Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Hariharan, Prasanna ^a   Giarra, Matthew ^b   Reddy, Varun ^c   Day, Steven W ^a   Manning, Keefe B ^c   Deutsch, Steven ^c   Stewart, Sandy F C ^a   Myers, Matthew R ^a   Berman, Michael R ^a   Burgreen, Greg W ^d   Paterson, Eric G ^c   Malinauskas, Richard A ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; FDA critical path initiative; Particle image velocimetry; Shear stress; Sudden expansion; Transitional flow; Turbulent flow measurement

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW PARAMETERS; CFD SIMULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; CONTROLLED TEMPERATURE; CRITICAL PATHS; EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; FLOW CONDITION; FLOW CONSTRICTION; FLOW QUANTITIES; FLUID JET; FLUID VELOCITIES; FLUID VISCOSITY; INLET TURBULENCE LEVELS; INTERLABORATORY STUDIES; MEAN VELOCITIES; MEDICAL DEVICES; NOZZLE EXITS; NOZZLE MODELS; NOZZLE THROAT; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRIES; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY ANALYSIS; RECIRCULATION ZONES; ROUND ROBIN; STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES; SUDDEN EXPANSION; SUPPORT VALIDATIONS; TRANSITIONAL FLOW;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; EXPANSION; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW VISUALIZATION; FLOWMETERS; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUIDS; INLET FLOW; NOZZLES; OPTIMIZATION; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; TRANSITION FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VELOCIMETERS; VELOCITY; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; BENCHMARK NOZZLE MODEL; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DEVICE; DEVICE SAFETY; FLOW KINETICS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW RATE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; LAMINAR FLOW; PARAMETER; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PRESSURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TRANSITIONAL FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW; VALIDATION STUDY; VISCOSITY; ALGORITHM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; LABORATORY; MULTICENTER STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; LABORATORIES; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEOLOGY; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 79951748124     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003440     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Pinotti M. Rosa E.S. Computational Prediction of Hemolysis in a Centrifugal Ventricular Assist Device. Artif. Organs 1995, 19(3):267-273. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1995.tb02326.x.
2. Grigioni M. Daniele C. D'Avenio G. Barbaro V.A. Discussion on the Threshold Limit for Hemolysis Related to Reynolds Shear Stress. J. Biomech. 1999, 32:1107-1112. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00063-9.
3. Burgreen G.W. Antaki J.F. Wu Z.J. Holmes A.J. Computational Fluid Dynamics as a Development Tool for Rotary Blood Pumps. Artif. Organs 2001, 25(5):336-340. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025005336.x.
4. De Wachter D. Verdonck P. Numerical Calculation of Hemolysis Levels in Peripheral Hemodialysis Cannulas. Artif. Organs 2002, 26(7):576-582. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.07079.x.
5. Yano T. Sekine K. Mitoh A. Mitamura Y. Okamoto E. Kim D.W. Nishimura I. Murabayashi S. Yozu R. An Estimation Method of Hemolysis Within an Axial Flow Blood Pump by Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis. Artif. Organs 2003, 27(10):920-925. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.00034.x.
6. Arvand A. Hormes M. Reul H. A Validated Computational Fluid Dynamics Model to Estimate Hemolysis in a Rotary Blood Pump. Artif. Organs 2005, 29(7):531-540. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29089.x.
7. Behbahani M. Behr M. Hormes M. Steinseifer U. Arora D. Coronado O. Pasquali M. A Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Blood Pumps. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 2009, 20(04):363-397. ZZZZZZ, 0956-7925, 10.1017/S0956792509007839.
8. Wootton D.M. Markou C.P. Hanson S.R. Ku D.N. A Mechanistic Model of Acute Platelet Accumulation in Thrombogenic Stenoses. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 29(4):321-329. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.1359449.
9. Goodman P.D. Barlow E.T. Crapo P.M. Mohammad S.F. Solen K.A. Computational Model of Device-Induced Thrombosis and Thromboembolism. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(6):780-797. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-005-2951-z.
10. Sorensen E.N. Burgreen G.W. Wagner W.R. Antaki J.F. Computational Simulation of Platelet Deposition and Activation: I. Model Development and Properties. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 27:436-448. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.200.
11. Fallon A.M. Dasi L.P. Marzec U.M. Hanson S.R. Yoganathan A.P. Procoagulant Properties of Flow Fields in Stenotic and Expansive Orifices. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 36(1):1-13. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-007-9398-3.
12. Tamagawa M. Kaneda H. Hiramoto M. Nagahama S. Simulation of Thrombus Formation in Shear Flows Using Lattice Boltzmann Method. Artif. Organs 2009, 33(8):604-610. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00782.x.
13. Richardson E. Applications of a Theoretical Model for Haemolysis in Shear Flow. Biorheology 1975, 12(1):27-37. BRHLAU, 0006-355X.
14. Giersiepen M. Wurzinger L.J. Opitz R. Reul H. Estimation of Shear Stress-Related Blood Damage in Heart Valve Prostheses-In Vitro Comparison of 25 Aortic Valves. Int. J. Artif. Organs 1990, 13(5):300-306. IJAODS, 0391-3988.
15. Bludszuweit C. Model for a General Mechanical Blood Damage Prediction. Artif. Organs 1995, 19(7):583-589. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1995.tb02385.x.
16. Gu L. Smith W. Evaluation of Computational Models for Hemolysis Estimation. ASAIO J. 2005, 51(3):202-207. ASJODE, 0162-1432, 10.1097/01.MAT.0000161939.29905.93.
17. Hentschel B. Tedjo I. Probst M. Wolter M. Behr M. Bischof C. Kuhlen T. Interactive Blood Damage Analysis for Ventricular Assist Devices. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2008, 14(6):1515-1522. ITVGEA, 1077-2626, 10.1109/TVCG.2008.142.
18. Stewart S.F. C. Day S. Burgreen G.W. Paterson E.G. Manning K.B. Hariharan P. Deutsch S. Giarra M. Cheek C. Reddy V. Berman M. Myers M.R. Malinauskas R.A. Preliminary Results of FDA's 'Critical Path' Project to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamic Methods Used in Medical Device Evaluation. ASAIO J. 2009, 55(2):173. ASJODE, 0162-1432.
19. Browne P. Ramuzat A. Saxena R. Yoganathan A.P. Experimental Investigation of the Steady Flow Downstream of the St. Jude Bileaflet Heart Valve: A Comparison Between Laser Doppler Velocimetry and Particle Image Velocimetry Techniques. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 28(1):39-47. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.252.
20. Kaminsky R. Morbiducci U. Rossi M. Scalise L. Verdonck P. Grigioni M. Time-Resolved PIV Technique for High Temporal Resolution Measurement of Mechanical Prosthetic Aortic Valve Fluid Dynamics. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2007, 30(2):153-162. IJAODS, 0391-3988.
21. Kaminsky R. Dumont K. Weber H. Schroll M. Verdonck P. PIV Validation of Blood-Heart Valve Leaflet Interaction Modelling. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2007, 30(7):640-648. IJAODS, 0391-3988.
22. Manning K.B. Kini V. Fontaine A.A. Deutsch S. Tarbell J.M. Regurgitant Flow Field Characteristics of the St. Jude Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Under Physiologic Pulsatile Flow Using Particle Image Velocimetry. Artif. Organs 2003, 27(9):840-846. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07194.x.
23. Lim W.L. Chew Y.T. Chew T.C. Low H.T. Pulsatile Flow Studies of a Porcine Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve In Vitro: PIV Measurements and Shear-Induced Blood Damage. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:1417-1427. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00132-4.
24. Ge L. Dasi L.P. Sotiropoulos F. Yoganathan A.P. Characterization of Hemodynamic Forces Induced by Mechanical Heart Valves: Reynolds vs. Viscous Stresses. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 36(2):276-297. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-007-9411-x.
25. Engelmayr Jr. G.C. Soletti L. Vigmostad S.C. Budilarto S.G. Federspiel W.J. Chandran K.B. Vorp D.A. Sacks M.S. A Novel Flex-Stretch-Flow Bioreactor for the Study of Engineered Heart Valve Tissue Mechanobiology. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 36(5):700-712. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-008-9447-6.
26. Hochareon P. Manning K.B. Fontaine A.A. Tarbell J.M. Deutsch S. Wall Shear-Rate Estimation Within the 50cc Penn State Artificial Heart Using Particle Image Velocimetry. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126:430-437. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1784477.
