Genetic architecture of nonadditive inheritance in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 46, 2016, Pages E7317-E7326

  Seymour, Danelle K ^a   Chae, Eunyoung ^a   Grimm, Dominik G ^b,c   Pizarro, Carmen Martín ^a,e   Habring Müller, Anette ^a   Vasseur, François ^a   Rakitsch, Barbara ^b,d   Borgwardt, Karsten M ^b,c   Koenig, Daniel ^a,f   Weigel, Detlef ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; GWAS; Half diallel; Heterosis

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; DIALLEL ANALYSIS; ENERGY YIELD; FLOWERING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE STRUCTURE; GENERAL COMBINING ABILITY; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HERITABILITY; HETEROSIS; HOMEOBOX; HYBRID; INHERITANCE; MATING; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; ROSETTE FORMATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIFIC COMBINING ABILITY; ARABIDOPSIS; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE;

ARABIDOPSIS; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRID VIGOR; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84995694788     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615268113     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Darwin C (1876) The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom (John Murray, London), pp viii, 482.
2. Shull GH (1914) Duplicate genes for capsule-form in Bursa bursa-pastoris. Z Vererbungsl 12(1):97-149.
3. Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. J Hered os-4(1):296-301.
4. East EM (1908) Inbreeding in corn. Rep Conn Agric Exp Stn 1907:419-428.
5. Duvick DN (2001) Biotechnology in the 1930s: The development of hybrid maize. Nat Rev Genet 2(1):69-74.
6. Riedelsheimer C, et al. (2012) Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet 44(2):217-220.
7. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, UK), 4th Ed.
8. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10(11):783-796.
9. Schwartz D, Laughner WJ (1969) A molecular basis for heterosis. Science 166(3905): 626-627.
10. Rédei GP (1962) Single locus heterosis. Z Vererbungsl 93(1):164-170.
11. Vrebalov J, et al. (2002) A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science 296(5566):343-346.
12. Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42(5):459-463.
13. Guo M, et al. (2014) Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield. J Exp Bot 65(1):249-260.
14. Todesco M, et al. (2014) Activation of the Arabidopsis thaliana immune system by combinations of common ACD6 alleles. PLoS Genet 10(7):e1004459.
15. Smith LM, Bomblies K, Weigel D (2011) Complex evolutionary events at a tandem cluster of Arabidopsis thaliana genes resulting in a single-locus genetic incompatibility. PLoS Genet 7(7):e1002164.
16. Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28(718):454-455.
17. Bruce AB (1910) The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32(827):627-628.
18. Jones DF (1917) Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 3(4):310-312.
19. Bomblies K, et al. (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol 5(9):e236.
20. Alcázar R, García AV, Parker JE, Reymond M (2009) Incremental steps toward incompatibility revealed by Arabidopsis epistatic interactions modulating salicylic acid pathway activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(1):334-339.
21. Alcázar R, et al. (2010) Natural variation at Strubbelig Receptor Kinase 3 drives immune-triggered incompatibilities between Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Nat Genet 42(12):1135-1139.
22. Chae E, et al. (2014) Species-wide genetic incompatibility analysis identifies immune genes as hot spots of deleterious epistasis. Cell 159(6):1341-1351.
23. Li Z, Pinson SRM, Park WD, Paterson AH, Stansel JW (1997) Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145(2):453-465.
24. Li ZK, et al. (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158(4):1737-1753.
25. Luo X, et al. (2009) Additive and over-dominant effects resulting from epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of heterosis in rice. J Integr Plant Biol 51(4):393-408.
26. Kusterer B, et al. (2007) Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 177(3):1839-1850.
27. Kusterer B, et al. (2007) Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175(4):2009-2017.
28. Melchinger AE, et al. (2007) Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 177(3):1827-1837.
29. Garcia AA, Wang S, Melchinger AE, Zeng ZB (2008) Quantitative trait loci mapping and the genetic basis of heterosis in maize and rice. Genetics 180(3):1707-1724.
