Do invasive freshwater fish species grow better when they are invasive?

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 279-289

  Rypel, Andrew L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894307120     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00530.x     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Alcaraz C. et al. 2005. Profiling invasive fish species: the impor tance of phylogeny and human use. Divers. Distrib. 11: 289-298.
2. Arendt J. D. 1997. Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q. Rev. Biol. 72: 149-177.
3. Beamesderfer R. C. P. and North J. A. 1995. Growth, natural mortality, and predicted response to fishing for largemouth bass and smallmouth bass populations in North America. N. Am. J. Fish Manage. 15: 688-704.
4. Behrenfeld M. J. et al. 2006. Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444: 752-755.
5. Blossey B. and Notzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887-889.
6. Borenstein M. et al. 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. - Wiley.
7. Bossdorf O. et al. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
8. Broennimann O. and Guisan A. 2008. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol. Lett. 4: 585-589.
9. Campana S. E. 2005. Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. J. Fish Biol. 59: 197-242.
10. Campana S. E. and Thorrold S. R. 2001. Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 30-38.
11. Castellanos M. C. and Verdu M. 2012. Meta-analysis of meta-analyses in plant evolutionary ecology. Evol. Ecol. 26: 1187-1196.
12. Charnov E. L. et al. 2001. Reproductive constraints and the evolution of life histories with indeterminate growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9460-9464.
13. Chauvaud L. et al. 2012. Variation in size and growth of the great scallop Pecten maximus along a latitudinal gradient. PLoS ONE 7: e37717.
14. Chen Y. et al. 1992. A comparison of von Bertalanffy and polynomial functions in modelling fish growth data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1228-1235.
15. Conover D. O. and Present T. M. C. 1990. Countergradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes. Oecologia 83: 316-324.
16. Conover D. and Schultz E. T. 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 248-252.
17. Conover D. O. et al. 1997. Countergradient variation in growth of young striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from different latitudes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 2401-2409.
18. Conover D. O. et al. 2009. The covariance between genetic and environmental influences across ecological gradients. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1168: 100-129.
19. Copp G. H. et al. 2004. Life-time growth patterns of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus introduced to Europe, relative to native North American populations. Folia Zool. 53: 237-254.
20. Crowl T. A. et al. 2008. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6: 238-246.
21. Day T. and Taylor P. D. 1997. Von Bertalanffy's growth equation should not be used to model age and size at maturity. Am. Nat. 149: 381-393.
22. Dumas A. and France J. 2010. Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going? Aquaculture Res. 41: 161-181.
23. Egger M. et al. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 315: 629-634.
24. Emery S. M. 2007. Limiting similarity between invaders and dominant species in herbaceous plant communities? J. Ecol. 95: 1027-1035.
25. Engqvist L. 2005. The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70: 967-971.
26. Epanchin-Niell R. S. et al. 2012. Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 15: 803-812.
27. Fox M. G. et al. 2007. Life history traits of introduced Iberian pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus relative to native populations. Can differences explain colonization success? J. Fish. Biol. 71: 56-69.
28. Freeman A. S. and Byers J. E. 2006. Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations. Science 313: 831-833.
29. Freeman G. 1973. Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype- environment interactions. Heredity 31: 339-354.
30. Funk J. L. and Vitousek P. M. 2007. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446: 1079-1081.
31. Gaeta J. W. et al. 2012. Eradication via destratification: whole- lake mixing to selectively remove rainbow smelt, a cold-water invasive species. Ecol. Appl. 22: 817-827.
32. Gallien L. et al. 2010. Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? Divers. Distrib. 16: 331-342.
33. Gallucci V. F. and Quinn T. J. 1979. Reparameterizing, fitting and testing a simple growth model. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 108: 14-25.
34. Garland T. et al. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 18-32.
35. Garvey J. E. and Marschall E. A. 2003. Understanding latitudinal trends in fish body size through models of optimal seasonal energy allocation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60: 938-948.
36. Gienapp P. et al. 2007. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol. Ecol. 17: 167-178.
37. Glenn E. et al. 1998. Growth rates, salt tolerance and water use characteristics of native and invasive riparian plants from the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 40: 281-294.
