Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 341, Issue 7782, 2010, Pages 1082-

  Groves, Trish ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; SHORT SURVEY; STUDY DESIGN;

CONFIDENTIALITY; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 78449273893     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6424     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Smith R. Opening up peer review. BMJ1999;318: 4.
2. Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.BMJ1999;318:23-7.
3. Walsh E, Rooney M, Appleby L, Wilkinson G. Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:47-51. (Pubitemid 30051088)
4. BioMed Central. BMC series journals: peer review processes. www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/bmcseries.
5. Nature's peer review debate. www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/ index.html.
6. BMJ. Guidance for peer reviewers. http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/reviewers/ peer-reviewers-guidance.
7. Van Rooyen S, Delamothe T, Evans S. Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c5729.
8. Godlee F. Editor's choice. BMJ 2010;341c6481.