The First Leg of E-Government Research: Domains and Application Areas 1998-2003

International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR)

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 26-44

  Anderson, Kim Viborg ^a   Henriksen, Helle Zinner ^a  

^a Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

governmental IS; IT in public administration; literature review

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001754567     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2005100102     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ahmed, A.S., Andersen, K.V., Arnthórsson, H., & Henriksen, H.Z. (2004). Stray dogs and wild cats tracking down information systems in government. In Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems, Turku, Finland.
2. Alexander, C.J. (2001). Wiring the nation! Including first nations? Aboriginal Canadians and federal e-government initiatives (Canada). Journal of Canadian Studies-Revue D Etudes Canadiennes, 35(4), 277–296.
3. Allison, G.T. (1983). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J.L. Perry, & K.L. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management: Public and private perspectives (pp. 79–92). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
4. Ambite, J.L. et al. (2001). Simplifying data access: The energy data collection project. Computer, 34(2), 47–54.
5. Andersen, K.V. & Danziger, J.N. (1994). Information technology and the political world: The impacts of it on capabilities, interactions, orientations, and values. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(11), 1693–1724.
6. Armstrong, A. (2002). E-government work force planning: A pilot study. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 51(2), 32–35.
7. Atherton, L. (2002). Seamless UK: Building bridges between information islands. New Library World, 103(11/12), 467–473.
8. Bajaj, A. & Ram, S. (2003). IAIS: A methodology to enable inter-agency information sharing in egovernment. Journal of Database Management, 14(4), 59–80.
9. Bannister, F. & Walsh, N. (2002). The virtual public servant: Ireland's public services broker. Information Polity, 7(2/3), 115–128.
10. Barata, K. & Cain, P. (2003). Records management toolkits from across the pond. Information Management Journal, 37(4), 40–46.
11. Barnes, S.J. & Vidgen, R. (2003). Measuring Web site quality improvements: A case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 103(5/6), 297–309.
12. Barnum, G. (2002). Availability, access, authenticity, and persistence: Creating the environment for permanent public access to electronic government information. Government Information Quarterly, 19(1), 37–43.
13. Bellamy, C. (2002). From automation to knowledge management: Modernising British government with ICTs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, 213–230.
14. Bozemann, B. (1989). All institutions are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15. Bretschneider, S. (2003). Information technology, e-government, and institutional change. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 738–744.
16. Burn, J. & Robins, G. (2003). Moving towards e-government: A case study of organisational change processes. Logistics Information Management, 16(1), 25–35.
17. Burrell, G. & Morgan, F. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
18. Carr, N.G. (2004). Does it matter? Information technology and the corrosion of competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455.
20. Chadwick, A. & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: “E-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16(2), 271–300.
21. Clark, E. (2003). Managing the transformation to e-government: An Australian perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45(4), 377–397.
22. Collins, N. & Butler, P. (2002). The marketplace, e-government and e-democracy. Irish Marketing Review, 15(2), 86–93.
23. Dale, A. (2001). Letters from the corporanian war zone. Journal of Information Science, 27(5), 351–353.
24. Danziger, J.N. & Andersen, K.V. (2002). The impacts of information technology in public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the “golden age” of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591–627.
25. Deakins, E. & Dillon, S.M. (2002). E-government in New Zealand: The local authority perspective. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(4/5), 375–398.
26. Dearstyne, B.W. (2001). E-business, e-government & information proficiency. Information Management Journal, 35(4), 16–24.
27. Deb, G.K. (1999). Electronic governance: A vehicle for the new world order. Electronics Information & Planning, 27(1), 29–33.
28. Devadoss, P.R., Pan, S.L., & Huang, J.D. (2002). Structural analysis of e-government initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34, 253–269.
29. Doty, P. & Erdelez, S. (2002). Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 369–387.
30. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Fletcher, P.D. (2002). The government paperwork elimination act: Operating instructions for an electronic government. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 723–736.
32. Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
33. Gibbs, J., Kraemer, K.L., & Dedrick, J. (2003). Environment and policy factors shaping global e-commerce diffusion: A cross-country comparison. Informa tion Society, 19(1), 5–18.
34. Grönlund, Å. (2004). State of the art in e-gov research: A survey. In Paper presented at the Third eGov DEXA Conference, Zaragoza, Spain.
35. Halchin, L.E. (2002). Electronic government in the age of terrorism. Government Information Quarterly, 19(3), 243–254.
36. Ham, C. & Hill, M. (1993). The policy process in the modern capitalist state (2nd ed.). New York: Wheatsheaf Books.
37. Ho, A.T.K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.
38. Hoff, J. (1992). Evaluation of information technology in private and public sector contexts. Informatization and the Public Sector, 2(4), 307–328.
39. Holliday, I. (2002). Building e-government in east and southeast Asia: Regional rhetoric and national (in)action. Public Administration & Development, 22(4), 323–335.
