Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs

Social Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 322-340

  Ledgerwood, Alison ^a   Mandisodza, Anesu N ^b   Jost, John T ^b   Pohl, Michelle J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959974476     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anson, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Political ideology in the 21st century: A terror management perspective on maintenance and change of the status quo. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 210-240). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. New York: Van Nostrand. Atkinson, J. W., & Reitman, W. R. (1956). Performance as a function of motive strength and expectancy of goal-attainment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 53, 361-366.
3. Atkinson, J. W., & Reitman, W. R. (1956). Performance as a function of motive strength and expectancy of goal-attainment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 53, 361-366.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Theno, S. (1996). Violating American values: A "value congruence" approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 387-41.
6. Bradbury, K., & Katz, J. (2002). Are lifetime incomes growing more unequal? Looking at new evidence on family income mobility. Regional Review, 12, 2-5.
7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the selfregulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (in press). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. Chapter to appear in P.A.M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage.
9. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
10. Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 415-430.
11. Cokley, K., Komarraju, M., Pickett, R., Shen, F., Patel, N., Belur, V., & Rosales, R. (2007). Ethnic differences in endorsement of the protestant work ethic: The role of identity and perceptions of social class. Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 75-89.
12. Connelly, M. (2005, May 15). How class works: A nationwide poll. New York Times. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://tinyurl.com/dq82n.
13. Eliezer, D., Townsend, S. M., Sawyer, P. J., Major, B., & Mendes, W. B. (2011). System-justifying beliefs moderate the relationship between perceived discrimination and resting blood pressure. Social Cognition, this issue.
14. Foster, M. D., & Tsarfati, M. E. (2005). The effects of meritocracy beliefs on women's well-being after first-time gender discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1730-1738. (Pubitemid 41703654)
15. Foster, M. D., Sloto, L., & Ruby, R. (2006). Responding to discrimination as a function of meritocracy beliefs and personal experiences: Testing the model for shattered assumptions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 401-411. (Pubitemid 43918993)
16. Furnham, A. (1982). The Protestant work ethic and attitudes towards unemployment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 277-285.
17. Garcia, D. M., Desmarais, S., Branscombe, N. R., & Gee, S. S. (2005). Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 583-602. (Pubitemid 43059634)
18. Henry, P. J., & Saul A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365-378. (Pubitemid 44386742)
19. Ho, E. A., Sanbonmatsu, D., & Akimoto, S. A. (2002). The effects of comparative status on social stereotypes: How the perceived success of some persons affects the stereotypes of others. Social Cognition, 20, 36-57. (Pubitemid 36742913)
20. Hochschild, J. L. (1981). What's fair? American beliefs about distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitivemotivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53-91. (Pubitemid 137639767)
22. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
23. Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333. (Pubitemid 41539604)
24. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171-186.
25. Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it's motivated? In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 173-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602. (Pubitemid 36100584)
27. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
28. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Groupbased dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
29. Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115-134. (Pubitemid 33604034)
30. Kaiser, C. R., Drury, B. J., Spalding, K. E., Cheryan, S., & O'Brien, L. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama's election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 556-559.
31. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
32. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
33. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97, 421-434.
34. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246. (Pubitemid 40447727)
35. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
36. Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Selfserving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647.
37. Lane, R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. Oxford, England: Free Press of Glencoe.
38. Lau, G. P., Kay, A. C., & Spencer, S. J. (2008). Loving those who justify inequality: The effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals. Psychological Science, 19, 20-21.
39. Ledgerwood, A., Liviatan, I., & Carnevale, P. J. (2007). Group identity completion and the symbolic value of property. Psychological Science, 18, 873-878.
40. Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 32-51.
41. Levy, S. R., Freitas, A. L., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Kugelmass, H. (2006). Hurricane Katrina's impact on African Americans' and European Americans' endorsement of the Protestant work ethic. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 75-85.
42. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
43. Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O'Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068-1086.
44. Major, B., & Townsend, S.S.M. (2010). Perceiving and reacting to prejudice: Impact of shared attitudes and beliefs about status inequality. In J. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. Crano (Eds.), The 12th annual Sydney symposium on social psychology: The psychology of attitude and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press.
45. Mandisodza, A., Jost, J. T., & Unzueta, M. (2006). "Tall poppies" and "American dreams": Reactions to rich and poor in Australia and the U.S.A. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 659-668. (Pubitemid 44545678)
46. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341-351.
47. Napier, J., Mandisodza, A., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57-73.
48. O'Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2009). Group status and feelings of personal entitlement: The roles of social comparison and system-justifying beliefs. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 427-443). New York: Oxford.
49. Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
50. Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402-414.
51. Scott, J., & Leonhardt, D. (2005, May 15). Class matters: Shadowy lines that still divide. New York Times. Retrieved July 9, 2006 from http://tinyurl.com/bg8od.
52. Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293. (Pubitemid 128455680)
53. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 578-596. (Pubitemid 43833119)
55. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509.
56. Stapel, D. A., & Noordewier, M. K. (2011). The mental roots of system justification: System threat, need for structure, and stereotyping. Social Cognition, this issue.
57. Ullrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence. Social Justice Research, 20, 117-139.
58. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
59. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., & Bauer, P. (2011). Spreading rationalization: Increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat. Social Cognition, this issue.
60. Weakliem, D., McQuillan, J., & Schauer, T. (1995). Toward meritocracy? Changing social class differences in intellectual ability. Sociology of Education, 68, 271-286.
61. Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-70.