Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: How far are we from clinical translation?

Heart

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 98-103

  Biglino, Giovanni ^a,b   Capelli, Claudio ^b,c   Bruse, Jan ^b,c   Bosi, Giorgia M ^b,c   Taylor, Andrew M ^b,c   Schievano, Silvia ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENGINEERING; BIOMECHANICS; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FALLOT TETRALOGY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; VIRTUAL REALITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84994713393     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310423     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Dubini G, de Leval MR, Pietrabissa R, et al. A numerical fluid mechanical study of repaired congenital heart defects. Application to the total cavopulmonary connection. J Biomech 1996;29:111-21.
2. Giannakoulas G, Dimopoulos K, Xu XY. Modelling in congenital heart disease. Art or science? Int J Cardiol 2009;133:141-4.
3. Valverde I, Nordmeyer S, Uribe S, et al. Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:25.
4. Silva Vieira M, Hussain T, Figueroa CA. Patient-specific image-based computational modeling in congenital heart disease: a clinician perspective. J Cardiol Ther 2015;2:436-48.
5. de Leval MR, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, et al. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of surgical procedures: application to the study of competitive flows in cavo-pulmonary connections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:502-13.
6. de Zélicourt DA, Kurtcuoglu V. Patient-specific surgical planning, where do we stand? The example of the Fontan procedure. Ann Biomed Eng 2016;44:174-86.
7. Haggerty CM, de Zélicourt DA, Restrepo M, et al. Comparing pre- and post-operative Fontan hemodynamic simulations: implications for the reliability of surgical planning. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:2639-51.
8. Corsini C, Baker C, Kung E, et al. An integrated approach to patient-specific predictive modeling for single ventricle heart palliation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014;17:1572-89.
9. Yang W, Chan FP, Reddy VM, et al. Flow simulations and validation for the first cohort of patients undergoing the Y-graft Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:247-55.
10. La Disa JF Jr, Figueroa C, Vignon-Clementel IE, et al. Computational simulations for aortic coarctation: representative results from a sampling of patients. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:091008.
11. Sotelo JA, Urbina J, Valverde I, et al. 3D quantification of hemodynamics parameters of pulmonary artery and aorta using finite-element interpolations in 4D flow MR data. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17(Suppl 1):Q27.
12. Carminati M, Pluchinotta FR, Piazza L, et al. Echocardiographic assessment after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Front Pediatr 2015;3:3.
13. Spilker RL, Feinstein JA, Parker DW, et al. Morphometry-based impedance boundary conditions for patient-specific modeling of blood flow in pulmonary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 2007;35:546-59.
14. Schievano S, Taylor AM, Capelli C, et al. First-in-man implantation of a novel percutaneous valve: a new approach to medical device development. EuroIntervention 2010;5:745-50.
15. Bosi GM, Capelli C, Khambadkone S, et al. Patient-specific finite element models to support clinical decisions: a lesson learnt from a case study of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:1120-30.
16. Cosentino D, Capelli C, Derrick G, et al. Patient-specific computational models to support interventional procedures: a case study of complex aortic re-coarctation. EuroIntervention 2015;11:669-72.
17. Hariharan P, Giarra M, Reddy V, et al. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:041002.
18. Bonhoeffer P. Are animal experiments the crux for decision making in whether new heart valves can be brought to clinical practice? EuroIntervention 2010;5:643-5.
19. Viceconti M, McCulloch AD. Policy needs and options for a common approach towards modelling and simulation of human physiology and diseases with a focus on the virtual physiological human. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;170:49-82.
20. Advancing Regulatory Science at FDA (Online). http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryscience (accessed Mar 2016).
21. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry and FDA staff-Nonclinical engineering tests and recommended labeling for intravascular stents and associated delivery systems, 2010. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ DeviceRegulationandGuidance (accessed Mar 2016).
22. Muller J. Inside a beating silicon heart. Forbes 2014; 20 January 2014 edition.
