The effect of health claim information disclosure on the sensory characteristics of plant sterol-enriched turkey as assessed using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) methodology

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 57, Issue , 2017, Pages 69-78

  Grasso, S ^a   Monahan, F J ^a   Hutchings, S C ^b   Brunton, N P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

CATA; Functional meat; Health claim; Information disclosure; Plant sterols; Processed meat product; Sensory analysis; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 85003485972     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ares, G., Barreiro, C., Deliza, R., Gimenez, A., Gambaro, A., Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies 25 (2010), 67–86.
2. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization. Food Quality and Preference 28:1 (2013), 141–153.
3. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice. Experimental considerations and impact on outcome. Rapid sensory profiling techniques: Applications in new product development and consumer research, Vol. 227, 2014.
4. Ares, G., Tárrega, A., Izquierdo, L., Jaeger, S.R., Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 135–141.
5. Bonanno, A., A hedonic valuation of health and nonhealth attributes in the U.S. yogurt market. Agribusiness 32:3 (2016), 299–313.
6. Bornkessel, S., Bröring, S., Omta, S.O., van Trijp, H., What determines ingredient awareness of consumers? A study on ten functional food ingredients. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 330–339.
7. Bower, J.A., Saadat, M.A., Whitten, C., Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Quality and Preference 14:1 (2003), 65–74.
8. Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Deliza, R., Ares, G., Comparison of intensity scales and CATA questions in new product development: Sensory characterisation and directions for product reformulation of milk desserts. Food Quality and Preference 44 (2015), 183–193.
9. Cadena, R.S., Caimi, D., Jaunarena, I., Lorenzo, I., Vidal, L., Ares, G., et al. Comparison of rapid sensory characterization methodologies for the development of functional yogurts. Food Research International 64 (2014), 446–455.
10. da Conceição Jorge, É., Mendes, A.C.G., Auriema, B.E., Cazedey, H.P., Fontes, P.R., Ramos, A.d.L.S., Application of a check-all-that-apply question for evaluating and characterizing meat products. Meat Science 100 (2015), 124–133.
11. Di Monaco, R., Ollila, S., Tuorila, H., Effect of price on pleasantness ratings and use intentions for a chocolate bar in the presence and absence of a health claim. Journal of Sensory Studies 20:1 (2005), 1–16.
12. Dooley, L., Lee, Y.-S., Meullenet, J.-F., The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 21:4 (2010), 394–401.
13. EFSA, Consumption of food and beverages with added plant sterols in the European Union. 2008, European Food Safety Authority.
14. EFSA, Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to plant sterols and plant stanols and maintenance of normal blood cholesterol concentrations (ID 549, 550, 567, 713, 1234, 1235, 1466, 1634, 1984, 2909, 3140), and maintenance of normal prostate size and normal urination (ID 714, 1467, 1635) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal, 8(10), 2010, 22, 1813.
15. EFSA. (2012). EU Register on nutrition and health claims. In < http://ec.europa.eu/nuhclaims/?event=search&CFID=2289844&CFTOKEN=528b7fb9bee1937-7A148734-FD66-BCA4-15FFD017A8A579A1&jsessionid=93126c38ca60a1f4996d7640175154c76351TR>.
16. Euromonitor International, Impact of new EU regulations on functional food/drink claims (Part 3: Opportunities and challenges). 2012.
17. European Commission, Commission regulation (EU) No 432/2012. Official Journal of the European Union, 2012.
18. Giacalone, D., Bredie, W.L.P., Frost, M.B., “All-In-One Test” (AI1): A rapid and easily applicable approach to consumer product testing. Food Quality and Preference 27:2 (2013), 108–119.
19. Grasso, S., Brunton, N.P., Lyng, J.G., Harrison, S.M., Monahan, F.J., Quality of deli-style turkey enriched with plant sterols. Food Science and Technology International 22:8 (2016), 743–751.
20. Henrique, N.A., Deliza, R., Rosenthal, A., Consumer sensory characterization of cooked ham using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) methodology. Food Engineering Reviews 7:2 (2015), 265–273.
21. IFIC, International food information council: 2011 Functional foods/foods for health consumer trending survey. 2011.
22. IFIC, International food information council: Functional foods – Consumer survey. 2013 [Executive Research Report].
23. ISO-Standard, Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO standard 8589. 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
24. Jaeger, S.R., Cardello, A.V., Direct and indirect hedonic scaling methods: A comparison of the labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale and best–worst scaling. Food Quality and Preference 20:3 (2009), 249–258.
25. Kemp, S., Hollowood, T., Hort, J., Sensory evaluation: A practical handbook. 2011, John Wiley & Sons.
26. Lado, J., Vicente, E., Manzzioni, A., Ares, G., Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90:13 (2010), 2268–2275.
27. Lähteenmäki, L., Claiming health in food products. Food Quality and Preference 27:2 (2013), 196–201.
28. Lampila, P., van Lieshout, M., Gremmen, B., Lähteenmäki, L., Consumer attitudes towards enhanced flavonoid content in fruit. Food Research International 42:1 (2009), 122–129.
29. Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H., Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2010, Springer Science & Business Media.
30. Menrad, K., Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. Journal of Food Engineering 56:2–3 (2003), 181–188.
31. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Check-all-that-apply questions. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling. Vol. 271, 2014.
32. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Randomization of CATA attributes: Should attribute lists be allocated to assessors or to samples?. Food Quality and Preference 48:Part A (2016), 210–215.
33. Miele, N., Di Monaco, R., Cavella, S., Masi, P., Effect of meal accompaniments on the acceptability of a walnut oil-enriched mayonnaise with and without a health claim. Food Quality and Preference 21:5 (2010), 470–477.
34. Ng, M., Chaya, C., Hort, J., The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations. Food Quality and Preference 29:2 (2013), 146–156.
35. Sabbe, S., Verbeke, W., Deliza, R., Matta, V., Van Damme, P., Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Appetite 53:1 (2009), 84–92.
36. Schutz, H.G., Cardello, A.V., A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. Journal of Sensory Studies 16:2 (2001), 117–159.
37. Shan, L.C., Regan, A., Monahan, F.J., Li, C., Murrin, C., Lalor, F., et al. Consumer views on ‘healthier'processed meat. British Food Journal, 118(7), 2016.
38. Siro, I., Kapolna, E., Kapolna, B., Lugasi, A., Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance – A review. Appetite 51:3 (2008), 456–467.
39. Spinelli, S., Masi, C., Zoboli, G.P., Prescott, J., Monteleone, E., Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods. Food Quality and Preference 42 (2015), 1–11.
40. Stolzenbach, S., Bredie, W.L.P., Christensen, R.H.B., Byrne, D.V., Impact of product information and repeated exposure on consumer liking, sensory perception and concept associations of local apple juice. Food Research International 52:1 (2013), 91–98.
41. Tobin, B.D., O'Sullivan, M.G., Hamill, R., Kerry, J.P., European consumer attitudes on the associated health benefits of neutraceutical-containing processed meats using co-enzyme Q10 as a sample functional ingredient. Meat Science 97 (2014), 207–213.
42. Vidal, L., Barreiro, C., Gomez, B., Ares, G., Gimenez, A., Influence of information on consumers’ evaluations using check-all-that-apply questions and sorting: A case study with milk desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies 28:2 (2013), 125–137.
43. Vidal, L., Tárrega, A., Antúnez, L., Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Comparison of correspondence analysis based on Hellinger and chi-square distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 43 (2015), 106–112.