Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management

Policy Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 37-69

  Martin, Iingrid M ^a   Steelman, Toddi A ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; LAND MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3342911909     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:OLIC.0000035463.79209.52     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Addams, H. (2000). 'Q Methodology,' in H. Addams and J. Proops, eds., Social Discourse and Environmental Policy: An Application of Q Methodology. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 14-40.
2. Addams, H. and J. Proops (2000). Social Discourse and Environmental Policy: An Application of Q Methodology. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
3. Barry, J. and J. Proops (1999). 'Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology,' Ecological Economics 28: 337-45.
4. Bengston, D. N. (1994). 'Changing forest values and ecosystem management,' Society and Natural Resources 7: 515-533.
5. Brown, G. and C. C. Harris (1998). 'Professional foresters and the land ethic, revisited,' Journal of Forestry 96 (1): 4-12.
6. Brown, G. and C. C. Harris (1992a). 'The U.S. forest service: Toward the new resource management paradigm?' Society and Natural Resources 5: 231-245.
7. Brown, G. and C. C. Harris (1992b). 'The U.S. forest service: Changing of the guard,' Natural Resources Journal 32: 459-466.
8. Brown, S. R. (1971). 'The forced-free distinction in Q-technique,' Journal of Educational Measurement 8: 283-287.
9. Brown, S. R. (1985). 'Comments on the search for structure,' Political Methodology 11: 109-117.
10. Brown, T. (1984). 'The concept of value in resource allocation,' Land Economics 60: 231-246.
11. Carey, H. H. (1999). 'The guiding stare of ecological and rural sustainability,' Journal of Forestry 97 (5): 42-43.
12. Clarke, J. N. and D. McCool (1985). Staking out the Terrain: Power Differentials among Natural Resource Management Agencies. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY.
13. Cottle, C. E. and B. F. McKeown (1981). 'The forced free distinction in Q-technique: A note on unused categories in the Q-sort continuum,' Operant Subjectivity 3: 58-63.
14. Culhane, P. J. (1981). Public Lands Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Dombeck, M. (1999). 'USDA forest service to implement President's roadless initiative,' USDA United States Forest Service Press Release, October 13, 1999.
16. Dombeck, M. (1998). 'A gradual unfolding of a national purpose: A natural resource agenda for the 21st century,' Speech by Michael Dombeck, February 2, 1998. http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/GEM/MD%20speeches/CD.../ Natural%20Resources%20Agenda.html
17. Fan, D. and D. Bengston (1997). 'Public debates shaping forestry's future: An analysis,' Washington, D.C.: USDA Forest Service, Office of Communications.
18. Farnham, T. J., C. P. Taylor and W. Callaway (1995). 'A shift in values: Non-commodity resource management and the forest service,' Policy Studies Journal 23 (2): 281-295.
19. Farnham, T. J. and P. Mohai (1995). 'National forest timber management over the past decade: A change in emphasis for the forest service?' Policy Studies Journal 23 (2): 268-280.
20. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Gregg, N. T. (1992). 'Sustainability and politics,' Journal of Forestry 90 (7): 17-21.
22. Hays, S. P. (1987). Beauty, Health and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hays, S. P. (1959). Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement 1890-1920. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
24. Hirt, P. W. (1994). Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests Since World War Two. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
25. Iacobucci, D. (2001). 'Special issue: Methodological and statistical concerns of the experimental behavioral researcher,' Journal of Consumer Psychology 10 (1-2): 75-82.
26. Jenkins, J. J. (1979). 'Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments' in L. S. Cermak and F. I. M. Craik, eds., Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 429-446.
27. Johnson, N. K., J. Agee, R. Beschta, V. Dale, L. Hardesty, J. Long, L. Neilsen, B. Noon, R. Sedjo, M. Shannon, R. Trosper, C. Wilkinson, and J. Wondolleck (1999). 'Sustaining the people's lands: Recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century,' Journal of Forestry 97 (5): 6-12.
28. Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Kennedy, J. J. (1988). 'Legislative confrontation of groupthink in U.S. natural resource agencies,' Environmental Conservation 15 (2): 123-128.
30. Kennedy, J. J., M. P. Dombeck, and N. E. Koch (1998). 'Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the western world at the close of the twentieth century,' Unasylva 49: 16-26.
31. Martin, I. M., W. E. Martin, H. Bender, and D. J. Shields (1998). 'The impact of goals on the values, attitudes, behavior framework,' Decision Sciences Proceedings 1: 126-130.
32. Martin, W. E., I. M. Martin, and D. J. Shields (2002). 'A role for values in evaluating sustainability,' Working Paper.
33. McKeown, B. and D. Thomas (1988). Q Methodology. Newbury Park: Sage Publication.
34. Mohai, P. and P. Jakes (1996). 'The forest service in the 1990's: Is it headed in the right direction?' Journal of Forestry 94 (1): 31-37.
35. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Radin, B. A. (1998). 'The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): Hydra-headed monster or flexible management tool?' Public Administration Review 58 (4): 307-316.
37. Robertson, F. D. (1992). Statement before U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Forests, Family Farms, and Energy Committee on Agriculture concerning H.R. 1969 on 'Clearcutting and Ecosystem Management', June 16, 1992.
38. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. NY: The Free Press.
39. Sabatier, P., J. Loomis, and C. McCarthy (1996). 'Policy attitudes and decisions within the forest service,' Journal of Forestry 94 (1): 42-46.
40. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). 'Universals in the context and structure of values' theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries,' in M. P. Zanna, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 25, pp. 1-66.
41. Shields, D. J., I. M. Martin, W. E. Martin, and M. Haefele (2002). 'Survey results of the American public's values, objectives, beliefs, and attitudes regarding forests and grasslands,' RMRS-GTR-95, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
42. Steelman, T. A. and L. Maguire (1999). 'Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management,', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 (3): 361-388.
43. Tipple, T. J. and J. D. Wellman (1991). 'Herbert Kaufman's rorest ranger 30 years later: From simplicity and homogeneity to complexity and diversity,' Public Administration Review 51 (5): 421-428.
44. Twight, B. (1983). Organizational Value and Political Power: The Forest Service versus the Olympic National Park. Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park.
45. Wood, C. A. (2000). 'The next decade of the forest service: Does the past hold the key to the future?' in R. A. Sedjo, ed., A Vision for the U.S. Forest Service: Goals for its Next Century, pp. 49-56.
46. Xu, Z. and D. N. Bengston (1997). 'Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals