메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue , 2016, Pages 15-19

Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process

Author keywords

Blind peer review; Conflict of interest; Medical publishing; Open peer review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITOR; HUMAN; IDENTITY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

EID: 84992307447     PISSN: 09536205     EISSN: 18790828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.04.014     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (26)

References (64)
  • 1
    • 84922571449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics
    • Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Odibo AO, Chauhan SP, Smulian JC, and Y. Oyelese The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics Am J Obstet Gynecol 211 2014 703.e1 703.e5
    • (2014) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.211 , pp. 703e1-703e5
    • Vintzileos, A.M.1    Ananth, C.V.2    Odibo, A.O.3    Chauhan, S.P.4    Smulian, J.C.5    Oyelese, Y.6
  • 3
    • 84928667465 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emerging trends in peer review - A survey
    • R. Walker, and Rocha da Silva P Emerging trends in peer review - a survey Front Neurosci 9 2015 169
    • (2015) Front Neurosci , vol.9 , pp. 169
    • Walker, R.1    Da Silva, P.R.2
  • 4
    • 84955739630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors
    • D.B. Resnik, and S.A. Elmore Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: a possible role of editors Sci Eng Ethics 22 2016 169 188
    • (2016) Sci Eng Ethics , vol.22 , pp. 169-188
    • Resnik, D.B.1    Elmore, S.A.2
  • 5
    • 84887085805 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The peer review congresses: Improving peer review and biomedical publication
    • R. Steinbrook The peer review congresses: improving peer review and biomedical publication JAMA 310 2013 1799 1800
    • (2013) JAMA , vol.310 , pp. 1799-1800
    • Steinbrook, R.1
  • 6
    • 33646104670 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals
    • R. Smith Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals J R Soc Med 99 2006 178 182
    • (2006) J R Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 178-182
    • Smith, R.1
  • 7
    • 84923445913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open, single-blind, double-blind: Which peer review process do you prefer?
    • E.C. Moylan, S. Harold, C. O'Neill, and M.K. Kowalczuk Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer? BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 15 2014 55
    • (2014) BMC Pharmacol Toxicol , vol.15 , pp. 55
    • Moylan, E.C.1    Harold, S.2    O'Neill, C.3    Kowalczuk, M.K.4
  • 8
    • 84907404190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: A case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
    • J. Patel Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials BMC Med 12 2014 128
    • (2014) BMC Med , vol.12 , pp. 128
    • Patel, J.1
  • 9
    • 78449273893 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is open peer review the fairest system?
    • T. Groves Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes BMJ 341 2010 c6424
    • (2010) Yes BMJ , vol.341 , pp. c6424
    • Groves, T.1
  • 10
    • 0033514073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: A randomised trial
    • S. van Rooyen, F. Godlee, S. Evans, N. Black, and R. Smith Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial BMJ 318 1999 23-
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 23
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3    Black, N.4    Smith, R.5
  • 11
    • 78449286446 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: Randomised controlled trial
    • S. van Rooyen, T. Delamothe, and S.J. Evans Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial BMJ 341 2010 c5729
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.341 , pp. c5729
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Delamothe, T.2    Evans, S.J.3
  • 12
    • 33747706116 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three blind mice-might make good reviewers
    • M. Albanese Three blind mice-might make good reviewers Med Educ 40 2006 828 830
    • (2006) Med Educ , vol.40 , pp. 828-830
    • Albanese, M.1
  • 13
    • 78449267048 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is open peer review the fairest system?
    • K. Khan Is open peer review the fairest system? No BMJ 341 2010 c6425
    • (2010) No BMJ , vol.341 , pp. c6425
    • Khan, K.1
  • 14
    • 33747670217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The case for open peer review
    • J. Morrison The case for open peer review Med Educ 40 2006 830 831
    • (2006) Med Educ , vol.40 , pp. 830-831
    • Morrison, J.1
  • 15
    • 30944437076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
    • S. Schroter, L. Tite, A. Hutchings, and N. Black Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors JAMA 295 2006 314 317
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 314-317
    • Schroter, S.1    Tite, L.2    Hutchings, A.3    Black, N.4
  • 16
    • 0028901196 scopus 로고
    • Blinded manuscript review: An idea whose time has come?