27. Deutsch S. Tarbell J.M. Manning K.B. Rosenberg G. Fontaine A.A. Experimental Fluid Mechanics of Pulsatile Artificial Blood Pumps. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2006, 38:65-86. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092022.
28. Day S.W. McDaniel J.C. PIV Measurements of Flow in a Centrifugal Blood Pump: Steady Flow. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127(2):244-253. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1865189.
29. Day S.W. McDaniel J.C. PIV Measurements of Flow in a Centrifugal Blood Pump: Time-Varying Flow. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127(2):254-263. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1865190.
30. Shu F. Vandenberghe S. Antaki J.F. The Importance of dQ/dt on the Flow Field in a Turbodynamic Pump With Pulsatile Flow. Artif. Organs 2009, 33(9):757-762. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00849.x.
31. Lee H. Tatsumi E. Taenaka Y. Experimental Study on the Reynolds and Viscous Shear Stress of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves in a Pneumatic Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2009, 55(4):348-354. ASJODE, 0162-1432, 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181a793e0.
32. Medvitz R.B. Reddy V. Deutsch S. Manning K.B. Paterson E.G. Validation of a CFD Methodology for Positive Displacement LVAD Analysis Using PIV Data. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131(11):111009. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.4000116.
33. Cooper B.T. Roszelle B.N. Long T.C. Deutsch S. Manning K.B. The Influence of Operational Protocol on the Fluid Dynamics in the 12 cc Penn State Pulsatile Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device: The Effect of End-Diastolic Delay. Artif. Organs 2010, 34(4):E122-E133. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00852.x.
34. Benard N. Coisne D. Donal E. Perrault R. Experimental Study of Laminar Blood Flow Through an Artery Treated by a Stent Implantation: Characterisation of Intra-Stent Wall Shear Stress. J. Biomech. 2003, 36:991-998. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00068-X.
35. Charonko J. Karri S. Schmieg J. Prabhu S. Vlachos P. In Vitro, Time-Resolved PIV Comparison of the Effect of Stent Design on Wall Shear Stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37(7):1310-1321. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-009-9697-y.
36. Stanislas K. Okamoto K. Kahler C.J. Westerweel J. Scarano F. Main Results of the Third International Challenge. Exp. Fluids 2008, 45:27-71. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/s00348-008-0462-z.
37. Umezu M. Fujimasu H. Yamada T. Fujimoto T. Ranawake M. Nogawa A. Kijima T. Fluid Dynamic Investigation of Mechanical Blood Hemolysis. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Artificial Heart and Assist Devices 1996, 327-335.
38. Hinds M.T. Park Y.J. Jones S.A. Giddens D.P. Alevriadou B.R. Local Hemodynamics Affect Monocytic Cell Adhesion to a Three-Dimensional Flow Model Coated With E-Selectin. J. Biomech. 2001, 34(1):95-103. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00139-1.
39. Worth Longest P. Kleinstreuer C. Comparison of Blood Particle Deposition Models for Non-Parallel Flow Domains. J. Biomech. 2003, 36(3):421-430. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00434-7.
40. Kameneva M.V. Burgreen G.W. Kono K. Repko B. Antaki J.F. Umezu M. Effects of Turbulent Stresses Upon Mechanical Hemolysis: Experimental and Computational Analysis. ASAIO J. 2004, 50:418-423. ASJODE, 0162-1432, 10.1097/01.MAT.0000136512.36370.B5.
41. Lacasse D. Garon A. Pelletier D. Mechanical Hemolysis in Blood Flow: User-Independent Predictions With the Solution of a Partial Differential Equation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 10(1):1-12. CMBEFS, 1025-5842, 10.1080/10255840600985535.
42. Prasad A.K. Particle Image Velocimetry. Curr. Sci. 2000, 79(1):51-60. CUSCAM, 0011-3891.
43. Westerweel J. Digital Particle Image Velocimetry, Theory and Application. 1993, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands.
44. Westerweel J. Fundamentals of Digital Particle Image Velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8:1379-1392. MSTCEP, 0957-0233, 10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/002.