38. Graebner R. C. et al. 2012. Invasive species grows faster, competes better, and shows greater evolution toward increased seed size and growth than exotic non-invasive congeners. Plant Ecol. 213: 545-553.
39. Guisan A. and Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8: 993-1009.
40. Gurevitch J. and Padilla D. K. 2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 470-474.
41. Hayes K. R. and Barry S. C. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol. Invas. 10: 483-506.
42. Helser T. E. and Lai H. L. 2004. A Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis of fish growth: with an example for North American largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Ecol. Modell. 178: 399-416.
43. Hierro J. L. et al. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol. 93: 5-15.
44. Hierro J. L. et al. 2013. Non-native conditions favor non-native populations of invasive plant: demographic consequences of seed size variation? Oikos 122: 583-590.
45. Huitema B. 1980. The analysis of covariance and alternatives. - Wiley.
46. Jobling M. 1981. Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum - rapid methods for the assessment of optimum growth temperatures. J. Fish Biol. 19: 439-455.
47. Knight W. 1968. Asymptotic growth: an example of nonsense disguised as mathematics. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1303-1307.
48. Kolar C. S. and Lodge D. M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
49. Kolar C. S. and Lodge D. M. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298: 1233-1236.
50. Kraft N. J. B. et al. 2008. Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322: 580-582.
51. Lancaster J. and Downes B. J. 2010. Ecohydraulics needs to embrace ecology and sound science, and to avoid mathematical artefacts. River Res. Appl. 26: 921-929.
52. Lee C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 386-391.
53. Leishman M. R. et al. 2010. Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J. Ecol. 98: 28-42.
54. Leprieur F. et al. 2009. Scientific uncertainty and the assessment of risks posed by non-native freshwater fishes. Fish Fish. 10: 88-97.
55. Maceina M. 2006. A simple regression model to assess environmental effects on fish growth. J. Fish. Biol. 41: 557-565.
56. Mau-Crimmins T. M. et al. 2006. Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native-range data?: Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) in the southwestern United States. Ecol. Modell. 193: 736-746.
57. Meiners S. J. 2007. Native and exotic plant species exhibit similar population dynamics during succession. Ecology 88: 1098-1104.
58. Michener W. K. and Jones M. B. 2012. Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 85-93.
59. Miehls A. L. J. et al. 2009. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: a comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion. Ecol. Modell. 220: 3182-3193.
60. Moher D. et al. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6: e1000097.
61. Mooney H. A. and Cleland E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5446-5451.
62. Murua R. et al. 2003. Population dynamics of rice rats (a Hantavirus reservoir) in southern Chile: feedback structure and non-linear effects of climatic oscillations. Oikos 102: 137-145.
63. Oberdoff T. et al. 2006. Global scale patterns of fish species richness in rivers. Ecography 18: 345-352.
64. Olden J. D. et al. 2010. Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges. Divers. Distrib. 16: 496-513.
65. Pattison R. R. et al. 1998. Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117: 449-459.
66. Peterson A. T. and Vieglais D. A. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. Bioscience 51: 363-371.
67. Phillip D. P. and Whitt G. S. 1991. Survival and growth of northern, Florida, and reciprocal F1 hybrid largemouth bass in central Illinois. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120: 58-64.
68. Pianka E. R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am. Nat. 100: 33-46.
69. Pimentel D. et al. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50: 53-65.
70. Pimm S. L. 1989. Theories of predicting success and impact of introduced species. - In: Drake J. A. et al. (eds), Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, pp. 351-365.
71. Poorter H. et al. 2012. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct. Plant Biol. 39: 839-850.
72. Power M. and McKinley R. 1997. Latitudinal variation in lake sturgeon size as related to the thermal opportunity for growth. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126: 549-558.
73. Raghu S. et al. 2006. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? Science 313: 1742.
74. Reichard S. H. and Hamilton C. W. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11: 193-203.
75. Roff D. A. 1980. A motion to retire the von Bertalanffy function. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 127-129.
76. Rogers H. M. and Hartemink A. E. 2000. Soil seed bank and growth rates of an invasive species, Piper aduncum, in the lowlands of Papua New Guinea. J. Trop. Ecol. 16: 243-251.
