A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data: Assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Bruse, Jan L ^a   McLeod, Kristin ^b,c   Biglino, Giovanni ^a,d   Ntsinjana, Hopewell N ^a   Capelli, Claudio ^a   Hsia, Tain Yen ^a   Sermesant, Maxime ^c   Pennec, Xavier ^c   Taylor, Andrew M ^a   Schievano, Silvia ^a   Taylor, Andrew ^a   Giardini, Alessandro ^a   Khambadkone, Sachin ^a   de Leval, Marc ^a   Bove, Edward ^e   Dorfman, Adam ^e   Baker, G Hamilton ^f   Hlavacek, Anthony ^f   Migliavacca, Francesco ^g   Pennati, Giancarlo ^g   Dubini, Gabriele ^g   Marsden, Alison ^h   Vignon Clementel, Irene ⁱ   Figliola, Richard ^j   McGregor, John ^k   more..

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

^c INRIA   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j INRIA   (France)

^k CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

3D Shape analysis; Coarctation of the aorta; Computational modelling; Congenital heart disease; Statistical shape model (SSM)

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC MODEL; AORTIC COARCTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; THORACIC AORTA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTA, THORACIC; AORTIC COARCTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84971542667     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0142-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lamata P, Casero R, Carapella V, Niederer SA, Bishop MJ, Schneider JE, et al. Images as drivers of progress in cardiac computational modelling. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014;115:198-212.
2. Craiem D, Chironi G, Redheuil A, Casciaro M, Mousseaux E, Simon A, et al. Aging Impact on Thoracic Aorta 3D Morphometry in Intermediate-Risk Subjects: Looking Beyond Coronary Arteries with Non-Contrast Cardiac CT. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40:1028-38.
3. Young AA, Frangi AF. Computational cardiac atlases: from patient to population and back. Exp Physiol. 2009;94:578-96.
4. Lamata P, Lazdam M, Ashcroft A, Lewandowski AJ, Leeson P, Smith N. Computational mesh as a descriptor of left ventricular shape for clinical diagnosis. Computing in Cardiology Conference. 2013;2013:571-4.
5. Cootes T, Hill A, Taylor C, Haslam J. Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image Vision Computing. 1994;12:355-65.
6. Remme E, Young AA, Augenstein KF, Cowan B, Hunter PJ. Extraction and quantification of left ventricular deformation modes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1923-31.
7. Lewandowski AJ, Augustine D, Lamata P, Davis EF, Lazdam M, Francis J, et al. Preterm Heart in Adult Life Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Reveals Distinct Differences in Left Ventricular Mass, Geometry, and Function. Circulation. 2013;127:197-206.
8. Styner MA, Rajamani KT, Nolte L-P, Zsemlye G, Székely G, Taylor CJ, et al. Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building. In: Taylor C, Noble JA, editors. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2003. p. 63-75. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_6.
9. Vaillant M, Glaunès J. Surface Matching via Currents. In: Christensen GE, Sonka M, editors. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 381-92. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11505730_32.
10. Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N. Measuring brain variability via sulcal lines registration: a diffeomorphic approach. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10:675-82.
11. Mansi T, Durrleman S, Bernhardt B, Sermesant M, Delingette H, Voigt I, et al. A Statistical Model of Right Ventricle in Tetralogy of Fallot for Prediction of Remodelling and Therapy Planning. In: Yang G-Z, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, Noble A, Taylor C, editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2009. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 214-21. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-04268-3_27.
12. Mansi T, Voigt I, Leonardi B, Pennec X, Durrleman S, Sermesant M, et al. A Statistical Model for Quantification and Prediction of Cardiac Remodelling: Application to Tetralogy of Fallot. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011;30:1605-16.
13. Leonardi B, Taylor AM, Mansi T, Voigt I, Sermesant M, Pennec X, et al. Computational modelling of the right ventricle in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: can it provide insight into patient treatment? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:381-6.
14. Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N. Statistical models of sets of curves and surfaces based on currents. Med Image Anal. 2009;13:793-808.
