 386–387.
70. Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996: 276: 1172–1177.
71. Santosa RE. Provisional restoration options in implant dentistry. Aust Dent J 2007: 52: 234–242; quiz 254.
72. Schoenbaum TR. Dentistry in the digital age: an update. Dent Today 2012: 31: 108, 110, 112–103.
73. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013: 17: 1759–1764.
74. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016: 32: 54–64.
75. Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Invest 2012: 16: 851–856.
76. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F, Neyt N, Casselman J, Schutyser F. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 2009: 20: 297–307.
77. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, Teller C, Bernhart T, Monov G, Watzek G. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. II. Implant acceptance, patient-perceived cost and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003: 14: 634–642.
78. Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015: 16: 1–9.
79. Touchstone A, Nieting T, Ulmer N. Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2010: 141 (Suppl 2): 15S–19S.
80. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012: 7: e43312.
81. van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J 2013: 215: E21.
82. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012: 28: 3–12.
83. Walton TR, Layton DM. Cost satisfaction analysis: a novel patient-based approach for economic analysis of the utility of fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 2012: 39: 692–703.
84. Wismeijer D, Bragger U, Evans C, Kapos T, Kelly JR, Millen C, Wittneben JG, Zembic A, Taylor TD. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding restorative materials and techniques for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014: 29 (Suppl): 137–140.
85. Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014: 25: 1113–1118.
86. Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Buser D, Joda T. Volumetric calculation of supra-implant submergence profile after soft-tissue conditioning with a provisional restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016: 36: 785–790.
87. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014: 14: 10.
88. Ziegler M. Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision. Int J Comput Dent 2009: 12: 159–163.