A methodology to develop collaborative robotic cyber physical systems for production environments

Logistics Research

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Khalid, Azfar ^a,b   Kirisci, Pierre ^a   Ghrairi, Zied ^a   Thoben, Klaus Dieter ^a   Pannek, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b CAPITAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Collaborative robotics; Cyber physical system; Human robot collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994492990     PISSN: 1865035X     EISSN: 18650368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12159-016-0151-x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. VDI VDE (2014) Industrie 4.0 Wertschöpfungsketten, status report. http://www.vdi.de/fileadmin/vdi_de/redakteur_dateien/sk_dateien/VDI_Industrie_4. 0_Wertschoepfungsketten_2014.pdf
2. Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S (2013) Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur Gener Comput Syst 29(7):1645–1660
3. Zuhlke D (2008) Smart factory—from vision to reality in factory technologies. In: Proceeding of the 17th international federation of automatic control world congress (IFAC), South Korea, pp 82–89
4. Zuehlke D (2010) Smart factory—towards a factory-of-things. Annu Rev Control 34(1):129–138
5. Mourtzis D (2016) Challenges and future perspectives for the life cycle of manufacturing networks in the mass customisation era. Logist Res 9(2)
6. Knight W (2014) How human–robot teamwork will upend manufacturing. In: Rotman D (ed) MIT technology review, business report, breakthrough factories. Jason Pontin. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/530696/how-human-robot-teamwork-will-upendmanufacturing/#
7. Lasota PA, Rossano GF, Shah JA (2014) Toward safe close-proximity human–robot interaction with standard industrial robots. In: The 10th IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), Taipei, Taiwan
8. Collaborative Robotics Market Exceeds US$1 Billion by 2020, ABIresearch (2015) https://abiresearch.com/press/collaborative-robotics-market-exceeds-us1-billion-/
9. http://new.abb.com/products/robotics/yumi
10. http://www.rethinkrobotics.com/sawyer-intera-3/
11. http://www.rethinkrobotics.com/baxter/
12. http://www.universal-robots.com/products/ur10-robot/
13. NASA, robonaut R2. http://robonaut.jsc.nasa.gov
14. http://www.kuka-robotics.com/en/products/industrial_robots/sensitiv/lbr_iiwa_14_r820/start.htm
15. http://nextage.kawada.jp/
16. Pirvu B-C, Zamfirescu C-B, Gorecky D (2015) Engineering insights from an anthropocentric cyber-physical system: a case study for an assembly station. Mechatronics. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.08.010
17. Griffiths S (2014) Meals on wheels! Robots deliver food they’ve cooked to diners in a Chinese restaurant—and they even make small talk. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2725845/Meals-wheels-Robots-deliver-food-cook-diners-Chinese-restaurant-make-small-talk.html
18. http://www.fanuc.eu/de/en/robots/robot-filter-page/collaborative-cr35ia
19. Kriaa S, Pietre-Cambacedes L, Bouissou M, Halgand Y (2015) A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control Systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 139:156–178
20. NIST (2013) Foundations for innovation in cyber-physical systems, workshop report. http://www.nist.gov/el/upload/CPS-WorkshopReport-1-30-13-Final.pdf
21. Schirner G, Erdogmus D, Chowdhury K, Padir K (2013) The future of human in-the loop cyber-physical systems. IEEE Comput 46(1):36–45
22. Peissner M, Hipp C (2013) Fraunhofer institute for industrial engineering IAO. In: Spath D, Weisbecker A (eds) The potential of human–machine interaction for the efficient and networked production of tomorrow. Fraunhofer Information Center for Planning and Building IRB. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart. https://www.iao.fraunhofer.de/lang-de/images/iao-news/studie_future_hmi-en.pdf
23. Horvath I (2014) What the design theory of social–cyber–physical systems must describe, explain and predict? In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, New York, pp 99–120
24. Biamino G (2012) A semantic model for socially aware objects. Adv Int Things 2(3):47–55
25. www.pilz.de/products/sensors/camera/f/safetyeye/index.jsp