23. Baillargeon B, Costa I, Leach JR, et al. Human cardiac function simulator for the optimal design of a novel annuloplasty ring with a sub-valvular element for correction of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2015;6:105-16.
24. Wood M. Climbing inside a human heart. The New York Time 2014; 17 November 2014 edition: B8.
25. Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW. Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births. Incidence and natural history. Circulation 1971;43:323-32.
26. Young AA, Frangi AF. Computational cardiac atlases: from patient to population and back. Exp Physiol 2009;94:578-96.
27. Bruse JL, McLeod K, Biglino G, et al. A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data: assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta. BMC Med Imaging 2016;16:40.
28. Cootes T, Hill A, Taylor C, et al. Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image Vis Comput 1994;12:355-65.
29. Lorenz C, von Berg J. A comprehensive shape model of the heart. Med Image Anal 2006;10:657-70.
30. Hoogendoorn C, Duchateau N, Sánchez-Quintana D, et al. A high-resolution Atlas and statistical model of the human heart from multislice CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:28-44.
31. Fonseca CG, Backhaus M, Bluemke DA, et al. The Cardiac Atlas Project-an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2288-95.
32. Remme EW, Young AA, Augenstein KF, et al. Extraction and quantification of left ventricular deformation modes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51: 1923-31.
33. Lamata P, Lazdam M, Ashcroft A, et al. Computational mesh as a descriptor of left ventricular shape for clinical diagnosis. Presented at the Computing in Cardiology, 2013, Vol 40, pp. 571-4.
34. Lewandowski AJ, Augustine D, Lamata P, et al. Preterm heart in adult life: cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals distinct differences in left ventricular mass, geometry, and function. Circulation 2013;127:197-206.
35. Casciaro ME, Craiem D, Chironi G, et al. Identifying the principal modes of variation in human thoracic aorta morphology. J Thorac Imaging 2014;29:224-32.
36. Bosmans B, Huysmans T, Wirix-Speetjens R, et al. Statistical shape modeling and population analysis of the aortic root of TAVI patients. J Med Devices 2013;7:040925-040925.
37. Mansi T, Voigt I, Leonardi B, et al. A statistical model for quantification and prediction of cardiac remodelling: application to tetralogy of Fallot. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011;30:1605-16.
38. Bruse JL, Ntsinjana HN, Capelli C, et al. CMR-based 3D statistical shape modelling reveals left ventricular morphological differences between healthy controls and arterial switch operation survivors. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016;18(Suppl 1):Q2.
39. Bruse JL, McLeod K, Biglino G, et al. A non-parametric statistical shape model for assessment of the surgically repaired aortic arch in coarctation of the aorta: how normal is abnormal? In Camara O, et al., eds. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart 2015. Munich: LNCS 9534, 2016:21-9.
40. Zhao F, Zhang H, Wahle A, et al. Congenital aortic disease: 4D magnetic resonance segmentation and quantitative analysis. Med Image Anal 2009;13:483-93.
41. Biglino G, Cosentino D, Steeden JA, et al. Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study. Front Pediatr 2015;3:107.
42. Guzzardi DG, Barker AJ, van Ooij P, et al. Valve-related hemodynamics mediate human bicuspid aortopathy: insights from wall shear stress mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:892-900.
43. Figueroa CA, Baek S, Taylor CA, et al. A computational framework for fluid-solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009;198:3583-602.
44. Good BC, Deutsch S, Manning KB. Hemodynamics in a pediatric ascending aorta using a viscoelastic pediatric blood model. Ann Biomed Eng 2016;44:1019-35.
45. Xu ZL, Chen N, Shadden SC, et al. Study of blood flow impact on growth of thrombi using a multiscale model. Soft Matter 2009;5:769-79.
46. Duggirala A, Delogu F, Angelini TG, et al. Non coding RNAs in aortic aneurysmal disease. Front Genet 2015;6:125.
47. Witschey WR, Pouch AM, McGarvey JR, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound-derived physical mitral valve modeling. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:691-4.
48. Schiavazzi DE, Arbia G, Baker C, et al. Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2016;32:e02737.
49. Antoniadis AP, Mortier P, Kassab G, et al. Biomechanical modeling to improve coronary artery bifurcation stenting: expert review document on techniques and clinical implementation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1281-96.
50. Marsden AL, Feinstein JA. Computational modeling and engineering in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 2015;27:587-96.