40. Hwang, S.D., Choi, Y., & Myeong, S.H. (1999). Electronic government in South Korea: Conceptual problems. Government Information Quarterly, 16(3), 277–285.
41. Jackson, N. (2003). MPS and Web technologies: An untapped opportunity? Journal of Public Affairs, 3(2), 124–137.
42. Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C., & McClure, C.R. (2003). The impact of the USA patriot act on collection and analysis of personal information under the foreign intelligence surveillance act. Government Information Quarterly, 20(3), 295–314.
43. Jorgensen, D.J. & Cable, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of e-goverment: A case study of the city of Corpus Christi, Texas. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 67(3), 15–21.
44. Joshi, J., Ghafoor, A., Aref, W.G., & Spafford, E.H. (2001). Digital government security infrastructure design challenges. Computer, 34(2), 66–72.
45. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., & Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 293–307.
46. Klausen, K.C. (2000). Leadership and management: Roles and styles among local government CEOs. In Paper presented at the IPMN conference at the MGSM, Sydney, Australia.
47. Kraemer, K.L., & King, J.L. (2003). Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? Retrieved on November 1, 2004, from http://www.crito.uci.edu
48. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In L.A. Musgrave (ed.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49. Laskowski, M.S. (2000). The impact of electronic access to government information: What users and documents specialists think. Journal of Government Information, 27(2), 173–185.
50. Laswell, H. (1936). Who gets what, when, how. New York: Whittlesey House.
51. Layne, K. & Lee, J.W. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
52. Lenk, K. (2002). Electronic service delivery: A driver of public sector modernisation. Information Polity, 7, 87–96.
53. Liao, S.H., Cheng, C.H., Liao, W.B., & Chen, I.L. (2003). A Web-based architecture for implementing electronic procurement in military organisations. Technovation, 23(6), 521–532.
54. Lindblom, C.E. (1959). “The science” of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
55. Lu, W., Du, J., Zahng, J., Ma, F., & Le, T. (2002). Internet development in China. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 207–224.
56. Luling, D. (2001). Taking it online: Anyway, anyplace, anytime. Tennessee anytime. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 50(2), 42.
57. March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (1985). The new-institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.
58. Marche, S. & McNiven, J.D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn't what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74–86.
59. Markus, L.M. & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
60. Meer, A.V.D. & Winden, W.V. (2003). Egovernance in cities: A comparison of urban information and communication technology policies. Regional Studies, 37(4), 407–419.
61. Micheletti, M. (2000). End of big government: Is it happening in the Nordic countries? Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(2), 265–278.
62. Parker, B. (2003). Maori access to information technology. Electronic Library, 21(5), 456–460.
63. Peled, A. (2001). Centralization or diffusion? Two tales of online government. Administration & Society, 32(6), 686–709.
64. Porter, M.E. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 63–78.
65. Potter, A. (2002). Accessibility of Alabama government Web sites. Journal of Government Information, 29(5), 303–317.
66. Shuler, J.A. (2003). Citizen-centered government: Information policy possibilities for the 108th congress. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(2), 107–100.
67. Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government? Parliamentary Affairs, 54(1), 88–101.
68. Stamoulis, D., Gouscos, D., Georgiadis, P., & Martakos, D. (2001). Revisiting public information management for effective e-government services. Information Management & Computer Security, 9(4), 146–153.
69. Susman, T.M. (2001). The good, the bad, and the ugly: E-government and the people's right to know. Vital Speeches of the Day, 68(2), 38–42.
70. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Preston, J. (1999). Knowledge management: The next fad to forget people? In Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
71. Tan, C.W. & Pan, S.L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: An e-government study of the inland revenue authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269–281.
72. Teicher, J., Hughes, O., & Dow, N. (2002). E-government: A new route to public sector quality. Managing Service Quality, 12(6), 384–393.
73. Thomas, J.C. & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102.
74. Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., & Seah, K.L. (2000). Business process reengineering in the public sector: The case of the housing development board in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(1), 245–270.
75. Tigre, P.B. (2003). Brazil in the age of electronic commerce. Information Society, 19(1), 33–43.
76. Tillman, B. (2003). More information could mean less privacy. Information Management Journal, 37(2), 20–23.
77. Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.
78. Waisanen, B. (2002). The future of e-government: Technology-fueled management tools. PM Public Management, 84(5), 6–9.
79. Watson, R.T. & Mundy, B. (2001). A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 27–30.
80. Wong, P.K. (2003). Global and national factors affecting e-commerce diffusion in Singapore. Information Society, 19(1), 19–32.
81. Yang, K.F. (2003). Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: Beyond Jane Fountain. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 432–442.
82. Zhang, J.H. (2002). Will the government “serve the people”? The development of Chinese e-government. New Media & Society, 4(2), 163–184.