Global meta-analysis of native and nonindigenous trophic traits in aquatic ecosystems

Global Change Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1861-1870

  McKnight, Ella ^a,d   García Berthou, Emili ^b   Srean, Pao ^b   Rius, Marc ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

^d THE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biological invasions; comparative studies; effect size; freshwater; invasive species; marine; range expansion; range shift

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; INVASIVE SPECIES; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; META-ANALYSIS; RANGE EXPANSION; SIZE EFFECT;

FRESH WATER; SEA WATER;

ANIMAL; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; INTRODUCED SPECIES; META ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; FRESH WATER; INTRODUCED SPECIES; SEAWATER;

EID: 84998890717     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13524     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alofs KM, Jackson DA (2014) Meta-analysis suggests biotic resistance in freshwater environments is driven by consumption rather than competition. Ecology, 95, 3259–3270.
2. Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lockwood JL (2009) The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds. Global Change Biology, 15, 2852–2860.
3. Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 83, 887–889.
4. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science, 261, 78–82.
5. Cebrian J, Lartigue J (2004) Patterns of herbivory and decomposition in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 74, 237–259.
6. Chase JM (2000) Are there real differences among aquatic and terrestrial food webs? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 408–412.
7. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10, 101–129.
8. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science, 279, 555–558.
9. Cox JG, Lima SL (2006) Naivete and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 674–680.
10. Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience, 12, 316–329.
11. Daehler CC (2001) Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. American Naturalist, 158, 324–330.
12. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 183–211.
13. Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 59, 1078–1084.
14. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.
15. Eggert M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.
16. Estrada A, Morales-Castilla I, Caplat P, Early R (2016) Usefulness of species traits in predicting range shifts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 190–203.
17. Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sanchez MI, Vila M (2016) Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 22, 151–163.
18. Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh J (1992) A meta-analysis. American Naturalist, 140, 539–572.
19. Hall SR, Mills EL (2000) Exotic species in large lakes of the world. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 3, 105–135.
20. Higgins SN, Vander Zanden MJ (2010) What a difference a species makes: a meta-analysis of dreissenid mussel impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 80, 179–196.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
22. Holomuzki JR, Biggs BJF (2012) Same enemy, same response: predator avoidance by an invasive and native snail. New Zealand Natural Sciences, 37, 11–24.
23. Holway DA, Suarez AV (1999) Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 328–330.
24. Keller TA, Moore PA (2000) Context-specific behavior: crayfish size influences crayfish-fish interactions. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19, 344–351.
25. Kimbro DL, Cheng BS, Grosholz ED (2013) Biotic resistance in marine environments. Ecology Letters, 16, 821–833.
26. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010a) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters, 13, 947–958.
27. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010b) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters, 13, 235–245.
28. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Maurel N (2015) Characteristics of successful alien plants. Molecular Ecology, 24, 1954–1968.
29. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science, 298, 1233–1236.
30. Kulhanek SA, Ricciardi A, Leung B (2011) Is invasion history a useful tool for predicting the impacts of the world's worst aquatic invasive species? Ecological Applications, 21, 189–202.
31. Leffler AJ, James JJ, Monaco TA, Sheley RL (2014) A new perspective on trait differences between native and invasive exotic plants. Ecology, 95, 298–305.
32. Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 7, 975–989.
33. Li SP, Cadotte MW, Meiners SJ, Hua ZS, Shu HY, Li JT, Shu WS (2015) The effects of phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: deconstructing Darwin's naturalisation conundrum. Ecology Letters, 18, 1285–1292.
34. Maggi E, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Castelli A et al. (2015) Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 1–12.
35. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB, Levine R (2004) Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecological Applications, 14, 587–596.
36. Paolucci EM, MacIsaac HJ, Ricciardi A, Mark Richardson D (2013) Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 988–995.
37. Pedersen MF, Stæhr PA, Wernberg T, Thomsen MS (2005) Biomass dynamics of exotic Sargassum muticum and native Halidrys siliquosa in Limfjorden, Denmark - Implications of species replacements on turnover rates. Aquatic Botany, 83, 31–47.
38. Pintor LM, Sih A (2009) Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Biological Invasions, 11, 1895–1902.
39. Pratt DR, Lohrer AM, Thrush SF et al. (2015) Detecting subtle shifts in ecosystem functioning in a dynamic estuarine environment. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133914.
40. Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Biological Invasions, Vol 93 (ed. Nentwig W), pp. 97–125. Springer-Verlag, Berlin & Heidelberg.
41. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarosik V, Sixtova Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 237–244.
42. R Development Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 3.2.2. R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria.
43. Reise K, Olenin S, Thieltges DW (2006) Are aliens threatening European aquatic coastal ecosystems? Helgoland Marine Research, 60, 77–83.
44. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 7, 781–784.
45. Ricciardi A, Mottiar M (2006) Does Darwin's naturalization hypothesis explain fish invasions? Biological Invasions, 8, 1403–1407.
46. Rius M, Potter EE, Aguirre JD, Stachowicz JJ (2014) Mechanisms of biotic resistance across complex life cycles. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 296–305.
47. Rosenberg MS (2013) Moment and least-squares based approaches to meta-analytic inference. In: Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (eds Koricheva J, Gurevitch J, Mengersen K), pp. 108–124. Princeton University Press, Princeton and London.
48. Rosenberg MS, Rothstein HR, Gurevitch J (2013) Effect sizes: conventional choices and calculations. In: Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (eds Koricheva J, Gurevitch J, Mengersen K), pp. 61–71. Princeton University Press, Princeton and London.
49. Rosenthal R (1979) The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
50. Rypel AL (2014) Do invasive freshwater fish species grow better when they are invasive? Oikos, 123, 279–289.
51. Salo P, Korpimaki E, Banks PB, Nordstrom M, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1237–1243.
52. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH et al. (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 465–471.
53. Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conservation Biology, 25, 428–437.
54. Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B et al. (2010) Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos, 119, 610–621.
55. Sol D, Maspons J, Vall-Llosera M, Bartomeus I, Garcia-Pena GE, Pinol J, Freckleton RP (2012) Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science, 337, 580–583.
56. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (1999) Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science, 286, 1577–1579.
57. Stachowicz JJ, Bruno JF, Duffy JE (2007) Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38, 739–766.
58. Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 5841–5845.
59. Strayer DL (2012) Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 15, 1199–1210.
60. Thomsen MS, Byers JE, Schiel DR, Bruno JF, Olden JD, Wernberg T, Silliman BR (2014) Impacts of marine invaders on biodiversity depend on trophic position and functional similarity. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 495, 39–47.
61. Thumers B (2006) DataThief III. Shareware Software.
62. Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER (2013) A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshwater Science, 32, 1367–1382.
63. Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
64. Ward JM, Ricciardi A (2007) Impacts of Dreissena invasions on benthic macroinvertebrate communities: a meta-analysis. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 155–165.
65. Young KA, Stephenson J, Terreau A, Thailly A-F, Gajardo G, de Leaniz CG (2008) The diversity of juvenile salmonids does not affect their competitive impact on a native galaxiid. Biological Invasions, 11, 1955–1961.