Bolstering system-justifying beliefs in response to social exclusion

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 494-508

  Hess, Yanine D ^a   Ledgerwood, Alison ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

just world beliefs; Protestant work ethic; rejection sensitivity; social exclusion; system justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993814823     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430213510572     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aydin N., Fischer P., Frey D. (2010). Turning to God in the face of ostracism: Effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753. doi:10.1177/0146167210367491
2. Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Baumeister R. F., Twenge J. M., Nuss C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 817–827. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817
4. Berger C. R. (1993). Uncertainty and social interaction. In DeetzS. A.,(Ed.), Communication Yearbook 16 (pp. 491–502). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Blackhart G. C., Baumeister R. F., Twenge J. M. (2006). Rejection's impact on self-defeating, prosocial, antisocial, and self-regulatory behaviors. In VohsK. D., FinkelE. J.,(Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 237–253). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6. Bolling D. Z., Pitskel N. B., Deen B., Crowley M. J., McPartland J. C., Mayes L. C., Pelphrey K. A. (2011). Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation. NeuroImage, 54, 2462–2471. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.049
7. Chen S., Shechter D., Chaiken S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262–275. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.262
8. Cheung R. M., Noel S., Hardin C. D. (2011). Adopting the system-justifying attitudes of others: Effects of trivial interpersonal connections in the context of inclusion and exclusion. Social Cognition, 29, 255–269. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.255
9. Cohen J., Cohen P., West A. G., Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
10. Connelly M. (2005, May 15). How class works: A nationwide poll. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/national/20050515_CLASS_GRAPHIC/index_01.html
11. Davey L. M., Bobocel D. R., Son Hing L. S., Zanna M. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 12, 223–240. doi:10.1023/A:1022148418210
12. Downey G., Feldman S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.132
13. Foster M. D., Tsarfati M. E. (2005). The effects of meritocracy beliefs on women's well-being after first-time gender discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1730–1738. doi:10.1177/0146167205278709
14. Furnham A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)0007
15. Gardner W. L., Pickett C., Brewer M. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167200266007
16. Garris C. P., Ohbuchi K-i., Oikawa H., Harris M. J. (2011). Consequences of interpersonal rejection: A cross-cultural experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1066–1083. doi:10.1177/0022022110381428
17. Greenberg J., Solomon S., Pyszczynski T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In ZannaM. P.,(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Hafer C. L., Olson J. M. (1989). Beliefs in a just world and reactions to personal deprivation. Journal of Personality, 57, 799–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00495.x
19. Haynes G. A., Olson J. M. (2006). Coping with threats to just-world beliefs: Derogate, blame, or help? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 664–682. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00023.x
20. Hennes E. P., Nam H. H., Stern C., Jost J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying beliefs. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
21. Howard J. W., Rothbart M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301–310. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.301
22. Hoyle R. H., Pinkley R. L., Insko C. A. (1989). Perceptions of social behavior: Evidence of differing expectations for interpersonal and intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 365–376. doi:10.1177/0146167289153007
23. Jost J. T., Banaji M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
24. Jost J. T., Blount S., Pfeffer J., Hunyady G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. In KramerR. M., StawB. M.,(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 25, pp. 53–91). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
25. Jost J. T., Hunyady O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. In StroebeW., HewstoneM.,(Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 111–153). Hove, UK: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
26. Jost J. T., Hunyady O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00
27. Jost J. T., Ledgerwood A., Hardin C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171–186. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00
28. Jost J. T., Liviatan I., van der Toorn J., Ledgerwood A., Mandisodza A., Nosek B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it's motivated? In BobocelD. R., KayA. C., ZannaM. P., OlsonJ. M.,(Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 173–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Jost J. T., Pelham B. W., Carvallo M. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X
30. Jost J. T., Pelham B. W., Sheldon O., Sullivan B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
31. Jost J. T., van der Toorn J. (2012). System justification theory. In van LangeP. A. M., KruglanskiA. W., HigginsT. E.,(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Kaiser C. R., Drury B. J., Spalding K. E., Cheryan S., O'Brien L. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama's election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 556–559. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006
33. Kay A. C., Friesen J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364. doi:10.1177/0963721411422059
34. Kay A. C., Moscovitch D. A., Laurin K. (2010). Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychological Science, 21, 216–218. doi:10.1177/0956797609357750