45. 2008, LaVision Inc., DAVIS FLOWMASTER Software Manual.
46. Keane R.D. Adrian R.J. Theory of Cross-Correlation Analysis of PIV Images. Appl. Sci. Res. 1992, 49:191-215. ASRHAU, 0003-6994, 10.1007/BF00384623.
47. Huang H. Dabiri D. Gharib M. On Errors of Digital Particle Image Velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8:1427-1440. MSTCEP, 0957-0233, 10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/007.
48. Christensen K.T. The Influence of Peak-Locking Errors on Turbulence Statistics Computed From PIV Ensembles. Exp. Fluids 2004, 36:484-497. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/s00348-003-0754-2.
49. Nobach H. Bodenschatz E. Limitations of Accuracy in PIV Due to Individual Variations of Particle Image Intensities. Exp. Fluids 2009, 47:27-38. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/s00348-009-0627-4.
50. Hariharan P. Myers M.R. Robinson R.A. Maruvada S.H. Sliwa J. Banerjee R.K. Characterization of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Transducers Using Acoustic Streaming. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 123(3):1706-1719. JASMAN, 0001-4966, 10.1121/1.2835662.
51. Zhou M. Garner C.P. Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of the Flow Field Within an Enclosed Rotating Disc-Stator System and Comparison With Computational Fluid Dynamics Results. Optical Diagnostics in Engineering 1996, 1(2):9-21. 1364-4173.
52. Adrian R.J. Dynamic Ranges of Velocity and Spatial Resolution of Particle Image Velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8:1393-1398. MSTCEP, 0957-0233, 10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/003.
53. Nigen S. El Kissi N. Piau J.M. Sadun S. Velocity Field for Polymer Melts Extrusion Using Particle Image Velocimetry Stable and Unstable Flow Regimes. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2003, 112:177-202. JNFMDI, 0377-0257, 10.1016/S0377-0257(03)00097-1.
54. Wernet M.P. Subramanian A. Mu H. Kadambi J.R. Comparison of Particle Image Velocimetry and Laser Doppler Anemometry Measurements in Turbulent Fluid Flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 28:1393-1394. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.1336827.
55. Hinze J.O. Turbulence 1975, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
56. Gach M.H. Lowe I.J. Measuring Flow Reattachment Lengths Downstream of a Stenosis Using MRI. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 2000, 12:939-948. ZZZZZZ, 1053-1807, 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<939::AID-JMRI18 3.0.CO;2-F.
57. Pak B. Cho Y.I. Choi S.U. S. Separation and Reattachment of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows in a Sudden Expansion Pipe. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 1990, 37:175-199. JNFMDI, 0377-0257, 10.1016/0377-0257(90)90004-U.
58. Cantwell C.D. Barkley D. Blackburn H.M. Transient Growth Analysis of Flow Through a Sudden Expansion in a Circular Pipe. Phys. Fluids 2010, 22:034101. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.3313931.
59. Mehrez Z. Bouterra M. Cafsi A.E. Belghith A. Le Quere P. The Influence of the Periodic Disturbance on the Local Heat Transfer in Separated and Reattached Flow. Heat Mass Transfer 2009, 46:107-112. HMTRF8, 0947-7411, 10.1007/s00231-009-0548-z.
60. Armaly B.F. Durst F. Pereira J.C. F. Schönung B. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Backward-Facing Step Flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1983, 127:473-496. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112083002839.
61. Sreenivasan K.R. Some Studies of Non-Simple Pipe Flows. Trans. of the Institution of Engineers, Australia: Mech. Eng. 1983, 8:200-208. 0727-7369.
62. Bluestein D. Niu L. Schoephoerster R.T. Dewanjee M.K. Fluid Mechanics of Arterial Stenosis: Relationship to the Development of Mural Thrombus. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 25:344-356. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/BF02648048.
63. Leverett L.B. Hellums J.D. Alfrey C.P. Lynch E.C. Red Blood Cell Damage by Shear Stress. Biophys. J. 1972, 12:257-273. BIOJAU, 0006-3495, 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86085-5.
64. Scarano F. Riethmuller M. Iterative Multigrid Approach in PIV Image Processing With Discrete Window Offset. Exp. Fluids 1999, 26:513-523. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/s003480050318.