77. Romanuk T. N. et al. 2009. Predicting invasion success in complex ecological networks. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364: 1743-1754.
78. Rosecchi E. et al. 2001. Can life history traits predict the fate of introduced species? A case study on two cyprinid fish in southern France. Freshwater Biol. 46: 845-853.
79. Rosenberg M. S. 2005. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59: 464-468.
80. Rypel A. L. 2011a. Meta-analysis of growth for five North American catfishes: effects of climate, hydrologic habitat, and latitudinal countergradients. - In: Michaletz P. and Travnichek V. (eds), Conservation, ecology and management of worldwide catfish populations and habitats. Am. Fish. Soc., pp. 661-677.
81. Rypel A. L. 2011b. River impoundment and sunfish growth. River Res. Appl. 27: 580-590.
82. Rypel A. L. 2012a. Concordant estimates of countergradient growth variation in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) using comparative life-history data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69: 1261-1265.
83. Rypel A. L. 2012b. Meta-analysis of growth rates for a circumpolar fish, the northern pike (Esox lucius), with emphasis on effects of continent, climate and latitude. Ecol. Freshwater Fish 21: 521-532.
84. Rypel A. L. and Bayne D. R. 2009. Hydrologic habitat preferences of select southeastern USA fishes resilient to river ecosystem fragmentation. Ecohydrology 2: 419-427.
85. Rypel A. L. et al. 2006. Growth of freshwater drum from lotic and lentic habitats in Alabama. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135: 987-997.
86. Sakai A. K. et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 305-332.
87. Sakaris P. C. et al. 2006. Comparison of native and introduced flathead catfish populations in Alabama and Georgia: growth, mortality and management. N. Am. J. Fish Manage. 26: 867-874.
88. Sanders N. J. et al. 2003. Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2474-2477.
89. Schultz E. et al. 1996. Countergradient variation in growth among newly hatched Fundulus heteroclitus: geographic differences revealed by common-environment experiments. Funct. Ecol. 10: 366-374.
90. Siemann E. and Rogers W. E. 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol. Lett. 4: 514-518.
91. Simberloff D. 2000. Forward to the ecology of invasions by plant and animals by C. S. Elton. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
92. Smith S. D. et al. 2000. Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408: 79-81.
93. Stachowicz J. J. et al. 2002. Linking climate change and biological invasions: ocean warming facilitates nonindigenous species invasions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 15497-15500.
94. Stafford C. P. and Haines T. A. 2001. Mercury contamination and growth rate in two piscivore populations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20: 2099-2101.
95. Strayer D. L. et al. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 645-651.
96. Sutherland S. 2004. What makes a weed a weed: life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA. Oecologia 141: 24-39.
97. Tack A. J. M. et al. 2012. Sizing up community genetics: it's a matter of scale. Oikos 121: 481-488.
98. Valentine-Rose L. and Layman C. A. 2011. Response of fish assemblage structure and function following restoration of two small Bahamian tidal creeks. Restor. Ecol. 19: 205-215.
99. Van Kleunen M. et al. 2010. A meta analysis of trait differences between invasive and non invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13: 235-245.
100. Vilà M. et al. 2003. Are alien plants more competitive than their native conspecifics? A test using Hypericum perforatum L. Oecologia 137: 211-215.
101. Werner C. et al. 2010. High competitiveness of a resource demanding invasive acacia under low resource supply. Plant Ecol. 206: 83-96.
102. Weyl O. L. F. and Hecht T. 1999. A successful population of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, in a subtropical lake in Mozambique. Environ. Biol. Fishes 54: 53-66.
103. Whitney K. D. and Gabler C. A. 2008. Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Divers. Distrib. 14: 569-580.
104. Willis A. J. et al. 1999. Is the increased vigour of invasive weeds explained by a tradeoff between growth and herbivore resistance? Oecologia 120: 632-640.
105. Winemiller K. O. and Rose K. A. 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for popu lation regulation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2196-2218.
106. Worm B. et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787-790.
107. Zaret T. M. and Paine R. 1973. Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science 182: 449-455.