Usefulness of Species Traits in Predicting Range Shifts

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 190-203

  Estrada, Alba ^a,b   Morales Castilla, Ignacio ^c   Caplat, Paul ^d   Early, Regan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; EMIGRATION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PROPAGULE; RANGE EXPANSION; RANGE SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; CLIMATE CHANGE; GENETICS; INVERTEBRATE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; CLIMATE CHANGE; INVERTEBRATES; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; POPULATION DYNAMICS; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84958110582     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.014     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Garcia R.A., et al. Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2014, 344:1247579.
2. Anderson R.P. A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1297:8-28.
3. Márquez A.L., et al. Combining climate with other influential factors for modelling the impact of climate change on species distribution. Clim. Chang. 2011, 108:135-157.
4. Foden W.B., et al. Identifying the world's most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e65427.
5. Triviño M., et al. Risk assessment for Iberian birds under global change. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 168:192-200.
6. Garcia R.A., et al. Matching species traits to projected threats and opportunities from climate change. J. Biogeogr. 2014, 41:724-735.
7. Pearson R., et al. Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4:217-221.
8. Bensch S. Is the range size of migratory birds constrained by their migratory program?. J. Biogeogr. 1999, 26:1225-1235.
9. Laube I., et al. Towards a more mechanistic understanding of traits and range sizes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:233-241.
10. Forsyth D.M., et al. Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:557-569.
11. Angert A.L., et al. Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges?. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:677-689.
12. Mattila N., et al. Ecological correlates of distribution change and range shift in butterflies. Insect Conserv. Diver. 2011, 4:239-246.
13. Auer S.K., King D.I. Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23:867-875.
14. Bradshaw C.J.A., et al. Predictors of contraction and expansion of area of occupancy for British birds. P. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281:20140744.
15. Sunday J.M., et al. Species traits and climate velocity explain geographic range shifts in an ocean warming hotspot. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18:944-953.
16. Tayleur C., et al. Swedish birds are tracking temperature but not rainfall: evidence from a decade of abundance changes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2015, 24:859-872.
17. Lenoir J., Svenning J.C. Climate-related range shifts - a global multidimensional synthesis and new research directions. Ecography 2015, 38:15-28.
18. Kunin W.E., Gaston K.J. The Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare-Common Differences 1997, Springer.
19. Svenning J-C., et al. Postglacial dispersal limitation of widespread forest plant species in nemoral Europe. Ecography 2008, 31:316-326.
20. Estrada A., et al. Species' intrinsic traits inform their range limitations and vulnerability under environmental change. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2015, 24:849-858.
21. Warren D.L., et al. Mistaking geography for biology: inferring processes from species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:572-580.
22. Svenning J-C., Skov F. Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:565-573.
23. Dullinger S., et al. Post-glacial migration lag restricts range filling of plants in the European Alps. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21:829-840.
24. Hortal J., et al. Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:741-748.
25. Wisz M.S., et al. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88:15-30.
26. Bucharova A., Van Kleunen M. Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:230-238.
27. Sol D., et al. Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science 2012, 337:580-583.
28. Caplat P., et al. Movement, impacts and management of plant distributions in response to climate change: insights from invasions. Oikos 2013, 122:1265-1274.
29. Moran E.V., Alexander J.M. Evolutionary responses to global change: lessons from invasive species. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17:637-649.
30. Mack R.N., et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:689-710.
31. Richardson D.M., Pysek P. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol. 2012, 196:383-396.
32. Williamson M. Biological Invasions 1996, Chapman & Hall.
33. Jeschke J.M., Strayer D.L. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. PNAS 2005, 102:7198-7202.
34. Blackburn T.M., Jeschke J.M. Invasion success and threat status: two sides of a different coin?. Ecography 2009, 32:83-88.
35. Jiguet F., et al. Climate envelope, life history traits and the resilience of birds facing global change. Global Change Biol. 2007, 13:1672-1684.
36. Seoane J., Carrascal L.M. Interspecific differences in population trends of Spanish birds are related to habitat and climatic preferences. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:111-121.
37. Collen B., et al. Predicting how populations decline to extinction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366:2577-2586.
38. Gill J.A., et al. The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature 2001, 412:436-438.
39. Devictor V., et al. Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough. P. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:2743-2748.