30. Guo T, et al. (2014) Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis in an "immortalized F2" maize population. Theor Appl Genet 127(10):2149-2158.
31. Atwell S, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465(7298):627-631.
32. Horton MW, et al. (2012) Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in worldwide Arabidopsis thaliana accessions from the RegMap panel. Nat Genet 44(2):212-216.
33. Consortium G; 1001 Genomes Consortium. Electronic address: magnus.nordborg@gmi. oeaw.ac.at; 1001 Genomes Consortium (2016) 1,135 genomes reveal the global pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 166(2):481-491.
34. Bomblies K, et al. (2010) Local-scale patterns of genetic variability, outcrossing, and spatial structure in natural stands of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 6(3):e1000890.
35. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), pp xvi, 980.
36. Cao J, et al. (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet 43(10):956-963.
37. Meyer RC, Törjék O, Becher M, Altmann T (2004) Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol 134(4):1813-1823.
38. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics 4(4):254-266.
39. Sasieni PD (1997) From genotypes to genes: Doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53(4):1253-1261.
40. Sladek R, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature 445(7130):881-885.
41. Zhang Q, et al. (1994) A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and microsatellites. Theor Appl Genet 89(2-3):185-192.
42. Ben-Israel I, Kilian B, Nida H, Fridman E (2012) Heterotic trait locus (HTL) mapping identifies intra-locus interactions that underlie reproductive hybrid vigor in Sorghum bicolor. PLoS One 7(6):e38993.
43. Mezmouk S, Ross-Ibarra J (2014) The pattern and distribution of deleterious mutations in maize. G3 (Bethesda) 4(1):163-171.
44. Laiba E, Glikaite I, Levy Y, Pasternak Z, Fridman E (2016) Genome scan for nonadditive heterotic trait loci reveals mainly underdominant effects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome 59(4):231-242.
45. Shapira R, David L (2016) Genes with a combination of over-dominant and epistatic effects underlie heterosis in growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high temperature. Front Genet 7:72.
46. Grimm D, et al. (2012) easyGWAS: An integrated interspecies platform for performing genome-wide association studies. arXiv:1212.4788v1211.
47. Lippert C, et al. (2011) FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods 8(10):833-835.
48. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2009) Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res 91(1):47-60.
49. Wray NR, et al. (2013) Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat Rev Genet 14(7):507-515.
50. Azencott CA, Grimm D, Sugiyama M, Kawahara Y, Borgwardt KM (2013) Efficient network-guided multi-locus association mapping with graph cuts. Bioinformatics 29(13):i171-i179.
51. Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A (1991) Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: A theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81(5): 571-575.
52. Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89(2-3): 336-343.
53. Bernardo R (1992) Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor Appl Genet 83(5):628-634.
54. Flint-Garcia SA, Buckler ES, Tiffin P, Ersoz E, Springer NM (2009) Heterosis is prevalent for multiple traits in diverse maize germplasm. PLoS One 4(10):e7433.
55. Cerna FJ, Cianzio SR, Rafalski A, Tingey S, Dyer D (1997) Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular marker heterozygosity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 95(3):460-467.
56. Liu ZQ, Pei Y, Pu ZJ (1999) Relationship between hybrid performance and genetic diversity based on RAPD markers in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Plant Breed 118(2): 119-123.
57. Riday H, Brummer EC, Campbell TA, Luth D, Cazcarro PM (2003) Comparisons of genetic and morphological distance with heterosis between Medicago sativa subsp. sativa and subsp. falcata. Euphytica 131(1):37-45.
58. Smaczniak C, Immink RG, Angenent GC, Kaufmann K (2012) Developmental and evolutionary diversity of plant MADS-domain factors: Insights from recent studies. Development 139(17):3081-3098.
59. Posé D, et al. (2013) Temperature-dependent regulation of flowering by antagonistic FLM variants. Nature 503(7476):414-417.
60. Lee JH, et al. (2013) Regulation of temperature-responsive flowering by MADS-box transcription factor repressors. Science 342(6158):628-632.
61. Parenicová L, et al. (2003) Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: New openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell 15(7):1538-1551.
