The peer review congresses: Improving peer review and biomedical publication

JAMA

Volumn 310, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1799-1800

  Steinbrook, Robert ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONFLICT OF INTEREST; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 84887085805     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280834     Document Type: Short Survey

References (9)

1. Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321-1322.
2. Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1323-1329.
3. Steinbrook R. Diagnosing biomedical publications. Los Angeles Times. May 22, 1989:II3.
4. The Seventh International Congress of Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: Final Program and Abstracts. International Congress of Peer Review and Biomedical Publication website. http://www.peerreviewcongress.org/index. html. Accessed September 25, 2013.
5. Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) website. http://orcid.org/. Accessed September 25, 2013.
6. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385-1389.
7. Steinbrook R, Sharfstein JM. The FDA Safety and Innovation Act. JAMA. 2012;308(14):1437-1438.
8. Steinbrook R, Kassirer JP. Data availability for industry-sponsored trials: what should medical journals require? BMJ. 2010;341:c5391.
9. Trial and Experimental Studies Transparency Act of 2012, HR 2031, 113th Cong, 1st Sess (2013).