    • R.M. Pitkin Blinded manuscript review: an idea whose time has come? Obstet Gynecol 85 1995 781 782
    • (1995) Obstet Gynecol , vol.85 , pp. 781-782
    • Pitkin, R.M.1
  • 17
    • 0032527549 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial
    • F. Godlee, C.R. Gale, and C.N. Martyn Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 280 1998 237 240
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 237-240
    • Godlee, F.1    Gale, C.R.2    Martyn, C.N.3
  • 19
    • 84928800890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publishing: Double-blind peer review a double risk
    • T.E. DeCoursey Publishing: double-blind peer review a double risk Nature 520 2015 623
    • (2015) Nature , vol.520 , pp. 623
    • Decoursey, T.E.1
  • 20
    • 0032527550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success? PEER investigators
    • M.K. Cho, A.C. Justice, M.A. Winker, J.A. Berlin, J.F. Waeckerle, M.L. Callaham, and et al. Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER investigators JAMA 280 1998 243 245
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 243-245
    • Cho, M.K.1    Justice, A.C.2    Winker, M.A.3    Berlin, J.A.4    Waeckerle, J.F.5    Callaham, M.L.6
  • 21
    • 33747698399 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefers
    • G. Regehr, and G. Bordage To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefers Med Educ 40 2006 832 839
    • (2006) Med Educ , vol.40 , pp. 832-839
    • Regehr, G.1    Bordage, G.2
  • 22
    • 0032527565 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators
    • A.C. Justice, M.K. Cho, M.A. Winker, J.A. Berlin, and D. Rennie Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators JAMA 280 1998 240 242
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 240-242
    • Justice, A.C.1    Cho, M.K.2    Winker, M.A.3    Berlin, J.A.4    Rennie, D.5
  • 23
    • 0031970614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masked peer review revisited
    • R.M. Pitkin Masked peer review revisited Obstet Gynecol 91 1998 780
    • (1998) Obstet Gynecol , vol.91 , pp. 780
    • Pitkin, R.M.1
  • 25
    • 84875759903 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening the black-box of peer review: An agent-based model of scientist behaviour
    • F. Squazzoni, and C. Gandelli Opening the black-box of peer review: an agent-based model of scientist behaviour J Artif Soc Soc Simul 16 2013 3
    • (2013) J Artif Soc Soc Simul , vol.16 , pp. 3
    • Squazzoni, F.1    Gandelli, C.2
  • 26
  • 27
    • 0032527564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
    • S. van Rooyen, F. Godlee, S. Evans, R. Smith, and N. Black Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial JAMA 280 1998 234 237
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 234-237
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3    Smith, R.4    Black, N.5
  • 29
    • 84956896349 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
    • M.K. Kowalczuk, F. Dudbridge, S. Nanda, S.L. Harriman, J. Patel, and E.C. Moylan Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models BMJ Open 5 2015 e008707
    • (2015) BMJ Open , vol.5
    • Kowalczuk, M.K.1    Dudbridge, F.2    Nanda, S.3    Harriman, S.L.4    Patel, J.5    Moylan, E.C.6
  • 30
    • 0037024254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making reviewers visible: Openness, accountability, and credit
    • F. Godlee Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit JAMA 287 2002 2762 2765
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2762-2765
    • Godlee, F.1
  • 31
    • 84908140780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ
    • T. Groves, and E. Loder Prepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ BMJ 349 2014 g5394
    • (2014) BMJ , vol.349 , pp. g5394
    • Groves, T.1    Loder, E.2
  • 33
    • 33846287604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
    • L. Tite, and S. Schroter Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey J Epidemiol Community Health 61 2007 9 12
    • (2007) J Epidemiol Community Health , vol.61 , pp. 9-12
    • Tite, L.1    Schroter, S.2
  • 34
    • 0033051347 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
    • S. van Rooyen, N. Black, and F. Godlee Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 625 629
    • (1999) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.52 , pp. 625-629