62. Manolio TA, et al. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461(7265):747-753.
63. Eichler EE, et al. (2010) Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 11(6):446-450.
64. Gibson G (2012) Rare and common variants: Twenty arguments. Nat Rev Genet 13(2): 135-145.
65. Mackay TF (2014) Epistasis and quantitative traits: Using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet 15(1):22-33.
66. Ehrenreich IM, et al. (2010) Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 464(7291):1039-1042.
67. Sugiyama M, Azencott C-A, Grimm D, Kawahara Y, Borgwardt KM (2014) Multi-task feature selection on multiple networks via maximum flows. Proc SIAM Int Conf Data Min 2014:199-207.
68. Llinares-López F, et al. (2015) Genome-wide detection of intervals of genetic heterogeneity associated with complex traits. Bioinformatics 31(12):i240-i249.
69. Sham PC, Purcell SM (2014) Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet 15(5):335-346.
70. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, Lite TL, Kruglyak L (2013) Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494(7436):234-237.
71. Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford University Press, Oxford), p 318.
72. Kimura M (1983) Rare variant alleles in the light of the neutral theory. Mol Biol Evol 1(1):84-93.
73. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237-268.
74. Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D (1991) Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352(6335):522-524.
75. Willis JH (1992) Genetic analysis of inbreeding depression caused by chlorophylldeficient lethals in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 69(6):562-572.
76. Crow JF (1993) Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 9:3-42.
77. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140(2):745-754.
78. Hua J, et al. (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(5):2574-2579.
79. Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80(6):833-840.
80. Barbosa AMM, et al. (2003) Relationship of intra-and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers. Euphytica 130(1):87-99.
81. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132(3):823-839.
82. Larièpe A, et al. (2012) The genetic basis of heterosis: Multiparental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 190(2):795-811.
83. Pogson GH (1991) Expression of overdominance for specific activity at the phosphoglucomutase-2 locus in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Genetics 128(1):133-141.
84. Mitchell-Olds T (1995) Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidopsis. Genetics 140(3):1105-1109.
85. Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37(5):1601-1610.
86. Steinmetz LM, et al. (2002) Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416(6878):326-330.
87. Stinchcombe JR, et al. (2004) A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(13):4712-4717.
88. Hancock AM, et al. (2011) Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 334(6052):83-86.
89. Dittmar EL, Oakley CG, Agren J, Schemske DW (2014) Flowering time QTL in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana and implications for their adaptive value. Mol Ecol 23(17):4291-4303.
90. Korves TM, et al. (2007) Fitness effects associated with the major flowering time gene FRIGIDA in Arabidopsis thaliana in the field. Am Nat 169(5):E141-E157.
91. Fournier-Level A, et al. (2013) Paths to selection on life history loci in different natural environments across the native range of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Ecol 22(13):3552-3566.
92. Brachi B, et al. (2010) Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet 6(5):e1000940.
93. Moore S, Lukens L (2011) An evaluation of Arabidopsis thaliana hybrid traits and their genetic control. G3 (Bethesda) 1(7):571-579.
94. Lisec J, et al. (2009) Identification of heterotic metabolite QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana RIL and IL populations. Plant J 59(5):777-788.
95. Meyer RC, et al. (2010) QTL analysis of early stage heterosis for biomass in Arabidopsis. Theor Appl Genet 120(2):227-237.
96. Oakley CG, Agren J, Schemske DW (2015) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in crosses between natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity (Edinb) 115(1):73-82.
97. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671-675.
98. Xiang B, Li BL (2003) Best linear unbiased prediction of clonal breeding values and genetic values from full-sib mating designs. Can J Res 33(10):2036-2043.
99. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1-48.
100. Devlin B, Roeder K (1999) Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55(4): 997-1004.
101. Chang CC, et al. (2015) Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4:7.
102. Szkiba D, Kapun M, von Haeseler A, Gallach M (2014) SNP2GO: Functional analysis of genome-wide association studies. Genetics 197(1):285-289.
103. Tamura K, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731-2739.