The role of emotions in drinking recycled water

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Leong, Ching ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Emotions; Public policy; Q methodology; Recycled water; Water governance

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; POTABLE WATER; PUBLIC POLICY; RECYCLING; WATER; WATER SUPPLY;

EMOTIONS; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTIONS; Q METHODOLOGY; RECYCLED WATER; TECHNICAL DECISION MAKING; WATER GOVERNANCE;

WATER RECYCLING;

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RECYCLING; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 85003680950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w8110548     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Paris, France, 2015.
2. Bourne, E. Global Shift: How a NewWorldview is Transforming Humanity; New Harbinger Publications: Oakland, CA, USA, 2009.
3. Heck, N.; Paytan, A.; Potts, D.C.; Haddad, B. Predictors of local support for a seawater desalination plant in a small coastal community. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 66, 101-111.
4. Gleick, P.H.Water in crisis: Paths to sustainable water use. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8, 571-579.
5. Kennedy, L.A.; Tsuchihasi, R. Is water reuse sustainable? Factors affecting its sustainability. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2005, 30, 3-15.
6. Furumai, H. Rainwater and reclaimed wastewater for sustainable urban water use. Phys. Chem. Earth A/B/C 2008, 33, 340-346.
7. Anderson, J. The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 3, 1-10.
8. Kucera, J. Introduction to desalination. In Desalination: Water fromWater; Kucera, J., Ed.; Scrivener Publishing: Austin, TX, USA, 2014; pp. 3-37.
9. Kajenthira, A.; Siddiqi, A.; Anadon, L.D. A new case for promoting wastewater reuse in Saudi Arabia: Bringing energy into the water equation. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 102, 184-192.
10. Sala, L.; Serra, M. Towards sustainability in water recycling. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50, 1-7.
11. Jaeger, W.K.; Plantinga, A.J.; Chang, H.; Dello, K.; Grant, G.; Hulse, D.; McDonnell, J.J.; Lancaster, S.; Moradkhani, H.; Morzillo, A.T.; et al. Toward a formal definition of water scarcity in natural-human systems. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 4506-4517.
12. Al-Jayyousi, O.R. Greywater reuse: Towards sustainable water management. Desalination 2003, 156, 181-192.
13. Angelakis, A.N.; Snyder, S.A. Wastewater treatment and reuse: Past, present, and future. Water 2015, 7, 4887-4895.
14. Lazarova, V.; Levine, B.; Sack, J.; Cirelli, G.; Jeffrey, P.; Muntau, H.; Salgot, M.; Brissaud, F. Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 25-33.
15. Rodriguez, C.; van Buynder, P.; Lugg, R.; Blair, P.; Devine, B.; Cook, A.;Weinstein, P. Indirect potable reuse: A sustainable water supply alternative. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1174-1203.
16. Bixio, D.; de Heyder, B.; Cikurel, H.; Muston, M.; Miska, V.; Joksimovic, D.; Schafer, A. MunicipalWastewater reclamation: Where do we stand? An overview of treatment technology and management practice. Water Sci. Technol. Water Suppl. 2005, 5, 77-85.
17. Meehan, K.; Ormerod, K.J.; Moore, S.A. Remaking waste as water: The governance of recycled effluent for potable water supply. Water Altern. 2013, 6, 67-85.
18. ACCESSanitation. Recycling Wastewater to Bolster Ground Water Supply: The Atlantis Story. Available online: http://www.awasla.org/Docs/ACCESS_Case_study_Atlantis_SA.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2016).
19. Dolnicar, S.; Hurlimann, A.; Nghiem, L.D. The effect of information on public acceptance-the case of water from alternative sources. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 1288-1293.
20. Dolnicar, S.; Schafer, A. Public perception of desalinated versus recycled water in Australia. In Proceedings of the AWWA Desalination Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 7-9 May 2006.
21. Hurlimann, A.C. Melbourne office worker attitudes to recycled water use. Water J. Aust. Water Assoc. 2006, 33, 58-65.
22. Hurlimann, A.C. Is recycled water use risky? An urban Australian community's perspective. Environmentalist 2007, 21, 83-94.
23. Marks, J.S.; Martin, B.; Zadoroznyj, M. How Australians order acceptance of recycled water: National baseline data. J. Sociol. 2008, 44, 83-99.
24. Po, M.; Nancarrow, B.E.; Kaercher, J.D. Literature Review of Factors Influencing Public Perceptions of Water Reuse. Available online: https://www.clearwater.asn.au/user-data/research-projects/swf-files/16-layingthe-foundation-for-confident-barrier-free-water-conservation-and-reuse-literature-review.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2016).
25. Lundholm, C.; Plummer, R. Resilience and learning: A conspectus for environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 2010, 16, 475-491.
26. MacDonald, J.P.; Harper, S.L.; Willox, A.C.; Edge, V.L. A necessary voice: Climate change and lived experiences of youth in Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 360-371.
27. Marshall, A.J.; Meijaard, E.; van Cleave, E.; Sheil, D. Charisma counts: The presence of great apes affects the allocation of research effort in the paleotropics. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 14, 13-19.
28. Hine, D.W.; Phillips, W.J.; Cooksey, R.; Reser, J.P.; Nunn, P.; Marks, A.D.; Loi, N.M.; Watt, S.E. Preaching to different choirs: How to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 36, 1-11.
29. Vasileiadou, E.; Botzen, W.J. Communicating adaption with emotions: The role of intense experiences in raising concern about extreme weather. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 36.
30. Roeser, S. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Anal. 2012, 32, 1033-1040.
31. Gadamer, H.G. Truth and Method; Sheed and Ward: London, UK, 1979.