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Black, N.2    Godlee, F.3
  • 37
    • 84957044165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • [[accessed 23/03/2016]]
    • R. Van Noorden The scientists who get credit for peer review 2014 10.1038/nature.2014.16102 [Available: http://www.nature.com/news/the-scientists-who-get-credit-for-peer-review-1.16102 [accessed 23/03/2016]]
    • (2014) The Scientists Who Get Credit for Peer Review
    • Van Noorden, R.1
  • 39
    • 84908881792 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review rewards
    • Review rewards Nature 514 2014 274
    • (2014) Nature , vol.514 , pp. 274
  • 40
    • 84951811041 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rewarding peer reviewers: Maintaining the integrity of science communication
    • A.Y. Gasparyan, A.N. Gerasimov, A.A. Voronov, and G.D. Kitas Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication J Korean Med Sci 30 2015 360 364
    • (2015) J Korean Med Sci , vol.30 , pp. 360-364
    • Gasparyan, A.Y.1    Gerasimov, A.N.2    Voronov, A.A.3    Kitas, G.D.4
  • 41
    • 85025100990 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review evaluation (PRE). /[accessed 23/03/2016]
    • Peer review evaluation (PRE). Available: www.pre-val.org /[accessed 23/03/2016]
  • 44
    • 85025096568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Engineering Fracture Mechnisms accessed 23/03/2016
    • Engineering Fracture Mechnisms. Peer review Report 2015;133, Supplement 1:1-308. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00137944/133/supp/S1 [accessed 23/03/2016]
    • Peer Review Report 2015 , vol.133 , pp. 1-308
  • 45
    • 33745749911 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflicts of interest: How money clouds objectivity
    • R. Smith Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity J R Soc Med 99 2006 292 297
    • (2006) J R Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 292-297
    • Smith, R.1
  • 46
    • 84863593744 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: Case-control study
    • A.E. Handel, S.V. Patel, J. Pakpoor, G.C. Ebers, B. Goldacre, and S.V. Ramagopalan High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case-control study BMJ 344 2012 e4212
    • (2012) BMJ , vol.344 , pp. e4212
    • Handel, A.E.1    Patel, S.V.2    Pakpoor, J.3    Ebers, G.C.4    Goldacre, B.5    Ramagopalan, S.V.6
  • 47
    • 84864386129 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Time to open up finances of medical journals
    • R. Smith Time to open up finances of medical journals BMJ 345 2012 e4968
    • (2012) BMJ , vol.345 , pp. e4968
    • Smith, R.1
  • 48
    • 84938540900 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Margaret McCartney: Medical journals and their parasitical profit
    • M. McCartney Margaret McCartney: medical journals and their parasitical profit BMJ 350 2015 h2832
    • (2015) BMJ , vol.350 , pp. h2832
    • McCartney, M.1
  • 49
    • 33749630452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The highly profitable but unethical business of publishing medical research
    • R. Smith The highly profitable but unethical business of publishing medical research J R Soc Med 99 2006 452 456
    • (2006) J R Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 452-456
    • Smith, R.1
  • 50
    • 22144485579 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies
    • R. Smith Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies PLoS Med 2 2005 e138
    • (2005) PLoS Med , vol.2 , pp. e138
    • Smith, R.1
  • 51
    • 1642325520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of training on quality of peer review: Randomised controlled trial
    • S. Schroter, N. Black, S. Evans, J. Carpenter, F. Godlee, and R. Smith Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial BMJ 328 2004 673
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 673
    • Schroter, S.1    Black, N.2    Evans, S.3    Carpenter, J.4    Godlee, F.5    Smith, R.6
  • 52
    • 0037024214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review
    • T. Jefferson, P. Alderson, E. Wager, and F. Davidoff Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review JAMA 287 2002 2784 2786
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2784-2786
    • Jefferson, T.1    Alderson, P.2    Wager, E.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 53