26. Kochan A (2006) Robots and operators work hand in hand. Ind Robot Int J 33(6):422–424
27. Kruger J, Nickolay B, Heyer P, Seliger G (2005) Image based 3D surveillance for flexible man–robot-cooperation. Ann CIRP 54:19–23
28. Winkler B (2007) Safe space sharing human–robot cooperation using a 3D time-of-flight camera. In: International robots & vision show: technical conference proceedings, Robotic Industries Association, Rosemont, Chicago, IL, USA, pp 1–8
29. Zamfirescu CB, Pirvu BC, Schlick J, Zuehlke D (2013) Preliminary insides for an anthropocentric cyber-physical reference architecture of the smart factory. Stud Inform Control 22:269–278
30. Krüger J, Lien TK, Verl A (2009) Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):628–646
31. Khalid A, Kirisci P, Ghrairi Z, Pannek J, Thoben K-D (2016) Safety requirements in collaborative human–robot cyber physical system. In: 5th international conference on dynamics in logistics (LDIC), Bremen, Germany. Lecture notes in logistics, pp 39–48
32. Wang L, Törngren M, Onori M (2015) Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008
33. Koppula HS, Saxena A (2013) Anticipating human activities using object affordances for reactive robotic response. In: Proceedings of the robotics: science and systems
34. Petric T, Zlajpah L (2013) Smooth continuous transition between tasks on a kinematic control level: obstacle avoidance as a control problem. Robot Auton Syst 61(9):948–959
35. Balan L, Bone GM (2006) Real-time 3D collision avoidance method for safe human and robot coexistence. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 276–282
36. Sanderud A, Thomessen T, Osumi H, Niitsuma M (2015) A proactive strategy for safe human–robot collaboration based on a simplified risk analysis. Model Identif Control 36(1):11–21
37. Green SA, Billinghurst M, Chen X, Chase JG (2008) Human–robot collaboration: a literature review and augmented reality approach in design. Int J Adv Robot Syst 5(1):1–18
38. Davison P (2015) How does the accident in Germany affect industrial robot safety? Robotics online. Robotics Industries Association. http://www.robotics.org/content-detail.cfm/Industrial-Robotics-News/How-Does-the-Accident-in-Germany-Affect-Industrial-Robot-Safety/content_id/5555
39. Arai T, Kato R, Fujita M (2010) Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):5–8
40. Kuli D, Croft E (2007) Pre-collision safety strategies for human–robot interaction. Auton Robot 22:149–164
41. EN ISO 10218-1:2011 Robots and robotic devices—safety requirements for industrial robots—part 1: robots (ISO 10218-1:2011)
42. EN ISO 10218-2:2011 Robots and robotic devices—safety requirements for industrial robots—part 2: robot systems and integration (ISO 10218-2:2011)
43. Kirisci PT, Pannek J, Ghrairi Z, Thoben K-D, Lawo M (2015) Mensch–Roboter–Kollaboration in cyber-physischen Arbeitsumgebungen. Robot Ind 4.0 Manag 31(1):43–47
44. Xing B (2014) Novel computational intelligence for optimizing cyber physical pre-evaluation system. In: Khan ZH, Shawkat Ali ABM, Riaz Z (eds) Computational intelligence for decision support in cyber–physical systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 449–64
45. ISO/TS 15066:2016 Robots and robotic devices—collaborative robots
46. Behrens R, Elkmann N (2014) Experimentelle Verifikation der biomechanischen Belastungsgrenzen bei Mensch-Roboter-Kollisionen: phase I. Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Fabrikbetrieb und -automatisierung IFF, Magdeburg
47. Research project No. FP-0317 (2013) Collaborative robots—investigation of pain sensibility at the man–machine–interface. Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany. Final report
48. Mosterman PJ, Zander J (2016) Cyber–physical systems challenges: a needs analysis for collaborating embedded software systems. Softw Syst Model 15:5–16
49. Porquet J, Schwarz C, Greiner A (2009) Multi compartment: a new architecture for secure co-hosting on SoC. In: International symposium on system-on-chip (SOC), pp 124–127
50. Sepulveda J, Gogniat G, Pires R, Chau WJ, Strum MJ (2013) Security enhanced 3D communication structure for dynamic 3D-MPSoCs protection. In: Symposium on integrated circuits and systems design (SBCCI), pp 1–6
51. Drechsler R, Kühne U (2014) Safe IP integration using container modules. In: International symposium on electronic system design (ISED), pp 1–4