Mixed methods

Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 135-161

  Ivankova, Nataliya V ^a   Creswell, John W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006460264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230239517     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Foundations and approaches to mixed methods research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik Publishers.
3. Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied social research methods series, 46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (2004). Instructor use of online language learning resources: A survey of socio-institutional and motivational factors. ReCALL, 16(2), 292-307.
7. Saito, H., & Ebsworth, M. E. (2004). Seeing English language teaching and learning through the eyes of Japanese EFL and ESL students. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 111-124.
8. Thang, S. M. (2005). Investigating Malaysian distance learners' perceptions of their English proficiency courses. Open Learning, 20(3), 243-256.
9. Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257-283.
10. Daud, N. M. (1995). A computer attitude scale for language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(4), 355-363.
11. Berne, J. E. (1998). Examining the relationship between L2 listening research, pedagogical theory, and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 31(2), 169-179.
12. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiating for meaning and peer assistance in second language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430.
13. Hawkey, R. (2006). Teacher and learner perceptions of language learning activity. ELT Journal, 60(3), 242-252.
14. Hinger, B. (2006). The distribution of instructional time and its effect on group cohesion in foreign language classroom: A comparison of intensive and standard format courses. System, 34(1), 97-118.
15. Andrews, S. (2006). The evolution of teachers' language awareness. Language Awareness, 15(1), 1-19.
16. Huang, S. C., & Chang, S. F. (1998). Self-efficacy in learners of English as a second language: Four examples. Journal of Intensive English Studies, 12, 23-40.
17. Taguchi, E., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(2), 70-96.
18. Andrews, S. (2006). The evolution of teachers' language awareness. Language Awareness, 15(1), 1-19.
19. Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative approaches to research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Pearson Education.
21. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 1-7.
22. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Daud, N. M. (1995). A computer attitude scale for language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(4), 355-363.
25. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Gravetter, F. L., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.
27. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
28. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Foundations and approaches to mixed methods research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik Publishers.
29. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. (2006). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20.
30. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
31. Jie, L., & Xiaoqing, Q. (2006). Language learning styles and learning strategies of tertiary-level English learners in China. RELC Journal, 37(1), 67-90.
32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Lopez, M. G., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). Differential outcomes of two bilingual education programs on English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 123-145.
34. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 362-376.
35. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
36. Onwuegbuzie, A., & Johnson, B. (2006). The validity issues in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
37. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Rocco, T., Bliss, L., Gallagher, S., Perez-Prado, A., Alacaci, C., Dwyer, E. S. et al. (2003). The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: Two views of mixed methods use in education. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 595-615). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Saito, H., & Ebsworth, M. E. (2004). Seeing English language teaching and learning through the eyes of Japanese EFL and ESL students. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 111-124.
40. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied social research methods series, 46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Thorndike, R. M. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (7th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merill Prentice Hall.