    • 0037024264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
    • T. Jefferson, E. Wager, and F. Davidoff Measuring the quality of editorial peer review JAMA 287 2002 2786 2790
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2786-2790
    • Jefferson, T.1    Wager, E.2    Davidoff, F.3
  • 54
    • 34547847361 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
    • Apr
    • T. Jefferson, M. Rudin, S. Brodney Folse, and F. Davidoff Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18 Apr 2007 MR000016
    • (2007) Cochrane Database Syst Rev , vol.18 , pp. MR000016
    • Jefferson, T.1    Rudin, M.2    Brodney Folse, S.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 55
    • 53649085249 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
    • S. Schroter, N. Black, S. Evans, F. Godlee, L. Osorio, and R. Smith What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? J R Soc Med 101 2008 507 514
    • (2008) J R Soc Med , vol.101 , pp. 507-514
    • Schroter, S.1    Black, N.2    Evans, S.3    Godlee, F.4    Osorio, L.5    Smith, R.6
  • 56
    • 84950154046 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer-review fraud - Hacking the scientific publication process
    • C.J. Haug Peer-review fraud - hacking the scientific publication process N Engl J Med 373 2015 2393 2395
    • (2015) N Engl J Med , vol.373 , pp. 2393-2395
    • Haug, C.J.1
  • 57
    • 84918802079 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publishing: The peer-review scam
    • C. Ferguson, A. Marcus, and I. Oransky Publishing: the peer-review scam Nature 515 2014 480 482
    • (2014) Nature , vol.515 , pp. 480-482
    • Ferguson, C.1    Marcus, A.2    Oransky, I.3
  • 58
    • 84927912572 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors?
    • E. Wager, and S. Kleinert Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors? J Glob Health 3 2013 020301
    • (2013) J Glob Health , vol.3 , pp. 020301
    • Wager, E.1    Kleinert, S.2
  • 59
    • 77952526993 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality and peer review of research: An adjudicating role for editors
    • D.P. Newton Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors Account Res 17 2010 130 145
    • (2010) Account Res , vol.17 , pp. 130-145
    • Newton, D.P.1
  • 60
    • 78149390160 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflicts of interest at medical journals: The influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - Cohort study
    • A. Lundh, M. Barbateskovic, A. Hróbjartsson, and P.C. Gøtzsche Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study PLoS Med 7 2010 e1000354
    • (2010) PLoS Med , vol.7 , pp. e1000354
    • Lundh, A.1    Barbateskovic, M.2    Hróbjartsson, A.3    Gøtzsche, P.C.4
  • 61
    • 84877034861 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Avoiding currently unavoidable conflicts of interest in medical publishing by transparent peer review
    • N. Gleicher Avoiding currently unavoidable conflicts of interest in medical publishing by transparent peer review Reprod Biomed Online 26 2013 411 415
    • (2013) Reprod Biomed Online , vol.26 , pp. 411-415
    • Gleicher, N.1
  • 62
    • 84878190326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Citations of scientific results and conflicts of interest: The case of mammography screening
    • K. Rasmussen, K.J. Jørgensen, and P.C. Gøtzsche Citations of scientific results and conflicts of interest: the case of mammography screening Evid Based Med 18 2013 83 89
    • (2013) Evid Based Med , vol.18 , pp. 83-89
    • Rasmussen, K.1    Jørgensen, K.J.2    Gøtzsche, P.C.3
  • 63
    • 84907486748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open payments goes live with pharma to doctor fee data: First analysis
    • D. Jarvies, R. Coombes, and W. Stahl-Timmins Open payments goes live with pharma to doctor fee data: first analysis BMJ 349 2014 g6003
    • (2014) BMJ , vol.349 , pp. g6003
    • Jarvies, D.1    Coombes, R.2    Stahl-Timmins, W.3
  • 64
    • 84883216043 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflicts of interest and medical publishing
    • W.W. Hurd Conflicts of interest and medical publishing Obstet Gynecol 122 2013 511 512
    • (2013) Obstet Gynecol , vol.122 , pp. 511-512
    • Hurd, W.W.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.