40. Clavero M., et al. Climate change or land use dynamics: do we know what climate change indicators indicate?. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18581.
41. Cardillo M., et al. The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals. P. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:1441-1448.
42. Schurr F.M., et al. Colonization and persistence ability explain the extent to which plant species fill their potential range. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:449-459.
43. Van der Veken S., et al. Life-history traits are correlated with geographical distribution patterns of western European forest herb species. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1723-1735.
44. Grime J.P. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 1977, 111:1169-1194.
45. Altwegg R., et al. Density-dependent dispersal and the speed of range expansions. Divers. Distrib. 2013, 19:60-68.
46. Catullo R.A., et al. Extending spatial modelling of climate change responses beyond the realized niche: estimating, and accommodating, physiological limits and adaptive evolution. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2015, 24:1192-1202.
47. Jongejans E., et al. Importance of individual and environmental variation for invasive species spread: a spatial integral projection model. Ecology 2011, 92:86-97.
48. Gaston K.J., Fuller R.A. The sizes of species' geographic ranges. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:1-9.
49. Aarssen L. On the distinction between niche and competitive ability: Implications for coexistence theory. Acta Biotheor 1984, 33:67-83.
50. Bartomeus I., et al. Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:4656-4660.
51. Violle C., et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos 2007, 116:882-892.
52. Travis J.M.J., et al. Modelling dispersal: an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3:628-641.
53. Warren R.J., et al. Competition as a mechanism structuring mutualisms. J. Ecol. 2014, 102:486-495.
54. Bocedi G., et al. Mechanistic modelling of animal dispersal offers new insights into range expansion dynamics across fragmented landscapes. Ecography 2014, 37:1240-1253.
55. Baguette M. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 2003, 26:153-160.
56. Coutts S., et al. What are the key drivers of spread in invasive plants: dispersal, demography or landscape: and how can we use this knowledge to aid management?. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13:1649-1661.
57. Brederveld R.J., et al. Dispersal as a limiting factor in the colonization of restored mountain streams by plants and macroinvertebrates. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:1241-1250.
58. Hampe A. Plants on the move: The role of seed dispersal and initial population establishment for climate-driven range expansions. Acta Oecol. 2011, 37:666-673.
59. Blackburn T.M., et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:333-339.
60. Møller A.P. Sociality, age at first reproduction and senescence: comparative analyses of birds. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:682-689.
61. Cassey P., et al. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. P. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:S405-S408.
62. Pöyry J., et al. Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies. Global Change Biol. 2009, 15:732-743.
63. Bohning-Gaese K., et al. Range size: disentangling current traits and phylogenetic and biogeographic factors. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:555-567.
64. Early R., Sax D.F. Analysis of climate paths reveals potential limitations on species range shifts. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1125-1133.
65. Jackson S.T., et al. Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19685-19692.
66. Liow L.H., et al. Lower extinction risk in sleep-or-hide mammals. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:264-272.
67. Laube I., et al. Intra-generic species richness and dispersal ability interact to determine geographic ranges of birds. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:223-232.
68. Hamilton M.A., et al. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1066-1074.
69. Grossenbacher D., et al. Geographic range size is predicted by plant mating system. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18:706-713.
70. Walker K.J., Preston C.D. Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the Flora of Lowland England, UK. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15:1913-1942.
71. Gove A.D., et al. Dispersal traits linked to range size through range location, not dispersal ability, in Western Australian angiosperms. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2009, 18:596-606.
72. Zhu K., et al. Failure to migrate: lack of tree range expansion in response to climate change. Global Change Biol. 2012, 18:1042-1052.
73. Thompson K., et al. Range size, dispersal and niche breadth in the herbaceous flora of central England. J. Ecol. 1999, 87:150-155.
74. Nogués-Bravo D., et al. Phenotypic correlates of potential range size and range filling in European trees. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2014, 16:219-227.
75. Kotiaho J.S., et al. Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:1963-1967.
76. Reif J., et al. Population changes in Czech passerines are predicted by their life-history and ecological traits. Ibis 2010, 152:610-621.
77. Hoare J.M., et al. Can correlated population trends among forest bird species be predicted by similarity in traits?. Wildl. Res. 2012, 39:469-477.
78. Munguía M., et al. Dispersal limitation and geographical distributions of mammal species. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35:1879-1887.