Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish

Biological Invasions

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1895-1902

  Pintor, Lauren M ^a,b,c   Sih, Andrew ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative biogeography; Competitive displacement; Crayfish; Ecotype; Ecotypic variation; Foraging behavior; Growth rate; Invasive species

Indexed keywords

BAIT; BIOGEOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; CRAYFISH; ECOTYPE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GROWTH RATE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ASTACOIDEA; ORCONECTES RUSTICUS;

EID: 70349486047     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-008-9367-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887-889. doi:10.2307/2261425
2. Byers JE (2000) Competition between two estaurine snails: implications for invasions of non-native species. Ecology 81:1225-1239
3. Capelli GM (1975) Distribution, life history and ecology of crayfish in northern Wisconsin, with emphasis on Orconectes propinquus (Girard). University of Wisconsin. Madison, WI, USA
4. Capelli G, Hamilton PA (1984) Effects of food and shelter on aggressive activity in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard). J Crustac Biol 4:252-260. doi:10.2307/1548022
5. Capelli G, Munjal B (1982) Aggressive interactions and resource competition in relation to species displacement among crayfish of the genus Orcontectes. J Crustac Biol 2:486-492. doi:10.2307/1548090
6. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA et al (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721-733. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.x
7. Gamradt SC, Kats LB, Anzalone CB (1997) Aggression by non-native crayfish deters breeding in California newts. Conserv Biol 11:793-796. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96230.x
8. Garvey JE, Stein RA, Thomas HM (1994) Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75:532-547. doi:10.2307/1939556
9. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: Lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab (Carcinus maenas). Biol Conserv 78:59-66. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00018-2
10. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (2003) Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates. Ecol Lett 6:700-705. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00495.x
11. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19:470-474. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.005
12. Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying non-natives in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5-15. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x
13. Hill AM, Lodge DM (1999) Replacement of resident crayfishes by an non-native crayfish: the roles of competition and predation. Ecol Appl 9:678-690. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0678:RORCBA]2.0.CO;2
14. Hill AM, Sinars DM, Lodge DM (1993) Invasion of an Occupied Niche by the Crayfish Orconectes-Rusticus - Potential Importance of Growth and Mortality. Oecologia 94:303-306. doi:10.1007/BF00317102
15. Holway DA, Suarez AV (1999) Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends Ecol Evol 14:328-330. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01741-3
16. Holway DA, Suarez AV, Case TJ (1998) Loss of intraspecific aggression in the success of a widespread invasive social insect. Science 282:949-952. doi:10.1126/science.282.5390.949
17. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Non-native plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199-204
18. Kohler CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology:predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199-204. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2
19. Lodge DM, Hill AM (1994) Factors governing species composition, population size and productivity of cool-water crayfish. Nord J Freshw Res 69:111-136
20. Lodge DM, Taylor CA, Holdrich DM et al (2000) Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: Lessons from Europe. Fisheries 25:7-17. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025<0007:NCTNAF>2.0.CO;2
21. Mather ME, Stein RA (1993) Using growth/mortality trade-offs to explore a crayfish species replacement in stream riffles and pools. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:88-96
22. Nyström P (2002) Ecology. In: Holdich DM (ed) Biology of freshwater crayfish, pp 192-235. Blackwell Science, Oxford
23. Perry WL, Feder JL, Dwyer G et al (2001) Hybrid zone dynamics and species replacement between Orcontectes crayfishes in a northern Wisconsin lake. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 55:1153-1166
24. Petren K, Case TJ (1996) An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118-132. doi:10.2307/2265661
25. Pintor LM (2007) The influence of invader traits and community characteristics on the invasion success of an non-native crayfish, Graduate Group in Ecology, PhD Thesis, University of California-Davis, Davis
26. Rehage JS, Barnett BK, Sih A (2005) Foraging behaviour and invasiveness: do invasive Gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives? Ecol Freshwat Fish 14:352-360. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00109.x
27. Ricciardi A (2004) Assessing species invasions as a cause of extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 19:619. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.021
28. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781-784. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00642.x
29. Roth BM, Kitchell JF (2005) The role of size-selective predation in the displacement of Orconectes crayfishes following rusty crayfish invasion. Crustaceana 78:297-310. doi:10.1163/1568540054286583
30. Snyder WE, Evans EW (2006) Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalists predators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:95-122. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110107
31. Sol D, Lefebvre L (2000) Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90:599-605. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900317.x
32. Sol D, Timmermans S, Lefebvre L (2002) Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim Behav 63:495-502. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1953
33. Stein RA (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58:1237-1253. doi:10.2307/1935078
34. Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA et al (1999) Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant. Biol Invasions 1:43-53. doi:10.1023/A:1010038413690
35. Taylor CA (2000) Systematic studies of the Orconectes Juvenilis complex (Decapoda: Cambaridae), with descriptions of two new species. J Crustac Biol 20:132-152. doi:10.1651/0278-0372(2000)020[0132:SSOTOJ]2.0.CO;2
36. Taylor CA, Redmer M (1996) Dispersal of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus in Illinois, with notes on species displacement and habitat preference. J Crustac Biol 16:547-551. doi:10.2307/1548745
37. Therbaud CA, Simberloff D (2001) Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? Am Nat 157:231-236. doi:10.1086/318635
38. Tierney AJ, Godleski MS, Massanari JR (2000) Comparative analysis of agonistic behavior in four crayfish species. J Crustac Biol 20:54-66. doi:10.1651/0278-0372(2000)020[0054:CAOABI]2.0.CO;2