Bridging the gap: How sustainable development can help companies create shareholder value and improve financial performance

Business Ethics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-17

  Gómez Bezares, Fernando ^a   Przychodzen, Wojciech ^a   Przychodzen, Justyna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002829333     PISSN: 09628770     EISSN: 14678608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12135     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.
2. Albertini, E. (2014). A descriptive analysis of environmental disclosure: A longitudinal study of French companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 233–254.
3. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
4. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.
5. Aragon-Correa, J., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 88–103.
6. Arimura, T. H., Darnall, N., Ganguli, R., & Katayama, H. (2016). The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 556–566.
7. Arimura, T. H., Hibiki, A., & Katayama, H. (2008). Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55, 281–295.
8. Banerjee, S. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51–79.
9. Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 341–372.
10. Baron, D. (2008). Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 268–288.
11. Berger, I., Cunningham, P., & Drumwright, M. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49, 132–157.
12. Berthelot, S., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1–44.
13. Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2007). Retailing public goods: the economics of social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1645–1663.
14. Boyle, E. J., Higgins, M. M., & Rhee, S. G. (1997). Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defense contractors: Theory and evidence. Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 8(6), 541–561.
15. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35, 97–116.
16. Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business and Society, 50(2), 233–265.
17. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453–470.
18. Cellier, A., & Chollet, P. (2016). The effects of social ratings on firm value. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 656–683.
19. Chang, D., & Kuo, L. (2008). The effects of sustainable development on firms’ financial performance—An empirical approach. Sustainable Development, 16(6), 365–380.
20. Charlo, M. J., Moya, I., & Muñoz, A. (2015). Sustainable development and corporate financial performance: A study based on the FTSE4Good IBEX index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 277–288.
21. Chen, N. F., & Zhang, F. (1998). Risk and return of value stocks. The Journal of Business, 71, 501–535.
22. Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37, 1558–1585.
23. Clark, C. E. (2000). Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis. Public Relations Review, 26, 363–380.
24. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
25. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review, 79, 329–353.
26. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303–327.
27. Cooper, M. J., Gulen, H., & Schill, M. J. (2008). Asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 63, 1609–1651.
28. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholder and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5–14.
29. Cui, X. G., Wang, L. Y., & Xu, H. (2007). High-speed growth, financial crisis and risk forecasting. Accounting Research, 12, 55–62.
30. Dasgupta, S., Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (2000). What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 39–66.
31. de Grosbois, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 896–905.
32. De Haan, M., Lammertjan, D., & Scholtens, B. (2012). The drivers of the relationship between corporate environmental performance and stock market returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 2, 338–375.
33. Dobiáš, J., & Macek, D. (2014). Leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) and its impact on building operational expenditures. Procedia Engineering, 85, 132–139.
34. Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461–1485.
35. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074.
36. Dye, R. A. (1985). Disclosure of non-proprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 123–145.
37. Eabrasu, M. (2015). Post hoc ergo propter hoc: Methodological limits of performance-oriented studies in CSR. Bussiness Ethics: A European Review, 24, S11–S23.
38. Elfenbein, D., & McManus, B. (2010). A greater price for a greater good? Evidence that consumers pay more for charity-linked products. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 28–60.
39. Epstein, M. J., Rejc Buhovac, A., & Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 35–45.
40. Ernult, J., & Ashta, A. (2008). How to measure global sustainability performance in a service enterprise? A case study of the credibility of Vigeo's rating of Caisse d'Epargne. Journal of Services Research, 8, 101–123.
41. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992–present: A review. Journal of Management, 33, 637–664.
42. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2007). Disagreement, tastes and asset prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 667–689.
43. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2008). Dissecting anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 63, 1653–1678.
44. Fombrun, C. J. (2008). Indices of corporate reputation: An analysis of media rankings and social monitors’ ratings. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(4), 327–334.
45. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
46. Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Bussiness Ethics: A European Review, 25, 258–285.
47. Funk, K. (2003). Sustainability and performance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), 65–70.
48. Gabbioneta, C., Ravasi, D., & Mazzola, P. (2007). Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: A study of Italian securities analysts. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 99–123.
49. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.
50. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 3–73.
51. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.
52. Griffin, J. M., & Lemmon, M. L. (2002). Book–to–market equity, distress risk, and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 57, 2317–2336.
53. Haigh, M. (2012). Connecting sustainability goals to financing activity. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 2, 85–87.
54. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.
55. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.
56. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37, 1464–1479.
57. He, T., Li, W., & Tang, G. (2012). Dividends behavior in state- versus family-controlled firms: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 97–112.
58. Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 431–449.
59. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.
60. Higgins, R. (1977). How much growth can a firm afford? Financial Management, 6, 7–16.
61. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.
62. Ho, F. N., Wang, H.-M. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 423–443.
63. Hoffman, A. J. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46.
64. Hooks, J., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. British Accounting Review, 43(3), 200–213.
65. Jawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26, 397–414.
66. Johnson, B., Connolly, E., & Carter, T. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: The role of Fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 352–369.
67. Johnstone, N., Serraville, C., Scapecchi, P., & Labonne, J. (2007). Many a slip “twixt the Cup and the lip”: Direct and indirect public policy incentives to improve corporate environmental performance. In N. Johnstone (Ed.), Environmental policy and corporate behaviour, Cheltenham, UK: OECD, Edward Elgar Publishing.
68. Kane, G. D., Velury, U., & Ruf, B. M. (2005). Employee relations and the likelihood of occurrence of corporate financial distress. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32, 1083–1105.
69. Kapoor, S., & Sandhu, H. S. (2010). Does it pay to be socially responsible? An empirical examination of impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. Global Business Review, 11(2), 185–208.
70. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.
71. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 1–15.
72. Kramer, J., & Peters, J. (2001). An interindustry analysis of economic value added as a proxy for market value added. Journal of Applied Finance, 11, 41–49.
73. Lamont, O. (1997). Cash flow and investment: Evidence from internal capital markets. The Journal of Finance, 52, 83–109.
74. Lang, L., Ofek, E., & Stulz, R. M. (1996). Leverage, investment, and firm growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 3–29.
75. Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. The Financial Review, 44, 213–237.
76. Melnyk, S., Sroufe, R., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.
77. Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The Journal of Finance, 42, 483–510.
78. Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 81–94.
79. Mouritsen, J. (1998). Driving growth: Economic value added versus intellectual capital. Management Accounting Research, 9, 461–482.
80. Nandy, M., & Lodh, S. (2012). Do banks value the eco-friendliness of firms in their corporate lending decision? Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 83–93.
81. Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 197–209.
82. Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of Finance, 49, 1015–1040.
83. Orlitzky, M. (2008). Corporate social performance and financial performance—A research synthesis. In D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 113–134). Oxford: University Press.
84. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
85. Orsato, R. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.
86. Patten, D. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 763–773.
87. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.
88. Peloza, J., & Papania, L. (2008). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Stakeholder salience and identification. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 169–181.
89. Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
90. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745–769.
91. Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2013). Corporate sustainability and shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 474–493.
92. Revelli, C., & Viviani, J. L. (2015). Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): What have we learned? A meta-analysis. Bussiness Ethics: A European Review, 24, 158–185.
93. Rodrigo, P., Duran, I. J., & Arenas, D. (2016). Does it really pay to be good, everywhere? A first step to understand the corporate social and financial performance link in Latin American controversial industries. Bussiness Ethics: A European Review, 25, 286–309.
94. Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 11–24.
95. Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39, 397–418.
96. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
97. Schueler, A., & Krotter, S. (2008). The link between residual income and value created for levered firms: A note. Management Accounting Research, 19, 270–277.
98. Seijas-Nogareda, J. S., & Ziegler, A. (2006). Green management and green technology: Exploring the causal relationship. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
99. Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.
100. Soppe, A. (2004). Sustainable corporate finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 213–224.
101. Soppe, A. (2011). Sustainable finance as a connection between corporate social responsibility and social responsible investing. Indian Management Reserch Journal, 1, 13–23.
102. TM roundtable. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7, 46–70.
103. Sutantoputra, A. W. (2009). Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms' CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(1), 34–48.
104. Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. O. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 352–364.
105. Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1274–1303.
106. Toms, J. S. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. British Accounting Review, 34(3), 257–282.
107. Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61–68.
108. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1997.
109. Verrecchia, R. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194.
110. Vuontisjarvi, T. (2006). Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 331–354.
111. Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
112. Wagner, M., & Blom, J. (2011). The reciprocal and non-linear relationship of sustainability and financial performance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(4), 418–432.
113. Whited, T. (1992). Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: Evidence from panel data. The Journal of Finance, 47, 1415–1461.
114. Young, D. (1997). Economic value added: A primer for European managers. European Management Journal, 15, 335–343.
115. Zhao, J. (2008). The effect of the ISO 14001 environmental management system on corporate financial performance. International Journal of Business Excellence, 1(1–2), 210–230.
116. Ziegler, A., & Schröder, M. (2005). What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for European companies. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
117. Ziegler, A., Schröder, M., & Rennings, K. (2007). The effect of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(4), 661–680.