Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 349, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Groves, Trish ^a   Loder, Elizabeth ^a  

^a British Medical Journal Technology Assessment Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; EDITORIAL; HISTORY; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SPORTS MEDICINE; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HUMAN; PUBLISHING;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84908140780     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5394     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Richards T, Godlee F. The BMJ's own patient journey. BMJ 2014;348:g3726.
2. Godlee F. Statins and The BMJ. BMJ 2014;349:g5038.
3. Groves T. Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes. BMJ 2010;341:c6424.
4. Khan K. Is open peer review the fairest system? No BMJ 2010;341:c6425.
5. van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ 1999;318:23-7.
6. van Rooyen S, Delamothe T, Evans SJW. Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c5729.
7. Hopewell S, Collins GS, Boutron I, Yu Ly-Mee, Cook J, Shanyinde M, et al. Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study. BMJ 2014;349:g4145.
8. Loder E, Godlee F, Barbour V, Winker M. Restoring the integrity of the clinical trial evidence base. BMJ 2013;346:f3601.