Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review

JAMA

Volumn 287, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 2784-2786

  Jefferson, Tom ^a   Alderson, Philip ^b   Wager, Elizabeth ^c   Davidoff, Frank ^c  

^a Reviewer Cochrane Collaboration   (Italy)

^b UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0037024214     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2784     Document Type: Short Survey

References (27)

1. Peer-review in 18th-century scientific journalism
2. The state of the evidence: What we know and what we don't know about journal peer review
3. Editorial peer review in biomedical publication
4. The second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
5. Congress on Biomedical Peer Review
6. Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: A systematic review
7. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review
8. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review
9. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials
10. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
11. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding peer reviewers and asking them to sign their reports
12. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality?
13. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations
14. Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
15. Open peer review
16. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions
17. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal
18. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
19. Calling Medical Care reviewers first
20. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance
21. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
22. Reviewer bias against the unconventional?
23. Are road safety evaluation studies published in peer reviewed journals more valid than similar studies not published in peer reviewed journals?
24. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine
25. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
26. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review