35. Kluegel J. R., Smith E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Adine de Gruyter.
36. Lane R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. Oxford, UK: Free Press of Glencoe.
37. Laurin K., Kay A. C., Moscovitch D. A. (2008). On the belief in God: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1559–1562. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.007
38. Laurin K., Kay A. C., Shepherd S. (2011). Self-stereotyping as a route to system justification. Social Cognition, 29, 360–375. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.360
39. Lawrence K. A., Chanen A. M., Allen J. S. (2011). The effect of ostracism upon mood in youth in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 702–714. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.702
40. Leary M. R., Kelly K. M., Cottrell C. A., Schreindorfer L. S. (2012). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
41. Ledgerwood A., Mandisodza A. N., Jost J. T., Pohl M. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29, 322–340. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322
42. Ledgerwood A., Shrout P. E. (2011). The tradeoff between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1174–1188. doi:10.1037/a0024776
43. Lerner M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
44. MacLean M. J., Chown S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 26, 249–260. doi:10.2190/N8GP-65XT-2XQQ-9J
45. Masten C. L., Eisenbeger N. I., Borofsky L. A., Pfeifer J. H., McNealy K., Mazziotta J. C., Dapretto M. (2009). Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: Understanding the distress of peer rejection. SCAN, 4, 143–157. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp007
46. McCoy S. K., Major B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
47. McGregor I., Haji R., Nash K. A., Teper R. (2008). Religious zeal and the uncertain self. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 183–188. doi:10.1080/01973530802209251
48. Mirels H. L., Garrett J. B. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44. doi:10.1037/h0030477
49. Murray J. D., Spadafore J. A., McIntosh W. D. (2005). Belief in a just world and social perception: Evidence for automatic activation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 35–47. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.1.35-48
50. Napier J., Mandisodza A., Andersen S. M., Jost J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57–63. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00
51. Pickett C. L., Gardner W. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion. In WilliamsK. D., ForgasJ. P., von HippelW.,(Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
52. Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
53. Proulx T., Heine S. J. (2007). Death and black diamonds: Meaning, mortality, and the meaning maintenance model. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 309–318. doi:10.1080/10478400701366985
54. Shrout P. E., Bolger N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
55. Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56. Sinclair S., Lowery B. S., Hardin C. D., Colangelo A. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 583–592. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.583
57. Somerville L. H., Heatherton T. F., Kelley W. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1007–1008. doi:10.1038/nn1728
58. Sommers S. R., Apfelbaum E. P., Dukes K. N., Toosi N., Wang E. J. (2006). Race and media coverage of Hurricane Katrina: Analysis, implications, and future research questions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 39–55. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00103.x
59. Son Hing L. S., Bobocel D. R., Zanna M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.493
60. Son Hing L. S., Bobocel D. R., Zanna M. P., Garcia D. M., Gee S. S., Orazietti K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 433–450. doi:10.1037/a0024618
61. Stillman T. F., Baumeister R. F. (2009). Uncertainty, belongingness, and four needs for meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 249–251. doi:10.1080/10478400903333544
62. Strelan P. (2007). The prosocial, adaptive qualities of just world beliefs: Implications for the relationship between justice and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 881–890. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.015
63. Strelan P., Sutton R. M. (2011). When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 163–168. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.019
64. Tullett A. M., Teper R., Inzlicht M. (2011). Confronting threats to meaning: A new framework for understanding responses to unsettling events. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 447–453. doi:10.1177/1745691611414588
65. Twenge J. M., Baumeister R. F., Tice D. M., Stucke T. S. (2001). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058
66. Warburton W. A., Williams K. D., Cairns D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213–220. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.005
67. Wesselmann E. D., Butler F. A., Williams K. D., Pickett C. L. (2010). Adding injury to insult: Unexpected rejection leads to more aggressive responses. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 232–237. doi:10.1002/ab.20347
68. Wesselmann E. D., Williams K. D. (2013). Ostracism and stages of coping. In DeWallN.,(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 20–30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
69. Williams K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
70. Williams K. D., Cheung C. K. T., Choi W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
71. Williams K. D., Jarvis B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180. doi:10.3758/BF03192765
72. Williams K. D., Nida S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71–75. doi:10.1177/0963721411402480
73. Zadro L., Boland C., Richardson R. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 692–697. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.007
74. Zadro L., Williams K. D., Richardson R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006