32. Cox, J. How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 2004, 46, 260-281.
33. Cox, J.; Friedman, D.; Gjerstad, S. A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness. Games Econ. Behav. 2007, 59, 17-45.
34. Jones, B.D.; Baumgartner, F.R. The Politics of Attention; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2005.
35. Hacker, J.S. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 2004, 98, 243-260.
36. Maor, M. Policy bubbles: Policy overreaction and positive feedback. Governance 2014, 27, 469-487.
37. Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5, 297-323.
38. Jolls, C.; Sunstein, C.R.; Thaler, R. A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanf. Law Rev. 1998, 50, 1471-1550.
39. Cox, R.H.; Béland, D. Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability. Governance 2013, 26, 307-328.
40. Jones, B.D.; Thomas, H.F.;Wolfe, M. Policy bubbles. Policy Stud. J. 2014, 42, 146-171.
41. Maor, M.; Gross, J. Emotion regulation by emotional entrepreneurs: Implications for political science and international relations. In Proceedings of the 73rd AnnualMPSA Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 16-19 April 2015.
42. Baumgartner, F.R.; Jones, B.D. Policy Agendas Project: Roll Call Votes. Available online: http://www. policyagendas.org (accessed on 6 October 2016).
43. Lasswell, H.D. The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci. 1970, 1, 3-14.
44. Wesselink, A.; Buchanan, K.S.; Georgiadou, Y.; Turnhout, E. Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science-policy interface. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30, 1-9.
45. Lasswell, H.D. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How? World Pub: New York, NY, USA, 1958.
46. Torgerson, D. Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell. Policy Sci. 1985, 18, 241-261.
47. Lasswell, H.D. The person: Subject and object of propaganda. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 1935, 179, 187-193.
48. Kingdon, J.W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies; Little, Brown and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1984.
49. Baumgartner, F.R.; Jones, B.D. Agendas and Instability in American Politics; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1993.
50. Mintrom, M. Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
51. Brouwer, S.; Biermann, F. Towards adaptive management: Examining the strategies of policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management. Ecol. Soc. 2001, 16, 5.
52. Lejano, R.P.; Tavares-Reager, J.; Berkes, F. Climate and narrative: Environmental knowledge in everyday life. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 31, 61-70.
53. Glymour, B.; Tanona, S. Reason, values and evidence: Rational dissent from scientific authority. In Between Scientists and Citizens: Proceedings of a Conference at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 1-2 June 2012; Jean, G., Ed.; Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation: Ames, IA, USA, 2012.
54. Turney, J. To Know Science is to Love It? Observations fromPublic Understanding of Science Research. Available online: http://www.communicatingastronomy.org/repository/guides/toknowscience.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2016).
55. Ratter, B.M.; Philipp, K.H.; von Storch, H. Between hype and decline: Recent trends in public perception of climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 18, 3-8.
56. Leiserowitz, A.; Maibach, E.; Roser-Renouf, C.; Smith, N. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' GlobalWarming Beliefs and Attitudes in June 2010; Yale Project on Climate Change Communication: New Haven, CT, USA, 2010.
57. Newport, F. Little Increase in Americans GlobalWarmingWorries. Available online: http://www.gallup. com/poll/106660/Little-IncreaseAmericans-Global-Warming-Worries.aspx3 (accessed on 6 October 2016).
58. Lahnsteiner, J.; Lempert, G. Water management in Windhoek, Namibia. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 441-448.
59. Lange, G. An approach to sustainable water management in Southern Africa using natural resource accounts: The experience in Namibia. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 26, 299-311.
60. Haarhoff, J.; van der Merwe, B. Twenty-five years of wastewater reclamation in Windhoek, Namibia. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33, 25-35.
61. Du Pisani, P.L. Direct reclamation of potable water at Windhoek's Goreangab reclamation plant. Desalination 2006, 188, 79-88.
62. Los Angeles Department ofWater and Power (LADWP). UrbanWater Management Plan; LADWP: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2005.
63. Reicher, M.; Scauzillo, S. $7.5 BillionWater Bond Could Meet California's Needs during Drought. Los Angeles Daily News, 16 August 2014.
64. Brown, S.R. A primer on Q methodology. Operant. Subj. 1993, 16, 91-138.
65. Focht, W. Assessment and management of policy conflict in the Illionois River watershed in Oklahoma: An Application of Q methodology. Int. J. Public Adm. 2002, 25, 1311-1349.
66. Davies, B.B.; Hodge, I.D. Exploring environmental perspectives in Lowland Agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 323-333.
67. Van Eeten, M.J.G. Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2001, 20, 391-414.
68. Martin, L.M.; Steelman, T.A. Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management. Policy Sci. 2004, 37, 37-69.
69. Smith, N.W. Current Systems in Psychology: History, Theory, Research and Application; Wadsworth: London, UK, 2001.
70. Rongmuang, D.; McElmurry, B.J.; McCreary, L.L.; Park, C.G.; Miller, A.G.; Corte, C. Regional differences in physical appearance identity among young adult women in Thailand. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2010, 33, 106-120.
71. Blyth, M. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
72. Howlett, M. Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 29, 395-403.