15. O'Sullivan J. Late Hypertension in Patients with Repaired Aortic Coarctation. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:1-6.
16. Vergales JE, Gangemi JJ, Rhueban KS, Lim DS. Coarctation of the Aorta - The Current State of Surgical and Transcatheter Therapies. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013;9:211-9.
17. Ou P, Bonnet D, Auriacombe L, Pedroni E, Balleux F, Sidi D, et al. Late systemic hypertension and aortic arch geometry after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1853-9.
18. De Caro E, Trocchio G, Smeraldi A, Calevo MG, Pongiglione G. Aortic Arch Geometry and Exercise-Induced Hypertension in Aortic Coarctation. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1284-7.
19. Lee MGY, Kowalski R, Galati JC, Cheung MMH, Jones B, Koleff J, et al. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detects a high prevalence of hypertension late after coarctation repair in patients with hypoplastic arches. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1110-8.
20. Durrleman S. Statistical models of currents for measuring the variability of anatomical curves, surfaces and their evolution. University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; 2010. Available from: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00631382/.
21. Mansi T. Modèles physiologiques et statistiques du cœur guidés par imagerie médicale: application à la tétralogie de Fallot [Internet]. École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris; 2010 [cited 2013 Aug 21]. Available from: http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00530956
22. McLeod K, Mansi T, Sermesant M, Pongiglione G, Pennec X. Statistical Shape Analysis of Surfaces in Medical Images Applied to the Tetralogy of Fallot Heart. In: Cazals F, Kornprobst P, editors. Modeling in Computational Biology and Biomedicine. Berlin: Springer; 2013. Available from: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-31208-3_5.pdf#page-1.
23. Durrleman S, Prastawa M, Charon N, Korenberg JR, Joshi S, Gerig G, et al. Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters. Neuroimage. 2014;101:35-49.
24. Ntsinjana HN, Biglino G, Capelli C, Tann O, Giardini A, Derrick G, et al. Aortic arch shape is not associated with hypertensive response to exercise in patients with repaired congenital heart diseases. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:101.
25. Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Carminati M, Wilson N, et al. Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation Based on Rapid Prototyping of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and Pulmonary Trunk from MR Data. Radiology. 2007;242:490-7.
26. Casciaro ME, Craiem D, Chironi G, Graf S, Macron L, Mousseaux E, et al. Identifying the principal modes of variation in human thoracic aorta morphology. J Thorac Imaging. 2014;29:224-32.
27. Bosmans B, Huysmans T, Wirix-Speetjens R, Verschueren P, Sijbers J, Bosmans J, et al. Statistical Shape Modeling and Population Analysis of the Aortic Root of TAVI Patients. J Med Devices. 2013;7:040925.
28. Zhao F, Zhang H, Wahle A, Thomas MT, Stolpen AH, Scholz TD, et al. Congenital Aortic Disease: 4D Magnetic Resonance Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis. Med Image Anal. 2009;13:483-93.
29. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman DA. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46:1097-112.
30. Piccinelli M, Veneziani A, Steinman DA, Remuzzi A, Antiga L. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1141-55.
31. Antiga L, Steinman DA. Robust and objective decomposition and mapping of bifurcating vessels. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:704-13.
32. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1992;14:239-56.
33. Heimann T, Meinzer H-P. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review. Med Image Anal. 2009;13:543-63.
34. Singh N, Thomas Fletcher P, Samuel Preston J, King RD, Marron JS, Weiner MW, et al. Quantifying anatomical shape variations in neurological disorders. Med Image Anal. 2014;18:616-33.
35. Mathworks. MATLAB v2014 Documentation - Cook's Distance. Natick, MA. 2014;
36. Joliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. Inc.: Springer-Verlag New York; 2002.
37. Canniffe C, Ou P, Walsh K, Bonnet D, Celermajer D. Hypertension after repair of aortic coarctation - A systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2456-61.
38. Lützen J. De Rham's Currents. In The Prehistory of the Theory of Distributions. [Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, vol. 7]. Springer New York; 1982:144-7.
39. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vision. 2005;61:139-57.
40. Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1989;11:567-85.